IRC log of rdfa on 2007-03-05
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:49:25 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdfa
- 13:49:25 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-irc
- 13:49:37 [RalphS]
- Meeting: RDF-in-XHTML Task Force
- 13:49:46 [RalphS]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Mar/0013.html
- 13:50:36 [RalphS]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes Previous 2007-02-12
- 13:50:42 [RalphS]
- rrsagent, please make record public
- 13:54:14 [Steven_]
- Steven_ has joined #rdfa
- 13:54:49 [mhausenblas]
- zakim, who is on the call?
- 13:54:49 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)9:00AM has not yet started, mhausenblas
- 13:54:50 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Steven_, RRSAgent, Zakim, RalphS, mhausenblas, Simone
- 13:59:17 [wing]
- wing has joined #rdfa
- 13:59:22 [Steven_]
- , XForms Working Group, W3C
- 13:59:48 [Steven_]
- sorry, ignore that
- 14:00:01 [Steven_]
- s/, XForms Working Group, W3C//
- 14:00:05 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)9:00AM has now started
- 14:00:12 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 14:00:29 [Zakim]
- +??P5
- 14:00:43 [RalphS]
- zakim, ??p5 is Michael
- 14:00:43 [Zakim]
- +Michael; got it
- 14:00:46 [Zakim]
- +[IBMCambridge]
- 14:00:56 [RalphS]
- zakim, ibm is Wing
- 14:00:56 [Zakim]
- sorry, RalphS, I do not recognize a party named 'ibm'
- 14:01:02 [RalphS]
- zakim, ibmcambridge is Wing
- 14:01:02 [Zakim]
- +Wing; got it
- 14:01:13 [Steven_]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 14:01:14 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven_; the call is being made
- 14:01:17 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 14:01:37 [benadida]
- benadida has joined #rdfa
- 14:01:50 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 14:01:51 [Simone]
- Zakim, Ipcaller is Simone
- 14:01:54 [Zakim]
- +Simone; got it
- 14:02:08 [Zakim]
- +Ben_Adida
- 14:03:13 [RalphS]
- Chair: Ben
- 14:03:35 [RalphS]
- zakim, pick a victim
- 14:03:35 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Michael
- 14:03:47 [RalphS]
- Scribe: Ralph
- 14:04:01 [Zakim]
- +EliasT
- 14:04:15 [EliasT]
- EliasT has joined #rdfa
- 14:04:25 [EliasT]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 14:04:25 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Ralph, Michael, Wing, Steven, Simone, Ben_Adida, EliasT
- 14:05:26 [benadida]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Mar/0013.html
- 14:05:29 [RalphS]
- Simone: my name is pronounced (as Ralph hears it) "see moan eh"
- 14:06:13 [RalphS]
- Topic: Action Items
- 14:06:26 [MarkB_]
- MarkB_ has joined #rdfa
- 14:06:51 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Michael to prepare RDF/XML - RDFa comparison wiki page [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action09]
- 14:07:01 [RalphS]
- Michael: I agreed to support that action for Ben
- 14:07:01 [mhausenblas]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/#sec4 RiR
- 14:07:35 [Zakim]
- +??P15
- 14:07:38 [RalphS]
- Michael: RiR is meant to be a list of features supported by RDFa
- 14:07:39 [MarkB_]
- zakim, i am ?
- 14:07:39 [Zakim]
- +MarkB_; got it
- 14:07:55 [RalphS]
- ... e.g. containers probably are 'in', reification is probably 'out'
- 14:08:20 [RalphS]
- ... I can add more detail to the list and I may have missed some features
- 14:08:52 [RalphS]
- Ben: TimBL might add some examples of N3 that cannot be expressed in RDFa
- 14:09:08 [RalphS]
- ... what are the 'levels' meant to indicate?
- 14:09:18 [RalphS]
- Michael: links point to QA document
- 14:09:29 [RalphS]
- ... allows for incremental enhancement of a spec
- 14:09:58 [RalphS]
- Ben: I worry this idea of 'levels' might imply more complication than there really is
- 14:10:39 [RalphS]
- Michael: we should decide whether to say 'this is all we support and no more' or indicate possible future features
- 14:10:52 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 14:11:31 [RalphS]
- Ralph: is it still useful to have a Wiki page so the community can edit?
