15:55:06 RRSAgent has joined #hcls 15:55:06 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/11/16-hcls-irc 15:55:21 rrsagent, set logs public 15:55:28 zakim, this is hcls 15:55:28 ok, eneumann; that matches SW_HCLS()11:00AM 15:55:40 No, there still is no change-log, I will start logging changes from now on. However, the ontology should be quite stable for the next time (i.e. no big changes that are not backwards-compatible) 15:56:09 okay 15:57:34 chimezie, Matthias, is there any summary of DOLCE or Biozen that this group could refer to? I'm not sure most of us know enough about it. 15:57:51 Don has joined #HCLS 15:59:10 At the time, there is only the 'manual' at http://neuroscientific.net/res/semsyn/biozen-manual-oct-06.pdf 15:59:11 +Don_Doherty 15:59:14 -Eric_Neumann 15:59:15 Mathias has a very nice writeup 15:59:16 +Eric_Neumann 15:59:35 And there should be a publication in the Journal of Web Semantics 15:59:42 in the next months. 15:59:58 Marja has joined #hcls 16:00:01 BillBug has joined #hcls 16:00:17 +Helen_Chen 16:01:11 +Bill_Bug 16:01:26 +[IPcaller] 16:01:29 Tonya has joined #hcls 16:01:35 + +1.443.538.aaaa 16:01:54 Helen has joined #hcls 16:02:12 +??P8 16:02:21 I'm probably [IPcaller] 16:02:24 +Chimezie_Ogbuji 16:02:31 +Tanya_Hongsermeier 16:02:35 +Marja 16:02:49 Zakim, +??P8 is samwaldmathias 16:02:49 sorry, chimezie, I do not recognize a party named '+??P8' 16:02:54 zakim, samwaldmatthias is IPcaller 16:02:54 sorry, eneumann, I do not recognize a party named 'samwaldmatthias' 16:03:19 zakim, IPcaller is samwaldmatthias 16:03:19 +samwaldmatthias; got it 16:05:32 + +46.3.17.06.aabb 16:05:47 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:05:47 On the phone I see Eric_Neumann, Don_Doherty, Helen_Chen, Bill_Bug, samwaldmatthias, +1.443.538.aaaa, ??P8, Chimezie_Ogbuji, Tanya_Hongsermeier, Marja, +46.3.17.06.aabb 16:07:44 I have added the writeup of my proposal on http://esw.w3.org/topic/MatthiasSamwald/DOLCE_bio-zen_patient-record_proposal 16:07:58 Thanks Matthias 16:08:07 Susie has joined #hcls 16:08:09 + +1.301.435.aacc 16:09:26 zakim, 46.3.17.06.aabb is Kerstin 16:09:26 sorry, eneumann, I do not recognize a party named '46.3.17.06.aabb' 16:09:35 BIRN: General tools and data sets (http://www.nbirn.net/downloads/index.shtm) 16:09:57 zakim, +46.3.17.06.aabb is Kerstin 16:09:57 +Kerstin; got it 16:10:07 scribe: Tonya 16:10:10 zakim, +1.443.538.aaaa is AJ 16:10:10 +AJ; got it 16:11:03 Mouse BIRN Integrated Atlasing Environment (http://www.nbirn.net/downloads/mbat/index.shtm) - visual presentation of spatially-specified neuro data sets (e.g., mRNA expression) 16:12:16 http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/F2F/Actions 16:15:40 +??P2 16:16:40 zakim, +1.301.435.aacc is Olivier 16:16:40 +Olivier; got it 16:16:53 BIRN: General downloads list the BIRN ontology - BIRNLex. We're in the process of moving this into Oracle RDF/XML and use it as the core semantic framework for ALL mediated datasets (60+ BIRN participating labs) - these site RDBMS stores are already registered with the BIRN RDBMS Mediator - currently in heavy use for intra-BIRN collaboration - ultimate goal is to expose all this data for... 16:16:55 ...open, public consumption 16:19:04 ACTION: Eric to get Draft Notes template from Ivan 16:19:23 SKOS: extremely detailed discussion of use of SKOS & RDF - contrast with FOAF - use for RDF representation of WordNet (http://www.nabble.com/SKOS-Core-enquiry-tf2495152.html) 16:21:16 Regarding SKOS: I have already converted many OBO ontologies to SKOS. However, you are limited to is-a and part-of properties between concepts. However, this might suffice for many parts of the UMLS, if completeness of the RDF version is not a major concern. 16:24:12 W3C Best Practices note on representing values in OWL: http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-specified-values/ 16:24:18 not sufficient for the original question 16:24:22 I think that constraint is probably OK for a first pass on UMLS. Given the specific support for lexical resources SKOS was designed to support (one reason for expression WordNet using it), I think UMLS --> RDF will be well support using SKOS (again, as a first pass). 