IRC log of ws-addr on 2007-03-05

Timestamps are in UTC.

20:57:02 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #ws-addr
20:57:02 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-ws-addr-irc
20:57:16 [bob]
zakim, this will be ws_addrwg
20:57:16 [Zakim]
ok, bob; I see WS_AddrWG()4:00PM scheduled to start in 3 minutes
20:57:35 [bob]
Meeting Web Services Addressing WG Teleconference
20:57:44 [bob]
Chair: Bob Freund
20:58:06 [gpilz]
gpilz has joined #ws-addr
20:58:42 [Zakim]
WS_AddrWG()4:00PM has now started
20:58:49 [Zakim]
+Gilbert_Pilz
20:59:52 [Zakim]
+Bob_Freund
21:00:10 [Zakim]
+David_Illsley
21:01:15 [cferris]
cferris has joined #ws-addr
21:01:19 [bob]
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2007Mar/0027.html
21:01:33 [plh]
plh has joined #ws-addr
21:01:41 [Zakim]
+Plh
21:01:44 [Zakim]
+Chris_Ferris
21:01:59 [Zakim]
+Dave_Hull
21:02:09 [MrGoodner]
MrGoodner has joined #ws-addr
21:02:28 [dhull]
dhull has joined #ws-addr
21:02:33 [Zakim]
+??P7
21:02:37 [Zakim]
+??P8
21:03:38 [bob]
zakim, mute ??P8
21:03:38 [Zakim]
??P8 should now be muted
21:03:44 [Katy]
Katy has joined #ws-addr
21:04:00 [bob]
zakim, ??P7 is katy
21:04:00 [Zakim]
+katy; got it
21:04:11 [MrGoodner]
that would help :-)
21:04:16 [bob]
zakim, ??P8 is MrGoodner
21:04:16 [Zakim]
+MrGoodner; got it
21:04:20 [plh]
zakim, unmute ?p8
21:04:20 [Zakim]
sorry, plh, I do not know which phone connection belongs to ?p8
21:04:26 [bob]
zakim, unmute mrgoodner
21:04:26 [Zakim]
MrGoodner should no longer be muted
21:05:06 [Zakim]
+Tom_Rutt
21:05:40 [plh]
Regrets: Tony, Anish
21:05:44 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-ws-addr-minutes.html plh
21:06:42 [plh]
Meeting: WS-Addressing
21:07:01 [bob]
Topic: Last Call issue
21:07:10 [bob]
scribe: bob
21:07:16 [plh]
Present: Gilbert_Pilz, Bob_Freund, David_Illsley, Plh, Chris_Ferris, Dave_Hull, katy, MrGoodner, Tom Rutt
21:07:33 [plh]
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2007Mar/0026.html Consolodated list of Alternatives A thru D to resolved WS ADDR LC comment
21:08:30 [bob]
TomR: Major point is to make all of the assertions requirements
21:08:48 [bob]
... The first two are probably non-starters
21:09:17 [bob]
... I do not want to spend time on alternative a since it has problems
21:10:04 [bob]
... Alternative b is just like a and has similiar problems.
21:11:15 [bob]
... Alternative c can be made to work, but I think that its use-case is fairly small.
21:12:33 [bob]
... Alternative d is my preference.
21:12:45 [Katy]
q+
21:13:38 [Zakim]
+??P1
21:14:06 [bob]
... These proposals pertain to the response message and can handle mixed alternatives since it pertains to a single exchange
21:14:23 [bob]
zakim, ??P1 is paco
21:14:23 [Zakim]
+paco; got it
21:14:42 [Paco]
Paco has joined #ws-addr
21:15:12 [bob]
Katy: I think that we have been over this ground before, I think that we established a need.
21:16:12 [bob]
TomR: I think that you need to come up with a use case when a server needs to specify a delayed response.
21:16:30 [bob]
Katy: The case is a server behind a firewall
21:16:52 [bob]
TomR: How would it get the request in the first case?
21:17:28 [MrGoodner]
q+
21:17:30 [gpilz]
q+
21:17:55 [bob]
TomR: Is that use case strong enough to support this alternative?
21:18:34 [bob]
MarcG: We have not talked about informational items expressed as parameters.
21:18:39 [MrGoodner]
q-
21:18:56 [bob]
zakim, who is making noise?