- 14:11:39 [RalphS]
- Ben: I think so
- 14:11:56 [RalphS]
- Michael: I can prepare a discussion of this in the Wiki
- 14:12:13 [RalphS]
- ... don't want to duplicate work
- 14:12:20 [RalphS]
- [DONE] ACTION: Ralph to check if the test suite can be hosted at the W3C--is Tomcat available? [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action04]
- 14:12:56 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Feb/0130.html action progress: test suite hosting [Ralph 2007-02-26]
- 14:13:04 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Steven to put together sample XHTML2 doc with all mime type, etc. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action07]
- 14:13:06 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 14:15:22 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Ben start a list of RDF/XML features that are not supported by RDFa [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action08]
- 14:15:24 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 14:15:52 [RalphS]
- [WITHDRAWN] ACTION: Ben to contemplate about the Dev Track [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/05-htmltf-minutes.html#action01]
- 14:16:04 [RalphS]
- Ben: I thought about it so long that I missed the deadline
- 14:16:37 [RalphS]
- ... I might talk during the W3C track
- 14:16:41 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Ben to look into Science Commons use case [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action10]
- 14:16:43 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 14:17:11 [RalphS]
- Ben: making some progress; Use Case document updated to include a little bit of Science Commons example
- 14:17:22 [RalphS]
- ... still hope for a big realistic example to include
- 14:17:28 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Ben to update RDFa schedule on wiki to aim for last call on June 1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action05]
- 14:17:32 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 14:17:35 [RalphS]
- Ben: I'd like feedback on this
- 14:17:48 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Elias to send email to list with use case from IBM [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action12]
- 14:18:16 [RalphS]
- Elias: I also am looking for a use case that adds more specifics
- 14:18:32 [RalphS]
- ... deciding whether to go to WWW2007 or XTech; I submitted an RDFa/GRDDL talk
- 14:19:52 [RalphS]
- Ben: a Use Case can be more abstract; can show "here's the triples we'd like to produce"
- 14:19:56 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 14:20:15 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Mark produce more examples of applicability of n-ary relations from IPTC documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action13]
- 14:20:17 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 14:21:01 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Michael continue work on the FAQ template that Elias started [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action15]
- 14:21:04 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 14:21:53 [mhausenblas]
- -> http://esw.w3.org/topic/RDFa#FAQ RDFa FAQ
- 14:22:47 [RalphS]
- Ben: Simone, comments on the FAQ from your new fresh eyes would be especially useful
- 14:23:06 [RalphS]
- Topic: Latest Documents (Primer and Scenarios)
- 14:23:20 [RalphS]
- Ben: I commited new updates to Primer and Scenarios on Friday
- 14:23:29 [RalphS]
- ... mostly editorial, related to comments received
- 14:23:30 [Zakim]
- -EliasT
- 14:23:59 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Mar/0004.html Update to RDFa Scenarios, including response to Comments [Ben 2007-03-02]
- 14:24:07 [Zakim]
- +EliasT
- 14:24:18 [RalphS]
- Ben: one comment remaining on clarifying the predicates should be cleaned up
- 14:24:34 [RalphS]
- ... the document currently assumes namespaced classes
- 14:24:51 [RalphS]
- ... are we comfortable enough with this to publish these WDs as they are?