16:24:42 (that was a followup to Matthias's comment) 16:26:41 In that case, I would strongly recommed SKOS instead of coming up with yet-another new RDF or OWL ontology. 16:27:01 ditto 16:28:19 agree with Eric's need to put a hold on action item - but it appears it would be very helpful to discuss this issue off-line with Matthias (and those who've worked on SKOS - see discussion thread cited above) 16:30:08 (issue was Helen's discussion of formalizing use of controlled lexicons in the ACPP - and links to CVs by other standards such as HL7) 16:31:43 My attempt to clarify the issue with an example: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2006Oct/0065.html 16:33:19 Regarding the example query we came up with in Amsterdam (I think it was my idea): unfortunately, the MeSH annotation of PubChem is rather lacking and hacky -- so PubChem does not seem as good as it seemed back then. 16:35:32 BioRDF - additional Use Cases from BIRN - this public BIRNLex page has an attempt review all the many use cases from throughout BIRN (http://xwiki.nbirn.net:8080/xwiki/bin/view/%20BIRN-OTF-Public/Home#Use+Cases) 16:37:14 (nearly all relate to defining requirements to support complex semantic queries on the topic of neurodegenerative disease) 16:39:31 ? (reminder) regarding use of OWL 1.1 and RDF 16:42:49 (relevant both to BioRDF & bioONT TFs - and likely all other TFs) 16:44:50 Helen & Chimezie: for issues you both have brought up - weren't there extensive discussions on the HCLSIG list back in Aug-Sep on these issues? 16:45:06 Not towards a concrete solution, however.. had more to do with HL7 16:46:49 absolutely - but also on the issue you brought up - more related to EPR issues related to roles - discussion about use of FOAF - etc. - isn't there something in those discussions that could lay the foundation for a position paper - that would review some of the papers you, Helen, & Eric have mentioned? 16:49:07 Harry Halpin is interested in making a HCLS usecase for GRDDL within the Primer document 16:50:00 John Madden is quite interested 16:50:02 as well 16:50:39 ACTION: draft of problem statement for computer-based patient records (Chimezie, Tonya, Helen, Susie) 16:52:24 BillBug: yes, sorry I misunderstood the context. I do recall that discussion thread and yes current efforts to ratify FOAF do not include concepts important to this community such as rules, etc.. 16:52:55 s/rules/roles 16:54:54 Helen has joined #hcls 16:58:05 see: http://lists.mindswap.org/pipermail/owl/2005-December/000097.html 16:59:37 there is big resistance to OWL 1.1 for this particular reason (modulo RDF) with folks such as Jim Hendler 17:00:07 http://www.mindswap.org/blog/2006/11/13/11-alternative/ 17:00:22 also... http://owl1_1.cs.manchester.ac.uk/rdf_mapping.html 17:00:57 thx, i wasn't aware of that one 17:04:08 -Kerstin 17:04:30 -??P8 17:04:35 -Chimezie_Ogbuji 17:04:38 -Bill_Bug 17:04:45 -Helen_Chen 17:04:48 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:04:48 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/11/16-hcls-minutes.html eneumann 17:04:49 -Don_Doherty 17:04:55 -Olivier 17:04:57 -AJ 17:04:59 -??P2 17:05:01 -Tanya_Hongsermeier 17:05:03 -Marja 17:05:05 -Eric_Neumann 17:05:06 Chimezie? 17:05:09 -samwaldmatthias 17:05:11 SW_HCLS()11:00AM has ended 17:05:13 Attendees were Eric_Neumann, Don_Doherty, Helen_Chen, Bill_Bug, Chimezie_Ogbuji, Tanya_Hongsermeier, Marja, samwaldmatthias, Kerstin, AJ, Olivier 17:05:17 rrsagent, bye 17:05:17 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/16-hcls-actions.rdf : 17:05:17 ACTION: Eric to get Draft Notes template from Ivan [1] 17:05:17 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/16-hcls-irc#T16-19-04 17:05:17 ACTION: draft of problem statement for computer-based patient records (Chimezie, Tonya, Helen, Susie) [2] 17:05:17 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/16-hcls-irc#T16-50-39