IRC log of ws-policy on 2006-08-23
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:21:54 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #ws-policy
- 15:21:54 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc
- 15:21:56 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 15:21:56 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #ws-policy
- 15:21:58 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be Policy
- 15:21:58 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see WS_Policy()12:00PM scheduled to start in 39 minutes
- 15:21:59 [trackbot]
- Meeting: WS Policy WG Teleconference
- 15:21:59 [trackbot]
- Date: 23 August 2006
- 15:23:05 [cferris]
- zakim, please read agenda from http://whatfettle.com/2006/07/RDFAgenda/http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0124.html
- 15:23:05 [Zakim]
- working on it, cferris
- 15:23:08 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Roll call and selection of secretary, Chair
- 15:23:10 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 added
- 15:23:11 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Review and approval of telcon minutes, Chair
- 15:23:14 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 added
- 15:23:15 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Future WG meetings, Chair
- 15:23:16 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 added
- 15:23:17 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Editorial team report
- 15:23:18 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 added
- 15:23:19 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Review action items, Chair
- 15:23:20 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 added
- 15:23:22 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Detailed review of current drafts
- 15:23:23 [Zakim]
- agendum 6 added
- 15:23:24 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Editorial and wording changing issues (30 minutes)
- 15:23:26 [Zakim]
- agendum 7 added
- 15:23:27 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Minor Technical Issues (30 minutes)
- 15:23:29 [Zakim]
- agendum 8 added
- 15:23:31 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Major Technical Issues (30 minutes)
- 15:23:33 [Zakim]
- agendum 9 added
- 15:23:35 [Zakim]
- agenda+ New issues (since Aug 7)
- 15:23:37 [Zakim]
- agendum 10 added
- 15:23:39 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Any other business
- 15:23:41 [Zakim]
- agendum 11 added
- 15:23:43 [Zakim]
- done reading agenda, cferris
- 15:23:57 [cferris]
- Chair: PaulC
- 15:38:12 [Fabian]
- Fabian has joined #ws-policy
- 15:45:05 [paulc]
- Chris: There is a updated agenda !
- 15:45:13 [paulc]
- Sorry for its late arrival.
- 15:47:00 [Yakov]
- Yakov has joined #ws-policy
- 15:47:09 [Yakov]
- scribe:Yakov
- 15:52:08 [Fabian]
- My last email to WS-Policy took 3 hrs to get distributed...
- 15:52:11 [Zakim]
- WS_Policy()12:00PM has now started
- 15:52:18 [Zakim]
- + +1.508.628.aaaa
- 15:53:09 [Yakov]
- scribe:Yakov
- 15:54:28 [Zakim]
- +??P8
- 15:54:39 [Fabian]
- zakim, ??P8 is me
- 15:54:39 [Zakim]
- +Fabian; got it
- 15:56:12 [cferris]
- rrsagent, where are we?
- 15:56:12 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. Sorry, nothing found for 'where are we'
- 15:56:18 [cferris]
- rrsagent, where am i?
- 15:56:18 [RRSAgent]
- See http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T15-56-18
- 15:57:04 [abbie]
- abbie has joined #ws-policy
- 15:58:00 [cferris]
- Topic: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0137
- 15:58:10 [paulc]
- Chris - please note that VER 2 agenda has a slighly different structure.
- 15:58:17 [whenry]
- whenry has joined #ws-policy
- 15:58:19 [Zakim]
- +Abbie_Barbir
- 15:58:27 [cferris]
- hmmm.... I'm trying to sort out how to deal with that
- 15:58:41 [cferris]
- zakim, what is the agenda?
- 15:58:41 [Zakim]
- I see 11 items remaining on the agenda:
- 15:58:43 [Zakim]
- 1. Roll call and selection of secretary, Chair
- 15:58:44 [Zakim]
- 2. Review and approval of telcon minutes, Chair
- 15:58:45 [Zakim]
- 3. Future WG meetings, Chair
- 15:58:46 [Zakim]
- 4. Editorial team report
- 15:58:47 [Zakim]
- 5. Review action items, Chair
- 15:58:48 [Zakim]
- 6. Detailed review of current drafts
- 15:58:49 [JCrump]
- JCrump has joined #ws-policy
- 15:59:06 [FrederickHirsch]
- FrederickHirsch has joined #ws-policy
- 15:59:17 [Zakim]
- 7. Editorial and wording changing issues (30 minutes)
- 15:59:18 [Zakim]
- 8. Minor Technical Issues (30 minutes)
- 15:59:19 [Zakim]
- 9. Major Technical Issues (30 minutes)
- 15:59:21 [Zakim]
- 10. New issues (since Aug 7)
- 15:59:24 [Zakim]
- 11. Any other business
- 15:59:25 [Zakim]
- +??P2
- 15:59:26 [Zakim]
- + +44.796.805.aabb
- 15:59:31 [Zakim]
- + +1.719.302.aacc
- 15:59:42 [dmoberg]
- dmoberg has joined #ws-policy
- 15:59:47 [whenry]
- zakim, +1.719.302.aacc is whenry
- 15:59:47 [Zakim]
- +whenry; got it
- 15:59:54 [Zakim]
- + +1.781.999.aadd
- 15:59:59 [cferris]
- agenda 8 = Possible out-of-scope issues
- 16:00:13 [JCrump]
- zakim, +1.781.999.aadd is JCrump
- 16:00:13 [Zakim]
- +JCrump; got it
- 16:00:20 [Zakim]
- +??P12
- 16:00:22 [cferris]
- agenda 9 = Minor technical issues (30 minutes)
- 16:00:22 [whenry]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:00:25 [Zakim]
- whenry should now be muted
- 16:00:29 [asir]
- asir has joined #ws-policy
- 16:00:29 [maryann]
- maryann has joined #ws-policy
- 16:00:40 [dmoberg]
- zakim, ??P12 is dmoberg
- 16:00:41 [Zakim]
- +dmoberg; got it
- 16:00:45 [cferris]
- agenda 10 = major technical issues (30 minutes)
- 16:00:54 [cferris]
- agenda 11 = New issues
- 16:01:00 [Zakim]
- - +44.796.805.aabb
- 16:01:05 [cferris]
- agenda 12 = AOB
- 16:01:16 [cferris]
- agenda+ AOB
- 16:01:18 [ruchith]
- ruchith has joined #ws-policy
- 16:01:21 [bijan]
- bijan has joined #ws-policy
- 16:01:23 [cferris]
- zakim, what is the agenda?