- 14:25:13 [RalphS]
- Ralph: "publish, publish, publish" It's not going to be perfect
- 14:26:13 [RalphS]
- Steven: don't say I didn't warn you
- 14:27:13 [Zakim]
- -EliasT
- 14:27:18 [RalphS]
- Ralph: WAI-ARIA is emphasizing use of @role, so I certainly don't think this discussion is over
- 14:27:23 [RalphS]
- ... but let's publish and get comments
- 14:27:34 [EliasT]
- EliasT: I'm +1 to publishing. (dialing back in)
- 14:27:42 [RalphS]
- PROPOSE: publish Primer and Scenarios as WDs
- 14:27:43 [mhausenblas]
- +1
- 14:27:45 [wing]
- +1
- 14:27:47 [RalphS]
- +1
- 14:27:47 [Simone]
- +1
- 14:27:59 [Zakim]
- +EliasT
- 14:28:07 [RalphS]
- Steven: warning, re: use of @class
- 14:28:24 [RalphS]
- RESOLVED Ask WG to publish Primer and Scenarios as WDs
- 14:29:03 [RalphS]
- Ben: I would like to respond to Antiones comment about multiple @rel and @property before publishing; I think it is one sentence
- 14:29:13 [RalphS]
- s/Antoines/Antoine's/
- 14:29:46 [RalphS]
- Topic: Test Suite Update
- 14:29:58 [RalphS]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/ RDFa Test Suite
- 14:30:08 [RalphS]
- Ben: we're not providing enough feedback on the test suite
- 14:30:09 [mhausenblas]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Mar/0010.html
- 14:30:20 [RalphS]
- Michael: DanC has given us lots of test suite feedback
- 14:30:37 [Zakim]
- -MarkB_
- 14:30:50 [RalphS]
- ... I'd like us to settle whether we're going to try to do conformance testing or not
- 14:30:51 [MarkB_]
- back in a sec
- 14:31:29 [RalphS]
- ... I would like just to claim that "any tool that claims to be RDFa-compliant has to correctly parse all the test cases"
- 14:31:45 [RalphS]
- ... i.e. test suite is necessary but may not be sufficient
- 14:31:57 [RalphS]
- s/test/passing test/
- 14:32:15 [RalphS]
- ... DanC was commenting about what conformance testing could or should be
- 14:32:32 [RalphS]
- ... he felt that we could not do conformance testing
- 14:32:53 [RalphS]
- ... I hope to prove that something is conforming but not to try to prove non-conformance
- 14:33:24 [RalphS]
- ... many specifications already provide conformance tests, though perhaps not as strong as what I envision
- 14:33:41 [Zakim]
- +??P16
- 14:33:43 [MarkB_]
- zakim, i am ?
- 14:33:44 [RalphS]
- Elias: is the problem just because of the word "conformance"? If so, let's drop that word
- 14:33:44 [Zakim]
- +MarkB_; got it
- 14:34:01 [RalphS]
- Michael: look at -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Mar/0010.html my response to Dan
- 14:34:41 [RalphS]
- ... an agent that claims to be RDFa-aware must pass the test suite, but passing the test suite does not guarantee the agent is conforming
- 14:34:52 [RalphS]
- Ben: what is the GRDDL test suite called?
- 14:35:32 [RalphS]
- Elias: W3C does not bless implementations, so we're not required to do conformance tests
- 14:35:40 [RalphS]
- ... all we need to do is provide guidance to developers
- 14:35:59 [RalphS]
- Steven: the real reason for a test suite is to test the _specification_
- 14:36:56 [benadida]
- RalphS: I agree with Steven. DanC has used the test suite to determine how the WG has responded to a question.
- 14:37:05 [benadida]
- ... if a question is raised, one should develop a test to show how to answer it
- 14:37:28 [benadida]
- ... Dan has encouraged us to write a test case in response to any technical discussion.
- 14:38:04 [mhausenblas]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2007Mar/0004.html Conformance testing discussion on QA
- 14:38:29 [RalphS]
- Ben: so this seems to be about the usage of the term "conformance"
- 14:38:57 [Zakim]
- -EliasT
- 14:39:00 [RalphS]
- ... I recommend continuing to build the input/output tests but drop the word "conformance"
- 14:39:54 [Zakim]
- +EliasT
- 14:40:48 [RalphS]
- Michael: an agent can always trick the test suite by producing exactly what it requires yet not be a true implementation
- 14:41:12 [RalphS]
- Ben: so the test suite is to help developers, help test the specification, but *not* to test implementations
- 14:41:25 [RalphS]
- Elias: the SPARQL test suite gives a set of files and the expected output
- 14:41:43 [RalphS]
- ... every SPARQL developer downloads the test suite and runs it themselves, then they can debate the test suite
- 14:42:10 [MarkB_]
- q+
- 14:42:55 [RalphS]
- ... the SPARQL test suite does not invoke any code; it's just the input and expected output
- 14:42:56 [mhausenblas]
- q+ on Test Runner
- 14:43:18 [mhausenblas]
- q+ to demo Test Runner
- 14:43:27 [RalphS]
- Mark: I agree that input and expected output is what Michael was doing but I don't think that is all we should do
- 14:43:46 [RalphS]
- ... I'd like to provide an interface for people to test their endpoints
- 14:44:08 [RalphS]
- ... concerned about only REST-based endpoint, as we haven't specified a REST requirement
- 14:44:27 [RalphS]
- ... we shoudl stop at just describing inputs and outputs
- 14:44:34 [RalphS]
- s/shoudl/should/
- 14:45:01 [RalphS]
- ... the other side of what Dan is getting at is 'anytime we mention RDFa in a document we should add to the test suite'
- 14:45:25 [RalphS]
- ... the moment we create a sample or a line of text in a paragraph, reflect this in the test suite with an input and output document
- 14:45:46 [RalphS]
- Ben: are you suggesting we drop the REST test harness?
