15:54:29 RRSAgent has joined #swd 15:54:29 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc 15:54:40 rrsagent, please make this record public 15:54:46 Zakim has joined #swd 15:54:52 TomB has joined #swd 15:54:53 zakim, this will be swd 15:54:53 ok, RalphS; I see SW_SWD()11:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 15:55:45 RalphS, Guus, I'm chairing today? 15:55:50 SW_SWD()11:00AM has now started 15:55:58 + +31.70.314.aaaa 15:56:33 zakim, aaaa is me 15:56:33 +Antoine; got it 15:56:55 + +1.617.395.aabb 15:56:59 -Antoine 15:57:01 +Antoine 15:57:13 zakim, aabb is me 15:57:13 +RalphS; got it 15:58:20 RalphS has changed the topic to: SWD WG 14 Nov agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0025.html 15:58:22 berrueta has joined #swd 15:58:30 +??P21 15:58:53 Bern has joined #swd 15:59:14 zakim, ??p21 is Tom 15:59:14 +Tom; got it 15:59:45 -RalphS 15:59:54 +??P34 16:00:04 zakim, ??p34 is me 16:00:04 +Bern; got it 16:00:15 JonP has joined #swd 16:00:16 +Ralph 16:00:27 aliman has joined #swd 16:00:54 +JonP 16:01:15 +Antoine.a 16:01:26 zakim, antoine.a is really Guus 16:01:26 +Guus; got it 16:01:48 +??P42 16:01:59 zakim, ??p42 is Alistair 16:01:59 +Alistair; got it 16:02:01 +CarlosI 16:02:38 zakim, Carlos is really Diego 16:02:39 +Diego; got it 16:02:49 zakim, wo is here? 16:02:49 sorry, Guus, I do not understand your question 16:03:08 Meeting: SWD WG 16:03:16 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0025.html 16:03:44 Regrets: Sean, Daniel 16:05:53 Scribe: Bernard 16:05:58 scribenick: bern 16:06:06 Previous: 2006-11-07 http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html 16:06:23 Guus: ignore action items at top of agenda are spurious 16:07:07 Guus: minures are accepted, seconded by TomB 16:07:26 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/Scribing.html 16:07:43 Ralph: question tutorial for IRC, zakim, etc 16:08:17 ...working with Tom 16:08:29 TomB: propose that tutorial is in agenda header 16:08:50 [DONE] ACTION: Ralph consider a tutorial on scribe conventions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-swd-minutes.html#action01] 16:09:39 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/Scribing.html Notes on scribing 16:10:03 RalphS: this on on the table of "nearby" links 16:10:12 ... on the WG home page 16:10:35 Topic: tlecon times 16:11:01 Guus: this time is convenient for many people including chairs 16:11:07 ...despite ovelap with RIF 16:11:30 ...so proposes to stay with this time 16:12:12 [DONE] ACTION: Tom to discuss with Guus [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html#action08] 16:12:41 s/discuss/discuss telecon time/ 16:13:07 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0014.html example SKOS use case 16:13:20 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0019.html email suggesting format for skos use cases 16:13:44 ACTION: Elisa to keep us posted as SKOS/iso 11179 16:13:46 compatibility issue evolves [recorded in 16:13:48 [36]w3c:/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html#action07] 16:13:56 -- continues 16:14:40 Guus: progress on http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action10 16:15:00 Alistair: waiting for concensus on use case format 16:16:23 Guus: taken action on http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action09 16:16:32 ...waiting for message to appear on mailing list 16:17:25 Jon: questions on Guus' example use cases 16:18:07 Guus: cannot be directly used for SKOS, different use but similar 16:18:26 ... also look at GoF Patterns book 16:19:06 Guus: action on http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action07 16:19:24 Antione: looking for more insight on use case format and how to divide workload 16:19:56 q+ to ask everybody to say what they think about the suggested use case 16:19:59 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0015.html W3C Tech Report editor's materials 16:20:50 Guus: talking to Chris Welty at ISWC about use of Wiki 16:21:05 ... doesn't require document editors to have CVS access 16:21:14 ...Chris has good experience with it 16:21:26 ...suggest as a way of capturing documentation for the WG 16:21:42 RalphS: Wiki might encourage more contributions 16:22:01 ... to find out more information about state of Wiki scripts 16:22:24 ...concen about ease of editing wiki pages 16:22:30 ...expressed from Tom 16:22:44 ...but could use Wiki to collect notes 16:23:14 Jon: which wiki? 16:23:21 it's moin moin 16:23:27 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/ RIF wiki 16:23:32 Guus: on the RIF WG home page 16:23:44 1+ Good experience with moinmoin 16:23:52 RIF wiki http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/ 16:24:29 Guus: suggest we consider it. but try it out first 16:24:57 ACTION: Ralph to find out more about the Wiki tools 16:25:13 s/the/the RIF/ 16:25:28 Guus: looking for tools to make collaboration for the group easier 16:26:10 Ralph: I personally find it very awkward to edit Wiki page 16:26:12 +1 to using a wiki for document production if scripts exist to convert to doc format 16:26:19 Guus: look at use cases 16:26:46 ...and a format to describe them 16:26:58 ...referrring to Alistair's posting 16:27:17 ...clarification of use of Alistair's term "fucntionality" 16:27:41 Alistair: functionality, for example, is search and browse (a description of how people can search and browse) 16:28:21 Guus: on vocabularies, expect examples for expressiveness 16:29:07 Alistair: expect to describe vocabulary, including their structural characteristics and provide concrrete examples to illustrate all features mentioned 16:29:19 q+ Alistair is cutting in and out acoustically - just my phone? 