- 16:01:23 [Zakim]
- I see 12 items remaining on the agenda:
- 16:01:24 [Zakim]
- 1. Roll call and selection of secretary, Chair
- 16:01:26 [Zakim]
- 2. Review and approval of telcon minutes, Chair
- 16:01:27 [Zakim]
- 3. Future WG meetings, Chair
- 16:01:28 [Zakim]
- 4. Editorial team report
- 16:01:30 [Zakim]
- 5. Review action items, Chair
- 16:01:31 [Zakim]
- 6. Detailed review of current drafts
- 16:01:33 [Zakim]
- 7. Editorial and wording changing issues (30 minutes)
- 16:01:34 [Zakim]
- 8. Possible out-of-scope issues
- 16:01:35 [Zakim]
- 9. Minor technical issues (30 minutes)
- 16:01:36 [Zakim]
- 10. major technical issues (30 minutes)
- 16:01:37 [Zakim]
- 11. New issues
- 16:01:40 [Zakim]
- +m2
- 16:01:59 [Zakim]
- +Frederick_Hirsch
- 16:02:06 [Zakim]
- + +1.781.643.aaee
- 16:02:10 [Zakim]
- +Chris_Ferris
- 16:02:10 [prasad]
- prasad has joined #ws-policy
- 16:02:12 [monica]
- monica has joined #ws-policy
- 16:02:15 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 16:02:20 [Zakim]
- + +1.617.933.aaff
- 16:02:21 [bijan]
- zakim, IPcaller is me
- 16:02:22 [Zakim]
- +bijan; got it
- 16:02:27 [bijan]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:02:27 [Zakim]
- bijan should now be muted
- 16:02:30 [sanka]
- sanka has joined #ws-policy
- 16:02:31 [cferris]
- zakim, who is here?
- 16:02:31 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see +1.508.628.aaaa, Fabian, Abbie_Barbir, ??P2, whenry (muted), JCrump, dmoberg, m2, Frederick_Hirsch, +1.781.643.aaee, Chris_Ferris, bijan (muted), +1.617.933.aaff
- 16:02:35 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see sanka, monica, prasad, bijan, ruchith, maryann, asir, dmoberg, FrederickHirsch, JCrump, whenry, abbie, Yakov, Fabian, Zakim, RRSAgent, cferris, paulc, charlton,
- 16:02:38 [maryann]
- 781-643-1843 is maryann
- 16:02:38 [Zakim]
- ... trackbot
- 16:02:39 [Zakim]
- + +1.415.402.aagg
- 16:02:51 [Zakim]
- +??P25
- 16:03:02 [cferris]
- zakim, aaaa is Yakov
- 16:03:02 [Zakim]
- +Yakov; got it
- 16:03:19 [Zakim]
- + +44.796.805.aahh
- 16:03:30 [bijan]
- zakim, 781-643-1843 is maryann
- 16:03:30 [Zakim]
- sorry, bijan, I do not recognize a party named '781-643-1843'
- 16:03:32 [cferris]
- zakim, aaee is maryann
- 16:03:32 [Zakim]
- +maryann; got it
- 16:03:54 [cferris]
- zakim, aagg is Lee
- 16:03:54 [Zakim]
- +Lee; got it
- 16:04:20 [maryann]
- someones at the beach
- 16:04:21 [cferris]
- zakim, ??P2 is Asir
- 16:04:21 [Zakim]
- +Asir; got it
- 16:04:29 [danroth]
- danroth has joined #ws-policy
- 16:04:38 [Zakim]
- +Prasad_Yendluri
- 16:04:40 [cferris]
- zakim, Asir has Dan
- 16:04:40 [Zakim]
- Dan was already listed in Asir, cferris
- 16:04:50 [cferris]
- zakim, who is here?
- 16:04:50 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Yakov, Fabian, Abbie_Barbir, Asir, whenry (muted), JCrump, dmoberg, m2, Frederick_Hirsch, maryann, Chris_Ferris, bijan (muted), +1.617.933.aaff, Lee, ??P25,
- 16:04:53 [Zakim]
- ... +44.796.805.aahh, Prasad_Yendluri
- 16:04:54 [Zakim]
- Asir has Dan
- 16:04:55 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see danroth, sanka, monica, prasad, bijan, ruchith, maryann, asir, dmoberg, FrederickHirsch, JCrump, whenry, abbie, Yakov, Fabian, Zakim, RRSAgent, cferris, paulc,
- 16:04:57 [Zakim]
- ... charlton, trackbot
- 16:05:01 [ruchith]
- zakim, +1.617.933.aaff is ruchith
- 16:05:01 [Zakim]
- +ruchith; got it
- 16:05:30 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 16:05:41 [bijan]
- no
- 16:05:44 [bijan]
- I'm on skype
- 16:05:45 [bijan]
- and muted
- 16:05:57 [sanka]
- zakim, [IPCaller] isprobably me
- 16:05:57 [Zakim]
- I don't understand '[IPCaller] isprobably me', sanka
- 16:06:07 [cferris]
- zakim, aaff is probably Mark
- 16:06:07 [Zakim]
- sorry, cferris, I do not understand your question
- 16:06:11 [Yakov]
- topic: Roll call and selection of secretary
- 16:06:20 [sanka]
- zakim, who is on phone
- 16:06:20 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'who is on phone', sanka
- 16:06:21 [cferris]
- zakim, who is here?