21:19:07 [Zakim]
bob, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Gilbert_Pilz (34%), Bob_Freund (28%), Chris_Ferris (31%)
21:19:18 [bob]
ack katy
21:19:26 [bob]
ack gpilz
21:19:28 [TRutt_]
TRutt_ has joined #ws-addr
21:19:42 [bob]
TomR: I guess parameters can be alternative e
21:20:29 [David_Illsley]
q+
21:20:40 [bob]
Gil: Features should be weighed against their usefulness and necessity
21:20:45 [bob]
ack david
21:21:10 [Zakim]
-katy
21:21:17 [bob]
David: In terms of use cases, Anish mentioned one where a service might take a long time to develop a response.
21:21:56 [TRutt_]
q+
21:22:03 [gpilz]
q+
21:22:10 [bob]
ack tru
21:22:12 [PaulKnight]
PaulKnight has joined #ws-addr
21:22:20 [cferris]
q+
21:22:45 [bob]
ack gpi
21:22:49 [Zakim]
+Paul_Knight
21:23:20 [bob]
Gil: Parameters are low cost, but the default intersection algorithm will not deal with them.
21:23:37 [bob]
TomR: Parameters will be passed to you.
21:23:49 [Zakim]
+[IPcaller]
21:24:21 [bob]
ack cfer
21:24:36 [David_Illsley]
q+
21:24:46 [MrGoodner]
q+
21:24:56 [bob]
Cfer: Although I am in favor of E, one must be aware of the cost.
21:25:04 [David_Illsley]
q-
21:25:36 [bob]
... The cost is the need to understand the interpretation of the parameters.
21:26:14 [bob]
... on the other hand, dealing with all of the combinatorial mechanics, one might end up with a rediculously comples think
21:26:25 [bob]
ack mrg
21:26:54 [cferris]
s/redic/ridic/
21:27:02 [gpilz]
q+
21:27:04 [cferris]
s/comples/complex/
21:27:21 [bob]
MarcG: I do not think that we need to define the logic, it might be good enough to convey the information
21:27:41 [bob]
ack gpilz
21:28:40 [TRutt_]
q+
21:28:44 [Katy]
q+
21:28:55 [bob]
Gil: I support alternative e and to break down the parameters to fine granularity
21:29:03 [bob]
ack tru
21:30:46 [bob]
TomR: Do we need the complexity, isn't it enough to express what the server supports, after all, the client picks.
21:31:04 [bob]
ack katy
21:31:08 [dhull]
q+
21:31:23 [bob]
ack dhu
21:32:28 [TRutt_]
q+
21:32:50 [David_Illsley]
q+
21:33:10 [bob]
ack tru
21:33:37 [bob]
ack david
21:34:02 [bob]
Bob: Are there any objections to alternative e?
21:35:57 [gpilz]
q+ - to ask a question
21:36:06 [gpilz]
q- -
21:36:18 [gpilz]
q+ gil to ask a question
21:37:11 [bob]
Gil: if it just says "addressing" and there are no parameters, what does it mean?
21:37:19 [bob]
ack gil
21:37:19 [Zakim]
gil, you wanted to ask a question
21:39:12 [bob]
action: TomR to craft some new language utilizing policy parameters by tomorrow
21:39:25 [bob]
Topic: WS-Naming
21:40:50 [bob]
plh: WS-Naming claims to profile ws-addressing, but violates ws-addressing
21:44:03 [bob]
action: distribute "key points" in ws-naming
21:45:00 [Zakim]
-Gilbert_Pilz
21:45:01 [Zakim]
-Plh
21:45:03 [Zakim]
-MrGoodner
21:45:04 [Zakim]
-Tom_Rutt
21:45:06 [Zakim]
-Chris_Ferris
21:45:06 [bob]
Next meeting to be March 19
21:45:07 [Zakim]
-David_Illsley
21:45:09 [Zakim]
-paco
21:45:10 [Zakim]
-Bob_Freund
21:45:18 [Zakim]
-[IPcaller]
21:45:22 [Zakim]
-Dave_Hull
21:45:47 [bob]
rrsagent, make logs public
21:45:58 [bob]
rrsagent, generate minutes
21:45:58 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-ws-addr-minutes.html bob
21:47:00 [TRutt_]
TRutt_ has left #ws-addr
21:47:18 [Zakim]
-Paul_Knight
21:47:19 [Zakim]
WS_AddrWG()4:00PM has ended
21:47:20 [Zakim]
Attendees were Gilbert_Pilz, Bob_Freund, David_Illsley, Plh, Chris_Ferris, Dave_Hull, katy, MrGoodner, Tom_Rutt, paco, Paul_Knight, [IPcaller]
22:00:26 [dhull]
dhull has joined #ws-addr
23:11:04 [bob]
bob has left #ws-addr