17:44:16 RRSAgent has joined #ua 17:44:16 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/05/10-ua-irc 17:44:26 rrsagent, set logs public 17:51:06 JR has joined #ua 17:54:07 Scribe: JR 17:54:10 WAI_UAWG()2:00PM has now started 17:54:17 +??P0 17:54:45 + +1.512.206.aaaa 17:55:29 +??P2 17:55:52 zakim, ??P2 is really JR 17:55:52 +JR; got it 17:56:41 zakim, +1.512.206.aaaa 17:56:41 I don't understand '+1.512.206.aaaa', AllanJ 17:56:51 zakim, ??P0 is really KellyFord 17:56:51 +KellyFord; got it 17:57:09 KFord has joined #ua 17:57:23 zakim, KellyFord is really KFord 17:57:23 +KFord; got it 17:57:34 zakim, +1.512.206.aaaa is Allanj 17:57:34 +Allanj; got it 18:01:22 parente has joined #ua 18:01:57 + +1.919.403.aabb 18:02:20 +[IBM] 18:02:34 zakim, +1.919.403.aabb is really parente 18:02:34 +parente; got it 18:02:43 cklaws has joined #ua 18:02:48 zakim, [IBM] is really cklaws 18:02:48 +cklaws; got it 18:03:15 JA: Nothing to report on emails to new members 18:03:26 Topic: Restructure current guidelines and provisions to fit new model 18:03:51 JR: Did a first pass: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2007AprJun/0017.html 18:04:32 JA: Al's conversation... 18:05:34 discussion of 'perceivable'. AG thinks should use 'recognizable' 18:06:13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2007AprJun/0024.html 18:06:51 cl: is WCAG changing? 18:07:09 jr: not that we are aware of. 18:07:37 JR: we should not just parrot WCAG, and look at things with a fresh eye. 18:08:32 JR: any other issuers with operable, perceivable, understandable, AT friendly? 18:09:18 CL: Who decides on styles 18:10:27 jr: what is worst case scenario...website with 1 pixel divs, content drawing content on screen, UA has no control of accessibility of content 18:11:00 jr: UA has limited resources, especially with AJAX type controls 18:11:39 cl: UA have different rendering engines 18:12:29 CL: The different renderings on different UAs is proof of a UA role 18:12:52 JR: Is Pereceivale UI understood to mean all of the UA 18:12:56 KF: Maybe not 18:13:08 PP: We canhave our own defns 18:13:20 KF JR: WCAG dictionary is used by ATAG, but on occasion have differences 18:15:00 JR: atag doesn't use wcag dictionmary... 18:15:08 but try to keep coordinated defns 18:15:36 KF: Recommend bringing this up at coord meeting 18:15:53 JA, JR: OK 18:16:17 Action JA: Send email to CG list about coordinating "perceivable" etc. 18:17:06 JA: Thinks its something we need to review. 18:17:28 JA: Al also refers back to essential components doc - which is also good to review 18:18:16 JA: Similar to to JTC work - where we want to make sure user needs are addressed in uaag 18:18:58 Topic: 2. Review ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) "User 18:18:58 Needs Summary (UNS)" 18:19:19 JA: Anyone have a chance to look at this? 18:19:25 All: nope. 18:19:48 JA: Pretty big chunk of information 18:21:02 JA: 16 diff categories 18:21:51 JA: Maybe each of us take 3 categories...for next time 18:22:50 CL: 1-3 18:22:55 JR: 4-6 18:23:01 JA: 7-9 18:23:18 KF: 10-12 18:23:25 PP: 13-15 18:23:31 JR: 16 18:24:17 JA: Review - are these properly done + are we missing anything (we should have a checkpoint for) 18:25:52 Action All: Group members to review assigned sections of the User Needs Mapping document 18:27:17 ALL: discussion of JTC 18:27:25 http://www.jtc1access.org/documents/swga_212.zip 18:27:56 JA: The new version has a cover letter... 18:28:30 JA: Purpose is to help out the JTC to make sure the mapping is ok, but it also helps us to review the needs to see if we are missing anything. 18:30:13 JA: Since jR already did prelim mapping we should all review that 18:30:36 Topic: back to Restructure current guidelines and provisions to fit new model 18:31:01 JA: But concerned about overloading... 18:31:27 JA: Let's split...do the JTC mapping for May 17 and then for May 24, look at JR's mapping... 18:33:23 JR: JTC is a gap analysis 18:33:38 JR: I can do a better chart 18:34:46 CL: Ok to leave way it is but add titles 18:35:32 Topic: Appollo 18:35:47 JA: New Adobe user agent... 18:36:24 JA: Apparently its pretty interesting...does anyone know about it? 18:36:42 CL: Think they are implementing IA2 on it 18:37:11 JA: sounds like its a browser replacment 18:37:26 CL: They say it allows flash to jump beyond the browser 18:37:52 http://news.com.com/Flash+to+jump+beyond+the+browser/2100-1007_3-6071005.html 18:38:00 KF: Do a web search there's lots out there 18:38:44 I believe this is a good URL http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo 18:39:17 -KFord 18:39:18 -cklaws 18:39:26 -parente 18:40:47 parente has left #ua 18:43:22 -JR 18:43:24 WAI_UAWG()2:00PM has ended 18:43:26 Attendees were JR, KFord, Allanj, parente, cklaws 18:48:46 RRSAgent, make minutes 18:48:46 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/05/10-ua-minutes.html JR 18:49:40 RRSAgent, set logs public 18:49:47 Zakim, bye 18:49:47 Zakim has left #ua 18:49:53 RRSAgent, bye 18:49:53 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/10-ua-actions.rdf : 18:49:53 ACTION: JA to Send email to CG list about coordinating "perceivable" etc. [1] 18:49:53 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/10-ua-irc#T18-16-17 18:49:53 ACTION: All to Group members to review assigned sections of the User Needs Mapping document [2] 18:49:53 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/10-ua-irc#T18-25-52