- 16:06:21 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Yakov, Fabian, Abbie_Barbir, Asir, whenry (muted), JCrump, dmoberg, m2, Frederick_Hirsch, maryann, Chris_Ferris, bijan (muted), ruchith, Lee, ??P25,
- 16:06:25 [Zakim]
- ... +44.796.805.aahh, Prasad_Yendluri, [IPcaller]
- 16:06:26 [Zakim]
- Asir has Dan
- 16:06:28 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see danroth, sanka, monica, prasad, bijan, ruchith, maryann, asir, dmoberg, FrederickHirsch, JCrump, whenry, abbie, Yakov, Fabian, Zakim, RRSAgent, cferris, paulc,
- 16:06:32 [Zakim]
- ... charlton, trackbot
- 16:06:46 [cferris]
- zakim, m2 is Monica
- 16:06:46 [Zakim]
- +Monica; got it
- 16:06:47 [sanka]
- zakim, [IPcaller] is probably me
- 16:06:47 [Zakim]
- +sanka?; got it
- 16:06:59 [cferris]
- zakim, aahh is probably mark
- 16:06:59 [Zakim]
- +mark?; got it
- 16:07:09 [cferris]
- zakim, who is here?
- 16:07:09 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Yakov, Fabian, Abbie_Barbir, Asir, whenry (muted), JCrump, dmoberg, Monica, Frederick_Hirsch, maryann, Chris_Ferris, bijan (muted), ruchith, Lee, ??P25, mark?,
- 16:07:16 [Zakim]
- ... Prasad_Yendluri, sanka?
- 16:07:18 [Zakim]
- Asir has Dan
- 16:07:22 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see danroth, sanka, monica, prasad, bijan, ruchith, maryann, asir, dmoberg, FrederickHirsch, JCrump, whenry, abbie, Yakov, Fabian, Zakim, RRSAgent, cferris, paulc,
- 16:07:27 [Zakim]
- ... charlton, trackbot
- 16:08:25 [bijan]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:08:25 [Zakim]
- bijan should no longer be muted
- 16:09:09 [bijan]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:09:09 [Zakim]
- bijan should now be muted
- 16:09:20 [cferris]
- zakim, ??P25 is PaulC
- 16:09:20 [Zakim]
- +PaulC; got it
- 16:09:33 [Zakim]
- -ruchith
- 16:09:58 [Yakov]
- Paul: Discussed new agenda
- 16:10:19 [Yakov]
- Tony Nadalin: will take notes next week
- 16:10:24 [Zakim]
- +ruchith
- 16:10:25 [cferris]
- Regrets: Seumas, Tony Nadalin, Toufic, Umit
- 16:10:37 [bijan]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:10:37 [Zakim]
- bijan should no longer be muted
- 16:10:50 [Zakim]
- +DOrchard
- 16:10:53 [cferris]
- zakim, take up action
- 16:10:54 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'take up action', cferris
- 16:10:58 [Yakov]
- Monica: scribe on Sept 6
- 16:11:12 [bijan]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:11:12 [Zakim]
- bijan should now be muted
- 16:11:17 [sanka]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:11:17 [Zakim]
- sanka? should now be muted
- 16:11:22 [Zakim]
- -mark?
- 16:11:25 [Yakov]
- topic: Review and approval of telcon minutes
- 16:11:26 [cferris]
- zakim, next agendum
- 16:11:26 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Roll call and selection of secretary, Chair" taken up
- 16:11:32 [cferris]
- zakim, next agendum
- 16:11:32 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 was just opened, cferris
- 16:11:34 [ruchith]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:11:34 [Zakim]
- ruchith should now be muted
- 16:11:40 [cferris]
- zakim, take up agendum 1
- 16:11:40 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Roll call and selection of secretary, Chair" taken up
- 16:11:46 [cferris]
- zakim, next agendum
- 16:11:46 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 was just opened, cferris
- 16:12:10 [Zakim]
- +Glen
- 16:12:18 [GlenD]
- GlenD has joined #ws-policy
- 16:12:34 [Yakov]
- Paul: amend the minutes with additional people
- 16:12:36 [dorchard]
- dorchard has joined #ws-policy
- 16:13:07 [Yakov]
- Paul: Umit pointed out the doc is misleading. It'd be useful to fix
- 16:13:12 [bijan]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:13:12 [Zakim]
- bijan should no longer be muted
- 16:13:43 [bijan]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:13:43 [Zakim]
- bijan should now be muted
- 16:13:48 [Yakov]
- Bijan: was present last week as well
- 16:14:05 [prasad]
- q+
- 16:14:09 [Yakov]
- Paul: make changes
- 16:14:24 [Yakov]
- topic:Future WG meetings
- 16:14:25 [prasad]
- I was present also
- 16:14:28 [prasad]
- q-
- 16:14:53 [Yakov]
- Paul: need to register to F2F
- 16:15:02 [FrederickHirsch]
- corrected agenda link: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0137.html
- 16:15:23 [whenry]
- Can we list who are registered?
