13:23:08 RRSAgent has joined #tsdtf 13:23:09 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-tsdtf-irc 13:23:15 Zakim has joined #tsdtf 13:23:25 zakim, this will be tsd 13:23:25 ok, shadi; I see WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes 13:23:32 meeting: TSD TF 13:23:43 chair: CarlosV, Chrsitophe 13:23:49 regrets: Tim 13:24:12 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Jan/0015.html 13:24:28 agenda+ Overview of core TF documents and pending changes 13:24:42 agenda+ Tools 13:24:56 agenda+ Locations 13:25:13 agenda+ Assignment of reviewers for new test cases 13:27:34 Daniela has joined #tsdtf 13:29:20 WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has now started 13:29:22 MichaelC has joined #tsdtf 13:29:28 +Daniela_Ortner 13:30:13 +Shadi 13:30:20 Vangelis has joined #tsdtf 13:31:23 +Cooper 13:32:01 CarlosI has joined #tsdtf 13:32:43 +Vangelis_Karkaletsis 13:34:07 CarlosV has joined #tsdtf 13:34:07 +Rodrigo 13:34:43 zakim, rodrigo is really CarlosI 13:34:43 +CarlosI; got it 13:35:01 +CarlosV 13:36:03 regrets: Tim, Christophe 13:36:15 agenda? 13:37:00 scribe: Daniela 13:37:08 scribenick: Daniela 13:37:28 zakim, take up agendum 1 13:37:28 agendum 1. "Overview of core TF documents and pending changes" taken up [from shadi] 13:38:37 saz: still need to update review process document 13:39:20 cv: cs seems to have updated his documents already 13:39:41 saz: will send a note to the list as soon as update is done. 13:40:06 cv: perhaps put links on the TF homepage 13:40:44 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2006/tests/ 13:41:25 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/ 13:41:27 saz: first link is for our internal usage 13:41:39 saz: second link is official homepage 13:42:25 cv: propose menu bar for the internal usage 13:43:06 saz: think that there is a css template for navigation bar on the right - will check if that is appropiate 13:43:46 ACTION: saz will check if it is possible to integrate a navigation bar on the homepage for internal usage 13:44:47 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 13:44:58 saz: cv, please send links that you thinks are suitable for this navigation bar 13:45:06 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/minutes 13:45:12 Links: Work statement; Using TCDL; Test Review Process; Tests CVS Web Interface 13:48:03 saz: need a form to upload new test samples 13:48:52 saz: need to fill the "repository contents" link 13:49:34 zakim, close agendum 1 13:49:34 agendum 1, Overview of core TF documents and pending changes, closed 13:49:35 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 13:49:36 2. Tools [from shadi] 13:49:40 zakim, take up agendum 2 13:49:40 agendum 2. "Tools" taken up [from shadi] 13:50:45 saz: put request to systems team reg. wiki 13:50:58 saz: will put some templates up and provide link 13:51:35 saz: more difficult task is thing on server side scripting 13:53:19 cv: we need generated content dependant on user input for some test cases 13:54:03 saz: e.g. for sc2.5.1, does the code need to actually run? 13:54:48 saz: there is a number of technologies that will be supported, but not all / not all kinds of versions 13:55:19 cv: for bentoweb, we are e.g. using jsp running under tomcat 13:56:45 saz: have to talk to systems team about what can be supported 13:59:46 saz: still not clear if examples have to run on w3c server 14:01:02 do: important for content review to have samples running 14:01:55 mc: samples do not have directly tested 14:02:15 cv: for the review process it would be important to have running testfiles 14:03:05 saz: who should have access? only this group or the public? 14:04:34 saz: should evaluation tools be able to run test suites directly on w3c server or is it enough that they are downloaded and run somewhere else? 14:04:54 cv: from marketing point of view: would be nice if the run on w3c 14:06:04 saz: can we agree to one technology (e.g. JSP=? 14:06:53 cv: from bentoweb view: jsp is the only technology used 14:07:33 ci: the problem is to reduce the scope of contributions from outside bentoweb 14:08:04 saz: what if someone comes along with ASP? 14:08:37 cv: state on homepage which technologies will be supported 14:08:48 saz: which ones to restrict? we cannot support all... 14:09:39 ci: it's clear that we cannot support ALL technologies, but reducing to only 1 technology could be problematic 14:10:07 ci: perhaps contributors can provide running samples on own domain 14:11:57 saz: has overview on requirements now, will check with WAI folks and systems group 14:12:34 ACTION: saz will check which technologies are supportable and which not 14:14:02 zakim, close agendum 2 14:14:02 agendum 2, Tools, closed 14:14:04 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 14:14:05 3. Locations [from shadi] 14:14:06 zakim, take up agendum 3 14:14:06 agendum 3. "Locations" taken up [from shadi] 14:14:53 cv: need a conclusion - but how can we solve that? 14:16:10 cv summarizes contents from email discussion 14:17:20 saz: does not have to be a tool that puts in the location 14:18:50 mc: who do we want to inform about location of an error? author? evaluator? user? 14:19:07 mc: source versus generated content 14:20:40 mc: there are evaluation tools that take a look at source code if they are able to 14:22:40 mc: there are cases where it makes sense to look at source, and others where generated content is important 14:24:32 saz: consumer of the location information will be mainly people, not tools 14:25:35 saz: tools will produce different results (e.g. missing alt - will the location be at the img element or at the alt attribut?) 14:26:10 mc: location of errors can also be in two different files (e.g. inline css and external css) 14:28:25 saz: not sure if we can specify more specific 14:29:49 ci: what about location of error in two different documents (see css example above) - do we support that? 14:31:01 saz: will need more discussion on that on mailing list? 14:31:50 ACTION: cv check with cs if there could be a solution within metadata 14:33:11 zakim, close agendum 3 14:33:12 agendum 3, Locations, closed 14:33:13 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 14:33:14 4. Assignment of reviewers for new test cases [from shadi] 14:33:23 zakim, take up adendum 4 14:33:23 I don't understand 'take up adendum 4', Daniela 14:33:35 zakim, take up agendum 4 14:33:35 agendum 4. "Assignment of reviewers for new test cases" taken up [from shadi] 14:34:23 cv: process in bentoweb took longer that expected - prefers to postpone evaluation process in TF till next week 14:35:02 saz: next week some people will not be able to attend - so we could make next meeting in two weeks 14:35:33 -Vangelis_Karkaletsis 14:35:37 -Cooper 14:35:38 -Shadi 14:35:39 -CarlosV 14:35:40 -Daniela_Ortner 14:35:40 WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has ended 14:35:41 Attendees were Daniela_Ortner, Shadi, Cooper, Vangelis_Karkaletsis, CarlosI, CarlosV 14:36:20 zakim, bye 14:36:20 Zakim has left #tsdtf 14:36:28 rrsagent, make logs world 14:36:34 rrsagent, make minutes 14:36:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-tsdtf-minutes.html shadi 14:36:38 rrsagent, make logs world 14:36:42 rrsagent, bye 14:36:42 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-tsdtf-actions.rdf : 14:36:42 ACTION: saz will check if it is possible to integrate a navigation bar on the homepage for internal usage [1] 14:36:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-tsdtf-irc#T13-43-46 14:36:42 ACTION: saz will check which technologies are supportable and which not [2] 14:36:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-tsdtf-irc#T14-12-34 14:36:42 ACTION: cv check with cs if there could be a solution within metadata [3] 14:36:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-tsdtf-irc#T14-31-50 14:36:50 Vangelis has left #tsdtf