1 Everyone all 13 Abhishek Rungta arungta 8 Alistair Miles ajm65 17 Antoine Isaac aisaac 6 Ben Adida adida 4 Bernard Horan bhoran 27 Clay Redding credding 19 Dan Brickley dbrickle2 33 Daniel Maycock dmaycock 20 Daniel Rubin drubin 31 David Peterson dpeterso 15 Diego Berrueta dberruet 26 Ed Summers esummers 11 Elisa Kendall ekendall 7 Fabien Gandon fgandon 3 Francesco de Leo fdeleo 5 Guus Schreiber gschreib 22 Jan Henke jhenke 18 Jon Phipps jphipps 28 Justin Thorp jthorp2 29 Justin Thorp jthorp 30 Manu Sporny msporny 32 Margherita Sini msini 14 Michael Hausenblas mhausenb 10 Mirghani Mohamed mmohamed2 25 Quentin Reul qreul 12 Rachel Yager ryager 2 Ralph Swick rswick 16 Sean Bechhofer sbechhof2 24 Siegfried Handschuh shandsch 21 Simone Onofri sonofri 9 Thomas Baker tbaker3 23 Vit Novacek vnovacek 1 All 2 RDFa 3 SKOS 4 VM 5 Recipes 1 2 6 2007-01-24 The concept of reification has been confusing and awkward to use (in RDF/XML at least). Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0007.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20070621133748.0357f868@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2007-06-21 RDFa Telecon swick@w3.org 2007-06-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/4681CE58.6020009@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification ben@adida.net 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852011C57B9@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0706270709p36d5bf0bnae14c32ee2640f6f@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706270744g621e3085x14322b811e7bedce@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/cf8107640706271523t7d62dca9k96cd26dee75f1e2@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification lindstream@gmail.com 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/46836CF8.2030705@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification ivan@w3.org 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/468915BC.4000300@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/46891656.1040500@sun.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468938E7.3070002@cs.vu.nl Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A5D1A.2000005@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0707030743j62fc4bd7h96f373f578043100@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A2950020000D8000156B0@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D030E3E5D@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk belated regrets (was RE: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/468BD635.3010401@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification ben@adida.net 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/468BDA30.6050904@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-1: PROPOSE to RESOLVE ben@adida.net 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070705110516.047e10c8@med.stanford.edu Minutes from July 3 tcon rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-07-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/4693B82E.4080801@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: PROPOSE to RESOLVE ben@adida.net 2007-07-10 2007-07-10 closed with the following resolution: "XHTML1.1+RDFa does not provide any compact syntax to enable reification. If some RDF-based notation exists for reification, there may be a way to express such graphs in XHTML1.1+RDFa, but the spec will not make any effort to simplify it or provide syntactic sugar." 2 2 6 2007-01-30 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/46771559.5050704@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand ben@adida.net 2007-06-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/cf8107640706181727t8885ff6y7f4f9149e36968de@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand lindstream@gmail.com 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/467795BD.5030502@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand ivan@w3.org 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706190809v287a825ekaf301043db3603a9@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/46780CF1.8050004@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand ben@adida.net 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/4681CDC7.3060105@adida.net [RDFa] Proposed resolutions to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4 ben@adida.net 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/468915BC.4000300@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/46891656.1040500@sun.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468938E7.3070002@cs.vu.nl Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A5D1A.2000005@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0707030743j62fc4bd7h96f373f578043100@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A2950020000D8000156B0@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468AF585.2010400@adida.net [RDFa] RESOLUTIONS to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4 ben@adida.net 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D030E3E5D@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk belated regrets (was RE: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070705110516.047e10c8@med.stanford.edu Minutes from July 3 tcon rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-07-05 2007-07-04 RESOLVED as: "XHTML1.1+RDFa does not support custom attributes for RDF shorthand. Future versions of RDFa in other host languages may support additional ways of expressing semantics." 3 2 6 2007-01-30 Tentative Resolution: class is rdf:type, while role is xhtml2:role. Related: Syntactic Sugar for class attribute Initial Motivation was to reduce the use of rdf:type in some examples. Discussions: July 2006: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Jun/0009 August 2005: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005Aug/0003 July 2005: http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#item02 Points of Debate about role: + should we use role in some RDF way that is equivalent to rdf:type at all? + if we do, does that mean role is equivalent to rdf:type, or is a subproperty of rdf:type? + is role more of a declaration of "plays the role of" for purposes of client user interface? + maybe we need a new syntactic sugar for rdf:type? But that's possibly a slippery slope. Points of Debate about class: + should class be rdf:type? Another predicate? + Mark's post: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Jun/0009 + only for scoped classes-discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Feb/0063.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20070621133748.0357f868@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2007-06-21 RDFa Telecon swick@w3.org 2007-06-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/4681CF16.5090702@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type ben@adida.net 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/4681E894.2060106@aptest.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type shane@aptest.com 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852011C57BA@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46836F5A.5090705@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type ivan@w3.org 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706280302h51e52496y876f94fe77e1a2e0@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/46838812.6060304@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type ivan@w3.org 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/4683C263.8000204@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type ben@adida.net 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/4683C2F3.6030900@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type ivan@w3.org 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706280729y78b9b170pdbf7f9d7a952462a@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/4683CFE5.5090003@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type ben@adida.net 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706280909i6849b24ama52d751b113c1eb1@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/4683E05E.7020607@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type ivan@w3.org 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706280929p1fbbb4dai8889e6250957a5eb@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/4683EC75.6060402@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type ben@adida.net 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706281035u5716762eqa037503a27d2510@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706281037x15a1cb09o26e66acd8e8ca1f2@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/468915BC.4000300@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/46891656.1040500@sun.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468938E7.3070002@cs.vu.nl Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A5D1A.2000005@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0707030743j62fc4bd7h96f373f578043100@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A2950020000D8000156B0@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D030E3E5D@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk belated regrets (was RE: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070705110516.047e10c8@med.stanford.edu Minutes from July 3 tcon rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-07-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/4696722C.9060409@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type ben@adida.net 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/46973D5E.1030101@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type ivan@w3.org 2007-07-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/469C079F.8090201@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type ben@adida.net 2007-07-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D2985201211DCD@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060707162350v462bca15vddd1b5c8df1de276@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070717070604.GA1628@Octavius Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/469C6E51.7060305@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type ivan@w3.org 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/469C7A7E.5080302@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type ivan@w3.org 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/1184663024.4766.10.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/469C9FF9.5000509@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type ivan@w3.org 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/cf8107640707170447u3bc8e15xdd8ee6345b5080e7@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type lindstream@gmail.com 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060707170615t1a1863edqa1e7bdae08f9424d@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/op.tvpviymnsmjzpq@acer3010.lan Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) steven.pemberton@cwi.nl 2007-07-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/469F7C53.6010305@adida.net Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) ben@adida.net 2007-07-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A078C2.8050706@w3.org Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) ivan@w3.org 2007-07-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852012121C3@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-07-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A07DA3.4050802@w3.org Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) ivan@w3.org 2007-07-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852012121D1@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-07-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A084D4.70100@w3.org Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) ivan@w3.org 2007-07-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060707200324l5ce07524mb8f933ebee8547de@mail.gmail.com Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-07-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/op.tvrd9ygn63ayaz@keith-alexanders-computer.local Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com 2007-07-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/cf8107640707200437j695df2e2lf0d953314b00a59@mail.gmail.com Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) lindstream@gmail.com 2007-07-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A0C67E.3090807@adida.net Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) ben@adida.net 2007-07-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/337D3644-5467-4194-AD00-E80F7A438E9C@w3.org Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) karl@w3.org 2007-07-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0708012327k1859a224pea7a17d71a283f09@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-08-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/op.tx6jpc18smjzpq@acer3010.lan Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) steven.pemberton@cwi.nl 2007-09-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/47044766.6040908@adida.net ISSUE-3: Attribute for RDF type declarations ben@adida.net 2007-10-03 2007-02-05 - on 2007-01-29, we discussed feedback from the WG and TimBL regarding the overloading of CLASS being too confusing for existing uses of CLASS. Considering applying this only to scoped CLASSes. 2007-10-18 Noting Steven's dissent, this is resolved: "@role and @class are thus ignored by the core RDFa specification, while @instanceof is syntactic sugar for rdf:type, and takes a CURIE as value." http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Oct/0020.html 4 2 6 2007-01-30 Tentative resolution: to use the REL attribute on other elements to allow striping and thus bnode creation without explicit names (cf. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Oct/0000) How to refer to blank nodes, viz. nodes that do not have an externally referencable identifer (http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-URI- Vocabulary) from within an XHTML document. How do we get anonymous nodes (http://www.xforms- wiki.com/bin/view/Main/LanguageRdfA#How_do_we_get_anonymous_nodes)? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/4677230E.3040606@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers ben@adida.net 2007-06-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/4677970C.7080108@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers ivan@w3.org 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706190540x284ca89bkc1a0de4f2d3339fe@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/4681CDC7.3060105@adida.net [RDFa] Proposed resolutions to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4 ben@adida.net 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0706270721l2843ca8cv8a6ee6645362d179@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/468915BC.4000300@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/46891656.1040500@sun.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468938E7.3070002@cs.vu.nl Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A5D1A.2000005@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0707030743j62fc4bd7h96f373f578043100@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A2950020000D8000156B0@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468AF585.2010400@adida.net [RDFa] RESOLUTIONS to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4 ben@adida.net 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D030E3E5D@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk belated regrets (was RE: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070705110516.047e10c8@med.stanford.edu Minutes from July 3 tcon rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-07-05 2007-07-04 RESOLVED as: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/#id2266829 5 2 6 2007-01-30 Details discussed during telecon (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005Oct/0052.html). Debate continuing on the mailing list (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Feb/0027.html). Currently, about and href attributes are of type CURIE/URI, which means that the value of the attribute can be either a CURIE or a URI. When it is a CURIE, it needs to be wrapped in square brackets as follows: [cc:license], in order to differentiate CURIEs from URIs. Should rel, rev, property have the same CURIE/URI type? Or should they be CURIE only, since there is no precedent for them being URIs? The advantage of CURIE only is that we get automatic backwards compatibility for things like rel="next", which would be interpreted as CURIE in the default XML namespace of xhtml2. If we go with CURIE/URI, then we can always declare parser-level legacy conditions for things like rel="next", which would immediately be transformed into rel="[next]" or maybe even more directly to rel="[xhtml2:next]". 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/46771636.408@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-5 ben@adida.net 2007-06-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/cf8107640706181730q39b07575ld557eb7620d10926@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 lindstream@gmail.com 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/467799B2.8040709@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 ivan@w3.org 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/4677E4C1.70906@aptest.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 shane@aptest.com 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852011C5121@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/46780DD2.30304@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 ben@adida.net 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/4678DABC.7030101@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 ivan@w3.org 2007-06-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/46794F9C.3040304@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 ben@adida.net 2007-06-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706210229t4fe206b6q314e174f915dbbdd@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/4681CDC7.3060105@adida.net [RDFa] Proposed resolutions to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4 ben@adida.net 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/468915BC.4000300@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/46891656.1040500@sun.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468938E7.3070002@cs.vu.nl Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A5D1A.2000005@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0707030743j62fc4bd7h96f373f578043100@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A2950020000D8000156B0@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468AF585.2010400@adida.net [RDFa] RESOLUTIONS to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4 ben@adida.net 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D030E3E5D@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk belated regrets (was RE: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070705110516.047e10c8@med.stanford.edu Minutes from July 3 tcon rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-07-05 2007-07-04 RESOLVED as: "@rel/@rev/@property does *not* accept URI values, only CURIEs." Note ISSUE-55 which may downgrade CURIEs to QNames. 6 2 6 2007-01-30 In the RDFa Syntax document (cf. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/), xml:lang is discarded for XML literals. While this may have been okay for RDF/XML, it's much worse for XHTML, which should be treated with "more respect." The fix for this may involve adding an extra SPAN or DIV as appropriate to XML literals. Likely dependent on ISSUE-97: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/97 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20070621133748.0357f868@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2007-06-21 RDFa Telecon swick@w3.org 2007-06-21 2008-02-19 The 2007-08-23 telecon resolved [[ RESOLUTION: @lang is not part of XHTML1.1, @xml:lang is, so we resolve that XHTML1.1+RDFa will only support @xml:lang. ]] http://www.w3.org/2007/08/23-rdfa-minutes#item01 2008-03-12 added argument for relating this to ISSUE-97: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0155.html 2008-04-30 CLOSED, since it is resolved. 7 2 6 2007-01-30 We need to address all comments from Christian Hoertnagl (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005Dec/0035.html ): 1. reifying LINK 2. CURIE/URI ambiguity 3. string v. XMLLiteral 4., 13. precision about number of generated triples 5., 6., 8., 9., 12., 14., 15. 16. editorial 7. namespace usage 10. specify behavior when href is absent 11. details of canonicalization 1 2008-05-08 responded in detail in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0038.html, and RESOLVED in telecon. 8 2 6 2007-01-30 The RDFa containers proposal (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2006- rdfa-containers) does not address DL. We should eventually address it. 4 http://www.w3.org/mid/46956362.5070305@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa ben@adida.net 2007-07-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D2985201211AE5@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060707120135u12b3bb54ld84ccf73cca2a47a@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/46960365.6030308@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa ivan@w3.org 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/469606CD.1070805@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa ivan@w3.org 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/469607C4.8040705@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa ivan@w3.org 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/469634B2.6020005@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa ben@adida.net 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/1184251753.4187.163.camel@pav Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa connolly@w3.org 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/469640E7.20603@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa ben@adida.net 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/1184252603.4187.173.camel@pav Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa connolly@w3.org 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/46967ACF.6040603@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa ben@adida.net 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/1184268117.4187.256.camel@pav Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa connolly@w3.org 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D2985201211BA2@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/469C09E9.4060709@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa ben@adida.net 2007-07-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/469C852E.1060203@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa ivan@w3.org 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/1184688743.4187.413.camel@pav Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa connolly@w3.org 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/469CEB05.2040908@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa ben@adida.net 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/469DEC8A.5070403@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa ivan@w3.org 2007-07-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070718122101.GA2440@Octavius Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-07-18 2007-06-13 updated this issue to discuss containers in general, since we haven't approved this. 2008-02-22 POSTPONED per http://www.w3.org/2008/02/21-rdfa-minutes.html#item03 (i.e. not in version 1) 9 2 6 2007-01-30 In Discussion as of 2006-12-18 What happens if we nest meta's and link's ? Proposed Resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml- tf/2006Apr/0007.html - The subject of the inners are the same as the subject of the outer. In particular, if the outer has a about, then that's the subject for the inners. If the outer has no about, then the subject is the outer's immediate parent. A good example was given in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Mar/0060 4 http://www.w3.org/mid/468BD635.3010401@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification ben@adida.net 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/468BD7D4.6080903@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-9: META and LINK in the body ben@adida.net 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/468CA00C.3040909@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: META and LINK in the body ivan@w3.org 2007-07-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060707050205t1e114871lf7499a7b9e369e2c@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: META and LINK in the body mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-07-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/46927BD7.5060505@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META ben@adida.net 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060707091446u6f527e9bjc5f0bf41854379b1@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/46935973.303@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META ivan@w3.org 2007-07-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/4693B8D6.8090503@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META, link to ISSUE-12 ben@adida.net 2007-07-10 2007-07-12 this will NOT happen in XHTML 1.1+RDFa, but we may consider it for XHTML2. 10 2 6 2007-01-30 How can we resolve CURIEs? Note (2006-05-13): As the TF is considering grounding CURIEs in the current URI (possibly followed by "#"), this may no longer be an issue. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/46FBD9B4.60501@adida.net ISSUE-10: RESOLVED - XHTML 1.1 namespace doesn't end in / or # ben@adida.net 2007-09-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/a707f8300709280248y5ff0da48k739cb57c8339072c@mail.gmail.com Re: ISSUE-10: RESOLVED - XHTML 1.1 namespace doesn't end in / or # mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com 2007-09-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/cf8107640709280552i607c994ane0fb20aa02723bea@mail.gmail.com Re: ISSUE-10: RESOLVED - XHTML 1.1 namespace doesn't end in / or # lindstream@gmail.com 2007-09-28 2007-09-27 2007-09-27: resolved to have a prefix of http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab# for all reserved values of @rel. 11 2 6 2007-01-30 Comments regarding the RDFa Primer document (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/ ). + Elias Torres sent comments on June 3rd, 2006: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Jun/0008.html + Lee Feigenbaum sent comments on May 31st, 2006: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Jun/0001.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852016638B9@RZJC2EX.jr1.local meeting record: 2008-04-24 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2008-04-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D298520166398A@RZJC2EX.jr1.local [RDFa] Comments on the RDFa Primer michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2008-04-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080501123531.04398fb0@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-05-01 RDFa telecon swick@w3.org 2008-05-01 2008-04-30 RESOLVED as "Michael to respond to Elias and Lee that the RDFa Primer has changed substantially and invite for new comments. This issue is closed." 12 2 6 2007-02-05 (for Bob DuCharme) 4 http://www.w3.org/mid/4693B8D6.8090503@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META, link to ISSUE-12 ben@adida.net 2007-07-10 2007-07-12 this will NOT happen for XHTML1.1+RDFa, but we may consider it for XHTML2. 13 2 14 2007-02-07 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2005-current-issues 1 2007-02-07 Closed due to [1], Topic 1. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Feb/0018.html 2007-02-13 [RRS] Open issues are carried forward to tracker as open issues. Closed issues were not carried forward; this single issue serves as a pointer to the old closed issues. 14 5 18 2007-02-13 Verify minimal required overrides. 1 2007-02-13 Diego's test results: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jan/0005.html Diego's proposed resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jan/0033.html 15 5 18 2007-02-13 Says: "If you are using a slash namespace and want to provide both RDF and HTML content, where the HTML content is served as individual hyperlinked documents for each class or property, and where the RDF is served as bounded descriptions of each class or property, see recipe 6 (@@TODO)." 1 2007-02-13 Same as ISSUE-17 16 5 18 2007-02-13 http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/#default Currently says: "Performing content negotiation based on the value of the 'User-agent:' header field is not generally considered good practice, @@TODO why." 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915090410.GA812@Octavius [RECIPES] 'Issue 1.3' baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915142535.GA680@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/bd1d3fc00709180239m41ab82d3v39701872d80381b9@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46EF9DF6.9050006@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46F7799E.6080801@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-09-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852012E5917@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-09-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/316ADBDBFE4F4D4AA4FEEF7496ECAEF9158948@EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie RE: [ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-09-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46F7D948.7080404@w3.org Re: [ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-09-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46F939E0.1070703@csd.abdn.ac.uk Meeting record: 2007-09-25 qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070925180109.GA2648@Octavius [ALL] Report - 2007-09-25 SWD telecon - with Amsterdam schedule baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/4783570E020000D8000266E9@ntgwgate.loc.gov Regrets - Re: [ALL] agenda 8 Jan telecon 1600 UTC juth@loc.gov 2008-01-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/47825367.10302@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 8 Jan telecon 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/CAB44397-D95E-4696-B790-B22F63BB8A30@manchester.ac.uk Meeting record: 2007-12-18 SWD telecon sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2007-12-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/4767EDC5.7040000@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0712180745x53d8c9d2o8087b56e66f13f79@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/4767E4F3.1020305@deri.org Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071218095958.GA3876@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/4761021E0200006A0001BF5B@ntgwgate.loc.gov Minutes from 2007-12-11 telecon cred@loc.gov 2007-12-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/47017183.2010400@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 2 Oct telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-10-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/4706296E02000015003B7A00@ntgwgate.loc.gov meeting record: 2007-10-02 swd telecon edsu@loc.gov 2007-10-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071022140030.GA2188@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-10-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/471E0DDD.3000407@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0710230811x4b8a09a8o86b415770d755f5d@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/471DE09A020000D80001FAC1@ntgwgate.loc.gov Late Regrets - Re: [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/471E010B0200006A0001784F@ntgwgate.loc.gov Meeting record: 2007-10-23 SWD telecon (Table of contents) cred@loc.gov 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/471E011D0200006A00017852@ntgwgate.loc.gov Meeting record: 2007-10-23 SWD telecon (Minutes) cred@loc.gov 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/4725C25B.8010403@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 30 Oct telecon - 1500 UTC (1 hour earlier than usual for Europeans) schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-10-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/316ADBDBFE4F4D4AA4FEEF7496ECAEF91589A1@EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie RE: [ALL] agenda 30 Oct telecon - 1500 UTC (1 hour earlier than usual for Europeans) vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-10-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0710300648p3afa5e31me87e0a40a970a89b@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda 30 Oct telecon - 1500 UTC (1 hour earlier than usual for Europeans) simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-10-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/47275381.3020204@csd.abdn.ac.uk Re: [ALL] agenda 30 Oct telecon - 1500 UTC (1 hour earlier than usual for Europeans) qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-10-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/87ED80C0-1C85-4355-BBC6-54D5D567BF62@manchester.ac.uk meeting record: 2007-10-30 SWDWG sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2007-10-31 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071105112919.GA4768@sub-tombaker [ALL] Agenda 6 November telecon - 1600 UTC (1100 Boston) baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-11-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/472F0728.5050404@csd.abdn.ac.uk Re: [ALL] Agenda 6 November telecon - 1600 UTC (1100 Boston) qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-11-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/0894AAE4-1177-4DC1-AF22-9AAFDD769A13@madcreek.com Re: [ALL] Agenda 6 November telecon - 1600 UTC (1100 Boston) jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-11-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/472EDF9F020000D800020C6C@ntgwgate.loc.gov Regrets - Re: [ALL] Agenda 6 November telecon - 1600 UTC (1100 Boston) juth@loc.gov 2007-11-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/472FEC05.1070800@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda 6 November telecon - 1600 UTC (1100 Boston) ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-11-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/474209F8.1010304@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 20 Nov telecon - 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-11-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F1EE@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] deliverables (was RE: [ALL] agenda 20 Nov telecon - 1600 UTC) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/47430233.1060908@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 20 Nov telecon - 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0711200756n1bc6b3c3s16049f3efee2f1be@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda 20 Nov telecon - 1600 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE80246E8AF@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk Meeting record: 2007-11-20 SWD telecon q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2007-11-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/47475538.8060302@few.vu.nl Re: Meeting record: 2007-11-20 SWD telecon aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-11-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE8B6C6C2@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk RE: Meeting record: 2007-11-20 SWD telecon q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2007-11-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071126165028.GA1112@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Nov 27 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-11-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/316ADBDBFE4F4D4AA4FEEF7496ECAEF9158A0C@EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie RE: [ALL] Agenda - Nov 27 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-11-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE80253E964@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk RE: [ALL] Agenda - Nov 27 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2007-11-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/001c01c830f9$7d9e5ea0$4101a8c0@dc.itd.rl.ac.uk Re: [ALL] Agenda - Nov 27 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0711270552i6ea118b3l599e9816a1179a42@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Nov 27 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-11-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/474BF3CE020000D800022C58@ntgwgate.loc.gov Leaving Early - Re: [ALL] Agenda - Nov 27 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-11-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060711290755g722f0342r7491b619e968b03b@mail.gmail.com Meeting record: 2007-11-27 SWD telecon ehs@pobox.com 2007-11-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/475420C3.6000606@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda Dec 4 telecon - 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-12-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/316ADBDBFE4F4D4AA4FEEF7496ECAEF9158A1D@EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie AW: [ALL] agenda Dec 4 telecon - 1600 UTC vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-12-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/47543D81020000D8000236F9@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] agenda Dec 4 telecon - 1600 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-12-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE802602411@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk RE: [ALL] agenda Dec 4 telecon - 1600 UTC q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071210151751.GA2940@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Dec 11 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-12-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/E92D1644-9044-4011-92A6-8455F0380B38@madcreek.