- 16:15:29 [cferris]
- zakim, move to next agendum
- 16:15:29 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Review and approval of telcon minutes, Chair" taken up
- 16:15:33 [asir]
- Here is the link to reg - http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/39293/policyf2f20060912/
- 16:15:35 [Yakov]
- Paul: please let chairs know about NOT attending
- 16:15:43 [cferris]
- zakim, take up agendum
- 16:15:43 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'take up agendum', cferris
- 16:15:48 [cferris]
- zakim, move to next agendum
- 16:15:48 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 was just opened, cferris
- 16:15:52 [whenry]
- zamkin, unmute me
- 16:15:56 [cferris]
- zakim, take up next agendum
- 16:15:56 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 was just opened, cferris
- 16:16:08 [bijan]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:16:08 [Zakim]
- bijan should no longer be muted
- 16:16:13 [bijan]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:16:13 [Zakim]
- bijan should now be muted
- 16:16:16 [cferris]
- zakim, close this agendum
- 16:16:16 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 closed
- 16:16:17 [Zakim]
- I see 10 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 16:16:18 [Zakim]
- 3. Future WG meetings, Chair
- 16:16:21 [cferris]
- zakim, take up next agendum
- 16:16:21 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Future WG meetings, Chair" taken up
- 16:16:28 [sanka]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:16:28 [Zakim]
- sanka? should no longer be muted
- 16:16:49 [whenry]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:16:49 [Zakim]
- whenry should no longer be muted
- 16:17:28 [Yakov]
- Paul: perosnal registration page -> result
- 16:17:32 [Yakov]
- topic: Editorial team report
- 16:17:41 [cferris]
- zakim, please close this agendum
- 16:17:41 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 closed
- 16:17:42 [Zakim]
- I see 9 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 16:17:43 [Zakim]
- 4. Editorial team report
- 16:17:47 [cferris]
- zakim, next agendum
- 16:17:47 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Editorial team report" taken up
- 16:18:09 [Yakov]
- Prasad: Working on AI - ongoing
- 16:18:54 [Yakov]
- Prasad: AI against W3C staff HTML generation scheme
- 16:19:12 [sanka]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:19:12 [Zakim]
- sanka? should now be muted
- 16:19:13 [Yakov]
- Prasad: Felix will this up
- 16:19:32 [Yakov]
- Prasad: Convert Primer to W3C format
- 16:19:54 [Yakov]
- Prasad: highlight all changes in spec
- 16:20:01 [Yakov]
- Paul: questions?
- 16:20:38 [Yakov]
- Paul: AI-59 AI-51 - outstanding
- 16:21:04 [Yakov]
- Asir: AI-59 AI-51 are done
- 16:21:15 [Yakov]
- Paul: Please update the status
- 16:21:42 [cferris]
- Regrets+ Skip Snow, Charlton Barreto
- 16:21:49 [Yakov]
- topic: Review action items
- 16:22:09 [Yakov]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/open
- 16:22:43 [whenry]
- Is everyone hearing this noise or have I been thrown out?
- 16:22:56 [Yakov]
- Paul AI-35 Glen proposed to close it
- 16:23:03 [danroth]
- danroth has joined #ws-policy
- 16:23:09 [cferris]
- zakim, who is making noise
- 16:23:09 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'who is making noise', cferris
- 16:23:10 [Zakim]
- -whenry
- 16:23:16 [cferris]
- zakim, who is making noise?
- 16:23:27 [Zakim]
- cferris, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Asir (84%), Chris_Ferris (15%), maryann (69%), Yakov (69%)
- 16:23:31 [Yakov]
- resolution: mark the AI-35 as done
- 16:23:45 [Zakim]
- +whenry
- 16:23:46 [Yakov]
- AI-44
- 16:24:12 [Yakov]
- AI-48
- 16:24:34 [Yakov]
- Paul: due on Sep 6
- 16:24:58 [Yakov]
- AI-59, 51 - were done. Asir will update the status
- 16:25:13 [Yakov]
- topic: Detailed review of current drafts
- 16:25:21 [cferris]
- zakim, close agendum
- 16:25:21 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'close agendum', cferris
- 16:25:28 [Yakov]
- Paul: continue to review working drafts
- 16:25:29 [cferris]
- zakim, close this agendum
- 16:25:29 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 closed
- 16:25:30 [Zakim]
- I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 16:25:31 [Zakim]
- 5. Review action items, Chair
- 16:25:34 [cferris]
- zakim, next agendum
- 16:25:34 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Review action items, Chair" taken up
- 16:25:45 [cferris]
- zakim, close this agendum
- 16:25:45 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 closed
- 16:25:46 [Zakim]
- I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 16:25:48 [Zakim]
- 6. Detailed review of current drafts
- 16:25:48 [Yakov]
- topic: Editorial and wording changing issues
- 16:25:51 [cferris]
- zakim, next agendum
- 16:25:53 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "Detailed review of current drafts" taken up
- 16:26:00 [cferris]
- zakim, close this agendum
- 16:26:00 [Zakim]
- agendum 6 closed
- 16:26:04 [Zakim]
- I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 16:26:06 [Zakim]
- 7. Editorial and wording changing issues (30 minutes)
- 16:26:06 [cferris]
- zakim, next agendum
- 16:26:10 [Zakim]
- agendum 7. "Editorial and wording changing issues (30 minutes)" taken up
- 16:26:13 [Yakov]
- topic: a) Typo wsp:tPolicyURIs in Section 3.3 first example
- 16:26:55 [Yakov]
- resolution: assign to editors
- 16:26:57 [asir]
- ACTION: Editors to implement the resolution for issue 3605
- 16:26:57 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-63 - Implement the resolution for issue 3605 [on Editors - due 2006-08-30].
- 16:27:28 [cferris]
- RESOLUTION: Issue 3605 closed as editorial and assigned to the editors to apply
- 16:27:47 [Yakov]
- topic: Conformance Sections needed for both specs, Umit
- 16:28:13 [Yakov]
- Paul: proposes to add empty section and keep the issue open
- 16:28:40 [Yakov]
- action: Asir to draft proposal
- 16:28:40 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-64 - Draft proposal [on Asir Vedamuthu - due 2006-08-30].
- 16:29:11 [cferris]
- action 2 = Asir to draft proposal for issue 3559
- 16:29:17 [asir]
- ACTION: Editors to add empty sections for Conformance in WS-Policy and WS-PolicyAttachment
- 16:29:17 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-65 - Add empty sections for Conformance in WS-Policy and WS-PolicyAttachment [on Editors - due 2006-08-30].
- 16:29:41 [Yakov]
- topic: Remove misleading reference to a Requester policy
- 16:30:32 [Yakov]
- resolution: close the issue 3586 - no changes in the doc
- 16:30:53 [cferris]
- RESOLUTION: close the issue 3586 - no changes in the doc, effectively solved by other work
- 16:31:17 [Yakov]
- topic: Clarify the relation of overlapping definitions in the fr.
