IRC log of ws-addr on 2007-03-05
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 20:57:02 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #ws-addr
- 20:57:02 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-ws-addr-irc
- 20:57:16 [bob]
- zakim, this will be ws_addrwg
- 20:57:16 [Zakim]
- ok, bob; I see WS_AddrWG()4:00PM scheduled to start in 3 minutes
- 20:57:35 [bob]
- Meeting Web Services Addressing WG Teleconference
- 20:57:44 [bob]
- Chair: Bob Freund
- 20:58:06 [gpilz]
- gpilz has joined #ws-addr
- 20:58:42 [Zakim]
- WS_AddrWG()4:00PM has now started
- 20:58:49 [Zakim]
- +Gilbert_Pilz
- 20:59:52 [Zakim]
- +Bob_Freund
- 21:00:10 [Zakim]
- +David_Illsley
- 21:01:15 [cferris]
- cferris has joined #ws-addr
- 21:01:19 [bob]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2007Mar/0027.html
- 21:01:33 [plh]
- plh has joined #ws-addr
- 21:01:41 [Zakim]
- +Plh
- 21:01:44 [Zakim]
- +Chris_Ferris
- 21:01:59 [Zakim]
- +Dave_Hull
- 21:02:09 [MrGoodner]
- MrGoodner has joined #ws-addr
- 21:02:28 [dhull]
- dhull has joined #ws-addr
- 21:02:33 [Zakim]
- +??P7
- 21:02:37 [Zakim]
- +??P8
- 21:03:38 [bob]
- zakim, mute ??P8
- 21:03:38 [Zakim]
- ??P8 should now be muted
- 21:03:44 [Katy]
- Katy has joined #ws-addr
- 21:04:00 [bob]
- zakim, ??P7 is katy
- 21:04:00 [Zakim]
- +katy; got it
- 21:04:11 [MrGoodner]
- that would help :-)
- 21:04:16 [bob]
- zakim, ??P8 is MrGoodner
- 21:04:16 [Zakim]
- +MrGoodner; got it
- 21:04:20 [plh]
- zakim, unmute ?p8
- 21:04:20 [Zakim]
- sorry, plh, I do not know which phone connection belongs to ?p8
- 21:04:26 [bob]
- zakim, unmute mrgoodner
- 21:04:26 [Zakim]
- MrGoodner should no longer be muted
- 21:05:06 [Zakim]
- +Tom_Rutt
- 21:05:40 [plh]
- Regrets: Tony, Anish
- 21:05:44 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-ws-addr-minutes.html plh
- 21:06:42 [plh]
- Meeting: WS-Addressing
- 21:07:01 [bob]
- Topic: Last Call issue
- 21:07:10 [bob]
- scribe: bob
- 21:07:16 [plh]
- Present: Gilbert_Pilz, Bob_Freund, David_Illsley, Plh, Chris_Ferris, Dave_Hull, katy, MrGoodner, Tom Rutt
- 21:07:33 [plh]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2007Mar/0026.html Consolodated list of Alternatives A thru D to resolved WS ADDR LC comment
- 21:08:30 [bob]
- TomR: Major point is to make all of the assertions requirements
- 21:08:48 [bob]
- ... The first two are probably non-starters
- 21:09:17 [bob]
- ... I do not want to spend time on alternative a since it has problems
- 21:10:04 [bob]
- ... Alternative b is just like a and has similiar problems.
- 21:11:15 [bob]
- ... Alternative c can be made to work, but I think that its use-case is fairly small.
- 21:12:33 [bob]
- ... Alternative d is my preference.
- 21:12:45 [Katy]
- q+
- 21:13:38 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 21:14:06 [bob]
- ... These proposals pertain to the response message and can handle mixed alternatives since it pertains to a single exchange
- 21:14:23 [bob]
- zakim, ??P1 is paco
- 21:14:23 [Zakim]
- +paco; got it
- 21:14:42 [Paco]
- Paco has joined #ws-addr
- 21:15:12 [bob]
- Katy: I think that we have been over this ground before, I think that we established a need.
- 21:16:12 [bob]
- TomR: I think that you need to come up with a use case when a server needs to specify a delayed response.
- 21:16:30 [bob]
- Katy: The case is a server behind a firewall
- 21:16:52 [bob]
- TomR: How would it get the request in the first case?
- 21:17:28 [MrGoodner]
- q+
- 21:17:30 [gpilz]
- q+
- 21:17:55 [bob]
- TomR: Is that use case strong enough to support this alternative?
- 21:18:34 [bob]
- MarcG: We have not talked about informational items expressed as parameters.
- 21:18:39 [MrGoodner]
- q-
- 21:18:56 [bob]
- zakim, who is making noise?
