IRC log of tsdtf on 2007-01-16
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:23:08 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #tsdtf
- 13:23:09 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-tsdtf-irc
- 13:23:15 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #tsdtf
- 13:23:25 [shadi]
- zakim, this will be tsd
- 13:23:25 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi; I see WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes
- 13:23:32 [shadi]
- meeting: TSD TF
- 13:23:43 [shadi]
- chair: CarlosV, Chrsitophe
- 13:23:49 [shadi]
- regrets: Tim
- 13:24:12 [shadi]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Jan/0015.html
- 13:24:28 [shadi]
- agenda+ Overview of core TF documents and pending changes
- 13:24:42 [shadi]
- agenda+ Tools
- 13:24:56 [shadi]
- agenda+ Locations
- 13:25:13 [shadi]
- agenda+ Assignment of reviewers for new test cases
- 13:27:34 [Daniela]
- Daniela has joined #tsdtf
- 13:29:20 [Zakim]
- WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has now started
- 13:29:22 [MichaelC]
- MichaelC has joined #tsdtf
- 13:29:28 [Zakim]
- +Daniela_Ortner
- 13:30:13 [Zakim]
- +Shadi
- 13:30:20 [Vangelis]
- Vangelis has joined #tsdtf
- 13:31:23 [Zakim]
- +Cooper
- 13:32:01 [CarlosI]
- CarlosI has joined #tsdtf
- 13:32:43 [Zakim]
- +Vangelis_Karkaletsis
- 13:34:07 [CarlosV]
- CarlosV has joined #tsdtf
- 13:34:07 [Zakim]
- +Rodrigo
- 13:34:43 [shadi]
- zakim, rodrigo is really CarlosI
- 13:34:43 [Zakim]
- +CarlosI; got it
- 13:35:01 [Zakim]
- +CarlosV
- 13:36:03 [shadi]
- regrets: Tim, Christophe
- 13:36:15 [shadi]
- agenda?
- 13:37:00 [shadi]
- scribe: Daniela
- 13:37:08 [shadi]
- scribenick: Daniela
- 13:37:28 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 1
- 13:37:28 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Overview of core TF documents and pending changes" taken up [from shadi]
- 13:38:37 [Daniela]
- saz: still need to update review process document
- 13:39:20 [Daniela]
- cv: cs seems to have updated his documents already
- 13:39:41 [Daniela]
- saz: will send a note to the list as soon as update is done.
- 13:40:06 [Daniela]
- cv: perhaps put links on the TF homepage
- 13:40:44 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2006/tests/
- 13:41:25 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/
- 13:41:27 [Daniela]
- saz: first link is for our internal usage
- 13:41:39 [Daniela]
- saz: second link is official homepage
- 13:42:25 [Daniela]
- cv: propose menu bar for the internal usage
- 13:43:06 [Daniela]
- saz: think that there is a css template for navigation bar on the right - will check if that is appropiate
- 13:43:46 [Daniela]
- ACTION: saz will check if it is possible to integrate a navigation bar on the homepage for internal usage
- 13:44:47 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/
- 13:44:58 [Daniela]
- saz: cv, please send links that you thinks are suitable for this navigation bar
- 13:45:06 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/minutes
- 13:45:12 [CarlosV]
- Links: Work statement; Using TCDL; Test Review Process; Tests CVS Web Interface
- 13:48:03 [Daniela]
- saz: need a form to upload new test samples
- 13:48:52 [Daniela]
- saz: need to fill the "repository contents" link
- 13:49:34 [shadi]
- zakim, close agendum 1
- 13:49:34 [Zakim]
- agendum 1, Overview of core TF documents and pending changes, closed
- 13:49:35 [Zakim]
- I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 13:49:36 [Zakim]
- 2. Tools [from shadi]
- 13:49:40 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 2
- 13:49:40 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Tools" taken up [from shadi]
- 13:50:45 [Daniela]
- saz: put request to systems team reg. wiki
- 13:50:58 [Daniela]
- saz: will put some templates up and provide link
- 13:51:35 [Daniela]
- saz: more difficult task is thing on server side scripting
- 13:53:19 [Daniela]
- cv: we need generated content dependant on user input for some test cases
- 13:54:03 [Daniela]
- saz: e.g. for sc2.5.1, does the code need to actually run?
- 13:54:48 [Daniela]
- saz: there is a number of technologies that will be supported, but not all / not all kinds of versions
- 13:55:19 [Daniela]
- cv: for bentoweb, we are e.g. using jsp running under tomcat
- 13:56:45 [Daniela]
- saz: have to talk to systems team about what can be supported
- 13:59:46 [Daniela]
- saz: still not clear if examples have to run on w3c server
- 14:01:02 [Daniela]
- do: important for content review to have samples running
- 14:01:55 [Daniela]
- mc: samples do not have directly tested
- 14:02:15 [Daniela]
- cv: for the review process it would be important to have running testfiles
- 14:03:05 [Daniela]
- saz: who should have access? only this group or the public?
- 14:04:34 [Daniela]
- saz: should evaluation tools be able to run test suites directly on w3c server or is it enough that they are downloaded and run somewhere else?