- 16:32:08 [Yakov]
- David: Issue 3562 - the work is ongoing
- 16:33:41 [Yakov]
- topic: Possible out of Scope issues
- 16:33:57 [cferris]
- zakim, close this agendum
- 16:33:57 [Zakim]
- agendum 7 closed
- 16:33:58 [Zakim]
- I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 16:33:59 [Zakim]
- 8. Possible out-of-scope issues
- 16:34:32 [prasad]
- s/AI against W3C staff HTML generation scheme/We have diffmk update from Norm Walsh. Seems to work fine. We have an AI assigned to W3C staff to integrate diffmk into WS-Policy build process so that HTML diff version of the specs can generated by invoking a build target/
- 16:34:40 [Yakov]
- Paul: Issue 3592 in not in the scope
- 16:34:47 [cferris]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3592
- 16:35:19 [Yakov]
- s/in not in the scope/is not in the scope
- 16:35:22 [sanka]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:35:22 [Zakim]
- sanka? should no longer be muted
- 16:35:45 [Yakov]
- Glen: looks implementation specific
- 16:35:59 [whenry]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:35:59 [Zakim]
- whenry should now be muted
- 16:36:22 [monica]
- I think this is actually playback.
- 16:36:35 [sanka]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:36:35 [Zakim]
- sanka? should now be muted
- 16:37:14 [prasad]
- s/Convert Primer to W3C format/Converted the "Understanding WS-Policy white paper" converted Primer in W3C format and checked in into CVS/
- 16:37:15 [Yakov]
- action: Willima to chech on Seimas whether to close the issue 3592
- 16:37:15 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - Willima
- 16:37:54 [cferris]
- action 4 = William to check on Seumas as to whether to close issue 3592
- 16:37:57 [Yakov]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3616
- 16:39:17 [dmoberg]
- q+
- 16:39:21 [Yakov]
- Paul: proposes to make it as a candidate to be resolved next
- 16:39:27 [prasad]
- s/highlight all changes in spec/we have a new Non-Normative Appendix in all policy specs called "Changes in this Version of the Document" that provides a list of substantive changes since the last Working Draft. This supplements the Change Log/
- 16:39:48 [Yakov]
- Glen: agrees
- 16:40:11 [danroth]
- +1 to Glen's comment and the chair's proposal
- 16:40:33 [sanka]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:40:33 [Zakim]
- sanka? should no longer be muted
- 16:40:41 [Yakov]
- Dale: negotiation - out-of-scope
- 16:40:59 [GlenD]
- As long as we don't preclude discussion of negotiation use-cases, I think we're good to push particular negotiation mechanisms, etc, off to v.next
- 16:41:15 [sanka]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:41:15 [Zakim]
- sanka? should now be muted
- 16:41:33 [Yakov]
- Dale: intersection is not defined
- 16:41:48 [danroth]
- q+
- 16:41:57 [Yakov]
- Dale: not an issue
- 16:42:10 [cferris]
- note: Dale might want to augment the minutes with his points on the possible inclusion of some ranking attribute
- 16:42:15 [prasad]
- s/converted Primer in/to primer in/
- 16:42:47 [danroth]
- q-
- 16:43:10 [Yakov]
- Chris: there was a lot of support for negotian at F2F
- 16:43:40 [Yakov]
- Paul: mark the issue as be done next
- 16:43:57 [dmoberg]
- A prerequisite of negotiation is that some way of marking ranking or preference exists. So no point of going into negotiation without the prerequisites. But maybe some blessed way of putting ranking on policy alternatives would be useful. Paul notes that this can always be done by an extension.
- 16:44:28 [cferris]
- RESOLUTION: Issue 3616 closed and marked as v.next: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3616
- 16:45:02 [cferris]
- ACTION: PaulC and Chris to investigate how to mark/close an issue as designated for v.next
- 16:45:02 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - PaulC
- 16:45:33 [Yakov]
- topic: Minor Technical Issues (30 minutes)
- 16:45:36 [monica]
- yes it did
- 16:46:15 [cferris]
- zakim, where am i?
- 16:46:15 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, cferris.
- 16:46:21 [cferris]
- rrsagent, where am i?
- 16:46:21 [RRSAgent]
- See http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T16-46-21
- 16:47:54 [asir]
- ACTION: Editors to implement the resolution for issue 3561
- 16:47:55 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-68 - Implement the resolution for issue 3561 [on Editors - due 2006-08-30].
- 16:48:25 [asir]
- ACTION: Chris to update issue 3561 (on behalf of Felix)
- 16:48:25 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - Chris
- 16:48:36 [cferris]
- RESOLUTION: 3561 close with proposal in message 65 as amended by 73
- 16:49:06 [Yakov]
- b) Policy Application to Web services Model description inac
- 16:50:12 [prasad]
- Applied in the Web services
- 16:50:12 [prasad]
- model, policy is used to convey the conditions for an interaction between a Web
- 16:50:12 [prasad]
- service requestor and a Web service provider.”
- 16:51:35 [asir]
- ACTION: Editors to implement the resolution for issue 3552
- 16:51:35 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-69 - Implement the resolution for issue 3552 [on Editors - due 2006-08-30].