- 21:19:07 [Zakim]
- bob, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Gilbert_Pilz (34%), Bob_Freund (28%), Chris_Ferris (31%)
- 21:19:18 [bob]
- ack katy
- 21:19:26 [bob]
- ack gpilz
- 21:19:28 [TRutt_]
- TRutt_ has joined #ws-addr
- 21:19:42 [bob]
- TomR: I guess parameters can be alternative e
- 21:20:29 [David_Illsley]
- q+
- 21:20:40 [bob]
- Gil: Features should be weighed against their usefulness and necessity
- 21:20:45 [bob]
- ack david
- 21:21:10 [Zakim]
- -katy
- 21:21:17 [bob]
- David: In terms of use cases, Anish mentioned one where a service might take a long time to develop a response.
- 21:21:56 [TRutt_]
- q+
- 21:22:03 [gpilz]
- q+
- 21:22:10 [bob]
- ack tru
- 21:22:12 [PaulKnight]
- PaulKnight has joined #ws-addr
- 21:22:20 [cferris]
- q+
- 21:22:45 [bob]
- ack gpi
- 21:22:49 [Zakim]
- +Paul_Knight
- 21:23:20 [bob]
- Gil: Parameters are low cost, but the default intersection algorithm will not deal with them.
- 21:23:37 [bob]
- TomR: Parameters will be passed to you.
- 21:23:49 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 21:24:21 [bob]
- ack cfer
- 21:24:36 [David_Illsley]
- q+
- 21:24:46 [MrGoodner]
- q+
- 21:24:56 [bob]
- Cfer: Although I am in favor of E, one must be aware of the cost.
- 21:25:04 [David_Illsley]
- q-
- 21:25:36 [bob]
- ... The cost is the need to understand the interpretation of the parameters.
- 21:26:14 [bob]
- ... on the other hand, dealing with all of the combinatorial mechanics, one might end up with a rediculously comples think
- 21:26:25 [bob]
- ack mrg
- 21:26:54 [cferris]
- s/redic/ridic/
- 21:27:02 [gpilz]
- q+
- 21:27:04 [cferris]
- s/comples/complex/
- 21:27:21 [bob]
- MarcG: I do not think that we need to define the logic, it might be good enough to convey the information
- 21:27:41 [bob]
- ack gpilz
- 21:28:40 [TRutt_]
- q+
- 21:28:44 [Katy]
- q+
- 21:28:55 [bob]
- Gil: I support alternative e and to break down the parameters to fine granularity
- 21:29:03 [bob]
- ack tru
- 21:30:46 [bob]
- TomR: Do we need the complexity, isn't it enough to express what the server supports, after all, the client picks.
- 21:31:04 [bob]
- ack katy
- 21:31:08 [dhull]
- q+
- 21:31:23 [bob]
- ack dhu
- 21:32:28 [TRutt_]
- q+
- 21:32:50 [David_Illsley]
- q+
- 21:33:10 [bob]
- ack tru
- 21:33:37 [bob]
- ack david
- 21:34:02 [bob]
- Bob: Are there any objections to alternative e?
- 21:35:57 [gpilz]
- q+ - to ask a question
- 21:36:06 [gpilz]
- q- -
- 21:36:18 [gpilz]
- q+ gil to ask a question
- 21:37:11 [bob]
- Gil: if it just says "addressing" and there are no parameters, what does it mean?
- 21:37:19 [bob]
- ack gil
- 21:37:19 [Zakim]
- gil, you wanted to ask a question
- 21:39:12 [bob]
- action: TomR to craft some new language utilizing policy parameters by tomorrow
- 21:39:25 [bob]
- Topic: WS-Naming
- 21:40:50 [bob]
- plh: WS-Naming claims to profile ws-addressing, but violates ws-addressing
- 21:44:03 [bob]
- action: distribute "key points" in ws-naming
- 21:45:00 [Zakim]
- -Gilbert_Pilz
- 21:45:01 [Zakim]
- -Plh
- 21:45:03 [Zakim]
- -MrGoodner
- 21:45:04 [Zakim]
- -Tom_Rutt
- 21:45:06 [Zakim]
- -Chris_Ferris
- 21:45:06 [bob]
- Next meeting to be March 19
- 21:45:07 [Zakim]
- -David_Illsley
- 21:45:09 [Zakim]
- -paco
- 21:45:10 [Zakim]
- -Bob_Freund
- 21:45:18 [Zakim]
- -[IPcaller]
- 21:45:22 [Zakim]
- -Dave_Hull
- 21:45:47 [bob]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 21:45:58 [bob]
- rrsagent, generate minutes
- 21:45:58 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-ws-addr-minutes.html bob
- 21:47:00 [TRutt_]
- TRutt_ has left #ws-addr
- 21:47:18 [Zakim]
- -Paul_Knight
- 21:47:19 [Zakim]
- WS_AddrWG()4:00PM has ended
- 21:47:20 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Gilbert_Pilz, Bob_Freund, David_Illsley, Plh, Chris_Ferris, Dave_Hull, katy, MrGoodner, Tom_Rutt, paco, Paul_Knight, [IPcaller]
- 22:00:26 [dhull]
- dhull has joined #ws-addr
- 23:11:04 [bob]
- bob has left #ws-addr