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 11 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/475EA699.3010609@adida.net Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 11 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC ben@adida.net 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0712110703s522fee13p1b16e6708e333418@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 11 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE802788761@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk RE: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 11 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/7C1F4F6C-FD48-46FF-814E-E84AB89D0987@madcreek.com Meeting record: 2008-01-08 SWD telecon jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-01-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/478BB65B.8080507@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 15 Jan telecon 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB6690269F988@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [ALL] agenda 15 Jan telecon 1600 UTC Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-01-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/478CE1C7.8010400@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 15 Jan telecon 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-01-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/478DB2D6.70308@fundacionctic.org Meeting record: 2008-01-15 SWD telecon diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080121175703.GA3684@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Jan 22 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-01-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47960E40.2070703@cs.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Jan 22 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/47961162.8060706@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Jan 22 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/479620AD.1020805@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Jan 22 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-01-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060801221808t55949239mdc9dc205605a72f4@mail.gmail.com Re: Revised Recipes ehs@pobox.com 2008-01-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/479E064F.6000309@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 29 Jan telecon -- 16:00 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/479E2C33.6020307@cs.vu.nl Re: [ALL] agenda 29 Jan telecon -- 16:00 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/A492AE2F-6DCF-4F65-93EA-A7EF9E80D5E7@manchester.ac.uk Meeting Record: 2008-01-29 telecon sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-01-31 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A75770.6060901@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 5 Feb telecon - 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A8AB1F.9060203@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 5 Feb telecon - 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-02-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080205160438.05ea66e8@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-02-05 SWD WG swick@w3.org 2008-02-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A8EFF9.8040405@sandsoft.com [VocabMgmt] New Editor's Draft Available ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-02-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080211171707.GA2136@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Feb 12 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-02-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE802E5523F@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk Meeting record: 2008-02-12 SWD telecon q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2008-02-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080218163809.GA3304@octavius [All] Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/34b5049c0802181029q5c534978m87acdc4c4f6a334d@mail.gmail.com Re: [All] Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAF5E@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [All] Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0802181458o4267f179lf9b25fbbe0e46971@mail.gmail.com Re: [All] Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BDA2FE.3020004@zoo.ox.ac.uk Minutes of 2008-02-19 telcon alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47C29E86.5010404@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda telecon 26 Feb - 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-02-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE80306897E@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk RE: [ALL] agenda telecon 26 Feb - 1600 UTC q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2008-02-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060803011003j16953aei9318c574bc410f2b@mail.gmail.com Meeting Record: 2008-02-27 SWD telecon ehs@pobox.com 2008-03-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080303141032.GA3540@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Mar 04 telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-03-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D298520157BD14@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [ALL] Agenda - Mar 04 telecon - 1600 UTC michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2008-03-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/47D2DD96.30402@sandsoft.com Meeting record: 2008-03-04 telecon ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-03-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/47D562EE.4020602@cs.vu.nl [ALL] NOTE TIME: agenda 11 Mar telecon - *1500* UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-03-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669037A03D1@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [ALL] NOTE TIME: agenda 11 Mar telecon - *1500* UTC Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/1205246076.4829.11.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/B0AAC07C-6A27-421A-8E62-523A40EC6D0A@madcreek.com Re: [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/47D83672.7040701@few.vu.nl Meeting record: 2008-03-11 telecon aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-03-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080317182900.GA3860@octavius [All] Agenda - Mar 18 - 1500 UTC - Europeans note time! baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-03-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47DEBA91.5060004@sandsoft.com Re: [All] Agenda - Mar 18 - 1500 UTC - Europeans note time! ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-03-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47E11ECC0200006A00024B85@ntgwgate.loc.gov Minutes from 2008-03-18 telecon cred@loc.gov 2008-03-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080331130017.GA3808@octavius [ALL] Agenda - SWD telecon Apr 01 - 1500 UTC - Europeans back to normal time baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-03-31 http://www.w3.org/mid/47F24A4F.4080404@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - SWD telecon Apr 01 - 1500 UTC - Europeans back to normal time ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-04-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669037A04D3@hqgiex01.fao.org Minutes from 2008-04-01 telecon Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-04-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/47FA3FE3.9050908@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 8 April telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-04-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/47FAF3EC.1050309@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 8 April telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-04-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0804080609t10266db0s930f8a6b84bca1b3@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda 8 April telecon 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2008-04-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080408132657.03313ea8@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-04-08 SWD telecon swick@w3.org 2008-04-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080414083109.GA1736@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Apr 15 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/000001c89f07$e921e800$bb65b800$@miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk RE: [ALL] Agenda - Apr 15 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0804150811j42e98896i7ad5be7ed68f64d2@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Apr 15 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/4804EEB4.4000305@deri.org meeting record: 2008-04-15 SWD telecon vit.novacek@deri.org 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480597C6.5090004@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Apr 15 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C93F1.50901@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 22 April telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-04-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/34b5049c0804220701l5d151ca4udf70a325129fc494@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda 22 April telecon 1500 UTC jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-04-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/480DF981.4090404@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 22 April telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-04-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/2B5F6004-902E-48F0-A5B1-5549EBB4CAAB@manchester.ac.uk meeting record: 2008-04-22 SWD telecon sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-04-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080428161756.GA3328@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Apr 29 2008 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/5C0FCE75-D11B-4659-8353-40FEA348CF02@manchester.ac.uk Re: [ALL] Agenda - Apr 29 2008 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-04-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/38100CBF-4FD1-4BA2-B7A7-C143A91AE1F4@madcreek.com meeting record: 2008-04-29 SWD WG jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-05-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/4828264C.8000402@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 13 May telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-05-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/1210756051.4662.4.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org Meeting record: 2008-05-13 SWD telecon diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-05-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080519162744.GA2200@sub-tombaker Agenda - May 20 2008 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-05-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/01E39CC4-0BD8-4713-AC7E-60B307F0D6FD@madcreek.com Re: Agenda - May 20 2008 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-05-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0805200329v26ee1e0cn65048bd90a062d8a@mail.gmail.com Re: Agenda - May 20 2008 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2008-05-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080520060610.ikydcafvdw8ogws0@webmail.stanford.edu Re: Agenda - May 20 2008 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC dlrubin@stanford.edu 2008-05-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/4832DD17.7040605@sandsoft.com Re: Agenda - May 20 2008 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-05-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060805200753u30bea643m355a8d4c9e2198b7@mail.gmail.com Re: Agenda - May 20 2008 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC ehs@pobox.com 2008-05-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE803B4F44F@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk Meeting record: 2008-05-20 SWD telecon q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2008-05-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/483AD731.8090201@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 27 May telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-05-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903B87F03@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [ALL] agenda 27 May telecon - 1500 UTC Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-05-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/483C0B41.3040209@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 27 May telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-05-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060805270706r59feda0dq685a36bda85d918c@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda 27 May telecon - 1500 UTC ehs@pobox.com 2008-05-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080528050511.06bef348@stanford.edu Minutes from tcon yesterday dlrubin@stanford.edu 2008-05-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080602152648.GA796@octavius Agenda - Jun 03 2008 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-06-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852014C6242@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: Agenda - Jun 03 2008 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2008-06-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/484D3AB1.2020101@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 10 June telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-06-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080610083536.046fc180@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-06-03 SWD WG telecon swick@w3.org 2008-06-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/484E8C2A.3020009@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 10 June telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-06-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/485255A6.9070800@deri.org meeting record: 2008-06-10 SWD WG telco vit.novacek@deri.org 2008-06-13 2007-02-13 This was discussed at the F2F meeting in Boston and Ralph agreed to write a brief description of how User Agent-based negotiation limits/stifles the creation of new User Agents in the future, citing past negative experience. 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action09 http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14 17 5 18 2007-02-13 http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/#recipe6 says: "@@TODO this recipe is included as a placeholder, as its best practice implementation currently requires further investigation, discussion and testing, but is anticipated to be an important part of this document, 'completing the set' of the most commonly needed configurations." 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/1174234347.9631.19.camel@daneel.berrueta.net [Recipes] discussion on Recipe 6 (and regrets) diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2007-03-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/1205246076.4829.11.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/B0AAC07C-6A27-421A-8E62-523A40EC6D0A@madcreek.com Re: [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-03-11 2007-02-13 This was discussed at the F2F meeting in Boston in January 2007. Diego will perform "further investigation, discussion and testing" and write a first draft of the recipe. 2007-09-24 There is a new draft here: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/BestPracticeRecipe6 18 5 18 2007-02-13 In May 2006, Karl Dubost posted a series of comments and suggestions about the Recipes draft to the Semantic Web Best Practice and Deployment Working Group mailing list. see: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/BestPracticeRecipesIssues/QaReviewSummary 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/1205246076.4829.11.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/B0AAC07C-6A27-421A-8E62-523A40EC6D0A@madcreek.com Re: [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-03-11 19 5 18 2007-02-13 The Recipes are specific to an Apache server, but may be applicable in non-Apache environments. It would be useful to provide a general-purpose configuration template for use by people setting up non-Apache servers" As part of his QA review KKarl Dubost said... "...here there's a good opportunity to create a template and/or invite people to submit bindings to the Mailing List, id est how people applied this recipe in this particular server environment, Web Apps Framework, HTTP Servers only, etc. That would help other people to find the information. With a proposed template, it would help people to collect, gather the information." http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/BestPracticeRecipesIssues/QaReviewSummary#head-3d24132de03d1b1b65a24aafeda257e78be72da1 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915142535.GA680@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915150038.GG2612@Octavius [RECIPES] Amsterdam topic 'Recipes' baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/bd1d3fc00709180239m41ab82d3v39701872d80381b9@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46EF9DF6.9050006@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/1205246076.4829.11.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/B0AAC07C-6A27-421A-8E62-523A40EC6D0A@madcreek.com Re: [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-03-11 20 5 18 2007-02-14 The recipes provide example URIs and example responses. Diego has written some httpUnit tests. Since the tests already exist, it would be very useful to make these available online to provide a server validation service. See Diego's email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Dec/0048.html 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/1174074778.4975.27.camel@daneel.berrueta.net [Recipes] towards an online validation tool for best practices diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2007-03-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915142535.GA680@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915150038.GG2612@Octavius [RECIPES] Amsterdam topic 'Recipes' baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/bd1d3fc00709180239m41ab82d3v39701872d80381b9@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46EF9DF6.9050006@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/1205246076.4829.11.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/B0AAC07C-6A27-421A-8E62-523A40EC6D0A@madcreek.com Re: [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-03-11 21 5 15 2007-02-14 "...the current document[1] fails to mention that the mod_rewrite module must be loaded into Apache (I followed the recipes step-by-step and I was surprised by a "500 Internal error" because the module wasn't loaded)." [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/#apache Diego's email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Dec/0048.html 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915142535.GA680@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915150038.GG2612@Octavius [RECIPES] Amsterdam topic 'Recipes' baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/bd1d3fc00709180239m41ab82d3v39701872d80381b9@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46EF9DF6.9050006@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/1205246076.4829.11.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/B0AAC07C-6A27-421A-8E62-523A40EC6D0A@madcreek.com Re: [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-03-11 22 5 4 2007-02-14 In http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/#negotiation there is reference to a hack that's required for Internet Explorer browser clients. The paragraph begins as follows: "In recipes 3, 4, 5, and 6 below, RDF/XML is configured as the default response. This is chosen to minimize the impact on deployed Semantic Web applications that do not currently send appropriate 'Accept:' header field values for RDF content. Note that, however, with RDF as the default response, a 'hack' has to be included..." The issue I'd like to raise is two fold: 1) wordsmithing: a) Suggest that there's a new para/section titled something like "Workaround for Internet Explorer". At the moment the details of the hack merge in with the rest of the default behaviour. b) the use of "hack" and "peculiar" is somewhat pejorative! c) the layout of the itemised instructions is confusing to read, as they're broken up by a yellow line of directive 2) ambiguity I think we need to come down on one side of the fence on whether this "hack" should be included. Either (a) we remove from the document any suggestion that the reader should delete the directive and just insert an explanation as to why it's needed; or (b) explain that IE clients will need this directive and include it _commented out_ in the recipes so that implementers may include it. I favour (a). 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915142535.GA680@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915150038.GG2612@Octavius [RECIPES] Amsterdam topic 'Recipes' baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/bd1d3fc00709180239m41ab82d3v39701872d80381b9@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46EF9DF6.9050006@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/1205246076.4829.11.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/B0AAC07C-6A27-421A-8E62-523A40EC6D0A@madcreek.com Re: [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-03-11 2007-02-14 There was some discussion about this at the January F2F in Boston: http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action12 (scroll up from there). 2007-02-14 Diego was asked to verify that the hack was still necessary for IE7 (http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action13) and he reported that it did (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jan/0076.html) 2007-02-14 Corrected links for above note. See: http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action13 -- and he reported that it did. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jan/0076.html 23 5 18 2007-02-14 Many organizations, for performance and security reasons, don't allow the use of AllowOveride and this precludes the use of .htaccess files completely. We should include a section that specifically addresses this: 1. Briefly discuss the relative performance and security disadvantages of .htaccess files, or at least point to such a discussion. 2. Discuss the possibility of enabling AllowOveride on a directory-specific rather than a global basis to address those issues 3. Point out that each of the recipes can be implemented directly in httpd.conf files without enabling AllowOveride and show how to do that for at least one of them 4. Include a recipe that rewrites the URL to a very simple cgi script (examples in perl, php) that would handle the actual redirect. This appears to be the way the recipes are often implemented. 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915142535.GA680@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915150038.GG2612@Octavius [RECIPES] Amsterdam topic 'Recipes' baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/bd1d3fc00709180239m41ab82d3v39701872d80381b9@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46EF9DF6.9050006@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/1205246076.4829.11.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/B0AAC07C-6A27-421A-8E62-523A40EC6D0A@madcreek.com Re: [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-03-11 24 5 18 2007-02-14 There have been a number of instances where Alistair et al have answered questions about the reasoning behind the use of 'conditional rewrites' and redirects in the recipes (I'm sure there are more): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Dec/0016.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0076 http://dowhatimean.net/2006/11/content-negotiation-with-hash-uris-long#comment-15928 It would be a good idea to answer those questions directly in the document, either at the top or in an Appendix. 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915142535.GA680@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915150038.GG2612@Octavius [RECIPES] Amsterdam topic 'Recipes' baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/bd1d3fc00709180239m41ab82d3v39701872d80381b9@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46EF9DF6.9050006@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/1205246076.4829.11.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/B0AAC07C-6A27-421A-8E62-523A40EC6D0A@madcreek.com Re: [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-03-11 25 2 14 2007-02-16 As of [1] we need to decide how to handle the default datatype in RDFa. See [2] for a comprehensive list of possible solutions, put together by Mark. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Feb/0055.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Feb/0003.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/46771B06.6000009@adida.net ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals ben@adida.net 2007-06-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/cf8107640706181733y19749746rc38164af7d8298c5@mail.gmail.com Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals lindstream@gmail.com 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/46779633.4010400@w3.org Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals ivan@w3.org 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706210250wbd15e85o508f307a97e4ef36@mail.gmail.com Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/4681CDC7.3060105@adida.net [RDFa] Proposed resolutions to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4 ben@adida.net 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0706270714k8b045bdlbbc492a0f9ac2a81@mail.gmail.com Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/468915BC.4000300@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/46891656.1040500@sun.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468938E7.3070002@cs.vu.nl Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A5D1A.2000005@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0707030743j62fc4bd7h96f373f578043100@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A2950020000D8000156B0@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468AF585.2010400@adida.net [RDFa] RESOLUTIONS to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4 ben@adida.net 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D030E3E5D@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk belated regrets (was RE: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070705110516.047e10c8@med.stanford.edu Minutes from July 3 tcon rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-07-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/4706296E02000015003B7A00@ntgwgate.loc.gov meeting record: 2007-10-02 swd telecon edsu@loc.gov 2007-10-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071022140030.GA2188@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-10-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/471E0DDD.3000407@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0710230811x4b8a09a8o86b415770d755f5d@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/471DE09A020000D80001FAC1@ntgwgate.loc.gov Late Regrets - Re: [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/471E010B0200006A0001784F@ntgwgate.loc.gov Meeting record: 2007-10-23 SWD telecon (Table of contents) cred@loc.gov 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/471E011D0200006A00017852@ntgwgate.loc.gov Meeting record: 2007-10-23 SWD telecon (Minutes) cred@loc.gov 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/4725C25B.8010403@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 30 Oct telecon - 1500 UTC (1 hour earlier than usual for Europeans) schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-10-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/316ADBDBFE4F4D4AA4FEEF7496ECAEF91589A1@EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie RE: [ALL] agenda 30 Oct telecon - 1500 UTC (1 hour earlier than usual for Europeans) vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-10-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0710300648p3afa5e31me87e0a40a970a89b@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda 30 Oct telecon - 1500 UTC (1 hour earlier than usual for Europeans) simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-10-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/47275381.3020204@csd.abdn.ac.uk Re: [ALL] agenda 30 Oct telecon - 1500 UTC (1 hour earlier than usual for Europeans) qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-10-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/87ED80C0-1C85-4355-BBC6-54D5D567BF62@manchester.ac.uk meeting record: 2007-10-30 SWDWG sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2007-10-31 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071105112919.GA4768@sub-tombaker [ALL] Agenda 6 November telecon - 1600 UTC (1100 Boston) baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-11-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/472F0728.5050404@csd.abdn.ac.uk Re: [ALL] Agenda 6 November telecon - 1600 UTC (1100 Boston) qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-11-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/0894AAE4-1177-4DC1-AF22-9AAFDD769A13@madcreek.com Re: [ALL] Agenda 6 November telecon - 1600 UTC (1100 Boston) jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-11-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/472EDF9F020000D800020C6C@ntgwgate.loc.gov Regrets - Re: [ALL] Agenda 6 November telecon - 1600 UTC (1100 Boston) juth@loc.gov 2007-11-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/472FEC05.1070800@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda 6 November telecon - 1600 UTC (1100 Boston) ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-11-05 2007-07-04 RESOLVED, as per: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Jun/0039 26 3 17 2007-02-20 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBetweenLabels SKOS allows to represent semantic relationships (broader, related) between concepts. It also allows to represent relationships between concepts and labels (prefLabel, altLabel). However, there is nothing proposed in SKOS to capture links between labels themselves, a configuration which sometimes happens in concept schemes. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0285A20B@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-03-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0285A26A@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-03-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0285A281@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-03-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20070320140023.032495d0@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2007-03-20 SWD WG swick@w3.org 2007-03-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070326133118.GA3168@sub-tombaker [ALL] Agenda - 2007-03-27 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-03-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070327153559.GA1668@Octavius [ALL] Report - 2007-03-27 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-03-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070327084617.04d9b218@med.stanford.edu Re: [ALL] Report - 2007-03-27 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-03-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02A90C53@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-03-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/460948EC.1040907@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels mark@cs.vu.nl 2007-03-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/460CF9AA.6070707@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-03-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/460CFC03.1070208@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels mark@cs.vu.nl 2007-03-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/460FFDD1.6060400@few.vu.nl [ALL] Regrets for April 3 telecon aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-04-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/461048D2.8080309@cs.vu.nl [ALL] Agenda SWD telecon 3 April 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-04-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070416163135.GA2352@sub-tombaker [ALL] Agenda SWD telecon 17 April 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-04-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/462C5283.8030405@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agena 24 April telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-04-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/34b5049c0704230532w5540c183kdd075e0b46736af4@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agena 24 April telecon - 1500 UTC jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-04-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/1177331961.5799.198.camel@localhost.localdomain Re: [ALL] agena 24 April telecon - 1500 UTC vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-04-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/462D9B71.9070100@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agena 24 April telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-04-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/1177485639.4867.9.