- 16:51:39 [Yakov]
- RESOLUTION: close with the issue http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3552
- 16:52:03 [FrederickHirsch]
- 3549 proposal : http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/att-0117/policy-framework-3549-proposal.pdf
- 16:52:14 [cferris]
- RESOLUTION: Issue 3552 closed with proposal in bugzilla entry http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3552
- 16:52:18 [Yakov]
- c) Require assertions to be distinguished from parameter elements, Frederick http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3549
- 16:52:27 [danroth]
- q+
- 16:53:08 [Yakov]
- Frederick: proposes to continue the discussion
- 16:54:05 [Yakov]
- Frederick: this issue is only to separate parameters from assertions
- 16:55:31 [asir]
- q+
- 16:55:44 [Yakov]
- Paul: Frederick needs clarifications ot the email loop http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0117.html
- 16:55:45 [paulc]
- ack dm
- 16:55:49 [paulc]
- ack dan
- 16:55:55 [Yakov]
- s/ot/on
- 16:56:41 [Yakov]
- Frederick: normalization now is a separate issue
- 16:57:11 [Fabian]
- q+
- 16:57:14 [Yakov]
- Dan: please provide some examples to illustrate the ambiguity
- 16:57:21 [Zakim]
- -Abbie_Barbir
- 16:57:53 [danroth]
- q+
- 16:57:57 [paulc]
- ack asir
- 16:57:59 [Yakov]
- Frederick: need to add some additional details in the text to overall model
- 16:58:10 [Zakim]
- +Abbie_Barbir
- 16:58:32 [Yakov]
- Asir: agrees on the substance but need to understand what exactly should be clarified
- 16:58:33 [paulc]
- ack fabian
- 16:58:39 [FrederickHirsch]
- q+
- 16:59:16 [Yakov]
- Fabian: please define the term "nested assertion"
- 16:59:18 [paulc]
- nested assertion is still not defined in Frederick's proposal
- 17:00:05 [cferris]
- q+
- 17:00:10 [paulc]
- ack dan
- 17:00:13 [paulc]
- ack fred
- 17:00:21 [Yakov]
- Dan: the text is correct. Clarifying the issue may create a problem
- 17:00:55 [danroth]
- q+
- 17:00:59 [Yakov]
- Frederick: the goal was to have a discussion and also to make it clear how to do the nesting
- 17:01:10 [asir]
- Frederick, I answered this question on e-mail - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0140.html
- 17:01:21 [paulc]
- ack cferris
- 17:02:05 [paulc]
- q+
- 17:02:07 [Yakov]
- Christopher: need clarification of the issue
- 17:02:27 [maryann]
- q+
- 17:02:35 [paulc]
- ack dan
- 17:02:42 [Zakim]
- +??P9
- 17:02:45 [Yakov]
- Dan: proposes to discuss the issue in Primer
- 17:02:51 [Zakim]
- -Prasad_Yendluri
- 17:03:42 [Yakov]
- Paul: Frederich should enumarate the questions, and others to review
- 17:03:50 [paulc]
- ack maryann
- 17:03:54 [paulc]
- ack paulc
- 17:03:58 [FrederickHirsch]
- q+
- 17:04:24 [Yakov]
- Mayann: Amend the proposal to move this to Primer
- 17:04:42 [Yakov]
- s/Mayann/Maryann
- 17:05:03 [monica]
- q+
- 17:05:13 [paulc]
- ack fred
- 17:05:31 [paulc]
- ack monica
- 17:05:55 [monica]
- q-
- 17:06:15 [Yakov]
- Monica: also proposes to consider pushing this to Primer
- 17:06:52 [monica]
- Correction: We should be conscious not to push so much to the Primer so it doesn't implicitly become a normative document.
- 17:07:12 [Yakov]
- ACTION: Frederick to enumarate th equestion - issue http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3549
- 17:07:12 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-70 - Enumarate th equestion - issue http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3549 [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2006-08-30].
- 17:07:36 [Yakov]
- s/ th equestion/ the questions
- 17:08:44 [Yakov]
- ACTION: Dan to review for issue 3549 the material in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0117.html
- 17:08:44 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - Dan
- 17:09:08 [danroth]
- ACTION: danroth to review for issue 3549 the material in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0117.html
- 17:09:08 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - danroth
- 17:09:30 [Yakov]
- topic: Add discussion/examples of domain expressions
- 17:09:36 [asir]
- q+
- 17:09:55 [paulc]
- ack asir
- 17:10:42 [cferris]
- q+
- 17:11:29 [paulc]
- ack cferris
- 17:11:35 [Yakov]
- Paul: Issue 3557 - Asir to get clarification from Ashok through email
- 17:13:09 [Yakov]
- topic: Major Technical Issues (30 minutes)
- 17:13:31 [cferris]
- expectation setting, re-raise this discussion after umit and ashok have had a chance to respond
- 17:13:39 [maryann]
- so chris suggested that Umit will be on vacation and that she will then probably need some time to respond to issue 3557
- 17:13:44 [cferris]
- zakim, close this agendum
- 17:13:44 [Zakim]
- I do not know what agendum had been taken up, cferris
- 17:14:41 [asir]
- Chris Proposal - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0130.html
- 17:14:56 [asir]
- Asir's Amendments - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0133.html
- 17:15:21 [Yakov]
- Christopher: Issue 3544 - proposal to clarify list of elements, which are extensible via elements or attributes
- 17:16:02 [Yakov]
- Christopher: agrees with Asir's ammendments
- 17:16:43 [asir]
- ACTION: Editors to implement the resolution for issue 3544
- 17:16:43 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-71 - Implement the resolution for issue 3544 [on Editors - due 2006-08-30].
- 17:16:50 [cferris]
- RESOLUTION: Issue 3544 closed with proposal from Chris as amended by Asir's email 133 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0133.html
- 17:17:34 [Yakov]
- topic: b) Normalization should make empty nested policy elements
- 17:17:35 [FrederickHirsch]
- q+
- 17:18:26 [cferris]
- ack fre
- 17:18:31 [Yakov]
- Frederick: Proposes to close the issue
- 17:18:49 [Yakov]
- see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0063.html
- 17:19:03 [Yakov]
- Asir: agrees with Frederick
- 17:19:41 [FrederickHirsch]
- s/see/Item not correct:
- 17:19:51 [FrederickHirsch]
- explanation - case cannot occur
- 17:19:54 [cferris]
- RESOLUTION: Issue 3548 closed with exlanation in bugzilla entry http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3548. The edge case can never occur
- 17:20:16 [Yakov]
- topic: c) Semantics of successful intersection determined by domain-specific assertion content
- 17:20:40 [Yakov]
- Paul: there is no any proposal
- 17:20:48 [cferris]
- glen intends this to start the discussion
- 17:21:38 [cferris]
- paul suggests some email discussion working off of this thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0138.html
- 17:22:55 [maryann]
- update with a pointer to the email thread?
- 17:23:05 [Yakov]
- ACTION: Glen to update 3577bugzilla
- 17:23:06 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-72 - Update 3577bugzilla [on Glen Daniels - due 2006-08-30].