- 14:46:05 [RalphS]
- Mark: no, it's useful but don't make it mandatory
- 14:46:18 [RalphS]
- ... the REST harness should not be "the test suite" itself
- 14:46:26 [mhausenblas]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/rdfa-test-manifest.rdf
- 14:46:38 [RalphS]
- Michael: agree. First we should look at the manifest file
- 14:46:49 [mhausenblas]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/
- 14:46:59 [RalphS]
- ... rdfa-test-manifest is the source; everything else is generated by Wing's script
- 14:47:09 [mhausenblas]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/run-tc.html
- 14:47:11 [wing]
- test case results are still TTL
- 14:47:38 [RalphS]
- ... test runner is supplemental; it just helps test REST-based endpoints, but I'm happy to move the test runner elsewhere
- 14:47:49 [RalphS]
- ... the mandatory part is just the manifest and the test case directory
- 14:48:10 [RalphS]
- ... we've taken Mark's suggestion to add a SPARQL query to test that the expected triples are present
- 14:49:06 [RalphS]
- ... the test asssertions are generated from the manifest
- 14:49:29 [RalphS]
- Elias: what property is available in the manifest to cite, e.g. the irc log where we discuss a test?
- 14:49:35 [mhausenblas]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/#RDFaTests
- 14:50:06 [RalphS]
- Michael: see 'status'
- 14:50:19 [RalphS]
- Elias: I'm looking for a property that describes why the test was written
- 14:50:26 [mhausenblas]
- pls choose one from http://www.w3.org/QA/2005/08/test-case-metadata.html
- 14:50:30 [RalphS]
- Wing: we can use seeAlso
- 14:51:04 [RalphS]
- Elias: also record when we accepted or rejected a test
- 14:51:42 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Wing add a property to the test case schema for tracking origin and approval of an individual test
- 14:51:52 [EliasT]
- Zakim, mute me
- 14:51:52 [Zakim]
- EliasT should now be muted
- 14:52:07 [RalphS]
- Mark: sounds like we're moving closer to a W3C test ontology
- 14:52:15 [RalphS]
- Wing: yep, we've been following that
- 14:52:24 [RalphS]
- Ben: are we outputting RDFa on the test suite page? :)
- 14:52:32 [RalphS]
- Michael: we've thought about that but aren't doing it yet
- 14:53:04 [RalphS]
- Topic: XHTML 1.1 Module Update
- 14:53:14 [RalphS]
- Mark: there's a document describing the modularization
- 14:53:24 [RalphS]
- ... I've given comments to Shane
- 14:53:33 [RalphS]
- ... sadly, Shane is ill right now
- 14:53:48 [RalphS]
- ... he had agreed to write the schemas
- 14:54:21 [RalphS]
- ... the RDFa schemas I wrote don't (yet) drop in smoothly
- 14:54:54 [RalphS]
- ... I will work on this myself in Shane's absence
- 14:55:29 [RalphS]
- ... I won't be able to pick this up again until next week
- 14:55:56 [RalphS]
- ... I'll do the schemas and then we can review
- 14:56:14 [RalphS]
- Ben: would March 19 be a reasonable date to expect to see update schemas?
- 14:56:34 [RalphS]
- Mark: I have had schemas on my server but they're old
- 14:56:48 [RalphS]
- Ben: we should have some versions published in the W3C process to get feedback
- 14:56:58 [RalphS]
- ... I don't want this to be a rushed, last-minute thing
- 14:57:17 [RalphS]
- Mark: the work on XHTML modularization has been underway for a long time
- 14:58:30 [RalphS]
- Ben: people will be looking at every little detail when we go to REC
- 14:58:50 [RalphS]
- Mark: the draft is the primary thing; Shane has aligned this with the latest XHTML Modularization spec
- 14:59:03 [RalphS]
- ... we won't gain by getting people to look at year-old schemas
- 14:59:24 [RalphS]
- ... point people to Shane's draft now
- 14:59:41 [RalphS]
- Ben: so let's hope to have schemas updated by March 19
- 14:59:47 [Steven_]
- Time
- 15:00:22 [RalphS]
- Mark: I'll have the schemas done by March 12
- 15:00:32 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Mark produce RDFa XHTML 1.1 module and spec [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action14]
- 15:00:34 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 15:00:39 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Mark to put M12N schema up somewhere, and tell us where [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action06]
- 15:00:46 [RalphS]
- scribenick: benadida
- 15:00:48 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 15:01:30 [mhausenblas]
- Topic: 5. Setting a Schedule
- 15:01:34 [mhausenblas]
- next week
- 15:01:42 [Zakim]
- -EliasT
- 15:02:40 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 15:03:05 [benadida]
- Mark's mashup demo
- 15:03:18 [benadida]
- MarkB: asked to demonstrate SideWinder
- 15:03:43 [benadida]
- ... framework to put together application "widgets"
- 15:03:50 [benadida]
- ... how do you get RDF? While you're browsing, etc...