16:29:28 Guus: I would be more explicit (e.g. broader, narrower, related) 16:29:44 ...and anything outside ISO format should be specified 16:30:22 RalphS: assume we should subsume ISO standards 16:30:26 iso 2788 and iso 5964 16:30:32 ... is this a requirement? 16:30:51 [i have to leave] 16:30:56 ...state this as a requirement 16:31:19 q+ on iso format 16:31:32 -Guus 16:31:44 RalphS: needs discussion on ISO format assumption 16:32:27 TomB: we're not going to be able to resolve this on this call 16:32:43 ...propose an addition to requirements template from Alistair 16:33:01 q+ to say on use case format 16:33:09 RalphS: suggest editors put forward a list of requriemetns that are proposed and accepted 16:33:33 TomB: so, simply, they have an action to start getting requiremetns from the email list? 16:33:56 RalphS: sugest Jon & Antione to keep this list 16:34:44 Alistair: I think Guus said I should have another crack at the format 16:35:14 ...but we may be able to be more precise and more specific 16:35:31 ...Guus seems to want us to talk about ISO formats 16:36:24 RalphS: is the decision about accepting ISO as base requirements necessary before Alistair re-does the format 16:36:52 ...but these are really separate, So these need to be discussed separately. 16:37:33 Alistair: I heard Guus say we should use the ISO format as a way of laying out use cases 16:37:52 ...but I tried to be as neutral as possible 16:38:08 ...and not tied to any classification schemata 16:38:18 ...and presented in a human readable form 16:38:36 RalphS: I strongly endorse that 16:39:09 TomB: I also thought Guus was suggesting that use case describe more about the vocabulary 16:39:22 ...suggest we discuss for one more week, then come to a decision next week 16:41:03 RalphS: everyone encouraged to provide feedback to Alistair 16:41:17 Alistair: does everyone understand what I've written? 16:41:44 RalphS: clarification of ISO format 16:42:39 Bernard: my understanding of Guus' point was that we use the GangOfFour patterns and only describe use cases that go beyond those narrower, broader, related-to 16:42:47 +1 on Bernard's understanding 16:43:26 Alistair: doesn't believe we should take ISO as a starting point 16:43:37 Alistair: taking 2788 as a style would lead to other things that are beyond our scope 16:44:04 ...there's an awful lot of flexibility in ISO, not sufficiently well-defined 16:44:39 q+ to ask about initial documents 16:44:56 q- 16:44:57 ACTION: all to respond to Alistair's proposal 16:45:44 Bernard: do the existing Working Drafts need some careful review by the WG? 16:46:14 ... I suggest that everyone send comments on the existing drafts in mail 16:46:31 Alistair: we could use the issues list to track these comments 16:47:49 ... I have been maintaining a public SKOS issues list; I use this to track comments 16:47:51 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0019.html 16:48:02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0019.html 16:48:08 http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/proposals 16:48:45 RalphS: important that this WG pays attention to these issues 16:49:09 ...if Alistair can continue to track the issues 16:49:17 Bern, you wanted to ask about initial documents 16:49:41 Alistair: been putting more energy into looking into requiremetns 16:50:03 TomB: like to propose an action on Alistair to continue maintaining that list 16:50:27 RalphS: priority is to capture use cases 16:50:47 Alistair: important to make a connection from issues to requirements 16:50:49 Ralph: we can't close issues without knowing what our use cases are 16:50:57 ...and make requirements explicit 16:51:20 ...and I will continue to maintain that list of issues 16:54:04 ACTION: Daniel to send mail describing his use cases for SKOS draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/24-swd-minutes.html#action01] 16:54:10 -- continues 16:54:38 ACTION: Elisa to keep us posted as SKOS/iso 11179 compatibility issue evolves [recorded in [36]http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html#action07] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action03] 16:54:45 -- continues 16:55:16 topic: RDF in XHTML 16:55:27 TOMB: no one on call to discuss 16:55:48 q+ to mention current thread on semantic-web@w3.org 16:56:05 Topic: Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies 16:56:15 RalphS: no time to participate 16:56:24 TomB: no one to participate 16:56:52 Ralph: I will have