16:03:10 RRSAgent has joined #biordf 16:03:10 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/02/19-biordf-irc 16:03:12 Susie has joined #BioRDF 16:03:13 246733 ("BIORDF") 16:03:23 Zakim, this will be BioRDF 16:03:23 ok, ericP, I see SW_HCLS(BioRDF)11:00AM already started 16:03:31 I'll try again 16:03:36 zakim, who's on the call? 16:03:36 On the phone I see +004631776aaaa, +1.781.620.aabb, Vipul_Kashyap, [IPcaller], Don_Doherty, +1.301.366.aacc 16:04:01 +EricP 16:04:12 i am ipcaller 16:04:16 +Bill_Bug 16:04:19 -Bill_Bug 16:04:30 Zakim, IPcaller is samwaldmatthias 16:04:30 +samwaldmatthias; got it 16:04:48 +Bill_Bug 16:04:58 Zakim, +1.781.620.aabb is Susie 16:04:58 +Susie; got it 16:05:05 zakim, who's on the call? 16:05:05 On the phone I see +004631776aaaa, Susie, Vipul_Kashyap, samwaldmatthias, Don_Doherty, +1.301.366.aacc, EricP, Bill_Bug 16:05:42 +Kei_Cheung 16:05:53 Olivier sends his regrets 16:06:13 Zakim, +1.301.366.aacc JohnBarkly 16:06:13 I don't understand '+1.301.366.aacc JohnBarkly', ericP 16:06:22 Zakim, +1.301.366.aacc is JohnBarkley 16:06:23 +JohnBarkley; got it 16:07:26 +004631776aaaa is Kirsten 16:07:34 zakim, +004631776aaaa is Kirsten 16:07:34 +Kirsten; got it 16:07:51 Zakim, pick up a scribe 16:07:51 I don't understand 'pick up a scribe', vipul 16:07:58 Zakim, please pick a victim 16:07:58 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Bill_Bug 16:08:40 Meeting: BioRDF 16:08:47 BB: VK - review Action Items 16:08:51 Scribenick: BillBug 16:09:26 VK: review Use Case (AD & PD) and look at demo script in more detail 16:09:46 +[MIT-G346] 16:10:08 SS: also 16:10:10 - review options for ISMB 16:10:11 - review JB SemWebTech pros 16:10:13 - review demo practical issues 16:10:16 VK: go SS 16:11:23 +June_Kinoshita 16:11:30 alanr has joined #biordf 16:11:39 Agenda 16:11:39 zakim, who is on 16:11:39 I don't understand 'who is on', alanr 16:11:49 zakim, who is on the call? 16:11:49 On the phone I see Kirsten, Susie, Vipul_Kashyap, samwaldmatthias, Don_Doherty, JohnBarkley, EricP, Bill_Bug, Kei_Cheung, [MIT-G346], June_Kinoshita 16:12:00 Options for presenting at ISMB - Susie 16:12:09 SS: review ISMB presentation options 16:12:11 - bypass writing full-paper (time too short) 16:12:13 zakim, [MIT-G346] is Alan_Ruttenberg 16:12:13 +Alan_Ruttenberg; got it 16:12:13 - Barb Bryant (ISMB chair) presented options 16:12:15 * send BMC Bioinform paper to highlights track 16:12:16 * PLoS track 16:12:18 * SIGs? 16:12:19 * organize Birds of Feather discussion (many BoF at ISMB) 16:12:21 VK: prioritize? 16:12:29 Bill, you scribing? 16:12:41 Can I pass the baton to you, Alan? 16:12:45 yes 16:13:16 SS 16:13:18 - 1) send BMC Bioinform 16:13:20 2) description of demo 16:13:21 3) BoF 16:13:23 4) SIG participation 16:13:24 5) PLoS Track 16:13:26 done scribing 16:13:55 21 - 25 of july 16:14:18 Core Semantic Web benefits to highlight in the demo - John 16:14:23 +??P0 16:14:23 ericP has changed the topic to: BIONT/BioRDF weekly telecon -- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2007Feb/0088 16:14:44 Advantages: Knowledge Representation 16:14:57 Zakim, ??P0 is alanr 16:14:57 +alanr; got it 16:15:16 2) Knowledge integration 16:15:24 - make sure consistent 16:15:30 - deduce additional knowledge 16:15:53 - in the case of OWL/RDF class hierarchy and class membership that is not explicitly declared 16:15:54 -alanr 16:16:23 - combine two "information resources" can use ontology to harmonize two resources 16:16:57 - using rdms ontology becomes queries, new tables, possible constraints, but not well defined. 16:17:04 - as opposed to OWL/RDF 16:17:07 +Scott_Marshall 16:17:13 q+ 16:17:13 zakim, who is on the call? 16:17:14 On the phone I see Kirsten, Susie, Vipul_Kashyap, samwaldmatthias, Don_Doherty, JohnBarkley, EricP, Bill_Bug, Kei_Cheung, Alan_Ruttenberg, June_Kinoshita, Scott_Marshall 16:17:31 mscottm has joined #biordf 16:17:46 Problem: Pages on wiki immutable. 