13:09:00 RRSAgent has joined #tsdtf 13:09:00 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-tsdtf-irc 13:09:07 zakim, calls? 13:09:07 I don't understand your question, Christophe. 13:10:11 Christophe has changed the topic to: WAI TSD TF telecon 13:11:02 zakim, what conferences? 13:11:02 I see ARCH_Team()8:00AM active and no others scheduled near this time 13:13:25 zakim, what conferences? 13:13:25 I see ARCH_Team()8:00AM active and no others scheduled near this time 13:15:32 Zakim, this will be WAI_TSDTF 13:15:32 ok, Christophe; I see WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM scheduled to start in 15 minutes 13:16:34 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Oct/0067.html 13:16:44 Vangelis has joined #tsdtf 13:16:55 Meeting: WAI TSD TF 13:17:24 Chair: Christophe_Strobbe 13:17:40 Regrets: CarlosI, Tim 13:18:29 Agenda+ First review of test samples 13:18:41 Agenda+ Web view of the test samples 13:29:33 Daniela has joined #tsdtf 13:29:40 \me technique.. i mean under "technique" element 13:30:13 Daniela has joined #tsdtf 13:31:19 WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has now started 13:31:26 +Christophe_Strobbe 13:31:27 +Daniela 13:31:40 + +30210820aaaa 13:32:00 Zakim, +30210820aaaa is Shadi 13:32:00 +Shadi; got it 13:32:57 +Vangelis_Karkaletsis 13:33:05 ChrisR has joined #tsdtf 13:33:47 +[IPcaller] 13:34:37 zakim, [IP is ChrisR 13:34:40 +ChrisR; got it 13:36:20 Scribe: Vangelis 13:36:34 Zakim, take up agendum 1 13:36:34 agendum 1. "First review of test samples" taken up [from Christophe] 13:37:13 CS: opportunity to look samples? 13:37:27 DO: no, probs with CVS access 13:39:25 CV: for eclipse you need only to locate private key home directory 13:40:39 EV: for eclipse see preferences>Team>CVS>SSH2 Connection method 13:40:45 +Cooper 13:41:34 Michael_Cooper has joined #tsdtf 13:41:42 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/ctprocess.html 13:42:41 CS: discuss the test process for test samples 13:44:07 SAZ: need experience from previous task forces and bentoweb 13:44:36 SAZ: what are the critical issues 13:44:57 SAZ: WCAG good example 13:45:50 CS: experience for bentoweb: test case developers when these are done-> evaluation team for review process in several stages- 13:46:44 CS: if change needed go back to developer otherwise go to second reviewer-> accepted 13:47:20 q+ to ask about meaning of "accepting" a test case in our context 13:47:49 CS: user testing : users review tests through html forms input 13:48:28 CS: automated testing: not done so far.. for colour contrast with tool for instance 13:48:51 SAZ: for task force this mean evaluating technique? 13:49:14 CS: yes, other purpose between bentoweb and TF 13:50:00 SAZ: for this task force focus on test samples and not techniques 13:53:06 ack m 13:53:06 Michael_Cooper, you wanted to ask about meaning of "accepting" a test case in our context 13:53:53 MC: need to have some criteria how to accept 13:55:00 CR: the WCAG group would need to have a look at them 13:55:21 MC: problem would be dependency 13:57:32 CR: maybe couple of tests in WCAG need review to make sure are correct 13:59:13 SAZ: what we need to produce accepted test samples ok by WCAG WG 14:00:23 SAZ: before formally accepted maybe both WCAg and ERT group have chance to look and send any comments 14:00:43 MC: ok, set a timeline 14:03:19 MC: WCAG pooling to surveys to accept or reject and moves on 14:04:19 MC: this tf needs a procedure 14:05:50 SAZ: what the acceptance really means? accepted for the draft technique? 14:06:53 CS: technique might change and a test could be accepted 14:07:52 MC: aggree mapping with url is the approach we need 14:09:40 SAZ: clarify that test samples cannot be more stable that techniques 14:10:29 SAZ: need specify procedures when ex a new test sample is uploaded 14:13:14 SAZ: write a proposal for criteria procedures (ex validate, check metadata...) 14:14:02 CS: I could have a try 14:15:22 ACTION: CS proposal for internal test case review process 14:17:40 SAZ: important to look procedure before looking actual test samples 14:19:01 Zakim, take up agendum 2 14:19:02 agendum 2. "Web view of the test samples" taken up [from Christophe] 14:21:09 SAZ: discuss the overall requirements and then with chris help could do that 14:21:42 SAZ: one audience public: maybe download test samples 14:22:05 SAZ: other: us for see what we have what do we develop... 14:22:36 SAZ: somebody want to test an evaluation tool 14:23:45 MC: every way.. by technology/ by tech feature 14:24:43 CR: dont think find organisation of WCAG script not so helpful 14:26:34 SAZ: wcag widget select certain things like level, technologies and give a view technique (wcag quick reference) 14:26:50 WCAG 2.0 Quick Reference: http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/ 14:28:29 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/complete 14:29:06 SAZ: List of Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools : might look like this 14:33:07 ACTION: SAZ and CR first prototype implementation and send to list 14:34:39 -ChrisR 14:34:40 -Daniela 14:34:40 -Cooper 14:34:41 ChrisR has left #tsdtf 14:34:42 -Vangelis_Karkaletsis 14:34:43 -Shadi 14:34:46 -Christophe_Strobbe 14:34:47 WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has ended 14:34:48 Attendees were Christophe_Strobbe, Daniela, Shadi, Vangelis_Karkaletsis, [IPcaller], ChrisR, Cooper 14:36:12 Vangelis has left #tsdtf 14:36:15 zakim, bye 14:36:15 Zakim has left #tsdtf 14:36:25 rrsagent, make log world 14:36:45 rrsagent, make minutes 14:36:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-tsdtf-minutes.html Christophe 14:39:11 rrsagent, bye 14:39:11 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-tsdtf-actions.rdf : 14:39:11 ACTION: CS proposal for internal test case review process [1] 14:39:11 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-tsdtf-irc#T14-15-22 14:39:11 ACTION: SAZ and CR first prototype implementation and send to list [2] 14:39:11 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/31-tsdtf-irc#T14-33-07