- 15:04:10 [benadida]
- ... sidebar in IE and, while you're browsing, looks for RDFa in main window
- 15:04:36 [benadida]
- ... converts it, stores it, and different running sidewinder applications can run queries
- 15:04:59 [benadida]
- ... to pull data out. Example: google map that periodically maps events browsed.
- 15:05:19 [benadida]
- ... browsing process adds triples as you go, don't pay any attention.
- 15:05:26 [benadida]
- ... separate process renders items found.
- 15:05:42 [benadida]
- ... next stage is to combine that with previous data.
- 15:05:49 [benadida]
- ... parser also does microformat processing.
- 15:06:27 [benadida]
- ... main thing we're trying to do is to build stuff into the browser.
- 15:07:12 [benadida]
- ... no demo just yet, but working on it soon.
- 15:09:25 [Zakim]
- -Wing
- 15:09:26 [Zakim]
- -Simone
- 15:09:27 [Zakim]
- -Michael
- 15:09:27 [Zakim]
- -MarkB_
- 15:09:30 [Zakim]
- -Ben_Adida
- 15:09:31 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)9:00AM has ended
- 15:09:32 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Ralph, Michael, Wing, Steven, Simone, Ben_Adida, EliasT, MarkB_
- 15:09:41 [benadida]
- zakim, please draft minutes
- 15:09:41 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'please draft minutes', benadida
- 15:10:32 [wing]
- wing has left #rdfa
- 15:10:42 [Simone]
- Simone has left #rdfa
- 15:11:18 [benadida]
- ADJOURNED
- 15:27:26 [Steven]
- Steven has joined #rdfa
- 15:29:59 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:29:59 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
- 15:33:54 [Steven]
- s/Scribe: Ralph/Scribe: RalphS/
- 15:33:59 [Steven]
- rrsagnet, make minutes
- 15:34:07 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:34:07 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
- 15:35:04 [benadida]
- benadida has left #rdfa
- 15:37:35 [Steven]
- s/Antiones/Antoine's/
- 15:37:45 [Steven]
- s/04 01rrsagnet, make minutes//
- 15:37:52 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:37:52 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
- 15:39:00 [EliasT]
- EliasT has left #rdfa
- 17:16:48 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #rdfa
- 17:17:10 [Steven]
- rrsagent, bye
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- I see 11 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-actions.rdf :
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Michael to prepare RDF/XML - RDFa comparison wiki page [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action09] [1]
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-irc#T14-06-51
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Steven to put together sample XHTML2 doc with all mime type, etc. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action07] [2]
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-irc#T14-13-04
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben start a list of RDF/XML features that are not supported by RDFa [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action08] [3]
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-irc#T14-15-22
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to look into Science Commons use case [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action10] [4]
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-irc#T14-16-41
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to update RDFa schedule on wiki to aim for last call on June 1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action05] [5]
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-irc#T14-17-28
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Elias to send email to list with use case from IBM [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action12] [6]
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-irc#T14-17-48
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Mark produce more examples of applicability of n-ary relations from IPTC documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action13] [7]
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-irc#T14-20-15
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Michael continue work on the FAQ template that Elias started [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action15] [8]
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-irc#T14-21-01
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Wing add a property to the test case schema for tracking origin and approval of an individual test [9]
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-irc#T14-51-42
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Mark produce RDFa XHTML 1.1 module and spec [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action14] [10]
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-irc#T15-00-32
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Mark to put M12N schema up somewhere, and tell us where [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action06] [11]
- 17:17:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/05-rdfa-irc#T15-00-39