14:56:57 RRSAgent has joined #databinding 14:56:57 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/11/28-databinding-irc 14:56:59 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:56:59 Zakim has joined #databinding 14:57:01 Zakim, this will be DBWG 14:57:01 ok, trackbot; I see WS_DBWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 14:57:02 Meeting: Databinding WG Teleconference 14:57:02 Date: 28 November 2006 14:57:30 JonC has joined #databinding 14:59:39 gcowe has joined #databinding 14:59:55 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Nov/0036.html 15:00:25 WS_DBWG()10:00AM has now started 15:00:32 +??P10 15:00:44 vlad has joined #databinding 15:01:19 +Jon_Calladine 15:01:32 +Mario_Jeckle 15:01:47 zakim, code? 15:01:47 the conference code is 3294 (tel:+1.617.761.6200), pauld 15:01:55 +??P16 15:02:41 zakim, ??P10 is probably George 15:02:41 +George?; got it 15:02:47 zakim, who is here? 15:02:47 On the phone I see George?, Jon_Calladine, Vlad, ??P16 15:02:48 On IRC I see vlad, gcowe, JonC, Zakim, RRSAgent, pauld, Yves, trackbot 15:02:52 +Yves 15:03:28 zakim, ??P16 is me 15:03:28 +pauld; got it 15:04:13 scribe: pauld 15:04:21 minutes from the 21st approved 15:05:31 ACTION: yves to add LC-Basic as a product on tracker 15:05:32 Created ACTION-91 - Add LC-Basic as a product on tracker [on Yves Lafon - due 2006-12-05]. 15:06:40 pauld: we're in last call 15:06:59 Topic: ISSUE-12 15:07:24 george: been working on a validation service, have a JSP 15:07:47 zakim, who is making noise? 15:08:03 pauld, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds 15:08:30 yves: send me the source, will look into it when the team return 15:09:55 Topic: ISSUE-2 15:10:08 pauld: i'm a block, will get a page put up 15:10:21 yves: still working on XMLUnit 15:10:58 vlad: been trying the testsuite in our framework, some general directions 15:11:34 pauld: include is broken 15:15:47 pauld: we need small schemas to include in some of our examples 15:17:03 ACTION: gcowe to look at fixing our include issues, ISSUE-98 15:17:03 Created ACTION-92 - Look at fixing our include issues, ISSUE-98 [on George Cowe - due 2006-12-05]. 15:18:11 pauld: we seem to have a number of patterns for Advanced which we closed the issue, but aren't in the patterns and examples 15:20:35 Topic: ISSUE-62 Why would a pattern NOT be included in our Advanced document? 15:21:24 -pauld 15:21:55 +??P0 15:22:10 zakim, ??P0 is me 15:22:10 +pauld; got it 15:25:03 jonc: how do we get vendors' input on what isn't implementable? 15:25:39 jonc: can we get a commnity input, or on an individual basis 15:26:00 .. is there a vendor concensus 15:26:29 pauld: we have a working group, they can join 15:27:09 pauld: business as usual, we may get some interest from the LC 15:27:19 pauld: testsuite will help 15:28:42 pauld: more interested in if we end up with the whole of schema covered, or only patterns we see in use? 15:29:31 pauld: maybe we should just examine some Advanced issues and find our way 15:29:52 jonc: is the concern this could be a job for life?: 15:30:19 .. some of us are only interested in the Basic, vendors may be more interested in the Advanced? 15:30:54 pauld: think schema publishers may also be interested in Advanced 15:32:57 pauld: risk is that anyone could come with any pattern and we would publish it as Advanced 15:33:29 jonc: if *any* recognised toolkit can process a pattern, then it could be "Advanced" 15:34:18 pauld: so what about "open enumeration type" no toolkit may support it, but i want it in Advanced 15:35:30 pauld: would it be acceptable for us to assign a URI for a pattern, but not put it in either document? 15:36:00 jonc: would any schema author want to use a pattern not implementable in a databinding toolkit 15:37:45 pauld: would like to have coverage for any valid schema 15:37:56 pauld: thinking we stop when we run out of time 15:38:27 pauld: am I overthinking this 15:38:47 george: not had many people contributing patterns 15:39:08 yves: we should contact people now we have LC documents 15:40:31 vlad: submitted some patterns, and publically available schemas, may not be representative in terms of coverage 15:41:21 pauld: ok so we need outreach 15:41:44 george: we need to make sure we have coverage of patterns from our issues list 15:42:09 pauld: george, submit your patterns! 15:46:08 pauld: we seem to have some base types missing for enumerations 15:48:15 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/patterns/6/09/LongSimpleTypePattern/ 15:50:02 This conference is scheduled to end in 10 minutes; all ports must be freed 15:50:06 pauld: so we need better coverage of base types 15:50:08 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/examples/6/09/StringSimpleTypePattern/ 15:50:44 george: may not be firing in our examples 15:53:20 pauld: will raise appInfo as a separate issue 15:55:02 This conference is scheduled to end in 5 minutes; all ports must be freed 15:55:59 RESOLUTION: close ISSUE-97 on basis of exploding into other issues 15:56:08 ACTION: pdowney to explode ISSUE-97 15:56:08 Created ACTION-93 - Explode ISSUE-97 [on Paul Downey - due 2006-12-05]. 15:57:21 -Vlad 15:57:22 -Yves 15:57:23 -George? 15:57:25 -Jon_Calladine 15:58:02 This conference is scheduled to end in 2 minutes; all ports must be freed 15:58:17 -pauld 15:58:18 WS_DBWG()10:00AM has ended 15:58:19 Attendees were Jon_Calladine, Vlad, George?, Yves, pauld 15:59:10 rrsagent, generate minutes 15:59:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/11/28-databinding-minutes.html pauld 17:30:16 Zakim has left #databinding