- 14:04:54 [Daniela]
- cv: from marketing point of view: would be nice if the run on w3c
- 14:06:04 [Daniela]
- saz: can we agree to one technology (e.g. JSP=?
- 14:06:53 [Daniela]
- cv: from bentoweb view: jsp is the only technology used
- 14:07:33 [Daniela]
- ci: the problem is to reduce the scope of contributions from outside bentoweb
- 14:08:04 [Daniela]
- saz: what if someone comes along with ASP?
- 14:08:37 [Daniela]
- cv: state on homepage which technologies will be supported
- 14:08:48 [Daniela]
- saz: which ones to restrict? we cannot support all...
- 14:09:39 [Daniela]
- ci: it's clear that we cannot support ALL technologies, but reducing to only 1 technology could be problematic
- 14:10:07 [Daniela]
- ci: perhaps contributors can provide running samples on own domain
- 14:11:57 [Daniela]
- saz: has overview on requirements now, will check with WAI folks and systems group
- 14:12:34 [Daniela]
- ACTION: saz will check which technologies are supportable and which not
- 14:14:02 [shadi]
- zakim, close agendum 2
- 14:14:02 [Zakim]
- agendum 2, Tools, closed
- 14:14:04 [Zakim]
- I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 14:14:05 [Zakim]
- 3. Locations [from shadi]
- 14:14:06 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 3
- 14:14:06 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Locations" taken up [from shadi]
- 14:14:53 [Daniela]
- cv: need a conclusion - but how can we solve that?
- 14:16:10 [Daniela]
- cv summarizes contents from email discussion
- 14:17:20 [Daniela]
- saz: does not have to be a tool that puts in the location
- 14:18:50 [Daniela]
- mc: who do we want to inform about location of an error? author? evaluator? user?
- 14:19:07 [Daniela]
- mc: source versus generated content
- 14:20:40 [Daniela]
- mc: there are evaluation tools that take a look at source code if they are able to
- 14:22:40 [Daniela]
- mc: there are cases where it makes sense to look at source, and others where generated content is important
- 14:24:32 [Daniela]
- saz: consumer of the location information will be mainly people, not tools
- 14:25:35 [Daniela]
- saz: tools will produce different results (e.g. missing alt - will the location be at the img element or at the alt attribut?)
- 14:26:10 [Daniela]
- mc: location of errors can also be in two different files (e.g. inline css and external css)
- 14:28:25 [Daniela]
- saz: not sure if we can specify more specific
- 14:29:49 [Daniela]
- ci: what about location of error in two different documents (see css example above) - do we support that?
- 14:31:01 [Daniela]
- saz: will need more discussion on that on mailing list?
- 14:31:50 [Daniela]
- ACTION: cv check with cs if there could be a solution within metadata
- 14:33:11 [Daniela]
- zakim, close agendum 3
- 14:33:12 [Zakim]
- agendum 3, Locations, closed
- 14:33:13 [Zakim]
- I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
- 14:33:14 [Zakim]
- 4. Assignment of reviewers for new test cases [from shadi]
- 14:33:23 [Daniela]
- zakim, take up adendum 4
- 14:33:23 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'take up adendum 4', Daniela
- 14:33:35 [Daniela]
- zakim, take up agendum 4
- 14:33:35 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Assignment of reviewers for new test cases" taken up [from shadi]
- 14:34:23 [Daniela]
- cv: process in bentoweb took longer that expected - prefers to postpone evaluation process in TF till next week
- 14:35:02 [Daniela]
- saz: next week some people will not be able to attend - so we could make next meeting in two weeks
- 14:35:33 [Zakim]
- -Vangelis_Karkaletsis
- 14:35:37 [Zakim]
- -Cooper
- 14:35:38 [Zakim]
- -Shadi
- 14:35:39 [Zakim]
- -CarlosV
- 14:35:40 [Zakim]
- -Daniela_Ortner
- 14:35:40 [Zakim]
- WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has ended
- 14:35:41 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Daniela_Ortner, Shadi, Cooper, Vangelis_Karkaletsis, CarlosI, CarlosV
- 14:36:20 [shadi]
- zakim, bye
- 14:36:20 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #tsdtf
- 14:36:28 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make logs world
- 14:36:34 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:36:34 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-tsdtf-minutes.html shadi
- 14:36:38 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make logs world
- 14:36:42 [shadi]
- rrsagent, bye
- 14:36:42 [RRSAgent]
- I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-tsdtf-actions.rdf :
- 14:36:42 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: saz will check if it is possible to integrate a navigation bar on the homepage for internal usage [1]
- 14:36:42 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-tsdtf-irc#T13-43-46
- 14:36:42 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: saz will check which technologies are supportable and which not [2]
- 14:36:42 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-tsdtf-irc#T14-12-34
- 14:36:42 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: cv check with cs if there could be a solution within metadata [3]
- 14:36:42 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-tsdtf-irc#T14-31-50
- 14:36:50 [Vangelis]
- Vangelis has left #tsdtf