- 17:23:41 [Yakov]
- topic: d) Optional Assertions may not be usable in all circumstances
- 17:24:00 [cferris]
- action 13 = Glen to update 3577bugzilla entry with the suggested format we're using
- 17:24:09 [Yakov]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0039.html
- 17:24:27 [asir]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0075.html
- 17:25:02 [cferris]
- continue discussion of issue 3564 on the mailing list
- 17:25:05 [Yakov]
- Paul: proposes to continue the email discussion
- 17:25:52 [sanka]
- zakim, sanka? is me
- 17:25:52 [Zakim]
- +sanka; got it
- 17:26:11 [Zakim]
- + +1.604.681.aaii
- 17:26:11 [Yakov]
- Glen: clarifies that email thread contained the necessary details. Will add then to bugzilla
- 17:26:38 [Yakov]
- s/then to bugzilla/them to bugzilla
- 17:26:39 [toufic]
- toufic has joined #ws-policy
- 17:27:46 [cferris]
- zakim, next agendum
- 17:27:46 [Zakim]
- agendum 8. "Possible out-of-scope issues" taken up
- 17:27:56 [cferris]
- zakim, close this agendum
- 17:27:56 [Zakim]
- agendum 8 closed
- 17:27:56 [whenry]
- I had replied to Umit on this topic - I replied to the group
- 17:27:57 [Zakim]
- I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 17:27:58 [Zakim]
- 9. Minor technical issues (30 minutes)
- 17:28:00 [cferris]
- zakim, next agendum
- 17:28:00 [Zakim]
- agendum 9. "Minor technical issues (30 minutes)" taken up
- 17:28:11 [cferris]
- zakim, close this agendum
- 17:28:11 [Zakim]
- agendum 9 closed
- 17:28:12 [Yakov]
- topic: New issues (since Aug 7)
- 17:28:13 [Zakim]
- I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 17:28:14 [Zakim]
- 10. major technical issues (30 minutes)
- 17:28:15 [cferris]
- zakim, next agendum
- 17:28:15 [Zakim]
- agendum 10. "major technical issues (30 minutes)" taken up
- 17:28:20 [cferris]
- zakim, close this agendum
- 17:28:20 [Zakim]
- agendum 10 closed
- 17:28:21 [Zakim]
- I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 17:28:22 [Zakim]
- 11. New issues
- 17:28:24 [cferris]
- zakim, next agendum
- 17:28:24 [Zakim]
- agendum 11. "New issues" taken up
- 17:28:56 [Yakov]
- a) Policy framework should document extensibility points
- 17:29:28 [maryann]
- q+
- 17:30:20 [Yakov]
- David: Issue 3590 is open. The proposal from Asir to close without action
- 17:31:09 [Yakov]
- David: framework has extensibility points, which are documented well
- 17:32:11 [Yakov]
- David: Attrribute can be added to the policy or to the policy reference
- 17:33:44 [Yakov]
- Child elements for policy reference. Any child should be treated as assertion. It should be documented
- 17:33:59 [paulc]
- ack maryann
- 17:34:56 [Yakov]
- David: make a change in a notational convention
- 17:35:13 [asir]
- q+
- 17:36:30 [Yakov]
- Christopher: Proposes to close the issue and assign it to the Editors.
- 17:37:45 [paulc]
- ack asir
- 17:38:00 [cferris]
- here are the 5 :
- 17:38:38 [cferris]
- wsp:Policy/@{any}
- 17:38:38 [cferris]
- wsp:Policy/.../wsp:PolicyReference/@{any}
- 17:38:38 [cferris]
- wsp:Policy/.../wsp:PolicyReference/{any}
- 17:38:38 [cferris]
- wsp:Policy/wsp:ExactlyOne/@{any}
- 17:38:38 [cferris]
- wsp:Policy/wsp:ExactlyOne/wsp:All/@{any}
- 17:38:54 [cferris]
- the first two can be handled editorially, since the elipses are already in the spec
- 17:39:07 [asir]
- link is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0108.html
- 17:40:54 [cferris]
- daveo's are about attributes... asir's point out element extensibility
- 17:41:13 [Yakov]
- David: extensibility points are not clearly documented
- 17:41:38 [cferris]
- daveo suggests that this confusion may be exactly why we need some clarity in the spec
- 17:42:22 [cferris]
- proposal part 1, document attribute extensbility of wsp:Policy/@{any} and wsp:Policy/.../wsp:PolicyReference/@{any}
- 17:42:39 [cferris]
- part2 are the remaining 3 in bugzilla
- 17:43:03 [cferris]
- plus the ones pointed out by Asir
- 17:44:22 [asir]
- q+
- 17:44:29 [cferris]
- +1 to daveo
- 17:44:29 [paulc]
- ack asir
- 17:44:49 [cferris]
- q+
- 17:45:24 [danroth]
- q+
- 17:45:37 [Yakov]
- Paul: need email dialog between Asir and David about extensibilty point
- 17:45:53 [Yakov]
- s/extensibilty point/extensibilty points/
- 17:46:10 [danroth]
- q-
- 17:46:33 [paulc]
- ack cf
- 17:46:56 [cferris]
- ACTION: Editors to apply proposal part 1, document attribute extensbility of wsp:Policy/@{any} and wsp:Policy/.../wsp:PolicyReference/@{any}
- 17:46:58 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-73 - Apply proposal part 1, document attribute extensbility of wsp:Policy/@{any} and wsp:Policy/.../wsp:PolicyReference/@{any} [on Editors - due 2006-08-30].
- 17:47:38 [asir]
- q+
- 17:48:39 [Yakov]
- Chris: Proposes to make everything extansible
- 17:48:40 [Fabian]
- now, bijan, that's at least a motivation we can put in the spec :-)
- 17:49:36 [paulc]
- ack asir
- 17:49:48 [cferris]
- ACTION: Asir and daveO to carry on the discussion of extensibility points on the mailing list
- 17:49:48 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-74 - And daveO to carry on the discussion of extensibility points on the mailing list [on Asir Vedamuthu - due 2006-08-30].