to miss the Nov 28 and Dec 5 telecons due to W3C meetings; will be back in the office on December 11 16:57:01 Alistair: also no time. However, there's a discussion on the semantic-web@w3.org thread 16:57:16 JonP: useful discussion on the thread 16:57:37 Alistair: a lot of the discussion seems to be igoring the recipes 16:57:49 ...so perhaps our work is not widely known 16:58:09 ...need to get more input and involvement 16:58:20 -Tom 16:58:29 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2006Nov/0055.html "Hash URIs" and content negotiation (start of thread) 16:58:34 ...so have requested comments 16:58:52 +??P6 16:59:09 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2006Nov/thread.html#msg55 "Hash URIs" and content negotiation thread 16:59:16 zakim, ??p6 is Tom 16:59:16 +Tom; got it 16:59:20 ...TomB: no editor currently 16:59:34 ...close meeting for today 16:59:53 zakim, list attendees 16:59:53 As of this point the attendees have been +31.70.314.aaaa, Antoine, +1.617.395.aabb, RalphS, Tom, Bern, Ralph, JonP, Guus, Alistair, CarlosI, Diego 16:59:57 -Alistair 16:59:58 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:59:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-minutes.html RalphS 17:00:11 -Bern 17:00:18 -JonP 17:00:21 -Diego 17:00:24 -Tom 17:00:27 -Ralph 17:02:20 hmm. there are several actions that did not get carried forward 17:02:33 (or closed) 17:02:37 Antoine has left #swd 17:02:54 -Antoine 17:02:55 SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended 17:02:56 Attendees were +31.70.314.aaaa, Antoine, +1.617.395.aabb, RalphS, Tom, Bern, Ralph, JonP, Guus, Alistair, CarlosI, Diego 17:03:32 [DONE] ACTION: Alistair propose a format for presenting use cases [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action11] 17:03:50 ACTION: Alistair work with the UCR editors to draft questions to invite the esw-thes mailing list to contribute to the use cases and requirements [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action10] 17:03:52 -- continues 17:04:23 [DONE] ACTION: Guus cite some examples of other Requirements documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action09] 17:04:44 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0028.html ACTION: Guus cite some examples of other Requirements docs [Guus Schreiber] 17:05:09 TomB has joined #swd 17:05:10 ACTION: Jon, Daniel, Antoine figure out their individual roles as SKOS Requirements editors [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action07] 17:05:13 -- continues 17:05:24 RalphS, can you chat on phone? 17:05:30 sure 17:05:34 #? 17:05:55 [DONE] ACTION: Ralph point Jon, Daniel, Antoine at the W3C tech report editors materials [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action08] 17:06:15 ACTION: Alistair give pointers to deployed SKOS systems. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-swd-minutes.html#action06] 17:06:18 -- continues 17:06:37 rrsagent, please draft minutes 17:06:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-minutes.html RalphS 17:07:44 Bernard, you'll want to start with the later version of the -minutes.html file as it has the full list of actions now 19:20:48 zakim, bye 19:20:48 Zakim has left #swd 19:20:50 rrsagent, bye 19:20:50 I see 8 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-actions.rdf : 19:20:50 ACTION: Elisa to keep us posted as SKOS/iso 11179 [1] 19:20:50 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T16-13-44 19:20:50 ACTION: Ralph to find out more about the Wiki tools [2] 19:20:50 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T16-24-57 19:20:50 ACTION: all to respond to Alistair's proposal [3] 19:20:50 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T16-44-57 19:20:50 ACTION: Daniel to send mail describing his use cases for SKOS draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/24-swd-minutes.html#action01] [4] 19:20:50 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T16-54-04 19:20:50 ACTION: Elisa to keep us posted as SKOS/iso 11179 compatibility issue evolves [recorded in [36]http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-swd-minutes.html#action07] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action03] [5] 19:20:50 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T16-54-38 19:20:50 ACTION: Alistair work with the UCR editors to draft questions to invite the esw-thes mailing list to contribute to the use cases and requirements [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action10] [6] 19:20:50 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T17-03-50 19:20:50 ACTION: Jon, Daniel, Antoine figure out their individual roles as SKOS Requirements editors [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/07-swd-minutes.html#action07] [7] 19:20:50 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T17-05-10 19:20:50 ACTION: Alistair give pointers to deployed SKOS systems. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/17-swd-minutes.html#action06] [8] 19:20:50 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-swd-irc#T17-06-15