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org Meeting record: 2007-04-24 SWD telecon diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2007-04-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/462F6D2D.8000500@cs.vu.nl May 1 telecon CANCELLED [Re: Meeting record: 2007-04-24 SWD telecon] schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-04-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070507163058.GA2552@Octavius Agenda - 2007-05-08 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-05-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/464088DA.1040206@few.vu.nl Re: Agenda - 2007-05-08 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/46481A20.3080008@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Links for discussing issue-26 RelationshipsBetweenLabels aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/46482D85.5000909@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 15 May telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-05-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070514125805.GA3000@Octavius [ALL] SWD minutes 2007-05-08 baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-05-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070521155830.GA2228@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - 2007-05-22 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-05-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/46554A32.5040905@sun.com meeting record: 2006-05-22 SWD telecon Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-05-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/465B038B.4020900@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 29 May teleon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-05-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/465C29E7.2030707@cs.vu.nl ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070529073905.0477aa78@med.stanford.edu Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/465C5F50.2000203@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/465C65D8.3040804@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070529150048.04778d18@med.stanford.edu Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/465D2CC8.3080504@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070530052311.0479cb50@med.stanford.edu Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-05-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/465D7BF0.2090800@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070531093140.02d3b2e8@med.stanford.edu Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-05-31 http://www.w3.org/mid/465F067D.9020008@few.vu.nl [SKOS] chatting on SKOS concepts and ontology classes (was Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-31 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070531154103.02d76430@med.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] chatting on SKOS concepts and ontology classes (was Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal) rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-05-31 http://www.w3.org/mid/34b5049c0706010800g36001a5fm13af12993a9e4d2f@mail.gmail.com meeting record: 2007-05-29 SWDWG [SKOS] telecon jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-06-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/4665C812.6010407@few.vu.nl [SKOS] ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal [Wiki form] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/46691507.8020504@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] chatting on SKOS concepts and ontology classes (was Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070608101425.GA2436@Octavius Re: [SKOS] chatting on SKOS concepts and ontology classes (was Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal) baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-06-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070608030612.04796b58@med.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] chatting on SKOS concepts and ontology classes (was Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal) rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-06-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/466940CA.40001@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] chatting on SKOS concepts and ontology classes (was Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/466DA35A.30008@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] chatting on SKOS concepts and ontology classes (was Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02EC079D@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] ISSUE-26: 'Minimal Label Relation' Proposal A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/46728D56.9070609@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-26: 'Minimal Label Relation' Proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02EC07E5@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-26: 'Minimal Label Relation' Proposal A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/46729DEE.2070903@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-26: 'Minimal Label Relation' Proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAB37@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-26: 'Minimal Label Relation' Proposal Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2007-06-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/467E897D.1030507@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-26: 'Minimal Label Relation' Proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46817A22.8030503@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-31 BasicLexicalLabelSemantics proposed resolution aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070709172306.GA428@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - July 10 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/469272F6.7030501@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - July 10 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/46924D6B0200006A0000E91B@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] Agenda - July 10 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC cred@loc.gov 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/4694CB5E.5050909@sun.com Meeting Record: 2007-07-10 SWD Telecon Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-07-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070716145919.GA2176@Octavius [ALL] SWD telecon - July 17 2007 - agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-07-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/469CD99E0200006A0000F440@ntgwgate.loc.gov meeting record: 2007-07-17 SWD telecon cred@loc.gov 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A4CE46.7060200@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda July 24 telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A4CE78.9080208@adida.net Re: [ALL] agenda July 24 telecon - 1500 UTC ben@adida.net 2007-07-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A496E7020000D8000170B3@ntgwgate.loc.gov Regrets - Re: [ALL] agenda July 24 telecon - 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-07-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A6E13502000015003B23AB@ntgwgate.loc.gov meeting record: 2007-07-24 telecon edsu@loc.gov 2007-07-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/46B7B1FB.7060402@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda Aug 7 telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-08-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070806171917.0487fc18@med.stanford.edu regrets for Aug 7 telecon - 1500 UTC rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-08-06 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070820154014.GA2580@Octavius Agenda - Aug 21 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/46C9B8D8.7080903@sun.com Re: Agenda - Aug 21 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-08-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/46CAABAF020000D800019C6F@ntgwgate.loc.gov Scribing - Re: Agenda - Aug 21 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-08-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2BA37.4070903@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 28 Aug telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D3A9D6.6040106@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Aug telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D3ED2B.9030506@sun.com Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Aug telecon - 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-08-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070903114838.GA4028@sub-tombaker Agenda - Sep 04 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852012A4DD5@RZJC2EX.jr1.local Meeting record: 2007-09-04 michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-09-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/46DE9B93020000D80001B06C@ntgwgate.loc.gov LATE REGRETS - Re: Meeting record: 2007-09-04 juth@loc.gov 2007-09-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/46E5D599.4050003@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 11 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-09-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D01B7D35A@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] agenda 11 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-09-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915142535.GA680@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915142947.GA2612@Octavius [SKOS] Amsterdam topic: 'Label relations' baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/bd1d3fc00709180239m41ab82d3v39701872d80381b9@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46EF9DF6.9050006@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46F7799E.6080801@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-09-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852012E5917@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-09-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/316ADBDBFE4F4D4AA4FEEF7496ECAEF9158948@EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie RE: [ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-09-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46F7D948.7080404@w3.org Re: [ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-09-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46F939E0.1070703@csd.abdn.ac.uk Meeting record: 2007-09-25 qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070925180109.GA2648@Octavius [ALL] Report - 2007-09-25 SWD telecon - with Amsterdam schedule baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/4761B47E.80302@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3FAB6@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-12-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/47017183.2010400@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 2 Oct telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-10-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0363B71F@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] Amsterdam topic: 'Label relations' A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-10-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/4706296E02000015003B7A00@ntgwgate.loc.gov meeting record: 2007-10-02 swd telecon edsu@loc.gov 2007-10-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071022140030.GA2188@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-10-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/471E0DDD.3000407@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0710230811x4b8a09a8o86b415770d755f5d@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/471DE09A020000D80001FAC1@ntgwgate.loc.gov Late Regrets - Re: [ALL] Agenda - Oct 23 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/471E010B0200006A0001784F@ntgwgate.loc.gov Meeting record: 2007-10-23 SWD telecon (Table of contents) cred@loc.gov 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/471E011D0200006A00017852@ntgwgate.loc.gov Meeting record: 2007-10-23 SWD telecon (Minutes) cred@loc.gov 2007-10-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060711210700u6cd6d8edmd7c80f0ab9a2a6cb@mail.gmail.com Re: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) ehs@pobox.com 2007-11-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47474EE1.4040609@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-11-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/4756ED09.5050907@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/4799B34E.7040203@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A7836B.2050501@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A8B04E.9010507@few.vu.nl [SKOS] TR : ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A99FB2.30003@dcs.gla.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] TR : ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk 2008-02-06 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B900.40700@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Proposal ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B96B20.4010007@dcs.gla.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] Proposal ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BB2384.10600@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Closing ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47FB407D.8090909@few.vu.nl [SKOS] About links between SKOS-XL and SKOS reference (ISSUE-26) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-08 2008-05-07 RESOLUTION: to accept sections 3 (xl:Label), 4 (Preferred, Alternate, and Hidden xl:Labels), 6 (Binary Relations Between Instances of xl:Label) of the 14 April -XL proposal and the vocabulary defined there RESOLUTION: Include XL sections 3, 4, 6 in SKOS Reference as OPTIONAL and NORMATIVE RESOLUTION: Use http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos-xl# as XL namespace URI -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#item03 27 3 5 2007-02-27 Labels which are currently modeled as literals in SKOS, as well as possibly other literals, are valid subjects of discourse when modeling concept schemes, e.g. when recording the dates during which a particular label was in common use. However, in RDF, only resources may be subjects of statements, and literals may only be objects of statements. The question then arises, how are we to annotate (i.e. relate, as subject) labels and other literals to other entities. Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-AnnotationOnLabel Related: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/AnnotationPatterns 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/4761B47E.80302@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3FAB6@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-12-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F1EA@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/96F793DD-4B61-453F-853E-FD80CDD174E1@madcreek.com Re: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel) jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/4742E652.2060203@csd.abdn.ac.uk Re: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel) qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F1F6@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F206@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] top priorities A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/95EE1497-2121-4762-A22F-D1C2A194C6A8@gmail.com Re: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) alanruttenberg@gmail.com 2007-11-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20071121043427.0499da78@smi.stanford.edu Re: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) rubin@smi.stanford.edu 2007-11-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060711210700u6cd6d8edmd7c80f0ab9a2a6cb@mail.gmail.com Re: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) ehs@pobox.com 2007-11-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47474EE1.4040609@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-11-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/47475497.6050303@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-11-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F782@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/4755721A.3020704@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F78E@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/4756ED09.5050907@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS-XL (was RE: SKOS/ synonym provenance (ISSUE-27 AnnotationOnLabel)) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 2008-05-07 RESOLUTION: to accept sections 3 (xl:Label), 4 (Preferred, Alternate, and Hidden xl:Labels), 6 (Binary Relations Between Instances of xl:Label) of the 14 April -XL proposal and the vocabulary defined there RESOLUTION: Include XL sections 3, 4, 6 in SKOS Reference as OPTIONAL and NORMATIVE RESOLUTION: Use http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos-xl# as XL namespace URI -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#item03 28 2 2 2007-03-12 An important feature of Web Architecture is that each document instance allow the user to "follow his nose" to find all the specifications that describe how to interpret the document. Dan Connolly asks "There doesn't seem to be anything in the 000001.htm test document that says "this is not just any HTML document; it's an HTML document with RDF data inside; any RDF triples you extract per the RDFa spec are indeed meant by the author." -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Aug/0002 and followed up with "xmlFunctions-34: XML Transformation and composability (e.g., XSLT, XInclude, Encryption) http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?type=1#xmlFunctions-34" -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Dec/0011.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070312133721.6CDCC47BA8@mojo.w3.org ISSUE-28: How does one \\'Follow your nose\\' from an HTML+RDFa document to know the author intended to assert the specified triples dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-03-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/46771CA9.9030105@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification ben@adida.net 2007-06-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/467798AC.9020706@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification ivan@w3.org 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0706190258h654266e1l277c42c058e0e36f@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/1182252772.6367.138.camel@pav Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification connolly@w3.org 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706210236g7daace40v1d972886280d5dfb@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706210247wd755101v1f3c2caf3dfc8ca8@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/467A4DAA.2030108@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification ivan@w3.org 2007-06-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706210321w34747df3hbf7b98e567e66626@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/1182430618.6367.413.camel@pav Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification connolly@w3.org 2007-06-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/467ACDAD.7060101@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification ben@adida.net 2007-06-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20070626101621.0322ec88@127.0.0.1 request for profile URI for RDFa swick@w3.org 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/1183159204.7058.335.camel@pav Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification connolly@w3.org 2007-06-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/46859825.3000705@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification ben@adida.net 2007-06-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706301249y7d054fdcqb3d2449cdc4c550f@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/46882AA9.2030208@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification ben@adida.net 2007-07-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/op.tuwdplkhzdej1c@keith-alexanders-computer.local Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A8FFE.90308@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification ben@adida.net 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/op.tu5u9zdi63ayaz@keith-alexanders-computer.local Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com 2007-07-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/46941130.2060205@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification ben@adida.net 2007-07-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/469411A0.9080704@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification ben@adida.net 2007-07-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/469BFE92.3060207@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification ben@adida.net 2007-07-16 2007-04-15 approved as an OPEN issue on 2007-04-11 telecon. 2007-06-13 This issue includes the RDFa Profile discussion. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007May/0015 2007-11-15 agreement from telecon that we have a profile, we encourage its use where possible, but we don't require it. This needs to be stated clearly in the syntax (it's not currently.) 2008-02-06 responded to comment at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0024.html 64 3 8 2007-11-20 SKOS currently has 7 "documentation"/"note" properties: skos:note, skos:scopeNote, skos:defition, skos:historyNote, skos:editorialNote, skos:changeNote, skos:example. In the SKOS Core Guide <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-guide-20051102>, 3 different design patterns are allowed for these properties -- "documentation as an RDF literal", "documentation as a related resource description", and "documentation as a document reference". Do we continue to allow these different design patterns? If we do, we have to accept a complex range for these properties. Is that OK? How should we formally specify that? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071120131435.A1066BEF0@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-64: TextualDescriptionsForConcepts dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F1EF@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: ISSUE-64: TextualDescriptionsForConcepts A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F206@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] top priorities A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F228@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: ISSUE-64: TextualDescriptionsForConcepts A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 2008-05-13 RESOLUTION: SKOS will explicitly allow all 3 patterns for documentation properties -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item13 29 2 2 2007-03-12 Dan Connolly writes: "Which MIME type does [a document containing RDFa] use?" -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Feb/0112.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070312135200.97C15BDA8@w3c4.w3.org ISSUE-29: What is the MIME type for an HTML+RDFa document? dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-03-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/467721A7.4050006@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document ben@adida.net 2007-06-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46772801.2080101@danbri.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document danbri@danbri.org 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/46779835.9010705@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document ivan@w3.org 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/1182253039.6367.144.camel@pav Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document connolly@w3.org 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/4677CD40.6030406@danbri.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document danbri@danbri.org 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/4677CF7D.8070604@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document ivan@w3.org 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/4677E95A.5020408@aptest.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document shane@aptest.com 2007-06-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706191626p44b40e08kd8a17a8c74814e5e@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060706210233q2ea40b27lb524b24b77ec0c86@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-06-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/4681CDC7.3060105@adida.net [RDFa] Proposed resolutions to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4 ben@adida.net 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/468915BC.4000300@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/46891656.1040500@sun.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468938E7.3070002@cs.vu.nl Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A5D1A.2000005@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0707030743j62fc4bd7h96f373f578043100@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A2950020000D8000156B0@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468AF585.2010400@adida.net [RDFa] RESOLUTIONS to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4 ben@adida.net 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D030E3E5D@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk belated regrets (was RE: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070705110516.047e10c8@med.stanford.edu Minutes from July 3 tcon rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-07-05 2007-04-15 approved as an OPEN issue on 2007-04-11 telecon. 2007-07-04 RESOLVED as: "the MIME type of an RDFa document is whatever the MIME type of the host document is. In the case of XHTML1.1+RDFa, application/xhtml+xml. If/when RDFa becomes a valid extension for other versions of HTML, then it will take on whatever MIME type they accept." 30 5 8 2007-03-13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Dec/0086.html Figuring out if and how the cookbook and RDDL [1] fit together is probably something we should look at ... [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDDL related: http://norman.walsh.name/2006/12/18/rddl Associating Resources with Namespaces Draft TAG Finding 13 December 2005 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/nsDocuments/ 2 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070313161227.2E83D47BA5@mojo.w3.org ISSUE-30: Determine how and if RDDL relates to the Resipes dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-03-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0285A1F3@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: ISSUE-30: Determine how and if RDDL relates to the Resipes A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-03-19 31 3 8 2007-03-19 Can a resource have two "preferred lexical labels"? Can a lexical label be both "preferred" and "alternative" for the same resource? If a lexical label is "hidden", can it also be "preferred" or "alternative" for the same resource? See also <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/BasicLexicalLabelSemantics> Imagine the SKOS vocabulary consisted only of skos:prefLabel, skos:altLabel and skos:hiddenLabel. I.e. forget everything else for the moment. Now, consider the following RDF graph: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:foo skos:prefLabel "foo"@en. ex:foo skos:prefLabel "bar"@en. The resource ex:foo has two different preferred lexical labels in the same language. Is this graph inconsistent? What about the following: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:foo skos:prefLabel "foo"@en. ex:foo skos:altLabel "foo"@en. The label "foo"@en is given as both a preferred and an alternative lexical label for the resource ex:foo. Is this graph inconsistent? Consider another graph: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:foo skos:prefLabel "foo"@en. ex:foo skos:hiddenLabel "foo"@en. The label "foo"@en is given as both a preferred and a hidden lexical label for the resource ex:foo. Is this graph inconsistent? Finally, consider: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:foo skos:altLabel "foo"@en. ex:foo skos:hiddenLabel "foo"@en. The label "foo"@en is given as both an alternative and a hidden lexical label for the resource ex:foo. Is this graph inconsistent? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070319131638.13D1133207@kearny.w3.org ISSUE-31: BasicLexicalLabelSemantics dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-03-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0285A1CB@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] Possible issue: Uniqueness of skos:prefLabel [was Re: [SKOS] inconsistency between Guide and Specification A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-03-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02EC0BF0@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] central issues A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/46814CEA.3000004@mondeca.com Re: [SKOS] central issues bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02EC0BF3@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] ISSUE-31 BasicLexicalLabelSemantics proposed resolution A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/468175A4.6050104@few.vu.nl [SKOS] question about SKOS semantics document (was Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-31 BasicLexicalLabelSemantics proposed resolution) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/46817A22.8030503@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-31 BasicLexicalLabelSemantics proposed resolution aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/46818CE0.8020106@mondeca.com Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-31 BasicLexicalLabelSemantics proposed resolution bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46824F52.3010205@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46825EA9.8010408@mondeca.com Re: [SKOS] central issues bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46891049.4070304@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468915BC.4000300@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/46891656.1040500@sun.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/46894F29.4010907@madcreek.com Re: [SKOS] central issues jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/4689FFFD.8080603@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A58FC.2030303@madcreek.com Re: [SKOS] central issues jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A5D1A.2000005@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0707030743j62fc4bd7h96f373f578043100@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A2950020000D8000156B0@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468AC9DE.8070503@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D030E3E5D@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk belated regrets (was RE: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070705110516.047e10c8@med.stanford.edu Minutes from July 3 tcon rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-07-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070709172306.GA428@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - July 10 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/469272F6.7030501@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - July 10 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/46924D6B0200006A0000E91B@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] Agenda - July 10 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC cred@loc.gov 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070716145919.GA2176@Octavius [ALL] SWD telecon - July 17 2007 - agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-07-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070716154620.GA2012@Octavius Re: [ALL] SWD telecon - July 17 2007 - agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-07-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A4CE46.7060200@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda July 24 telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A4CE78.9080208@adida.net Re: [ALL] agenda July 24 telecon - 1500 UTC ben@adida.net 2007-07-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A496E7020000D8000170B3@ntgwgate.loc.gov Regrets - Re: [ALL] agenda July 24 telecon - 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-07-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/46B7B1FB.7060402@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda Aug 7 telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-08-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070806171917.0487fc18@med.stanford.edu regrets for Aug 7 telecon - 1500 UTC rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-08-06 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070820154014.GA2580@Octavius Agenda - Aug 21 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/46C9B8D8.7080903@sun.com Re: Agenda - Aug 21 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-08-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/46CAABAF020000D800019C6F@ntgwgate.loc.gov Scribing - Re: Agenda - Aug 21 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-08-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2BA37.4070903@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 28 Aug telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D3A9D6.6040106@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Aug telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D3ED2B.9030506@sun.com Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Aug telecon - 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-08-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070903114838.GA4028@sub-tombaker Agenda - Sep 04 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852012A4DD5@RZJC2EX.jr1.local Meeting record: 2007-09-04 michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-09-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/46DE9B93020000D80001B06C@ntgwgate.loc.gov LATE REGRETS - Re: Meeting record: 2007-09-04 juth@loc.gov 2007-09-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/46E5D599.4050003@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 11 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-09-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D01B7D35A@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] agenda 11 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-09-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D5CFF@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] Amsterdam topic 'Labeling properties' A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-10-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/47062449.2010801@csd.abdn.ac.uk [SKOS] Amsterdam topic: 'Labeling properties' qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-10-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0499E457@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] ISSUE-31 proposed resolution A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2008-01-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE802E5523F@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk Meeting record: 2008-02-12 SWD telecon q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2008-02-14 2007-03-19 Issues Sandbox: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox#head-5593998a47bf818e6bbcf40d289d95f6390c320a 2008-02-12 2008-02-12. RESOLVED ISSUE-31 is as per email (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0191.html) 32 3 17 2007-03-19 Can two different concepts in the same concept scheme have any lexical labels in common? I.e. can two different concepts in the same concept scheme both have the same preferred lexical label? Can two different concepts in the same concept scheme both have the same alternative lexical label? Can a lexical label be preferred for one concept and alternative for a different concept in the same concept scheme? Can a lexical label be hidden for one concept and either preferred or alternative for a different concept in the same concept scheme? See also: <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions> Imagine the SKOS vocabulary consists of only skos:prefLabel, skos:altLabel, skos:hiddenLabel, skos:Concept, skos:ConcepScheme and skos:inScheme. Now consider the following graph: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:fooscheme rdf:type skos:ConceptScheme. ex:A rdf:type skos:Concept. ex:A skos:prefLabel "orange"@en. ex:A skos:scopeNote "The colour orange."