- 17:50:58 [Yakov]
- Asir: Proposes to create a new issue with the requirements to extensibility points
- 17:51:14 [Yakov]
- David and Paul disagree
- 17:51:29 [cferris]
- paul agrees with daveo that there is no need of the overhead of a separate issue for dealing with those points that are in disagreement
- 17:52:32 [Yakov]
- topic: Coordination item, Maryann Hondo
- 17:53:00 [Yakov]
- Maryann: already sent a note to WS-Addressing
- 17:53:14 [cferris]
- q+
- 17:53:15 [Yakov]
- Paul: please update in bugzilla
- 17:53:45 [Zakim]
- -Lee
- 17:53:52 [paulc]
- ack cf
- 17:54:08 [Yakov]
- Christopher: Proposes to defer c)
- 17:54:36 [Yakov]
- f)Clarify conversion of compact to normal form in Framework section 4.
- 17:55:46 [Yakov]
- Frederick: Possibly there are some issues in specifying the normalization process
- 17:56:57 [Yakov]
- Paul: Need to start email thread with bug# reference
- 17:57:17 [Yakov]
- and insert the link to bugzilla
- 17:58:26 [Yakov]
- Paul: email dialog + bugzilla
- 17:58:35 [Zakim]
- -dmoberg
- 17:58:45 [cferris]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:58:45 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-minutes.html cferris
- 17:58:45 [dmoberg]
- dmoberg has left #ws-policy
- 17:58:52 [Zakim]
- -Monica
- 17:59:01 [Zakim]
- -Glen
- 17:59:04 [Zakim]
- -Asir
- 17:59:05 [Zakim]
- -sanka
- 17:59:05 [Zakim]
- -JCrump
- 17:59:07 [Zakim]
- -Frederick_Hirsch
- 17:59:08 [Zakim]
- -Yakov
- 17:59:09 [Zakim]
- -maryann
- 17:59:10 [Zakim]
- -Chris_Ferris
- 17:59:11 [Zakim]
- -prasad
- 17:59:12 [JCrump]
- JCrump has left #ws-policy
- 17:59:13 [Zakim]
- - +1.604.681.aaii
- 17:59:14 [Zakim]
- -PaulC
- 17:59:15 [Zakim]
- -whenry
- 17:59:17 [Zakim]
- -bijan
- 17:59:20 [Zakim]
- -Fabian
- 17:59:27 [Zakim]
- -DOrchard
- 17:59:28 [maryann]
- -maryann
- 17:59:28 [sanka]
- sanka has left #ws-policy
- 17:59:40 [maryann]
- maryann has left #ws-policy
- 17:59:42 [cferris]
- zakim, who is here?
- 17:59:42 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see ruchith (muted), Abbie_Barbir
- 17:59:43 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see toufic, danroth, dorchard, monica, prasad, asir, whenry, abbie, Fabian, Zakim, RRSAgent, cferris, paulc, charlton, trackbot
- 17:59:52 [cferris]
- zakim, disconnect r
- 17:59:52 [Zakim]
- ruchith is being disconnected
- 17:59:53 [Zakim]
- -ruchith
- 17:59:54 [Zakim]
- -Abbie_Barbir
- 17:59:55 [Zakim]
- WS_Policy()12:00PM has ended
- 17:59:57 [cferris]
- zakim, disconnect a
- 17:59:58 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.508.628.aaaa, Fabian, Abbie_Barbir, +44.796.805.aabb, whenry, JCrump, dmoberg, Frederick_Hirsch, +1.781.643.aaee, Chris_Ferris, bijan, +1.415.402.aagg, Yakov,
- 18:00:01 [Zakim]
- ... +44.796.805.aahh, maryann, Lee, Dan, Prasad_Yendluri, ruchith, Monica, mark?, PaulC, DOrchard, Glen, prasad, sanka, +1.604.681.aaii
- 18:00:04 [Zakim]
- sorry, cferris, I don't know what conference this is
- 18:03:28 [cferris]
- Present: Yakov, Fabian, Abbie_Barbir, Asir, William Henry, JCrump, Dale Moberg, Monica, Frederick_Hirsch, maryann, Chris_Ferris, Bijan, +1.617.933.aaff, Jong Lee, PaulC,
- 18:04:13 [cferris]
- Present+ Dave Orchard, Sanka,
- 18:04:24 [cferris]
- rrsagent, make minutes member
- 18:04:24 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes member', cferris. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 18:08:06 [cferris]
- zakim, please excuse us
- 18:08:06 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #ws-policy
- 18:08:14 [cferris]
- rrsagent, please excuse us
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- I see 15 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-actions.rdf :
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Editors to implement the resolution for issue 3605 [1]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T16-26-57
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Asir to draft proposal for issue 3559 [2]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T16-28-40
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Editors to add empty sections for Conformance in WS-Policy and WS-PolicyAttachment [3]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T16-29-17
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: William to check on Seumas as to whether to close issue 3592 [4]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T16-37-15
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: PaulC and Chris to investigate how to mark/close an issue as designated for v.next [5]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T16-45-02
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Editors to implement the resolution for issue 3561 [6]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T16-47-54
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Chris to update issue 3561 (on behalf of Felix) [7]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T16-48-25
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Editors to implement the resolution for issue 3552 [8]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T16-51-35
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Frederick to enumarate th equestion - issue http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3549 [9]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T17-07-12
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Dan to review for issue 3549 the material in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0117.html [10]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T17-08-44
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: danroth to review for issue 3549 the material in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0117.html [11]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T17-09-08
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Editors to implement the resolution for issue 3544 [12]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T17-16-43
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Glen to update 3577bugzilla entry with the suggested format we're using [13]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T17-23-05
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Editors to apply proposal part 1, document attribute extensbility of wsp:Policy/@{any} and wsp:Policy/.../wsp:PolicyReference/@{any} [14]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T17-46-56
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Asir and daveO to carry on the discussion of extensibility points on the mailing list [15]
- 18:08:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/23-ws-policy-irc#T17-49-48