16:17:57 Action: EricP to investigate problems with wiki 16:18:24 Kei - multilayer representation, starting with annotation layer 16:18:51 many sites are not structured. Adding annotation to sites would help with resource discovery 16:19:02 q+ to advise "semantics of RDBs not expressed in SQL and not globally distinguishable". saying there are no semantics my annoy RDB folks 16:19:18 q 16:19:25 But: Standard vocabulary needed for this sort of annotation 16:19:27 q? 16:19:57 Kei - next layer: Integration 16:20:14 allow users to interrelate concepts in meaningful ways 16:20:35 q+ 16:20:46 in rdb: can supply foreign key, primary key but semantics has to be external - hard to discover relationship inside the rdb 16:20:56 agree with Kei - need to distinguish between domain semantics and data structure semantics. 16:21:03 Beauty of semantic web is that it is describeed so machine can get at it. 16:21:31 Third layer: Data available in OWL/RDF 16:22:01 not only raw data - may not be that informative. Bill suggested distilled knowledge 16:22:10 easier to integrate using SW technology. 16:22:35 q+ 16:22:38 ack 16:22:46 Bill, John: What pages were immutable? 16:23:00 ack BillBug 16:24:05 BillBug: Key thing: Semantics. Of minimal use unless we tie into shared formal semantic structures that people are already using. 16:24:13 From controlled vocabularies to OBO Foundry. 16:25:44 q+ 16:26:01 BillBug: Third dimension of Kei's is most important. Distilled knowledge resources *not* with data. Rather people mix them up. 16:26:37 e.g. if you do text mining but don't do it in terms defined by these already extant ontologies then you lose the value 16:27:32 ack ErcP 16:27:41 ack ericP 16:27:41 ericP, you wanted to advise "semantics of RDBs not expressed in SQL and not globally distinguishable". saying there are no semantics my annoy RDB folks 16:28:32 Semantics are not global - can't move from one RDB to another 16:29:23 ack Don 16:29:41 for a good time: sw dot neurocommons dot org slash map.html 16:31:20 John: Difference between prolog and OWL-DL. Decidable and computable. Compare to prolog/uml 16:31:27 here, here - JB! 16:31:56 June: Sent mail to Don re: use case 16:33:05 From EricN: re: clinical 16:33:06 Alan, 16:33:06 Here is a draft for a possible clinical angle to the HCLS demo... 16:33:06 1. Extend PD/AD demo to include clinical study data from patients, using DSE's draft RDF model based on CDISC's SDTM standard: 16:33:06 http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/Drug_Safety_and_Efficacy/SDTM/Example_N3#Clinical_Data 16:33:07 2. Compile patient data for either: 16:33:09 a. disease progression - base on symptomatic terminology such as EOAD or MCI for AD, and tremor, hyperkinetic dysarthia, or bradykinesia for PD 16:33:12 or b. new drug trial - dosing, symptomatic response patterns over time + any observed adverse events (AE) 16:33:14 3. If drug trial, then links to PubChem drug information would be useful: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=search&DB=pccompound 16:33:17 - for AD: Cognex, http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=2723754 (images- http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/image/structurefly.cgi?cid=2723754) 16:33:17 http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/HCLSIG_DemoHomePage_HCLSIG_Demo 16:33:20 - for PD: Cogentin, http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=441352 16:33:22 or Piribedil, http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=198284 16:33:24 4. Use either set of data to show trends using a simple graph visualization (generic table to graph tool?) 16:34:34 Maybe link it through from the demo wiki page? 16:37:22 June discusses AD/PD Use case: Large, not intended to do all - more to pick from for demo. 16:38:37 q? 16:39:20 q+ 16:39:35 Layout: AD on left, data sources, Parallel PD use case. Some blank because they haven't been able to figure out parallels yet 16:39:39 ack BillBug 16:39:46 q+ alanr re: Progress on image aspect of demo 16:40:06 q+ alanr to talk about progress on image aspect of demo 16:41:07 BillBug: Working on way of expressing specific assertions in narrow area , to use PATO to use phenotypic qualities. 