@en. ex:A skos:inScheme ex:fooscheme. ex:B rdf:type skos:Concept. ex:B skos:prefLabel "orange"@en. ex:B skos:scopeNote "The citrus fruit."@en. ex:B skos:inScheme ex:fooscheme. This graph is not inherently inconsistent. However, if we were to assume that ex:fooscheme was a thesaurus, and attempt to generate a thesaurus from this graph, following the conventions and notation of ISO 2788 and BS 8723, we would have a problem. The problem is that two concepts in the ex:fooscheme concept scheme have the same preferred lexical label, and we can't tell from the graph whether these two concepts are supposed to be different or not. If we assumed that ex:A and ex:B were different concepts, we could not generate a thesaurus, because it is an axiom of thesaurus construction that each preferred term in a thesaurus has one and only one meaning, i.e. there is a one-to-one correspondance between preferred terms and concepts. If we assumed that ex:A and ex:B were the same concept, we would get the following thesaurus: orange SN The colour orange. SN The citrus fruit. ... which obviously violates the original intention. Consider a different example: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:fooscheme rdf:type skos:ConceptScheme. ex:A rdf:type skos:Concept. ex:A skos:prefLabel "orange (colour)"@en. ex:A skos:altLabel "orange"@en. ex:A skos:scopeNote "The colour orange."@en. ex:A skos:inScheme ex:fooscheme. ex:B rdf:type skos:Concept. ex:B skos:prefLabel "orange"@en. ex:B skos:scopeNote "The citrus fruit."@en. ex:B skos:inScheme ex:fooscheme. Again, this graph is not inherently inconsistent. However, problems arise when trying to generate a thesaurus from this graph. In this case it is simply not possible to generate the thesaurus under any assumption, because the lexical label "orange"@en would be mapped to both a preferred term and a non-preferred term. It is an axiom of thesaurus construction that a term must be either preferred or non-preferred. Consider a third example: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:fooscheme rdf:type skos:ConceptScheme. ex:A rdf:type skos:Concept. ex:A skos:prefLabel "orange (colour)"@en. ex:A skos:altLabel "orange"@en. ex:A skos:scopeNote "The colour orange."@en. ex:A skos:inScheme ex:fooscheme. ex:B rdf:type skos:Concept. ex:B skos:prefLabel "orange (fruit)"@en. ex:B skos:altLabel "orange"@en. ex:B skos:scopeNote "The citrus fruit."@en. ex:B skos:inScheme ex:fooscheme. Again, this graph is not inherently inconsistent. Again, however, problems arise when trying to generate a thesaurus from this graph, which are summed up in SkosDesign/ThesaurusPatterns. Summary Thesauri are a major application of the SKOS vocabulary. However, to be usable as a thesaurus, an RDF representation has to observe some syntactic constraints on the usage of the SKOS vocabulary. These syntactic constraints should probably be optional, because other types of vocabulary may not need them, but we still have to say what they are. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070319142324.5EF5266367@dolph.w3.org ISSUE-32: ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-03-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0285A1CB@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] Possible issue: Uniqueness of skos:prefLabel [was Re: [SKOS] inconsistency between Guide and Specification A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-03-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/46817A22.8030503@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-31 BasicLexicalLabelSemantics proposed resolution aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/479F6D3B.70606@few.vu.nl [SKOS] ISSUE-32 ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080205160438.05ea66e8@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-02-05 SWD WG swick@w3.org 2008-02-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/47AC1669.7050505@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-32 ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080208043655.04a23e70@med.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-32 ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions rubin@med.stanford.edu 2008-02-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/47AC4F97.2050700@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-32 ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAEFD@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-32 ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080208050548.rjmdkcx1c44s04s4@webmail.stanford.edu RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-32 ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions rubin@med.stanford.edu 2008-02-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAF08@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-32 ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080210074059.04cc9b98@med.stanford.edu RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-32 ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions rubin@med.stanford.edu 2008-02-10 2007-03-19 Issues Sandbox: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox#head-5593998a47bf818e6bbcf40d289d95f6390c320a 2008-02-05 [rrs] RESOLVED 2008-02-05 to accept Antoine's proposal of 29-Jan http://www.w3.org/2008/02/05-swd-minutes.html#item02 33 3 8 2007-03-26 Thesaurus standards describe the use of "node labels" for convenient grouping and display. Many thesauri use node labels in this way. Some thesauri use "guide terms" for a similar purpose. In some social tagging systems, tags can be grouped into "bundles". The current vocabulary support in SKOS (called "Collections") for these kinds of grouping construct is broken, in that it introduces a contradiction into the SKOS specifications. Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-GroupingInConceptHierarchies See further information at: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/GroupingConstructs 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070326115742.7306EDAE4A@w3c4-bis.w3.org ISSUE-33: GroupingConstructs dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-03-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0285A5AD@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] RE: ISSUE-33: GroupingConstructs A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-03-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02A90C4C@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] RE: ISSUE-33: GroupingConstructs A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-03-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/SEh2U0RkxUCGFAhr@mail.willpowerinfo.co.uk Re: [SKOS] RE: ISSUE-33: GroupingConstructs L.Will@willpowerinfo.co.uk 2007-03-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02CAB20D@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-05-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02CAB21E@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Bundles' Proposal A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-05-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/4649C935.3050404@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Bundles' Proposal schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-05-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/464C231E.60006@few.vu.nl [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Loosening domain and ranges' Proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/46531A7F.10607@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/46531B0E.4070900@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/465C29E7.2030707@cs.vu.nl ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070529073905.0477aa78@med.stanford.edu Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/465C5F50.2000203@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/465C65D8.3040804@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070529150048.04778d18@med.stanford.edu Re: ISSUE-26: SimpleExtension proposal rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/DC1481A1-51A7-4F6B-A644-A4B72BF9EA3F@manchester.ac.uk Test Cases sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2007-06-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02EC07DE@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/46729747.30109@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02EC07EA@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'SimpleExtension' proposal (was RE: [SKOS] 'Lexicalization' or 'term'?) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02EC07EB@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/4672A1A7.8080806@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/4672ACE7.3010600@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'SimpleExtension' proposal (was RE: [SKOS] 'Lexicalization' or 'term'?) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/4675130E.9070806@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'SimpleExtension' proposal (was RE: [SKOS] 'Lexicalization' or 'term'?) schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-06-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/467642BC.7090301@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'SimpleExtension' proposal (was RE: [SKOS] 'Lexicalization' or 'term'?) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02EC0BF1@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02EC0BF2@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] presentation information and thesaurus displays (views) (was RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/1E41AE9AC12EA549BE5BC51A08DD8DC1026DE975@OAEXCH5SERVER.oa.oclc.org RE: [SKOS] presentation information and thesaurus displays (views) (was RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal) houghtoa@oclc.org 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/46817F84.1020800@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/46820EF1.60603@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] presentation information and thesaurus displays (views) (was RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852011C5874@RZJC2EX.jr1.local Meeting record: 2007-06-26 SWD Telecon michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/000001c7ba26$5f45c500$0300000a@DELL RE: [SKOS] presentation information and thesaurus displays (views) (was RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 'Minimal Fix' Proposal) sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk 2007-06-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/468915BC.4000300@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/46891656.1040500@sun.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A5D1A.2000005@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0707030743j62fc4bd7h96f373f578043100@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A2950020000D8000156B0@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D030E3E5D@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk belated regrets (was RE: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070705110516.047e10c8@med.stanford.edu Minutes from July 3 tcon rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-07-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070709172306.GA428@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - July 10 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/469272F6.7030501@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - July 10 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/46924D6B0200006A0000E91B@ntgwgate.loc.gov Re: [ALL] Agenda - July 10 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC cred@loc.gov 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/4694CB5E.5050909@sun.com Meeting Record: 2007-07-10 SWD Telecon Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-07-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070716145919.GA2176@Octavius [ALL] SWD telecon - July 17 2007 - agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-07-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070716154620.GA2012@Octavius Re: [ALL] SWD telecon - July 17 2007 - agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-07-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080123095757.9498EC6DB6@barney.w3.org ISSUE-84: ConstructionOfSystematicDisplaysFromGroupings dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/47971152.5080107@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-84: ConstructionOfSystematicDisplaysFromGroupings aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-23 2007-03-26 SKOS issues sandbox: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox#head-76037c2efdbe6b35874f4f6f69a6d4fe23c18703 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox#head-599459b500012b323811e3c8d8a6baafc5cb41d7 2007-07-17 RESOLVED with the design in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/Semantics/Grouping?action=recall&rev=4 by consensus as detailed in the 07/17/2007 meeting minutes: http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-swd-irc#T15-35-16 34 2 6 2007-04-10 Should XHTML1.1+RDFa allow for HREF on elements other than A and LINK, where XHTML1.1 does not? If so, should conforming agents make those elements clickable links? When considering XHTML2, the task force had the following discussion: http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-htmltf-minutes#item03 In a recent telecon, this was brought up, too: http://www.w3.org/2007/04/02-rdfa-minutes.html#item03 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070410195415.680A366364@dolph.w3.org ISSUE-34: HREF attribute on elements other than A and LINK dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-04-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/46927B15.3050806@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-34: @href everywhere and non-information resources ben@adida.net 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/46970AEF.6050509@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-34: partial resolution to @href everywhere ben@adida.net 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/46988337.7030403@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-34: partial resolution to @href everywhere ivan@w3.org 2007-07-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/1184688743.4187.413.camel@pav Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa connolly@w3.org 2007-07-17 2007-04-15 approved as an OPEN issue on 2007-04-11 telecon. 2007-06-13 This issue is intimately tied with, and thus should include, the discussion of adding a @RESOURCE attribute that is like @HREF except not navigable, even in XHTML2 and beyond. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007May/0020.html 2007-07-23 @href and @resource appear on every element, and @resource overrides @href, as per: http://www.w3.org/2007/07/19-rdfa-minutes.html 2008-02-06 additional related resolution from 2008-01-24: "@href/@resource complete hanging @rel's." as per http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-rdfa-minutes.html 35 3 16 2007-05-29 The SKOS Core Guide includes references to rules. If SKOS is to make use of rules, this should be in terms of standards rather than particular implementations. Definitions for conformance need to be identified. Should all SKOS implementations implement rules? Sean's initial email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0077.html 4 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070529143030.D0BBC13AC6@seamus.w3.org ISSUE-35: RulesAndConformance dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/465C5B27.4040101@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-35: RulesAndConformance aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915142535.GA680@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/bd1d3fc00709180239m41ab82d3v39701872d80381b9@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46EF9DF6.9050006@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/50317A43-A082-4BAA-9B9D-DCB8BF83711E@manchester.ac.uk ISSUE-35: Proposed Resolution sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-02-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080205160438.05ea66e8@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-02-05 SWD WG swick@w3.org 2008-02-05 2008-02-05 [rrs] POSTPONED per resolution of 2008-02-05 http://www.w3.org/2008/02/05-swd-minutes.html 36 3 16 2007-05-29 SKOS defines a 'concept scheme' as: "a set of concepts, optionally including statements about semantic relationships between those concepts." SKOS relationships such as broader and narrower are represented as triples in RDF. The fact that a particular broader/narrower relationship between two concepts belongs to a concept scheme cannot then be represented without resorting to reification. A principled approach to representing this containment would be desirable. Sean's initial email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0078.html Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-ConceptSchemeContainment 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070529143428.3EDC93320C@kearny.w3.org ISSUE-36: SemanticRelationshipContainment dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/465C5B70.3010109@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-36: SemanticRelationshipContainment aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/46824F52.3010205@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46825EA9.8010408@mondeca.com Re: [SKOS] central issues bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46826B5D.1080106@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/468288C7.9040409@mondeca.com Re: [SKOS] central issues bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46836268.8030503@few.vu.nl [SKOS] About ISSUE-36, ISSUE-39, ISSUE-44, (was Re: [SKOS] central issues) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A8D24.7060904@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] on ISSUE-36, ISSUE-39, ISSUE-47 mapping and concept scheme provenance and (was Re: [SKOS] central issues) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468ACEBB.5050006@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] on ISSUE-36 schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/468B5303.8050204@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] on ISSUE-36 aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46F7799E.6080801@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-09-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852012E5917@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-09-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/316ADBDBFE4F4D4AA4FEEF7496ECAEF9158948@EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie RE: [ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-09-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46F7D948.7080404@w3.org Re: [ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-09-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/4784F7CC.2030502@few.vu.nl [SKOS] About Closing ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/4783570E020000D8000266E9@ntgwgate.loc.gov Regrets - Re: [ALL] agenda 8 Jan telecon 1600 UTC juth@loc.gov 2008-01-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/47825367.10302@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 8 Jan telecon 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/477293E1.5060104@few.vu.nl Re: TR : [ISSUE-36 related] Linking a ConceptScheme and a Concept subclass using OWL aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/CAB44397-D95E-4696-B790-B22F63BB8A30@manchester.ac.uk Meeting record: 2007-12-18 SWD telecon sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2007-12-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/4767EDC5.7040000@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0712180745x53d8c9d2o8087b56e66f13f79@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/4767E4F3.1020305@deri.org Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071218095958.GA3876@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/4761021E0200006A0001BF5B@ntgwgate.loc.gov Minutes from 2007-12-11 telecon cred@loc.gov 2007-12-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DADF1@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment, skos:inScheme and rdfs:isDefinedBy Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2007-12-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/475EDA83.5060100@few.vu.nl [SKOS] ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment, skos:inScheme and rdfs:isDefinedBy aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/47017183.2010400@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 2 Oct telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-10-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/472762F5.8040709@few.vu.nl [SKOS] inScheme and rdfs:isDefinedBy (cf. ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-10-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0363C417@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] inScheme and rdfs:isDefinedBy (cf. ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-06 http://www.w3.org/mid/34b5049c0711080542y73bb5542w3f857576fabc04a7@mail.gmail.com Re: [SKOS] inScheme and rdfs:isDefinedBy (cf. ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment) jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-11-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/478BB65B.8080507@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 15 Jan telecon 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB6690269F988@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [ALL] agenda 15 Jan telecon 1600 UTC Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-01-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/478CE1C7.8010400@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 15 Jan telecon 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-01-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/478D1E24.50502@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] About Closing ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/478DB2D6.70308@fundacionctic.org Meeting record: 2008-01-15 SWD telecon diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0499DF7F@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] About Closing ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2008-01-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/479243F6.3040108@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] About Closing ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080121175703.GA3684@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Jan 22 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-01-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/479620AD.1020805@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Jan 22 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-01-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A7836B.2050501@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A8B04E.9010507@few.vu.nl [SKOS] TR : ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A99FB2.30003@dcs.gla.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] TR : ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk 2008-02-06 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B900.40700@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Proposal ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B96B20.4010007@dcs.gla.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] Proposal ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BB2384.10600@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Closing ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/0F1C3BFC-85E4-49FC-BE79-4E43F0371E02@manchester.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-02-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BC05B9.70806@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/68C22185DB90CA41A5ACBD8E834C5ECD0465B110@goofy.wpakb.kb.nl [SKOS] Re: SKOS Concept schemes and OWL Ontologies (related to ISSUE-36) Antoine.Isaac@KB.nl 2008-03-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/5DB9EA83-0017-4455-86B6-A77C0CBDAD5E@manchester.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] Re: SKOS Concept schemes and OWL Ontologies (related to ISSUE-36) simon.jupp@manchester.ac.uk 2008-04-17 2007-06-16 Sean's initial mail on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0077.html Corresponding requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-ConceptSchemeContainment 2008-01-22 2008-01-22 [rrs] Closed per Antoine's proposal in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0093.html (Alistair: with slightly different wording) see http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#item01 2008-01-22 [rrs] closed, per http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#item01 37 3 5 2007-05-29 Local specialization of SKOS vocabulary: for particular situations, the designer of a SKOS concept scheme should be able to introduce new model-level classes and properties, and link them to existing SKOS constructs. Possible cases include the creation of specific kinds of textual definitions or notes for concepts, or the specification of new types of concepts. How does a third party create and publish custom extensions to SKOS? What are the design patterns, and what are best practices? Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-SkosSpecialization 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070529144012.A40686636B@dolph.w3.org ISSUE-37: CustomExtensions dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/465C52CE.3020005@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] tracking SKOS issues aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/46665CFA.2050703@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] tracking SKOS issues - links to requirements aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-06 http://www.w3.org/mid/466EC763.40106@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] tracking SKOS issues - links to requirements and wording issues aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070703161338.0366047BA3@mojo.w3.org ISSUE-56: ReferenceSemanticRelationshipSpecializations dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060803011003j16953aei9318c574bc410f2b@mail.gmail.com Meeting Record: 2008-02-27 SWD telecon ehs@pobox.com 2008-03-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/47E11ECC0200006A00024B85@ntgwgate.loc.gov Minutes from 2008-03-18 telecon cred@loc.gov 2008-03-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903B87AC7@hqgiex01.fao.org List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-05-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/482ADFEC.9070001@cs.vu.nl Re: List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-05-14 2008-05-07 RESOLVED: Section 4.8 of the SKOS Primer resolves ISSUE-37 -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item08 38 3 8 2007-05-29 What are best practices for using the SKOS vocabulary within the constraints required for OWL-DL compatibility? Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-CompatibilityWithOWL-DL 4 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070529144909.D39BD3320C@kearny.w3.org ISSUE-38: OWLDLCompatibility dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02EC07DB@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] basis for the SKOS semantics and ISSUE-38: OWLDLCompatibility A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D030E42C0@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] ISSUE-38 CompatibilityWithOWL-DL - use of '[OWL-Full]' tag in SKOS/Semantics wiki draft A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A4CE46.7060200@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda July 24 telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A4CE78.9080208@adida.net Re: [ALL] agenda July 24 telecon - 1500 UTC ben@adida.net 2007-07-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A496E7020000D8000170B3@ntgwgate.loc.gov Regrets - Re: [ALL] agenda July 24 telecon - 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-07-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A5EEBB.5000100@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-38 CompatibilityWithOWL-DL - use of '[OWL-Full]' tag in SKOS/Semantics wiki draft aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-07-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46A6E13502000015003B23AB@ntgwgate.loc.gov meeting record: 2007-07-24 telecon edsu@loc.gov 2007-07-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/46B7B1FB.7060402@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda Aug 7 telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-08-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20070806171917.0487fc18@med.stanford.edu regrets for Aug 7 telecon - 1500 UTC rubin@med.stanford.edu 2007-08-06 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070820154014.GA2580@Octavius Agenda - Aug 21 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/46C9B8D8.7080903@sun.com Re: Agenda - Aug 21 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-08-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/46CAABAF020000D800019C6F@ntgwgate.loc.gov Scribing - Re: Agenda - Aug 21 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC juth@loc.gov 2007-08-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2BA37.4070903@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 28 Aug telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D3A9D6.6040106@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Aug telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D3ED2B.9030506@sun.com Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Aug telecon - 1500 UTC Bernard.Horan@sun.com 2007-08-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070903114838.GA4028@sub-tombaker Agenda - Sep 04 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D525A@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] moving development forward & compatibility with OWL-DL (ISSUE-38) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-09-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/46DD83D0.5050701@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] moving development forward & compatibility with OWL-DL (ISSUE-38) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-09-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070905114919.GA3500@sub-tombaker [SKOS] Compatibility with OWL-DL - Issue-26 baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852012A4DD5@RZJC2EX.jr1.local Meeting record: 2007-09-04 michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-09-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/46DE9B93020000D80001B06C@ntgwgate.loc.gov LATE REGRETS - Re: Meeting record: 2007-09-04 juth@loc.gov 2007-09-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/46E4F20F.5020503@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] moving development forward & compatibility with OWL-DL (ISSUE-38) schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-09-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/46E5D599.4050003@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 11 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-09-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D01B7D35A@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] agenda 11 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-09-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915142535.GA680@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/bd1d3fc00709180239m41ab82d3v39701872d80381b9@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46EF9DF6.9050006@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/A6C0A826-154B-4466-91DC-3A2758362604@manchester.ac.uk SKOS and imports sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-04-16 39 3 17 2007-05-29 Is the current vocabulary for mapping between concepts in different concept schemes (previously called "SKOS Mapping") sufficient? Could it be simplified? Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-ConceptualMappingLinks 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070529145256.0A9F56636D@dolph.w3.org ISSUE-39: SemanticMappingVocabulary dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/4682400B.4030808@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-39: ConceptualMappingLinks aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/4783570E020000D8000266E9@ntgwgate.loc.gov Regrets - Re: [ALL] agenda 8 Jan telecon 1600 UTC juth@loc.gov 2008-01-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/47825367.10302@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 8 Jan telecon 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/CAB44397-D95E-4696-B790-B22F63BB8A30@manchester.ac.uk Meeting record: 2007-12-18 SWD telecon sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2007-12-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/4767EDC5.7040000@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0712180745x53d8c9d2o8087b56e66f13f79@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/4767E4F3.1020305@deri.org Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071218095958.GA3876@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAE0D@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2007-12-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAE0C@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] A revised proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks [CORRECTION] Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2007-12-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAE0B@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2007-12-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/476654D6.70208@dcs.gla.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk 2007-12-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47659465.1090802@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] A revised proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks [CORRECTION] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/4761021E0200006A0001BF5B@ntgwgate.loc.gov Minutes from 2007-12-11 telecon cred@loc.gov 2007-12-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3FABA@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-12-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3FAB9@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-12-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/475EE0DE.3080602@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] A revised proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F206@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] top priorities A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/474C9618.2050701@few.vu.nl [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-11-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/BED9D15F73EDDE48BF480604236A456004BBC16B@ex1.ad.dcs.gla.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk 2007-11-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/474EA6E0.5000705@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-11-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20071201074627.04846340@smi.stanford.edu RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks rubin@smi.stanford.edu 2007-12-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/475478DE.1090205@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/2C50F05E7BE301499FDE5A2820E4CFE0627C36@BE-SCAM2.ds.strath.ac.uk RE: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? e.mcculloch@strath.ac.uk 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB6690269F7AD@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DADC5@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47556EF8.6040802@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47557082.0@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB6690269F7B4@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DADC6@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47558836.80109@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F7C4@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F7C8@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] ISSUE-39A Grouping for Mapping? (was RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/4755A88B.5080609@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/uIg5HcJ8HeVHFA6w@mail.willpowerinfo.co.uk Re: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? L.Will@willpowerinfo.co.uk 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/4756CC46.3030905@dcs.gla.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk 2007-12-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/4756F25B.7010801@few.vu.nl [SKOS] ISSUE-39B Parallel vocabulary for Mapping? (was RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/47570A73.9050309@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-39A Grouping for Mapping? (was RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/47570D3C.3050900@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-39C Related vs Overlapping match (was Re: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification?) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/002a01c838e7$f90cddf0$0300000a@DELL RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk 2007-12-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/f99la3JH8bWHFAXz@mail.willpowerinfo.co.uk A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks L.Will@willpowerinfo.co.uk 2007-12-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/475D19D9.3080009@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/002001c83b1d$a1cee3c0$0300000a@DELL RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk 2007-12-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/475D21D7.1080805@few.vu.nl Re: A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071210151751.GA2940@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Dec 11 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-12-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/004b01c83b43$72306140$0300000a@DELL RE: A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk 2007-12-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/475D84E8.305@few.vu.nl [SKOS] A revised proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/475DA0DD.6050807@few.vu.nl Re: A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/E92D1644-9044-4011-92A6-8455F0380B38@madcreek.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 11 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/475EA699.3010609@adida.net Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 11 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC ben@adida.net 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0712110703s522fee13p1b16e6708e333418@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 11 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE802788761@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk RE: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 11 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB6690269F81F@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/7C1F4F6C-FD48-46FF-814E-E84AB89D0987@madcreek.com Meeting record: 2008-01-08 SWD telecon jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-01-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/478BB65B.8080507@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 15 Jan telecon 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB6690269F988@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [ALL] agenda 15 Jan telecon 1600 UTC Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-01-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/478CE1C7.8010400@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 15 Jan telecon 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-01-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/478DB2D6.70308@fundacionctic.org Meeting record: 2008-01-15 SWD telecon diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B622.8060206@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAF56@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BB2300.8010702@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080219110910.3gcob74r340swck4@webmail.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary dlrubin@stanford.edu 2008-02-19 2007-12-18 In [1] Alistair proposed dropping all grouping constructs from the Rec. This was discussed during the 18-Dec telecon [2]. During that telecon we resolved to proceed per Alistair's recommendation and drop the legacy AND, OR, ... [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Dec/0025.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes 2008-01-15 [rrs] RESOLUTION: Accept Antoine's proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Dec/0083.html <p> -- http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes#item02 40 3 8 2007-05-29 Many subject vocabularies are designed to be "coordinated". For example, when using MeSH, main descriptors can be "coordinated with" modifiers to create more specific meanings, e.g. "aspirin" coordinated with "side-effects". SKOS does not provide any support for coordination. See also http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/Coordination . Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-ConceptCoordination 4 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070529145521.121866B64C@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-40: Coordination dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070616124931.AE5056B644@kent.w3.org ISSUE-45: NaryLinksBetweenDescriptorsAndNonDescriptors dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/4767EDC5.7040000@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0712180745x53d8c9d2o8087b56e66f13f79@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/4767E4F3.1020305@deri.org Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071218095958.GA3876@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAE0C@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] A revised proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks [CORRECTION] Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2007-12-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47659465.1090802@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] A revised proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks [CORRECTION] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/475EE0DE.3080602@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] A revised proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/475478DE.1090205@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/2C50F05E7BE301499FDE5A2820E4CFE0627C36@BE-SCAM2.ds.strath.ac.uk RE: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? e.mcculloch@strath.ac.uk 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47557082.0@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47558836.80109@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/4755A88B.5080609@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS ISSUE-39: clarification? aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47570A73.9050309@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-39A Grouping for Mapping? (was RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/68C22185DB90CA41A5ACBD8E834C5ECD04953D70@goofy.wpakb.kb.nl RE : ISSUE 77 and postcoordination [and ISSUE-40!] Antoine.Isaac@KB.nl 2008-03-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/47D539BA.9060501@gbv.de Re: ISSUE 77 and postcoordination [and ISSUE-40!] jakob.voss@gbv.de 2008-03-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/O14MrDFEYn1HFANZ@mail.willpowerinfo.co.uk Re: ISSUE 77 and postcoordination [and ISSUE-40!] L.Will@willpowerinfo.co.uk 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/47DA58CD.6020406@lukehouse.org Re: ISSUE 77 and postcoordination [and ISSUE-40!] stella@lukehouse.org 2008-03-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/47DAA274.3060600@gbv.de Re: ISSUE 77 and postcoordination [and ISSUE-40!] jakob.voss@gbv.de 2008-03-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/229614.35279.qm@web44814.mail.sp1.yahoo.com Re: ISSUE 77 and postcoordination [and ISSUE-40!] nabonitaguha@yahoo.com 2008-03-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/47DE408B.8050208@gbv.de Re: ISSUE 77 and postcoordination [and ISSUE-40!] jakob.voss@gbv.de 2008-03-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47DEA249.4070801@gbv.de Re: ISSUE 77 and postcoordination [and ISSUE-40!] jakob.voss@gbv.de 2008-03-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47DF77C5.3000209@few.vu.nl [SKOS] ISSUE 77 and ISSUE-40: proposal for postcoordination aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-03-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47DF9683.8070700@dcs.gla.ac.uk Re: ISSUE 77 and postcoordination [and ISSUE-40!] agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk 2008-03-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47E11ECC0200006A00024B85@ntgwgate.loc.gov Minutes from 2008-03-18 telecon cred@loc.gov 2008-03-19 2008-01-29 [rrs] Alistair agrees to make a proposal, though he feels that SKOS could go to REC without resolving this 2008-05-07 RESOLUTION: to postpone issue 40, due to lack of time, lack of implementation experience with tentative solutions, and unclear interaction between SKOS and OWL. -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item04 41 3 8 2007-05-29 The SKOS Core Guide should use language tags with literals throughout, as examples of good practice. 3 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070529145846.CF0FF3320C@kearny.w3.org ISSUE-41: UseLangTagsInExamples dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/479E554A.4020607@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Re: Review of the SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0499E45B@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] ISSUE-41 A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2008-01-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/479F6E52.5020509@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-41 aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060801291151p6cedd4f8y96df92440cbab812@mail.gmail.com Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-41 ehs@pobox.com 2008-01-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 2008-01-29 [rrs] The WG believes this no longer applies to the current SKOS Reference. Alistair will inform the commenter. 42 2 6 2007-06-13 We need to come to a conclusion on what @SRC does. The most recent consensus was: @SRC is like @HREF, but there has been some dissent on this topic. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070613165649.61CF5BDAF@w3c4.w3.org ISSUE-42: How does RDFa handle the @SRC attribute? dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/469011A1.5000305@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve ben@adida.net 2007-07-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/4690B30D.8090908@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve ivan@w3.org 2007-07-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/469266E9.4000503@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve ben@adida.net 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/46926887.8050803@aptest.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve shane@aptest.com 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/469268B5.30402@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve ivan@w3.org 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/46926950.2090504@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve ben@adida.net 2007-07-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/469358D6.9000106@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve ivan@w3.org 2007-07-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/46935E25.1010003@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve ivan@w3.org 2007-07-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/46935EB1.8080408@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve ivan@w3.org 2007-07-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/46967A6B.90904@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute ben@adida.net 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/46973F72.9010908@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute ivan@w3.org 2007-07-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/469C0776.7010601@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute ben@adida.net 2007-07-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/469ECA95.3020701@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute ben@adida.net 2007-07-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/cf8107640707190738u60f995e3lc89c20a6267ad193@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute lindstream@gmail.com 2007-07-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/47044893.6070506@adida.net ISSUE-42: @src attribute ben@adida.net 2007-10-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/47049AEB.5040002@w3.org Re: ISSUE-42: @src attribute ivan@w3.org 2007-10-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/cf8107640710040148k6681018bo64c47418a4cc03d3@mail.gmail.com Re: ISSUE-42: @src attribute lindstream@gmail.com 2007-10-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/a707f8300710040228k6d5a7780y2d532ec7480e36cd@mail.gmail.com Re: ISSUE-42: @src attribute mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com 2007-10-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/4704F031.1070100@digitalbazaar.com Re: ISSUE-42: @src attribute msporny@digitalbazaar.com 2007-10-04 2007-10-18 RESOLVED: @src on IMG behaves just @href and @resource, and it is overridden by @href and @resource, in that order. (for some reason, some of the mailing list links on the tracker are dead...) 2008-02-06 this resolution was modified on 2008-01-24, as follows: "@src behaves like @about and is overridden by @about" telecon: http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-rdfa-minutes.html 43 2 6 2007-06-13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Apr/0003.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070613172919.6A1D06B643@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-43: Primer should link to the URIs of the assumed namespaces (e.g. cc, foaf,...) dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/46FAEE7D.6010609@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-43: Primer should link to URIs of assumed namespaces ben@adida.net 2007-09-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852016638B9@RZJC2EX.jr1.local meeting record: 2008-04-24 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2008-04-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D298520166398A@RZJC2EX.jr1.local [RDFa] Comments on the RDFa Primer michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2008-04-28 2008-04-30 RESOLVED as "Michael to answer Lee's comments for Issue 43 in the same e-mail as Issue 11, noting that the Primer and Syntax Document have changed significantly and issues seem to have been addressed. Invite for further comments. This issue is closed, no changes to the documents." 44 3 16 2007-06-15 What are the semantics of skos:broader and skos:narrower? There are several open questions: * Are they transitive? Intransitive? Or can the application choose? * Are they reflexive? Irreflexive? Or can the application choose? * Should the transitive closure be irreflexive (i.e. a cycle is a contradiction)? Or can the application choose? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070615092507.87D2EC1F7@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-44: BroaderNarrowerSemantics dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070615040030.zd82d9tqmsw04s00@webmail.stanford.edu Re: ISSUE-44: BroaderNarrowerSemantics dlrubin@stanford.edu 2007-06-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/1182425449.4846.18.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org Re: ISSUE-44: BroaderNarrowerSemantics diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2007-06-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02EC0BF0@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] central issues A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/46814CEA.3000004@mondeca.com Re: [SKOS] central issues bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/46824F52.3010205@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46825EA9.8010408@mondeca.com Re: [SKOS] central issues bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46891049.4070304@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/46894F29.4010907@madcreek.com Re: [SKOS] central issues jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/4689FFFD.8080603@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A58FC.2030303@madcreek.com Re: [SKOS] central issues jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468AC9DE.8070503@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/47865A88.4050108@mondeca.com Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080110083519.pd3bcl1aqs8k4s88@webmail.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) rubin@med.stanford.edu 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/4786461D.6030404@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080110074342.5xlew9uwbo0048wc@webmail.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) rubin@med.stanford.edu 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/478637BF.5080809@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080110065848.04a0f5a8@med.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) rubin@med.stanford.edu 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080110065354.04a039c8@med.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) rubin@med.stanford.edu 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/47861B85.5000700@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/12B58E38-84DC-40F7-A890-F05947AABCE3@gmail.com Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) sesuncedu@gmail.com 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/4D7608C1-EF26-4D70-BCB7-508CC72040D2@gmail.com Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) sesuncedu@gmail.com 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/746215BF-3FF6-42F9-939A-6A0862A79C9A@manchester.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/4785EE6E.3070804@mondeca.com Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/4785E95A.3040900@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/4785E7A1.5060706@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080109142807.02d93ff0@med.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) rubin@med.stanford.edu 2008-01-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/D2721347-6B91-4EAD-8AD6-2E26A85929B6@gmail.com Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) sesuncedu@gmail.com 2008-01-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/478539B3.20907@few.vu.nl [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/475D87BF.7010801@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 11 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080110101818.04793948@med.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) rubin@med.stanford.edu 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/47866CEB.2040702@mondeca.com Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 2008-01-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080112055253.0435b758@med.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) rubin@med.stanford.edu 2008-01-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/6DA97EFF2763174B8BDC409CA1972984067F6B54@dbf-ex.AD.DDB.DE AW: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) l.svensson@d-nb.de 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/478B1DE8.3060204@few.vu.nl Re: AW: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/6DA97EFF2763174B8BDC409CA1972984067F6B5C@dbf-ex.AD.DDB.DE AW: AW: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) l.svensson@d-nb.de 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080114082411.04afe3f0@med.stanford.edu Re: AW: [SKOS] The return of ISSUE-44 (was Re: TR : SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007) rubin@med.stanford.edu 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAE64@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/478BB65B.8080507@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 15 Jan telecon 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/478C8BA1.3080201@few.vu.nl Re: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB6690269F988@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [ALL] agenda 15 Jan telecon 1600 UTC Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-01-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/478CE1C7.8010400@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 15 Jan telecon 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-01-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/003001c856d5$12d30060$6702a8c0@TFJOHAN RE: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) johan.de-smedt@tenforce.com 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/478DDBCA.4010601@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] proposed resolution for Issue 4 - BroaderNarrowerSemantics aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080116153050.38D2CBEF0@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-69: BroaderIrreflexive dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080116153440.4745C5F70C@stu.w3.org ISSUE-70: BroaderCycles dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/478E245D.7090403@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-69: BroaderIrreflexive aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/478F2594.7020002@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-70: BroaderCycles aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0499DF75@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 18 January 2008 A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2008-01-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0499DF79@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007 A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2008-01-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE802ACF9DD@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 18 January 2008 q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2008-01-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080121175703.GA3684@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Jan 22 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-01-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47960E40.2070703@cs.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Jan 22 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/479620AD.1020805@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Jan 22 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-01-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/47971236.404@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-69: BroaderIrreflexive aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/479E064F.6000309@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 29 Jan telecon -- 16:00 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/479E2C33.6020307@cs.vu.nl Re: [ALL] agenda 29 Jan telecon -- 16:00 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-01-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/A492AE2F-6DCF-4F65-93EA-A7EF9E80D5E7@manchester.ac.uk Meeting Record: 2008-01-29 telecon sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-01-31 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/000601c8b5e0$5ee5a830$1cb0f890$@miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] ISSUE-44 (was: Suggestion for SKOS FAQ) alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-05-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/483E6C2A.2060901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-44 (was: Suggestion for SKOS FAQ) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-05-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/005701c8c17c$2ade3410$6973a8c0@TFJOHAN RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-44 (was: Suggestion for SKOS FAQ) johan.de-smedt@tenforce.com 2008-05-29 2007-08-21 Assigned to Sean during 21 August WG telecon 2008-01-22 [rrs] Guus proposes a resolution in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0090.html 2008-01-22 [rrs] closed per http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#item01 Alistair: separate issues have been opened for transitivity (68, 69) and cycles (70) 45 3 8 2007-06-16 Normally in a thesaurus, every non-descriptor (non-preferred term) points to one and only one descriptor (preferred term). However, the ISO 2788 standard also allows instructions of the form "USE X + Y" and "USE X OR Y". Related wiki page: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ThesaurusPatterns Alistair's initial email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0036 Related issue: ISSUE-40 ConceptCoordination, http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/40 4 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070616124931.AE5056B644@kent.w3.org ISSUE-45: NaryLinksBetweenDescriptorsAndNonDescriptors dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/4767EDC5.7040000@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0712180745x53d8c9d2o8087b56e66f13f79@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/4767E4F3.1020305@deri.org Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC vit.novacek@deri.org 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071218095958.GA3876@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-12-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAE0C@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] A revised proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks [CORRECTION] Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2007-12-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47659465.1090802@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] A revised proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks [CORRECTION] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/475EE0DE.3080602@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] A revised proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/47570A73.9050309@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-39A Grouping for Mapping? (was RE: [SKOS] A new proposal for ISSUE-39 ConceptualMappingLinks) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-12-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/4799B34E.7040203@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A7836B.2050501@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 2008-01-29 [rrs] Deferred pending a resolution of issue-40. Guus notes that some of the use cases assume this feature. 2008-05-07 RESOLVED: to postpone issue 45, due to lack of time, lack of implementation experience with tentative solutions, and unclear interaction between SKOS and OWL. -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item09 46 3 17 2007-06-16 SKOS should provide different classes for conceptual entities that can be used for indexing resources and for those that cannot be used for such a purpose (e.g. specific qualifiers that can only be used to narrow down the meaning of an existing concept). Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-IndexingAndNonIndexingConcepts 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070616125310.04C0D6B644@kent.w3.org ISSUE-46: IndexingAndNonIndexingConcepts dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 2008-02-05 [rrs] accepted as OPEN on 2008-02-05 2008-05-07 RESOLUTION: Close issue 46 as we have decided that the indexing vocabulary is not part of SKOS -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item10 47 3 5 2007-06-16 It shall be possible to record provenance information on mappings between concepts in different concept schemes. Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-MappingProvenanceInformation 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070616125926.153C247BA8@mojo.w3.org ISSUE-47: MappingProvenanceInformation dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A8D24.7060904@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] on ISSUE-36, ISSUE-39, ISSUE-47 mapping and concept scheme provenance and (was Re: [SKOS] central issues) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B900.40700@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Proposal ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B96B20.4010007@dcs.gla.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] Proposal ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BB2384.10600@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Closing ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 2008-02-05 [rrs] accepted as OPEN on 5-Feb 2008-05-07 RESOLVED: Provenance of mappings is not handled by the introduction of specific SKOS vocabulary. In the SKOS reference documents (Reference and maybe Primer), SKOS users are instead pointed at other RDF containment mechanisms (E.g. the URI of a mapping information source can be used in a SPARQL query). -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item11 48 3 17 2007-06-16 The SKOS model should contain mechanisms to attach a given resource (e.g. corresponding to a document) to a concept the resource is about, e.g. to query for the resources described by a given concept. Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-IndexingRelationship 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070616130155.A9AD613AC7@seamus.w3.org ISSUE-48: IndexingRelationship dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/4799C6D9.8000907@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Re: Review of the SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE802C2BA9C@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] Re: Review of the SKOS Primer q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2008-01-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/68C22185DB90CA41A5ACBD8E834C5ECD0465B0C3@goofy.wpakb.kb.nl RE : RE : [ISSUE-77] [ISSUE-48] Skos subject properties are deprecated Antoine.Isaac@KB.nl 2008-01-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/479E554A.4020607@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Re: Review of the SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/48187F16.6060201@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Material for ISSUE-48 and ISSUE-77 aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080430153626.GA1784@octavius Re: [SKOS] Material for ISSUE-48 and ISSUE-77 baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-30 2008-05-07 See also ISSUE-77 SubjectIndexing 2008-05-07 RESOLUTION: to not include the SKOS indexing properties because 1) it's the role of SKOS to publish vocabularies and not to indicate how they should be used for indexing purposes 2) there appear to be enough support from existing metadata vocabularies to handle links between resources and SKOS concepts -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item05 49 3 17 2007-06-16 In the process of mapping different concept schemes, it should be possible to identify correspondence links not only between concepts from these concept schemes, but also between the labels that can be attached to these concepts. Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-LexicalMappingLinks 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070616162313.024306B644@kent.w3.org ISSUE-49: LexicalMappingLinks dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 2008-05-07 RESOLUTION: the XL appendix provides a framework for asserting lexical mapping links -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item12 50 3 17 2007-06-16 Using SKOS model shall be compatible with using Dublin Core Abstract Model (http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/). When there are links between SKOS features and Dublin Core ones, these shall be specified. Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-CompatibilityWithDC 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070616162515.464216B644@kent.w3.org ISSUE-50: CompatibilityWithDC dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 2008-05-07 RESOLUTION: the use of concept scheme URI in DC metadata as a vocabulary scheme URI does not raise compatibility issues -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item06 51 3 17 2007-06-16 SKOS model shall be compatible with part 3 of ISO 11179 specifications for a metadata registry metamodel (http://metadata-standards.org/11179/#11179-3 ) Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-CompatibilityWithISO11179 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070616162724.1B19A6B644@kent.w3.org ISSUE-51: CompatibilityWithISO11179 dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903B87AC7@hqgiex01.fao.org List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-05-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/482ADFEC.9070001@cs.vu.nl Re: List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-05-14 2008-05-07 2008-05-07: RESOLVED to close ISSUE-53 by saying that we see no incompatibility between SKOS and ISO 11179 http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item06 52 3 17 2007-06-16 SKOS model shall be compatible with ISO 2788 specifications for monolingual thesauri (http://www.collectionscanada.ca/iso/tc46sc9/standard/2788e.htm ) Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-CompatibilityWithISO2788 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070616164743.ECFEEC1F7@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-52: CompatibilityWithISO2788 dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903B87AC7@hqgiex01.fao.org List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-05-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/482ADFEC.9070001@cs.vu.nl Re: List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-05-14 2008-05-07 RESOLUTION: to close ISSUE-52 by adding a table to the Primer with correspondences between ISO-2788 and SKOS constructs -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item06 2008-05-07 RESOLUTION: to close ISSUE-52 by adding a table to the Primer with correspondences between ISO-2788 and SKOS constructs http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item06 53 3 17 2007-06-16 SKOS model shall be compatible with ISO 5964 specifications for multilingual thesauri (http://www.collectionscanada.ca/iso/tc46sc9/standard/5964e.htm) Requirement: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-CompatibilityWithISO5964 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070616165243.F03ADC1F7@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-53: CompatibilityWithISO5964 dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 2008-05-07 RESOLVED to close ISSUE-53 by saying that we see no imcompatibility between SKOS and ISO5964 http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item06 54 3 17 2007-06-26 What are the semantics of skos:Concept? skos:Concept is currently declared as { skos:Concept rdf:type rdfs:Class . } ... is this ok? Is this enough? What about the OWL universe? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070626160934.3BAB06B651@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-54: ConceptSemantics dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D02EC0BF0@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] central issues A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/46814CEA.3000004@mondeca.com Re: [SKOS] central issues bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 2007-06-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/46824F52.3010205@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46825EA9.8010408@mondeca.com Re: [SKOS] central issues bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46891049.4070304@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/46894F29.4010907@madcreek.com Re: [SKOS] central issues jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-07-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/4689FFFD.8080603@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468A58FC.2030303@madcreek.com Re: [SKOS] central issues jphipps@madcreek.com 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/468AC9DE.8070503@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] central issues schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2007-07-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0363C425@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] Resolutions on concept semantics (ISSUE-54) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-06 http://www.w3.org/mid/4730A1CE.5000402@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Resolutions on concept semantics (ISSUE-54) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-11-06 http://www.w3.org/mid/4730B089.3000607@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Resolutions on concept semantics (ISSUE-54) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-11-06 http://www.w3.org/mid/4733298B.50906@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Resolutions on concept semantics (ISSUE-54) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-11-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080117132525.4BAB3C6DB6@barney.w3.org ISSUE-80: SKOS-OWL-Patterns dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B1EF98.7090608@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Proposed resolution to close ISSUE-54 aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080218163809.GA3304@octavius [All] Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/34b5049c0802181029q5c534978m87acdc4c4f6a334d@mail.gmail.com Re: [All] Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAF5E@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [All] Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0802181458o4267f179lf9b25fbbe0e46971@mail.gmail.com Re: [All] Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BDA2FE.3020004@zoo.ox.ac.uk Minutes of 2008-02-19 telcon alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BEEB3F.60801@few.vu.nl [SKOS] ISSUE--54 closed, ISSUE-80 opened aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 2007-08-21 Assigned to Antoine during 21 August WG telecon 2008-02-22 2008-02-19 [rrs] Closed per Antoine's proposal in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0053.html Section 3 of the SKOS reference http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-skos-reference-20080125/#L1289 is adopted as a partial solution to ISSUE-54. ISSUE-54 is CLOSEd. ISSUE-80 is now OPENed. 2008-02-19 [rrs] closed per http://www.w3.org/2008/02/19-swd-minutes.html#item03 55 2 6 2007-06-27 Ivan requests that we drop CURIEs and opt for QNames at this point. Shane adds that it's dangerous to base our specification on the CURIE spec, which itself is not finished. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070627021747.04AB1C200@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa, dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-06-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/46967313.3040508@adida.net [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa ben@adida.net 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D2985201211B9F@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/46967F76.3060702@adida.net Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa ben@adida.net 2007-07-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/46973DAF.2030700@w3.org Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa ivan@w3.org 2007-07-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/4697D02B.4080100@aptest.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa shane@aptest.com 2007-07-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/640dd5060707131304j42d33146w60eeb59208d0a117@mail.gmail.com Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa mark.birbeck@x-port.net 2007-07-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D2985201211CB0@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2007-07-13 2007-08-16 resolved as: "RDFa does not use QNames for shortening URIs, as that is technically incorrect. We use the equivalent of CURIEs, exactly as SPARQL. We will include the definition of CURIES inline with the RDFa syntax, though we may eventually choose to refer to the CURIE doc instead." 56 3 5 2007-07-03 Additionally to guidelines on how to create custom extensions to SKOS (ISSUE-37, [1]) the WG could take the responsability to publish a reference list of semantic relationships mirroring established needs like [2,3] Currently there is a proposal containing 8 such specializations for SKOS broader, narrower and related properties [4]: - broaderGeneric - broaderInstantive - broaderPartitive - narrowerGeneric - narrowerInstantive - narrowerPartitive - relatedHasPart - relatedPartOf Are these enough, are some of these not needed? References: [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/37 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0216.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0120.html [4] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/extensions/spec/ 4 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070703161338.0366047BA3@mojo.w3.org ISSUE-56: ReferenceSemanticRelationshipSpecializations dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-07-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070822065936.GA2376@Octavius [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-08-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D033D4F83@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-08-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/46D2E6F9.1070403@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] SWD face-to-face - draft agenda aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-08-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F206@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] top priorities A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/478B5599.8070104@few.vu.nl Re: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/D1E85BF9-6DD9-46F1-BFC0-E7495CD99122@madcreek.com Re: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/A1C143B9-31FB-478E-88CB-812E99D5AA90@gmail.com Re: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) sesuncedu@gmail.com 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/478B8CCE.9090008@few.vu.nl Re: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/478B90FC.10804@few.vu.nl Re: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/1af06bde0801140908x481af966xac40c59e228ea32a@mail.gmail.com Re: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) sesuncedu@gmail.com 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/478B9B21.7030100@few.vu.nl Re: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAE64@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080114184316.02ddb6c8@med.stanford.edu RE: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) rubin@med.stanford.edu 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/478C8BA1.3080201@few.vu.nl Re: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/003001c856d5$12d30060$6702a8c0@TFJOHAN RE: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) johan.de-smedt@tenforce.com 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/658901D9-165C-4046-9D96-FCE68332B367@gmail.com Re: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) sesuncedu@gmail.com 2008-01-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/4799C6D9.8000907@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Re: Review of the SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/4799E003.1020806@few.vu.nl Re: AW: AW: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 ) aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE802C2BA9C@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] Re: Review of the SKOS Primer q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2008-01-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/479E554A.4020607@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Re: Review of the SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903B87AC7@hqgiex01.fao.org List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-05-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/482ADFEC.9070001@cs.vu.nl Re: List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-05-14 2008-05-07 RESOLVED: To postpone Reference Semantic Relation Specialisations (ISSUE-56) becuase we do not yet have sufficient information on how to embed these specializations in the current SKOS model -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item02 57 2 6 2007-07-05 xml:base may present problem with clickability of links. 2 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070705161543.CB6923320A@kearny.w3.org ISSUE-57: xml:base meaningful in XHTML1.1+RDFa? dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-07-05 58 5 18 2007-07-17 Per Tim BL "The recipe for responding to an accept header only responds to a header which EXACTLY matches "application/rdf+xml". However, a client may send (and often will) a header with many comma-separated values, and they may have quality parameters (q=0.xx). This is a serious problem as people are copying the recipe, and making sites which do not work." This applies to Recipes 3, 4, 5 and references this part of the .htaccess Apache configuration: "... # Rewrite rule to serve RDF/XML content if requested RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT} application/rdf\+xml ..." The rewrite condition regular expression: "application/rdf\+xml" needs to be rewritten 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070717121239.2E01B6B644@kent.w3.org ISSUE-58: .htaccess \\'accept header\\' ONLY responds to a header which EXACTLY matches \\'application/rdf+xml\\' dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-07-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/1184768175.4685.76.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org Re: [Recipes] ISSUE-58: .htaccess 'accept header' ONLY responds to a header which EXACTLY matches \\'application/rdf+xml\\' diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2007-07-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D030E4485@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [Recipes] ISSUE-58: .htaccess 'accept header' ONLY responds to a header which EXACTLY matches \\'application/rdf+xml\\' A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-07-24 http://www.w3.org/mid/1185359793.4730.49.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org Re: [Recipes] ISSUE-58: .htaccess 'accept header' ONLY responds to a header which EXACTLY matches \\'application/rdf+xml\\' diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2007-07-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D030E460A@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: [Recipes] ISSUE-58: .htaccess 'accept header' ONLY responds to a header which EXACTLY matches \\'application/rdf+xml\\' A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-07-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/1186424707.9838.27.camel@daneel.berrueta.net RE: [Recipes] ISSUE-58: .htaccess 'accept header' ONLY responds to a header which EXACTLY matches \\'application/rdf+xml\\' diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2007-08-06 http://www.w3.org/mid/1188919889.5666.29.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org Re: Agenda - Sep 04 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2007-09-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070904144244.GB1040@sub-tombaker [ALL] Discussion of 'Recipes' in Amsterdam baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915142535.GA680@Octavius [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070915150038.GG2612@Octavius [RECIPES] Amsterdam topic 'Recipes' baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2007-09-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/bd1d3fc00709180239m41ab82d3v39701872d80381b9@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/46EF9DF6.9050006@few.vu.nl Re: [ALL] Agenda - Sep 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-09-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/1205246076.4829.11.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/B0AAC07C-6A27-421A-8E62-523A40EC6D0A@madcreek.com Re: [Recipes] roadmap to the next draft jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-03-11 http://www.w3.org/mid/47D83672.7040701@few.vu.nl Meeting record: 2008-03-11 telecon aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-03-12 59 2 14 2007-08-10 Does RDFa (regarding a certain hostlanguage: HTML 4, XHTML1, XHTML2) support the usage of xml:base? See Also and Related: + Ivan has asked for xml:base in the Test Cases [1] + As Shane points out [2], the decision to support xml:base would have far- reaching ramifications (cf. also his action [3]) [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Aug/0038.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/08/09-rdfa-irc#T15-16-05 [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/28-rdfa-minutes.html#action02 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070810193650.E8F5DC235@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-59: xml:base support dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-08-10 2007-08-16 opened on 2007-08-16 2007-08-23 As per discussion and resolution on telecon: http://www.w3.org/2007/08/16-rdfa-minutes.html xml:base is not supported in XHTML 1.1 + RDFa, as it has no effect on @href. In general, this is dependent on the host language's use of xml:base. 60 5 18 2007-09-18 The recipes don't spend very much time discussing best practices for URI construction for vocabulary schemes and 'terms'. Based on a request by the International Press Telecommunications Council: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Sep/0023.html They are seeking guidance wrt construction of URIs to identify taxonomy schemes and "terms". They have two questions: 1. Should we opt for "#" or "#_" or "/" or "?" or "?<foo>=" or some other string as the scheme URI terminator? 2. What mechanism should we adopt for constructing code URIs? (By "Code URIs" they mean a mapping of URI to existing term codes: "...we decided to continue using the large number of existing codes that are used in News and related industries today.") Below is the full text of the email that raised the questions: Introduction ------------ Below is a draft statement of matters on which the International Press Telecommunications Council [1] seeks help from the W3C and from the broader Semantic Web community. The statement hasn't yet been reviewed by the relevant IPTC groups, but to save time I'm sending it in draft form. We would very much like to have these matters resolved by the time of the next IPTC meeting on 15-17 October 2007, in Prague. Background ---------- The IPTC decided a few years ago that its new G2 family of News Exchange standards must be compatible with the Semantic Web. We decided that: 1. Terms from taxonomies used for News would be associated with individual URIs. 2. We would encourage the use of GRDDL to convert News marked up with metadata into forms understood by SemWeb tools. At the same time we decided to continue using the large number of existing codes that are used in News and related industries today. To reconcile these two requirements (SemWeb plus existing codes), we chose an approach somewhat similar to QNAMEs, though with several significant differences. The approach is: - Codes exist within (coding) schemes. Familiar examples are: ISO 4217 alpha codes ISO 4217 numeric codes ISO 3166-1 two-letter alpha codes ISO 3166-1 three-letter alpha codes ISO 3166-1 numeric alpha codes IETF BCP 47 language tags Possibly less familar examples are: CUSIPs (eg "037833100", Apple Computer) ISBNs(eg "0-321-18578-1", The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0) ISSNs (eg "0261-3077", The Guardian) SEDOLs (eg "0263494", BAE Systems) Valorens (eg "1203203", UBS) - Each coding scheme is associated with a URI. That URI *must* resolve to a resource (or resources) containing information about the scheme. - Each scheme URI is locally mapped to a prefix. - There are almost no constraints on the values of codes. For example, a code may start with a digit. - A qualified code (QCODE) is expressed in the form: prefix:code - We shall define rules for how scheme URIs should be terminated. These rules may take the form of guidelines. - We shall define rules for the construction of a code URI from the corresponding scheme URI and the code. These rules may or may not specify simple concatenation. - In the case of schemes controlled by the News industry, each code URI *must* resolve to a resource or (content negotiated) resources containing information about the code. - In the case of schemes used but not not controlled by the News industry, each code URI *should* resolve to a resource or (content negotiated) resources containing information about the code. Matters we need help with ------------------------- 1. Should we opt for "#" or "#_" or "/" or "?" or "?<foo>=" or some other string as the scheme URI terminator? 2. What mechanism should we adopt for constructing code URIs? Simple concatenation would work for (made up) URIs such as: www.iptc.org/taxonomies/subjects#_ www.iptc.org/taxonomies/subjects/ www.iptc.org/taxonomies/subjects? www.iptc.org/taxonomies/subjects?code= It would not work for: www.iptc.org/taxonomies/subjects# as the resulting URI would not be legal for HTML if the code started with a digit. The alternative is to inject some buffer string during the construction of the code URI. This would probably have to be a fixed string for all News taxonomies, as the alternative of retrieving (from the scheme URI?) per-scheme rules seems too burdensome for the recipient. Such a string could be, eg "_", so allowing a scheme URI such as: www.iptc.org/taxonomies/subjects# and a code URI such as: www.iptc.org/taxonomies/subjects#_12345678 Alternatively, such a string could be, eg "#_", so allowing a scheme URI such as: www.iptc.org/taxonomies/subjects and a code URI such as: www.iptc.org/taxonomies/subjects#_12345678 The disadvantage of both approaches is that such a rule would make it difficult for people to use scheme URIs such as: www.iptc.org/taxonomies/subjects/ www.iptc.org/taxonomies/subjects? www.iptc.org/taxonomies/subjects?code= 3. We would very much appreciate help in developing a GRDDL script for our G2 standards. Nearly two years ago we developed a script to convert NewsML-G2 to RDF triples (N-Triples). We were not, however, able to figure out how to handle statements about statements. Note that for each piece of descriptive metadata we support attributes such as: creator date modified confidence relevance why present Thus one can, losely speaking, express: On 7 September 2007, Reuters stated that this News item has a subject of: - George W. Bush (with 60% confidence) - George H. W. Bush (with 40% confidence) We appreciate that the best way to handle statements about statements may still be unresolved within the SemWeb community. 4. We request that the W3C and the broader Semantic Web community take our requirements into consideration in the development of new specifications and tools, and in the enhancement of existing ones. We are aware that some of these assume particular URI formats, eg the presence of a "#" as a separator or the absence of a digit after such a "#". [1] http://www.iptc.org/ Thank you Misha Wolf News Standards Manager Reuters 2 http://www.w3.org/mid/20070918151812.A5BD0C6DA3@barney.w3.org ISSUE-60: Guidelines needed for proper construction of vocabulary scheme and \\'term\\' URIs dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-09-18 61 2 6 2007-10-04 We've been dancing around the following for a while: PROPOSAL - "RDFa parsers should ignore non-prefixed values of @rel that are not part o the reserved words." See telecon discussion record of 2007-10-04 http://www.w3.org/2007/10/04-rdfa-minutes.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071004154436.2DEF45F70B@stu.w3.org ISSUE-61: namespace for non-prefixed values of @rel dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-10-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/470514CF.4060706@w3.org Re: ISSUE-61: namespace for non-prefixed values of @rel ivan@w3.org 2007-10-04 2008-02-06 resolved as follows: "@rel/@rev non-prefixed values other than reserved keywords are ignored. Reserved keywords resolve to vocab#[keyword]." as per telecon on 2008-01-24: http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-rdfa-minutes.html 62 2 20 2007-11-06 New information about this medication! <a href="http://agtc.wayne.edu/agtc/portal_memberdata/portraits/phen"> <b> phentermine </b> </a> phentermine [url=http://agtc.wayne.edu/agtc/portal_memberdata/portraits/phen] phentermine [/url] http://agtc.wayne.edu/agtc/portal_memberdata/portraits/phen phentermine <a href=" http://agtc.wayne.edu/agtc/portal_memberdata/portraits/phen "> phentermine </a> 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071106021319.372236B5EA@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-62: phentermine dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-11-06 2007-11-06 spam -- identified to sysreq on 6-Nov by R. Swick to find the hole 63 2 6 2007-11-09 There is question as to what canonicalization of white-space literals we should do, as per this thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Nov/0000.html The XPath normalize-space() function can be used on plain literals, but there are issues to discuss for XML Literals, as per Ivan's point: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Oct/0173.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071109025325.6878F6B62B@kent.w3.org ISSUE-63: White-Space Canonicalization of XML Literals dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-11-09 2008-02-19 2008-02-14 [RRS] http://www.w3.org/2008/02/14-rdfa-minutes.html RESOLUTION: RDFa will state that whitespace is preserved and note that some implementations might not behave this way 2008-02-19 Manu tested several Javascript implementations for XML Literal and reported his results in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Nov/0022.html [[ In short - Firefox's implementation allows you to retrieve the original whitespace and line breaks using Javascript. IE7 does not. IE7 normalizes all of the whitespace before inserting it into the DOM, which means that Javascript does not have access to the original text in the XHTML file. ]] 2008-02-19 [RRS] Niklas Lindström followed up Manu's tests in IE7 in more detail and reported in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Nov/0027.html [[ I just did these quick tests in case the capabilities of IE7 is what would put an end to any hope of keeping non-canonicalized XMLLiterals. There seems to be some possibilities, but perhaps not stable enough? So if nothing else, it should be noted that requiring normalized space from RDFa parsers in such a case would require manual processing (DOM walking + normalizing) in some (at least non-XHTML-aware..) client implementations. ]] 2008-02-19 [2007-11-15] telecon discussion record in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/15-rdfa-minutes.html#item04 - RESOLVED plain literals are normalized using XPath normalized-space ... [[ Ben: for XMLLiterals, I'd like us to preserve them if we can ... but if browsers do canonicalize, I think we have to allow it ... I don't expect canonicalization to change how the literal is rendered ... conclusion; we'll normalize plain literals and element content but not normalize @content value except perhaps for special rule about leading newlines depending on what browsers do ]] 65 3 8 2007-11-20 How do you annotate concepts with different types of XML content? Some use cases might be... (1) "E=MC²" -- Text using XHTML for basic styling (superscript, subscript etc.) (2) MathML for complex mathematical formulas. (3) Text or XHTML content marked up with Ruby annotations. (4) Speech Synthesis Markup (SSML) 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071120145658.3A8B76B62B@kent.w3.org ISSUE-65: XMLLiteralNotes dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D03B3F206@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk [SKOS] top priorities A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/474316D0.5040209@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-65: XMLLiteralNotes aisaac@few.vu.nl 2007-11-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 2008-05-07 This isue is conderied out of scope http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#xmlliterals 66 2 2 2007-11-29 To what node does the instanceof attribute apply? From Manu's summary [1], which of the following options do we choose: (a) @instanceof applies to the current element it is defined on. (b) @instanceof applies to the chaining node. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Nov/0044.html See most recent (as of 2007-11-29) threads: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Nov/0001.html "@about/@instanceof discussion" and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Nov/thread.html#msg30 "chaining-friendly rules for @instanceof" 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20071129162419.D26385F70A@stu.w3.org ISSUE-66: What is the Subject of @instanceof ? dean+cgi@w3.org 2007-11-29 2008-02-06 resolved as: "@href/@resource without @rel/@rev/@about sets the subject for @instanceof on same element." Note related resolution: "@href/@resource without @rel/@rev/@about sets the subject for @property on the same element." all on 2008-01-24: http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-rdfa-minutes.html 67 3 8 2008-01-08 In the SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007 [1], the formal class and property definitions, and the integrity conditions, are stated in the main body of the document as prose. For example, from section 4.3: "skos:ConceptScheme has type Class." "skos:inScheme, skos:hasTopConcept habe type Object Property." "skos:ConceptScheme is Disjoint with skos:Concept." For example, from section 7.3: "The Domain and Range of skos:semanticRelation is skos:Concept." This style of stating the formal definitions is potentially confusing. To reduce confusion, should the formal definitions be stated instead using prose in some other style (e.g. as in the RDFS spec [2])? Or as triples, wherever possible? Or something else? [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20071223 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-schema-20040210/ 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE8028EE7D1@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk ISSUE-67: StatingFormalDefinitions q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2008-01-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0499DAA4@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk ISSUE-67: StatingFormalDefinitions (was: Comments on SKOS Reference) A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2008-01-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080108150235.37D2B5F70B@stu.w3.org ISSUE-67: StatingFormalDefinitions dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB6690269F968@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: ISSUE-67: StatingFormalDefinitions Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0499DF7B@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: Comments on SKOS Reference A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2008-01-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060803011003j16953aei9318c574bc410f2b@mail.gmail.com Meeting Record: 2008-02-27 SWD telecon ehs@pobox.com 2008-03-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/47D514FD.5060104@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] ISSUE-67 StatingFormalDefinitions alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-03-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/47E11ECC0200006A00024B85@ntgwgate.loc.gov Minutes from 2008-03-18 telecon cred@loc.gov 2008-03-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 2008-01-08 See also mail from Tom Baker: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0000.html 2008-01-15 Better formal specifications for Turtle and N3 were published yesterday: http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2008/SUBM-turtle-20080114/ http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2008/SUBM-n3-20080114/ I recommend using those citations for whichever of Turtle or N3 is chosen. 2008-01-15 [rrs] sigh. "I recommend" in the note above is me, Ralph. 2008-04-14 RESOLVED: To state formal aspects of the SKOS data model in the main body of the SKOS Reference as sentences of prose following the style of prose used in the RDF Schema specification <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-schema-20040210/>. An OWL ontology will also be given as an appendix to the SKOS Reference, however the prose in the main body of the SKOS Reference will take precedence. -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Mar/0027.html. For resolution decision, see http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html 68 3 8 2008-01-16 Currently, skos:related is *not* defined as an irreflexive property. Therefore, graphs such as: <A> skos:related <A> . ... are consistent with the SKOS data model. However, such a graph would never be found in a representation of a thesaurus or classification scheme, and if it did, would probably indicate some sort of error. If skos:related were formally defined as an irreflexive property in the normative specification, this would endorse stronger checking of instance data against the SKOS data model, which would probably be both useful and appropriate to most SKOS use cases. Should skos:related be normatively irreflexive? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080116150111.1A9F7BEF0@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-68: RelatedIrreflexive dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/478E1F87.6040001@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-68: RelatedIrreflexive aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 2008-05-07 http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#irreflexive RESOLUTION: to resolve skos:related, skos:broader and skos:broaderTransitive are not normatively irreflexive 69 3 8 2008-01-16 This is a sub-issue of ISSUE-44. Currently, skos:broader is *not* defined as an irreflexive property. Therefore, graphs such as: <A> skos:broader <A> . ... are consistent with the SKOS data model. However, such a graph would never be found in a representation of a thesaurus or classification scheme, and if it did, would probably indicate some sort of error. If skos:broader were formally defined as an irreflexive property in the normative specification, this would endorse stronger checking of instance data against the SKOS data model, which would probably be both useful and appropriate to most SKOS use cases. Should skos:broader be normatively irreflexive? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080116153050.38D2CBEF0@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-69: BroaderIrreflexive dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/478E245D.7090403@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-69: BroaderIrreflexive aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/47971236.404@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-69: BroaderIrreflexive aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/D79DD37AAC57EB4582A756C175CEB8890170AA3F@KFSVS1.utk.tennessee.edu Comment: ISSUE-69 rde2@utk.edu 2008-02-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 2008-05-07 http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#irreflexive RESOLUTION: to resolve skos:related, skos:broader and skos:broaderTransitive are not normatively irreflexive 70 3 8 2008-01-16 This is a sub-issue of ISSUE-44. Currently, skos:broaderTransitive is *not* defined as an irreflexive property. Therefore, graphs such as: <A> skos:broader <B> . <B> skos:broader <A> . ... are consistent with the SKOS data model. However, such a graph would never be found in a representation of a thesaurus or classification scheme, and if it did, would probably indicate some sort of error. If skos:broaderTransitive were formally defined as an irreflexive property in the normative specification, this would endorse stronger checking of instance data against the SKOS data model, which would probably be both useful and appropriate to most SKOS use cases. Should skos:broaderTransitive be normatively irreflexive? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080116153440.4745C5F70C@stu.w3.org ISSUE-70: BroaderCycles dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/478F2594.7020002@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-70: BroaderCycles aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/D79DD37AAC57EB4582A756C175CEB8890170AA40@KFSVS1.utk.tennessee.edu Comment: ISSUE-70 rde2@utk.edu 2008-02-10 http://www.w3.org/mid/99BBE409-1A4A-475C-9C9D-685678AC33FC@manchester.ac.uk Re: Comment: ISSUE-70 sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-02-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAF18@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: Comment: ISSUE-70 Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/D79DD37AAC57EB4582A756C175CEB8890170AED4@KFSVS1.utk.tennessee.edu RE: Comment: ISSUE-70 rde2@utk.edu 2008-02-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/7728477E-2627-4254-AA7E-AA21DB96CF05@manchester.ac.uk Re: Comment: ISSUE-70 sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-02-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/D79DD37AAC57EB4582A756C175CEB8890170AF2C@KFSVS1.utk.tennessee.edu RE: Comment: ISSUE-70 rde2@utk.edu 2008-02-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/56EA6C1D-AB3C-4565-BA7F-85A5EB353E79@manchester.ac.uk Re: Comment: ISSUE-70 sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-02-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/D79DD37AAC57EB4582A756C175CEB8890170B0C2@KFSVS1.utk.tennessee.edu RE: Comment: ISSUE-70 rde2@utk.edu 2008-02-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 2008-05-07 http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#irreflexive RESOLUTION: to resolve skos:related, skos:broader and skos:broaderTransitive are not normatively irreflexive 71 3 17 2008-01-16 Currently, the SKOS vocabulary includes two "parallel" sets of URIs vocabulary for hierarchical and associative links between conceptual resources. The semantic relation properties skos:semanticRelation, skos:broader, skos:narrower and skos:related are mirrored in skos:mappingRelation, skos:broadMatch, skos:narrowMatch and skos:relatedMatch. A separate, parallel mapping vocabulary provides a convenient way to differentiate links *within* a scheme from links *between* a scheme (given that certain conventions of practice are followed). However, there may also be other mechanisms for making such a differentiation that do not require a separate vocabulary, by e.g. keeping links between concepts within a scheme in a separate RDF graph from mapping links. With a separate vocabulary for mapping relations, a number of interactions between the parallel vocabularies then have to be considered, which increases the size and complexity of the SKOS data model. Many of these interactions have not yet been considered by the Working Group, and as such the model currently leads to a number of counter-intuitive results. E.g. <A> skos:broader <B> . <A> skos:exactMatch <B> . is consistent with the SKOS data model (this is one of a number of similar scenarios). Should we keep skos:broadMatch, skos:narrowMatch and skos:relatedMatch? Or should we drop them, and use skos:broader, skos:narrower and skos:related for mapping, providing guidance on how to make a distinction between intra-scheme and inter-scheme links by managing RDF graphs (or some other mechanism)? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080116174249.CC3356B5EA@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-71: ParallelMappingVocabulary dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080116212347.DF07B6B62C@kent.w3.org ISSUE-74: MappingPropertyConventions dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/4794661E.2000101@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-74: MappingPropertyConventions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/479505A7.7040309@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-71: ParallelMappingVocabulary aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/D79DD37AAC57EB4582A756C175CEB8890170AA20@KFSVS1.utk.tennessee.edu Comment: ISSUE-71 rde2@utk.edu 2008-02-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B4DB.6020705@few.vu.nl [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions [From Alistair Miles!] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B622.8060206@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B900.40700@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Proposal ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAF56@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B96B20.4010007@dcs.gla.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] Proposal ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BB2300.8010702@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BB2352.4050705@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BB2384.10600@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Closing ISSUE 47 MappingProvenanceInformation aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080219110910.3gcob74r340swck4@webmail.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary dlrubin@stanford.edu 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/0F1C3BFC-85E4-49FC-BE79-4E43F0371E02@manchester.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-02-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BC05B9.70806@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BDC7D9.3080503@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] on ISSUE-71 and ISSUE-74 alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BE9BE7.7070900@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] on ISSUE-71 and ISSUE-74 aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/47C540D3.8050509@cs.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] on ISSUE-71 and ISSUE-74 schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-02-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/47C5450C.8050608@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] on ISSUE-71 and ISSUE-74 aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/0BA7EE4D4646E0409D458D347C508B780419A945@MAILSERV1.uni.glam.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] on ISSUE-71 and ISSUE-74 dstudhope@glam.ac.uk 2008-02-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060803011003j16953aei9318c574bc410f2b@mail.gmail.com Meeting Record: 2008-02-27 SWD telecon ehs@pobox.com 2008-03-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/000801c87d33$194203e0$0300000a@DELL RE: [SKOS] on ISSUE-71 and ISSUE-74 sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk 2008-03-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/47E11ECC0200006A00024B85@ntgwgate.loc.gov Minutes from 2008-03-18 telecon cred@loc.gov 2008-03-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/47F0C02B.3040400@ninebynine.org Comment: ISSUE-71 GK@ninebynine.org 2008-03-31 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080331130017.GA3808@octavius [ALL] Agenda - SWD telecon Apr 01 - 1500 UTC - Europeans back to normal time baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-03-31 http://www.w3.org/mid/47F24A4F.4080404@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - SWD telecon Apr 01 - 1500 UTC - Europeans back to normal time ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-04-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669037A04D3@hqgiex01.fao.org Minutes from 2008-04-01 telecon Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-04-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/47FA3FE3.9050908@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 8 April telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-04-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/47FAF3EC.1050309@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 8 April telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-04-07 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0804080609t10266db0s930f8a6b84bca1b3@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda 8 April telecon 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2008-04-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080408132657.03313ea8@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-04-08 SWD telecon swick@w3.org 2008-04-08 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080414083109.GA1736@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Apr 15 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-14 http://www.w3.org/mid/000001c89f07$e921e800$bb65b800$@miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk RE: [ALL] Agenda - Apr 15 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0804150811j42e98896i7ad5be7ed68f64d2@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Apr 15 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/4804EEB4.4000305@deri.org meeting record: 2008-04-15 SWD telecon vit.novacek@deri.org 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480597C6.5090004@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] Agenda - Apr 15 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C93F1.50901@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 22 April telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-04-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/34b5049c0804220701l5d151ca4udf70a325129fc494@mail.gmail.com Re: [ALL] agenda 22 April telecon 1500 UTC jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-04-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/480DF981.4090404@sandsoft.com Re: [ALL] agenda 22 April telecon 1500 UTC ekendall@sandsoft.com 2008-04-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/2B5F6004-902E-48F0-A5B1-5549EBB4CAAB@manchester.ac.uk meeting record: 2008-04-22 SWD telecon sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-04-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080428161756.GA3328@octavius [ALL] Agenda - Apr 29 2008 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/5C0FCE75-D11B-4659-8353-40FEA348CF02@manchester.ac.uk Re: [ALL] Agenda - Apr 29 2008 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-04-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/006001c8aafd$f3f4e5a0$dbdeb0e0$@miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] ISSUE-71, ISSUE-74 preparation for Washington alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-04-30 http://www.w3.org/mid/48198F3A.4060100@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-71, ISSUE-74 preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-05-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/000301c8ab9d$2b6b8120$82428360$@miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-71, ISSUE-74 preparation for Washington alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-05-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/38100CBF-4FD1-4BA2-B7A7-C143A91AE1F4@madcreek.com meeting record: 2008-04-29 SWD WG jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-05-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/4828264C.8000402@cs.vu.nl [ALL] agenda 13 May telecon 1500 UTC schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-05-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/1210756051.4662.4.camel@duncan.fundacionctic.org Meeting record: 2008-05-13 SWD telecon diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-05-14 2008-04-22 See also issue 74 MappingPropertyConventions http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/74 2008-05-07 RESOLUTION: 1. keep the mapping vocabulary broadMatch, narrowMatch, 2. broadMatch, narrowMatch, etc. are rdfs:subPropertyOf broader, narrower, 3. there are no semantic conditions on broadMatch, narrowMatch; i.e. graphs 1-6 are all consistent, 4. there is some text about cultural conventions explaining where we expect broadMatch to be used, 5. by convention, mapping properties are only used to link concepts in different schemes, 6. in the Last Call WD we'll note that the mapping vocabulary may be dropped -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#item04 72 3 8 2008-01-16 Currently, skos:exactMatch is not defined as a transitive property. However, it would seem reasonable and useful to define skos:exactMatch as transitive, which would mean e.g. that the graph: <A> skos:exactMatch <B>. <B> skos:exactMatch <C>. ... would entail: <A> skos:exactMatch <C>. Should skos:exactMatch be transitive? 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080116205428.AD9F35F70A@stu.w3.org ISSUE-72: ExactMatchTransitive dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/D79DD37AAC57EB4582A756C175CEB8890170AA1F@KFSVS1.utk.tennessee.edu Comment: ISSUE-75 rde2@utk.edu 2008-02-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/D79DD37AAC57EB4582A756C175CEB8890170AA1E@KFSVS1.utk.tennessee.edu Comment: ISSUE-72 rde2@utk.edu 2008-02-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 73 3 8 2008-01-16 Currently, the property skos:exactMatch is not stated as disjoint with any of the other concept mapping properties (or with any of the semantic relation properties). Therefore e.g. the graph below is consistent with the SKOS data model. <A> skos:exactMatch <B> ; skos:broadMatch <B> ; skos:exactMatch <C> ; skos:relatedMatch <C> . Intuitively, an exact mapping link asserts something fundamentally different from a hierarchical or associative link. Therefore, it might be reasonable and useful to define skos:exactMatch as disjoint with skos:broadMatch (and/or skos:broader), and disjoint with skos:relatedMatch (and/or skos:related). Should these disjointness conditions be stated in the normative specification? 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080116210550.4C253BEF0@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-73: ExactMatchDisjoints dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B4DB.6020705@few.vu.nl [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions [From Alistair Miles!] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B622.8060206@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAF56@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BB2300.8010702@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080219110910.3gcob74r340swck4@webmail.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary dlrubin@stanford.edu 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 74 3 8 2008-01-16 Currently, given separate vocabularies for semantic relations (skos:broader, skos:narrower, skos:related etc.) and for concept mapping relations (skos:broadMatch, skos:narrowMatch, skos:relatedMatch etc.), our assumption is that, *by convention*, the SKOS semantic relation properties are *only* used to state links between conceptual resources within the *same* concept scheme, and the SKOS concept mapping properties are *only* used to state links between conceptual resources in *different* concept schemes. Is this usage convention appropriate, useful and viable? Are there circumstances where we would recommend *not* adhering to this convention? Note that it is difficult to formally state any integrity conditions which could be used to enforce this usage convention. No such integrity conditions are currently stated in the SKOS reference. Therefore, graphs such as: <A> skos:broader <B> ; skos:related <C> . <A> skos:inScheme <MyScheme> . <B> skos:inScheme <AnotherScheme> . <C> skos:inScheme <AnotherScheme> . <MyScheme> owl:differentFrom <AnotherScheme> . ... and: <A> skos:broadMatch <B> ; skos:relatedMatch <C> . <A> skos:inScheme <MyScheme> . <B> skos:inScheme <MyScheme> . <C> skos:inScheme <MyScheme> . ... are both consistent with the SKOS data model. If we agree on the usage convention, can we live without any supporting integrity conditions? Note finally that if we chose *not* to have a separate vocabulary for concept mapping relations and for semantic relations, and we use only semantic relations to assert links between conceptual resources, this issue goes away. I.e. the resolution of this issue is dependant on the resolution of ISSUE-71. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080116212347.DF07B6B62C@kent.w3.org ISSUE-74: MappingPropertyConventions dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/4794661E.2000101@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-74: MappingPropertyConventions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/479505A7.7040309@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-71: ParallelMappingVocabulary aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B4DB.6020705@few.vu.nl [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions [From Alistair Miles!] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B622.8060206@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAF56@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BB2300.8010702@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BB2352.4050705@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080219110910.3gcob74r340swck4@webmail.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary dlrubin@stanford.edu 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/0F1C3BFC-85E4-49FC-BE79-4E43F0371E02@manchester.ac.uk Re: [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-02-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BC05B9.70806@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/0BA7EE4D4646E0409D458D347C508B780419A945@MAILSERV1.uni.glam.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] on ISSUE-71 and ISSUE-74 dstudhope@glam.ac.uk 2008-02-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060803011003j16953aei9318c574bc410f2b@mail.gmail.com Meeting Record: 2008-02-27 SWD telecon ehs@pobox.com 2008-03-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/000901c87c61$b7f4ba00$6802a8c0@TFJOHAN Comment: ISSUE-74 johan.de-smedt@tenforce.com 2008-03-02 http://www.w3.org/mid/000801c87d33$194203e0$0300000a@DELL RE: [SKOS] on ISSUE-71 and ISSUE-74 sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk 2008-03-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/47E11ECC0200006A00024B85@ntgwgate.loc.gov Minutes from 2008-03-18 telecon cred@loc.gov 2008-03-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 2008-04-22 See also issue 71 ParallelMappingVocabulary ParallelMappingVocabulary 2008-04-22 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/71 2008-05-07 RESOLUTION: 1. keep the mapping vocabulary broadMatch, narrowMatch, 2. broadMatch, narrowMatch, etc. are rdfs:subPropertyOf broader, narrower, 3. there are no semantic conditions on broadMatch, narrowMatch; i.e. graphs 1-6 are all consistent, 4. there is some text about cultural conventions explaining where we expect broadMatch to be used, 5. by convention, mapping properties are only used to link concepts in different schemes, 6. in the Last Call WD we'll note that the mapping vocabulary may be dropped -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#item04 75 3 8 2008-01-16 Can any property chain inclusion axioms be stated for skos:exactMatch? E.g. SubObjectPropertyOf(SubObjectPropertyChain(broadMatch exactMatch) broadMatch) ? This axiom would mean that the graph: <A> skos:broadMatch <B> . <B> skos:exactMatch <C> . ... entails: <A> skos:broadMatch <C> . E.g. SubObjectPropertyOf(SubObjectPropertyChain(relatedMatch exactMatch) relatedMatch) ? This axiom would mean that the graph: <A> skos:relatedMatch <B> . <B> skos:exactMatch <C> . ... entails: <A> skos:relatedMatch <C> . E.g. SubObjectPropertyOf(SubObjectPropertyChain(broader exactMatch) broader) ? E.g. SubObjectPropertyOf(SubObjectPropertyChain(related exactMatch) related) ? 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080116225508.9AEA5C6DB9@barney.w3.org ISSUE-75: ExactMatchInclusions dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-16 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/D79DD37AAC57EB4582A756C175CEB8890170AA1F@KFSVS1.utk.tennessee.edu Comment: ISSUE-75 rde2@utk.edu 2008-02-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B4DB.6020705@few.vu.nl [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions [From Alistair Miles!] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B622.8060206@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAF56@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BB2300.8010702@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080219110910.3gcob74r340swck4@webmail.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary dlrubin@stanford.edu 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 76 3 8 2008-01-17 Previous drafts of SKOS included skos:prefSymbol and skos:altSymbol. Should these be carried forward into the SKOS Reference? Or should they be dropped? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080117130109.53328BEF0@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-76: SymbolicLabels dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080121170414.GA1108@octavius Re: ISSUE-76: SymbolicLabels baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-01-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAE87@hqgiex01.fao.org RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-01-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/4799B34E.7040203@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A7836B.2050501@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 2008-05-27 RESOLVED not to carry forward SKOS: prefSymbol and altSymbol into the new namespace for lack clear requirements -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/27-swd-minutes.html#item02 77 3 8 2008-01-17 Previous drafts of the SKOS specification included the properties skos:subject, skos:isSubjectOf, skos:primarySubject and skos:isPrimarySubjectOf as "subject indexing properties". Should these properties be carried forward to the SKOS Reference? Or should they be dropped? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080117130354.94FD55F70A@stu.w3.org ISSUE-77: SubjectIndexing dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/478F5F3B.6010302@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-77: SubjectIndexing aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/68C22185DB90CA41A5ACBD8E834C5ECD0465B0C3@goofy.wpakb.kb.nl RE : RE : [ISSUE-77] [ISSUE-48] Skos subject properties are deprecated Antoine.Isaac@KB.nl 2008-01-28 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 2008-05-07 See also ISSUE-48 IndexingRelationship 2008-05-07 RESOLUTION: to not include the SKOS indexing properties because 1) it's the role of SKOS to publish vocabularies and not to indicate how they should be used for indexing purposes 2) there appear to be enough support from existing metadata vocabularies to handle links between resources and SKOS concepts -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item05 78 3 8 2008-01-17 Previous drafts of the SKOS specification included the property skos:subjectIndicator, which was intended as a bridge between SKOS and topic maps. Should this property be carried forward in the SKOS Reference? Or should it be dropped? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080117130632.9368C6B5E9@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-78: SubjectIndicators dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 2008-05-27 RESOLVED: to not carry forward skos:subjectIndicator, as it is out of scope -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/27-swd-minutes.html#item02 79 3 27 2008-01-17 What is best practice for assigning a notation to a conceptual resource (notations are codes used in some thesauri and classification schemes)? Do we need some explicit vocabulary for expressing notations (e.g. skos:notation)? Or can it be done using existing features (e.g. skos:prefLabel @art)? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080117131530.13B8B6B5E9@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-79: Notations dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A1A05C.3080900@gbv.de SKOS comment: Notations jakob.voss@gbv.de 2008-01-31 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/483BD9A50200006A0002B254@ntgwgate.loc.gov Notations in SKOS cred@loc.gov 2008-05-27 2008-05-07 RESOLVED: to introduce skos:notation a rdf:Property whose value is a typed literal. The datatype of the literal specifies a syntax encoding scheme and the value of the literal is the classification code from that encoding scheme. As prefLabel is optional, SKOS tools may want to display notations as labels. -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item01 80 3 8 2008-01-17 Some patterns have been proposed for working with SKOS and OWL in combination. E.g. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptSemantics E.g. http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/public/skos/2007/10/f2f/skos-owl-patterns.html So what are the recommended patterns? See also ISSUE-54 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080117132525.4BAB3C6DB6@barney.w3.org ISSUE-80: SKOS-OWL-Patterns dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B1EF98.7090608@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Proposed resolution to close ISSUE-54 aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-12 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B99D63.2090301@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Re: TR : Broader, collections and the difference between SKOS and OWL aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080218163809.GA3304@octavius [All] Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/34b5049c0802181029q5c534978m87acdc4c4f6a334d@mail.gmail.com Re: [All] Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC jphipps@madcreek.com 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAF5E@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [All] Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/52bd7c3d0802181458o4267f179lf9b25fbbe0e46971@mail.gmail.com Re: [All] Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC simone.onofri@gmail.com 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BDA2FE.3020004@zoo.ox.ac.uk Minutes of 2008-02-19 telcon alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BEEB3F.60801@few.vu.nl [SKOS] ISSUE--54 closed, ISSUE-80 opened aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/f032cc060803011003j16953aei9318c574bc410f2b@mail.gmail.com Meeting Record: 2008-02-27 SWD telecon ehs@pobox.com 2008-03-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/47E11ECC0200006A00024B85@ntgwgate.loc.gov Minutes from 2008-03-18 telecon cred@loc.gov 2008-03-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080415154659.GA4980@octavius [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de 2008-04-15 http://www.w3.org/mid/480C7E67.9090901@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-04-21 2008-04-22 "SKOS and imports" [Sean, 2008-04-16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Apr/0078.html 2008-05-27 Closed, per agreement that the technical issues of SKOS/OWL have already been dealt with -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/27-swd-minutes.html#item02 81 3 9 2008-01-17 From http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0008.html ... The draft SKOS Reference [1] very helpfully points out the symmetry between mappingRelation (with its subproperties broadMatch, narrowMatch, and relatedMatch) and semanticRelation (with its subproperties broader, narrower, and related). However, I find that this naming pattern subtly gets in the way of grasping the much different concept of label relations. The problem becomes clear if one puts the names side-by-side: Properties: labelRelated mappingRelation semanticRelation Classes: LabelRelation I cannot think of a better name than LabelRelation, but I would find it less confusing if labelRelated were renamed relatedLabel: Properties: relatedLabel mappingRelation semanticRelation Classes: LabelRelation [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20071223 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080117175104.EE84DC6DBA@barney.w3.org ISSUE-81: LabelRelationsNaming dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0499DF7D@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk RE: Label relations confusingly named? A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk 2008-01-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/D79DD37AAC57EB4582A756C175CEB8890170AA21@KFSVS1.utk.tennessee.edu Comment: ISSUE-81 rde2@utk.edu 2008-02-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903B87AC7@hqgiex01.fao.org List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-05-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/482ADFEC.9070001@cs.vu.nl Re: List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-05-14 2008-05-07 RESOLVED: ISSUE-81 is resolved because the property in question "labelRelated", has been dropped -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item06 82 3 17 2008-01-22 From http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0150.html or http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0075.html or http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0089.html ======= For all relationships as already mentioned I suggest to make them more clear by adding the verb. For example: - skos:hasNarrowerConcept - skos:hasBroaderConcept - skos:hasRelatedConcept ======= The current SKOS specification uses the URI skos:broader, skos:narrower, skos:related. Should these be changed? The same hold for other properties, such as skos:note or skos:scopeNote 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080122150156.21B895F70C@stu.w3.org ISSUE-82: PropertyNames dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/2AD2401FC36E784094D0B3375FDA6CE802B8A526@VMAIL2.uoa.abdn.ac.uk RE: ISSUE-82: PropertyNames q.reul@abdn.ac.uk 2008-01-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/47960E40.6030203@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-82: PropertyNames aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903B87AC7@hqgiex01.fao.org List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-05-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/482ADFEC.9070001@cs.vu.nl Re: List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-05-14 2008-05-07 RESOLVED: to close ISSUE-82 by adding editorial changes to the documents highlighting the intended interpretation of broader and narrower -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item06 83 3 17 2008-01-22 From [1]: ====== considering the skos:inScheme tag. I personally not used it in the agrovoc skos version, because i preferred to make use of the skos:hasTopConcept to associate concepts to the ConceptSchemes. Using this i define the full hierarchy of the scheme, because i consider all the skos:hasTopConcept plus all the skos:narrower to build the full hierarchy of the classification scheme. Therefore I do not use the skos:inScheme for every concept in the thesaurus because this information again can be inferred. ====== Currently the SKOS Reference [2] does not support that kind of inference. Should it do so? [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0150.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20080118 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080122154612.8C9E2C6DBB@barney.w3.org ISSUE-83: SemanticsOfSchemeContainmentProperties dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-22 http://www.w3.org/mid/4799B34E.7040203@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A1ADA3.2020806@few.vu.nl Re: SKOS comment: Grouping Concept Schemes aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-31 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A7836B.2050501@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B4DB.6020705@few.vu.nl [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions [From Alistair Miles!] aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/47B8B622.8060206@few.vu.nl Re: [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669029DAF56@hqgiex01.fao.org RE: [SKOS] On ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary and ISSUE-74 MappingPropertyConventions Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-18 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BB2300.8010702@few.vu.nl [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080219110910.3gcob74r340swck4@webmail.stanford.edu Re: [SKOS] Closing ISSUE-71 ParallelMappingVocabulary dlrubin@stanford.edu 2008-02-19 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/483C322E.8010703@few.vu.nl [SKOS] proposal for ISSUE-83 SemanticsOfSchemeContainmentProperties aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-05-27 http://www.w3.org/mid/000001c8c1d7$e57ad160$b0707420$@miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk RE: [SKOS] proposal for ISSUE-83 SemanticsOfSchemeContainmentProperties alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-05-29 2008-06-17 RESOLVED to adopt the solution proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008May/0068.html per http://www.w3.org/2008/06/17-swd-minutes.html#item03 84 3 17 2008-01-23 From [1]: > I propose the following section of the SKOS Semantics wiki draft as resolution of ISSUE-33 "Grouping Constructs" [2]: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/Semantics/Grouping?action=recall&rev=2> > > This section implements the "Minimal Fix" proposal [2], with a few additional > axiomatic triples to make explicit the OWL typing of properties and the > disjointness of skos:Collection and skos:ConceptScheme. > > Note that this section does not address the issue of constructing a systematic > hierarchical display, but delegates this responsibility to the SKOS Primer. > Note also that the SKOS Primer section on grouping constructs is yet to be >done, and that in particular I have not met Antoine's concerns below regarding > nested collections. > > However, I suggest we accept this resolution for now (because it does fix the > actual issue), and raise a new issue regarding the representation and > construction of systematic hierarchical displays. (Antoine's comment on nested collections are at [3]) Now from [4] (no need to thank me Alistair ;-p) > However, in the absence of any presentational information, there could be a > default method of constructing a systematic display. To handle SKOS grouping > constructs, this would require an algorithm which is *fairly* sophisticated - > certainly not straightforward to a novice hacker. The onus is on me to provide > a reference implementation :) This was reflected in [5]: >(Statement 2) The SWDWG MAY publish an algorithm to generate a default > thesaurus systematic display from an RDF graph using the SKOS vocabulary. > However, applications are not required to use the algorithm, and MAY use any > means to convey information required to construct a thesaurus systematic >display. The current Primer [6] in its section on Collections of Concepts (4.1) does not propose anything: > A systematic (hierarchical) display can then be generated including the > concept grouping "milk by source animal", as presented in the example >introducing this sub-section. The skos:broader hierarchy and the collection >membership information can be used for this, but the process still requires a >dedicated algorithm, the implementation of which is left to specific > applications. Shall we change this? [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2007Jun/0012.