16:42:32 discussion at http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=31662008&forum_id=35770 16:43:16 BillBug: Means to move from June's description to formal representation 16:43:47 vipul: Bill plz identify specific use cases he is representing. Bill: Linked to PD use case as existed in Sept/Oct 16:44:51 is useful! 16:44:55 Keep going! 16:46:10 (Bill asks if people think this is useful - so he can decide how much effort to put into it) 16:47:26 Everyone...I just received an email back that the Use Case document exceeded the permitted size on the list. 16:47:58 Action: Check feasibility of Bill's approach. All check out his examples. 16:48:47 Action: Check feasibility of Bill's approach for focusing the use case 16:49:10 http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/SeedOntology/SeedOntologyDetailedFollowup 16:49:51 Action 2 is Don_Doherty 16:51:12 June - initial thoughts on where to show benefits re: use case. Would like to integrate 3 databases. 1) SWAN 2) Genomic, e.g. expression. 3) NeuronDB and associated databases 16:51:35 ESW wiki has account creation temporarily turned off due to spamming prob. i wonder if we can temporarily temporarily turn it on so folks can create their accounts 16:52:17 K channel story, interferon gamma story. Too much to fold into one scenario 16:52:52 Ask whether polymorphisms in channels associated with disease risks 16:52:56 Okay...people should be receiving the use case 16:53:13 Got document. 16:53:58 June: Mouse models/ does SNP exist in human. 16:54:50 q? 16:54:52 alan - just read about K channel SNP associated with deafness. 16:56:25 Bill - idea about immunotherapy link. Bill could you plz elaborate on this to mailing list? 16:56:49 -Kirsten 16:57:32 June...could we talk more about the Use Case on tomorrow's BIONT call? 16:58:13 Action: Connect the benefits to the use case 16:58:20 hearing loss discussion - http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=31646450&forum_id=44607 16:58:52 sw dot neurocommons dot org slash map.html 16:59:13 BillBug has joined #biordf 16:59:48 -Scott_Marshall 17:01:24 -Bill_Bug 17:01:25 -Susie 17:01:27 -Vipul_Kashyap 17:01:28 -Kei_Cheung 17:01:29 -JohnBarkley 17:01:30 -samwaldmatthias 17:01:31 -Don_Doherty 17:01:32 -June_Kinoshita 17:01:34 Action: Susie to poll group on meeting before next SW Gathering 17:01:40 -EricP 17:01:50 Zakim, prepare minutes 17:01:50 I don't understand 'prepare minutes', alanr 17:01:59 hi all. account create is turned back on on the wiki 17:02:05 but i may be telling you too late 17:02:11 RRSAgent, prepare minutes 17:02:11 I'm logging. I don't understand 'prepare minutes', alanr. Try /msg RRSAgent help 17:02:22 eric will you handle minutes generation please? 17:03:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:03:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/19-biordf-minutes.html alanr 17:03:45 rrsagent set minutes world-readable 17:04:50 rrsagent set log world-readable 17:05:00 rrsagent, set log world-readable 17:05:15 RRSAgent, set log world-readable 17:05:34 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:05:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/02/19-biordf-minutes.html alanr 17:06:40 disconnecting the lone participant, Alan_Ruttenberg, in SW_HCLS(BioRDF)11:00AM 17:06:43 SW_HCLS(BioRDF)11:00AM has ended 17:06:46 Attendees were Vipul_Kashyap, Don_Doherty, EricP, Bill_Bug, samwaldmatthias, Susie, Kei_Cheung, JohnBarkley, Kirsten, June_Kinoshita, Alan_Ruttenberg, alanr, Scott_Marshall 17:08:12 RRSAgent, please make log world-readable 17:08:43 though i note from before: 2007-02-19T17:05:00Z rrsagent, set log world-readable 17:08:46 2007-02-19T17:05:00Z I have made the request, alanr 17:09:27 ok looks good now. Bye