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/33 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2007May/0010.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2007Jun/0016.html [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/PresentationInformation [6] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DraftPrimer 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080123095757.9498EC6DB6@barney.w3.org ISSUE-84: ConstructionOfSystematicDisplaysFromGroupings dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-01-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/47971152.5080107@few.vu.nl Re: ISSUE-84: ConstructionOfSystematicDisplaysFromGroupings aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/4797BA74.907@fundacionctic.org Re: ISSUE-84: ConstructionOfSystematicDisplaysFromGroupings diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org 2008-01-23 http://www.w3.org/mid/4799B34E.7040203@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903408403@hqgiex01.fao.org Several emails to reply to Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A7836B.2050501@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD72BB.1010906@zoo.ox.ac.uk [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BD9D4A.2090301@zoo.ox.ac.uk [SKOS] Issues Review alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 85 2 14 2008-02-15 In http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/selfDescribingDocuments#UsingRDFa the following is stated: Note: at this time, drafts of the [RDFa] specification are available, but the media-type registration for HTML itself has not been updated to reflect RDFa. As described in TAG Finding [AuthoritativeMetadata], conventions like RDFa are normative only if provided for in the applicable specification for the media- type in which they are used. Thus, for RDFa to be fully integrated with 2 The Web's Standard Retrieval Algorithm, the HTML and/or XHTML media-type registrations must be be updated. Use of RDFa is in any case encouraged in the interim until that happens. We need to state our position regarding this (feedback to TAG, explicitely invite to last call comments, etc.) 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/4799B34E.7040203@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-01-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/47A7836B.2050501@few.vu.nl Re: RIF: Comments on SKOS Primer aisaac@few.vu.nl 2008-02-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080215143015.942CE6B62B@kent.w3.org ISSUE-85: Self-describing Web - media type dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-02-15 2008-05-08 status: The task force has no control over that RFC. The XHTML2 Working Group has informed us that the RFC covers all XTHML family markup languages as it is currently written, and requires no changes to accommodate XHTML+RDFa. 2008-05-19 In response to a related request from the TAG for comments on their Self-Describing Web document, I have sent the following: The Media Type definition indicates that XHTML Family document types can use application/xhtml+xml. The specification defines XHTML+RDFa, a markup language. Further, the specification declares that the document type is in fact part of that family. The specification also (obviously) defines how RDF is embedded in XHTML. So the specification, per force, defines the connection and enables the use use of RDFa in XHTML+RDFa. I have suggested that this closes this issue, and therefore am marking it closed. 86 3 8 2008-02-21 What is the recommended URI dereference behaviour for resources of type skos:Concept? What is the minimum required behaviour? What is the recommended URI dereference behaviour for resources of type skos:ConceptScheme? What is the minimum required behaviour? 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080221150858.191176B62D@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-86: SkosURIDereferenceBehaviour dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-02-21 2008-02-21 Would a required minimum dereference behaviour exclude the use of using HTTP schemes like info: or urn: as URI for SKOS concepts? 87 2 6 2008-02-26 " 5.3. Chaining The first code example <div about="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Albert_Einstein"> ... <img rel="foaf:depiction" src="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Albert_Einstein_Head.jpg" /> seems to indicate that a triple <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Albert_Einstein> foaf:depiction <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Albert_Einstein_Head.jpg> . should be created. But according to section 5.5 step 5 and section 6.1.1.3 the rel attribute would have to be on the div element, not the img element. The example as is IMHO creates an incomplete triple <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Albert_Einstein_Head.jpg> foaf:depiction ? . 5.4. wording regarding non-prefixed CURIEs as per: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0161.html " 5.4.4. Use of CURIEs in Specific Attributes "Note that only values in the link type list have this special behaviour, which means that any value that is not in the list and is not a valid CURIE MUST not generate triples in the [default graph] ." Even "foobar" is a valid CURIE according to section 7, because it "is also possible to omit both the prefix and the colon, leaving just a reference." However "the mapping to use when there is no prefix is not defined;" If your intent is to disallow unprefixed CURIEs you may want to change the text above to "Note that only values in the link type list have this special behaviour, which means that any value that is not in the list and is not a valid and prefixed CURIE MUST not generate triples in the [default graph]." " 5.5. Sequence * step 5: "Note that final value of the [current object resource] will either be null (from initialization), a full URI or a bnode." According to the algorithm, [current object resource] is never set to a bnode. * After step 8 follows step 10: Probably the numbering is incorrect. " by Johannes Koch in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0116.html Probable Resolution: fix the text of the spec to use @rel in the parent DIV for 5.3, use Johannes's suggested text for 5.4, and address typos and small editing mistakes in 5.5. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080226162358.77DD86B62C@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-87: @src bug in Section 5.3 of Syntax dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-02-26 2008-02-26 added other "bugs" from Johannes's message into this same issue, separating out only the parts of his email that require discussion. 2008-02-26 changed title to include "Last Call Comment" 2008-03-04 merged with additional text bug brought up by Johannes about 5.4 2008-03-04 added full text of Johannes comment on 5.4 2008-05-08 assigning this to Shane. 2008-05-09 This issue has 3 parts. Part 1 was overcome by events. Part 2 was implemented as suggested. Part 3 was fixed by removing the reference to a bnode. 2008-06-12 ACTION:Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE:Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION:This issue has 3 parts. Part 1 was overcome by events. Part 2 was implemented as suggested. Part 3 was fixed by removing the reference to a bnode. 88 2 6 2008-02-26 " 5.5. Sequence [...] * step 10 (9?): "as a [plain literal] if: * @content is present; * or all children of the [current element] are text nodes; * or there are no child nodes; * or the body of the [current element] does have non-text child nodes but @datatype is present, with an empty value." According to this the example in 6.3.1.2 <span property="cal:dtstart" content="20070916T1600-0500" datatype="xsd:datetime"> September 16th at 4pm </span>. would not create a typed literal (@content is present). Or can the following bullets (XML literal, typed literal) "overwrite" the result from the first bullet (plain literal)? " by Johannes Koch in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0116.html Probable Resolution by MarkB in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0117.html "the simplest solution is to make the minor change of moving the third step (that checks for typed literals) to become the first." RESOLVED in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/06-rdfa-minutes as per MarkB. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080226163405.87B436B62C@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-88: bug in setting of datatype with @content in Syntax dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-02-26 2008-02-26 added "Last Call Comment" in title. 2008-03-12 Johannes: approves of resolution http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0086.html 2008-04-30 CLOSED, since it is resolved. 2008-06-12 ACTION:Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE:bug fix 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: moved the third step (that checks for typed literals) to become the first. This is a small bug fix that implementors were able to integrate immediately. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 89 2 6 2008-02-26 " 6.1.1.5.2. Using an implicit object second example: <div about="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Baruch_Spinoza" rel="dbp:influenced"> <div> <span property="foaf:name">Albert Einstein</span> <span property="dbp:dateOfBirth" datatype="xsd:date">1879-03-14</span> </div> </div> Because the inner div element has no instanceof attribute, according to section 5.5 step 4 [new subject] is set to the [evaluation context]'s [parent object], which is <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Baruch_Spinoza>, because the [current object resource] for the outer div was null. The incomplete triple <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Baruch_Spinoza> dbp:influenced ? . never gets completed. And because no bnode was created, the foaf:name and dbp:dateOfBirth properties apply to <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Baruch_Spinoza>. Similar things happen with the third and forth examples in 6.1.1.5.2 and the sixth example in 6.2: <div about="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Baruch_Spinoza" rel="dbp:influenced"> <span property="foaf:name">Albert Einstein</span> <span property="dbp:dateOfBirth" datatype="xsd:date">1879-03-14</span> <div rel="dbp:citizenship"> <span about="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Germany" /> <span about="http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States" /> </div> </div> " by Johannes Koch in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0116.html Probable Resolution: this looks like confusion, may require small tweak in language to specifically call out the case of intermediate HTML elements. Update 2008-03-05: actually, there's a deeper issue: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0043.html 5 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080226163654.3A6F75F74E@stu.w3.org ISSUE-89: Last Call Comment: confusion regarding completion of hanging triples across intermediate HTML elements dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-02-26 2008-02-27 followup by Johannes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0118.html 2008-03-06 added the note about the deeper issue: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0043.html 2008-05-08 Status on 2008-05-08: checking with Mark to confirm that we handled this issue with the 20080501 draft. 2008-06-03 this issue was already solved with ISSUE-108, and indeed this is fixed. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: bug fix 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: this issue was already solved with ISSUE-108, and indeed this is fixed. 90 2 6 2008-02-26 " 9.3. @rel/@rev attribute values * While there is a "last" value listed, there is no "first". * What about "top"? " by Johannes Koch in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0116.html Probable Resolution: ensure we have all existing reserved words in XHTML, otherwise leave this decision to the XHTML WG. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080226164007.2F3685F74E@stu.w3.org ISSUE-90: Last Call Comment: adding \\'top\\' and \\'first\\' to reserved values of @rel/@rev dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-02-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080313122858.02dbb8c0@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-03-13 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon swick@w3.org 2008-03-13 2008-03-04 fixed title to make it visible in the listing (no single quotes.) 2008-03-20 RESOLVED in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/13-rdfa-minutes as "accept XHTML2 WG decision on reserved keywords", which in this case includes accepting "top" and "first". 2008-03-20 note sent to Johannes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0239.html 2008-04-30 CLOSED, since it is resolved. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: inquired with the XHTML WG, who agreed that these additional reserved terms should be added to the XHTML namespace for consistency. Updated the RDFa specification accordingly. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 2008-06-12 Johannes acknowledged the change: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0255.html 93 2 6 2008-03-04 raised by Shane: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0162.html " In Section 5.5, processing rule 4, it says "If no URI is provided by a resource attribute, then..." This is a little confusing, since we of course have an attribute named "resource". What is meant is "If no new subject URI is obtained via these rules, then..." I hope, anyway. " Proposed Resolution: accept Shane's wording. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080304042223.94AD7C6DC0@barney.w3.org ISSUE-93: Last Call Comment: editorial bug in 5.5 processing rule 4 dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-03-04 2008-03-21 RESOLVED as "If no new subject URI is obtained via these rules, then...", as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0286.html 2008-04-30 CLOSED, since it is resolved. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: accepted Shane's wording. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 91 2 6 2008-02-26 " A. Other XML Languages "If a language includes @xml:base [XMLBASE], an RDFa parser for that host language must process it, and use its value to set [base]." Is this a requirement? The section is marked "informative". " by Johannes Koch in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0116.html Probable Resolution: we may not want to state any *requirements* about other host languages, probably only indications. Requires further discussion. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080226164201.7B0615F74E@stu.w3.org ISSUE-91: Last Call Comment: informative section on other XML dialects states a requirement dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-02-26 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080313122858.02dbb8c0@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-03-13 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon swick@w3.org 2008-03-13 2008-03-20 RESOLVED in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/13-rdfa-minutes as "we remove the xml:base example, and move the xml:base description (minus example) into the main text, removing appendix A." 2008-03-20 sent note to Johannes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0240.html 2008-04-30 CLOSED, since it is resolved. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: we remove the xml:base example, and move the xml:base description (minus example) into the main text, removing appendix A. 2008-06-12 Johannes acknowledges response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0257.html 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 92 2 6 2008-02-27 Johannes worries that @about="" will resolve to the parent directory of the current URI, not the full URI: " section 5.5 step 4: "if the element is the head or body element then act as if there is an empty @about present, and process it according to the rule for @about, above;" As the type of @about is URIorCURIE, and "" (empty attribute) is no valid safe CURIE, it will be treated as a URI reference, which is to be resolved to the current base. So e.g. "" resolved to http://www.example.org/foo/bar results in http://www.example.org/foo/ Is that what is intended? " in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0121.html Probable Resolution: base actually resolves to the complete URI. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080227164846.3DE16C6DB0@barney.w3.org ISSUE-92: Last Call Comment: resolution of @about=\\'\\' dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-02-27 2008-03-04 Johannes states that we have correctly explained this on the list, no change needed to the spec: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0042.html 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: None 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: clarification in email conversion, no change needed. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 94 2 6 2008-03-04 raised by Shane: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0163.html " In section 5.5 Sequence, processing rule 13 (really rule 12) it says "a value of 'true' should be returned from this level of processing. Otherwise a value of false should be returned." Two things: 1) change false to 'false' or change 'true' to true. 2) change should to MUST. This section is normative, and that is a conformance requirement. The use of "should" is polite, but not what is intended I think. " Proposed Resolution: uncontroversial, accept Shane's changes. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080304042552.92B71C6DBB@barney.w3.org ISSUE-94: Last Call Comment: editorial bug in 5.5 processing rule 13 dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-03-04 2008-03-21 RESOLVED as Shane proposes above, as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0286.html 2008-04-30 CLOSED, since it is resolved. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: accept Shane's suggested wording. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 95 2 6 2008-03-04 raised by Shane: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0027.html " Section 5.4 paragraph 3 reads: "For example, the full URI for Albert Einstein on DPPedia is:" It should of course be "For example, the full URI for Albert Einstein on DBPedia is:" " Proposed Resolution: obviously accept Shane's comment. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080304043058.D3A32C6DB0@barney.w3.org ISSUE-95: Last Call Comment: editorial typo in 5.4, paragraph 3 dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-03-04 2008-03-21 RESOLVED to fix typo, as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0286.html 2008-04-30 CLOSED, since it is resolved. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: fixed typo. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 96 2 6 2008-03-04 raised by Shane: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0028.html " Section 5.4.3 reads (in part): There are a number of ways that attributes will make use of CURIEs, and they need to be dealt with differently. These are: 1. An attribute may be CURIE-only, disallowing other types of values. In this case any value that is not a 'curie' according to the definition in the section CURIE Syntax Definition <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_curies> should not affect processing in any way; this means that not only will there be no error reporting, but also the RDFa processor should act as if the value simply did not exist. 2. An attribute may allow CURIEs, as well as a full URI. In this case any value that is not surrounded by square brackets, as defined by 'safe_curie' in the section CURIE Syntax Definition <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_curies>, will be processed as if it was a URI. If the value /is/ surrounded by square brackets, then the inner content must conform to the 'curie' definiton, and as before, if it does not then the value should have no effect on processing. Since this is normative content, the shoulds in need to be "MUST". Second, "no effect on processing" is a little ambiguous for my tastes. I would prefer "be ignored". So, these clauses could read: There are a number of ways that attributes will make use of CURIEs, and they need to be dealt with differently. These are: 1. An attribute may be CURIE-only, disallowing other types of values. In this case any value that is not a 'curie' according to the definition in the section CURIE Syntax Definition <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_curies> MUST be ignored; this means that not only will there be no error reporting, but also the RDFa processor MUST act as if the value simply did not exist. 2. An attribute may allow CURIEs, as well as a full URI. In this case any value that is not surrounded by square brackets, as defined by 'safe_curie' in the section CURIE Syntax Definition <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_curies>, will be processed as if it was a URI. If the value /is/ surrounded by square brackets, then the inner content must conform to the 'curie' definiton, and as before, if it does not then the value MUST be ignored. " Proposed Resolution: easy recommendations, accept Shane's wording. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080304043356.0A4BDC6DB0@barney.w3.org ISSUE-96: Last Call Comment: editorial imprecision in 5.4.3 dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-03-04 2008-03-21 continued discussion between Mark and Ben: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0285.html 2008-06-03 fixed in draft. Mark says: "I've changed the two points that Shane refers to, to 'MUST'. I've also added a couple of words to make it clear that we're dealing with a list of items, and that if any one is invalid, it doesn't mean that the others should not be processed." 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: changed the two points to 'MUST'. Added a couple of words to make it clear that we're dealing with a list of items, and that if any one is invalid, it doesn't mean that the others should not be processed. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 97 2 6 2008-03-06 pointed out by Johannes in this thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0049.html What transformation should be applied to XML literals? Specifically, should they carry the XHTML namespace on all elements? If so, how? Mark points out that the RDF spec references the Exclusive Canonicalization of XML, which requires at least an XML parser/serializer and which could get complicated. 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080306004359.63D3A6B62D@kent.w3.org ISSUE-97: Last Call Comment: handing of namespaces and canonicalization of XML literals dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-03-06 2008-03-25 resolved as "the RDFa syntax does not need any change with respect to XMLLiterals. We note that the easy way to generate a valid serialization of the XMLLiteral is to dump the namespaces and xml:lang into all top-level elements of the xml literal, including xmlns, watching out for redeclarations." on 03/20: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0278.html 2008-04-30 CLOSED, since it is resolved. 2008-06-12 Johannes agrees with resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0324.html 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: None 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: the RDFa syntax does not need any change with respect to XMLLiterals. We note that the easy way to generate a valid serialization of the XMLLiteral is to dump the namespaces and xml:lang into all top-level elements of the xml literal, including xmlns, watching out for redeclarations. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 98 5 15 2008-03-16 Escape sequences in URIs (such as %20 for whitespaces) must be double-escaped to build a SPARQL query in the implementation of Recipe 6, pattern 2. The issue and a potential solution were raised by Josh Tauberer (2008-01-20): [[[ (...) I ran into a problem when I created some URIs with %20's in them, because the redirect would need to double-escape the %20's when they are put into the query string. After some chin-scratching I found out that mod_rewrite could be used to do a proper redirect, and I've documented it here: http://rdfabout.com/demo/census/htaccess.txt There's more explanation in the link, but the short story is putting into the main httpd.conf: RewriteMap esc int:escape and then into .htaccess: RewriteEngine on RewriteBase "/" RewriteRule ^(rdf/.*) http://%{HTTP_HOST}/sparql? (..all one line..) query=DESCRIBE+<http://%{HTTP_HOST}/${esc:$1}> [R] ]]] Source: http://simile.mit.edu/mail/ReadMsg?listName=Linking%20Open%20Data&msgId=23498 [[[ # When we get URIs with %20s or other escaped characters in them, # a simple RedirectMatch won't do because in the query string # DESCRIBE query, the escaped characters will be unescaped at # some point during processing. So this is bad: # # RedirectMatch 303 (/rdf/.*) http://rdfabout.com/sparql?query=DESCRIBE+%3Chttp://www.rdfabout.com$1%3E # # Instead, we need to double-escape the characters: The percent # signs should ultimately be escaped so the processor gets back # the original escaping when unescaping is applied. # # To do this, we need to use mod_rewrite. However, mod_rewrite is # operating on the unescaped URI, so we need the 'escape' mapping # function, which needs to be activated in httpd.conf with: # RewriteMap esc int:escape # The rewrite rule below re-escapes the unescaped URI (getting back # the problematic URL we started with), and then mod_rewrite # escapes it again when it sends the redirect, finally achieving # the double-escape. RewriteEngine on RewriteBase "/" RewriteRule ^(rdf/.*) http://%{HTTP_HOST}/sparql?query=DESCRIBE+<http://%{HTTP_HOST}/${esc:$1}> [R] ]]] Source: http://rdfabout.com/demo/census/htaccess.txt 2 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080316115025.75C096B62C@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-98: URI escaping in SPARQL query in Recipe 6 dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-03-16 99 2 6 2008-03-20 raised by Micah Dubinko in [1]. """ If I am reading the 21 Feb spec correctly, @src now can stand in for the subject of a triple in the absence of @about. Can somebody set me straight on how this squares with the leading example in section 5.3? <div about="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Albert_Einstein"> <span property="foaf:name">Albert Einstein</span> <span property="dbp:dateOfBirth" datatype="xsd:date">1879-03-14</span> <div rel="dbp:birthPlace" resource="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Germany"> <span property="dbp:conventionalLongName">Federal Republic of Germany</span> </div> <img rel="foaf:depiction" src="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Albert_Einstein_Head.jpg" /> </div> In particular, how does foaf:depiction fit in here? Given the image resource as a subject, shouldn't it use foaf:depicts? """ Probably Resolution: this is an editorial bug in section 5.3 where the usage of @src hasn't been updated to the latest spec. Updating the example to bring the @rel up one level is the way to fix this. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0114.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080320012933.3DE766B62C@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-99: Last Call Comment: Editorial Bug in @src example mistaken in Section 5.3 dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-03-20 2008-05-08 This has been fixed in the latest draft (20080501). 2008-05-08 following up with Micah: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0043.html 2008-05-21 no response from Micah, but this is fixed and now closed. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: bug fix 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: fixed the example (wasn't updated from a pre-Last-Call draft). 2008-06-13 Micah agrees with resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0078.html 2008-06-13 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 100 2 6 2008-03-20 raised by Shane in [1] """ Test 58 reveals a problem in the processing rules. Rule 11 says that incomplete triples are only completed when a bnode is NOT created, but the P elements in test 58 create BNodes - so the incomplete triple from the parent DIV should never be completed. """ Likely a bug in the presentation of step 11, but needs review. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0087.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080320014246.EDFDA6B62C@kent.w3.org ISSUE-100: Last Call Comment: Bug in Step 11 of Processing rules, as evidenced by Test Case 58 dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-03-20 2008-05-08 assigned to Shane 2008-05-09 This issue was overcome by events - the related rules were changed. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: bug fix 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: issue overcome by other edits, subsumed. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 101 2 6 2008-03-20 raised by Ben in [1]: """ I don't believe it is necessary, and it may be harmful, to garbage collect so-called "useless" triples in cases like: <div rel="foaf:knows"> <div rel="foaf:knows"> <div rel="foaf:knows"> ... </div> </div> </div> So what if someone writes useless triples? That's their intent, so let it be :) This step in the processing adds notable complexity to the parser rules. It also may make life difficult for authors who are progressively writing RDFa, building up a skeleton of bnodes before hanging properties onto them: they wouldn't see any triples at all until they add a @property, at which point a slew of triples would appear. There's a notable cost here, and questionable value. """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0242.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080320014508.B31766B62B@kent.w3.org ISSUE-101: Last Call Comment: garbage collecting \\'useless\\' triples doesn\\'t seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-03-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080403145210.04afad50@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-04-03 RDF-in-XHTML TF swick@w3.org 2008-04-03 2008-04-03 further comments by Micah Dubinko: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0380.html 2008-04-10 RESOLVED to indeed keep these "useless triples" in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/03-rdfa-minutes.html 2008-04-11 RESOLUTION: Modify processing rules per ISSUE-101 to process and produce triples consisting of only bnodes -- http://www.w3.org/2008/04/03-rdfa-minutes.html#item03 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: Modify processing rules to process and produce triples consisting of only bnodes. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 2008-06-16 CHANGE-TYPE: outstanding issue resolution (BenA had objected) 102 2 6 2008-03-20 raised by John Boyer in [1]: """ ... Instantiation does not appear to be what is happening in the case of RDFa. Instead, the element to which you attach "instanceof" is something to which you simply seem to be attaching some RDF type information. A name that more accurately reflects that behavior would be preferable. ... """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0211.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080320031955.DFAB0C6DB0@barney.w3.org ISSUE-102: Last Call Comment: Better name than \\'instanceof\\' is needed dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-03-20 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080403145210.04afad50@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-04-03 RDF-in-XHTML TF swick@w3.org 2008-04-03 2008-04-03 further comments by Elias: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0315.html 2008-04-10 RESOLVED to @typeof in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/03-rdfa-minutes.html 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: changed @instanceof to @typeof 2008-06-16 CHANGE-TYPE: outstanding issue resolution (StevenP had objected) 2008-06-18 John accepts: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0106.html 2008-06-18 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 103 2 6 2008-04-03 brought up by Jonathan Rees in [1]: """ Hal Abelson of MIT pointed out to me that the [...] syntax effectively introduces a new kind of URI - it extends the URI space. However, we already have a standard way to extend the URI space, namely the creation of new URI schemes. Did you consider doing this (curie:prefix:suffix or cu:prefix:suffix or ...)? It would have some advantages over [...]: . it would eliminate the need for a new URIor[safe]CURIE datatype since you could just use URI . it would protect against possible conflicting future extensions of the URI space that include [...] . it would avoid ambiguity with relative URIrefs that happen to be spelled [...] . it would avoid setting a precedent; by introducing [...] you pave the way for other notations that extend URI syntax in other ways, e.g. {...}, <...> I know this makes the mapping of the lexical space to the value space for the URI datatype context-sensitive (in the same way that the mapping for URIor[safe]CURIE is). I haven't worked through the implications of this. """ This requires further discussion. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0294.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403014414.303F3BF63@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-103: Last Call Comment: a URI-centric approach to CURIEs dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080529122700.052d08b8@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-05-29 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force swick@w3.org 2008-05-29 2008-05-08 Status: needs discussion ASAP 2008-05-29 [rrs] [[ RESOLUTION: ISSUE-103 closed, CURIEs are not URI schemes, they are a macro expansion mechanism. No need to change the Syntax document. CURIEs are also QName-like, allowing legacy languages to migrate forward cleanly. ]] -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/29-rdfa-minutes.html#item05 2008-06-02 resolved in telecon, closing issue. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Reject 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: CURIEs are not URI schemes, they are a macro expansion mechanism. No need to change the Syntax document. CURIEs are also QName-like, allowing legacy languages to migrate forward cleanly. 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: None 2008-06-12 response from Jonathan, doesn't agree with our resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0073.html. Further explanation from Mark: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0075.html 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Disagree 104 2 6 2008-04-03 brought up by Jonathan Rees in [1]: """ 9.1 Please provide complete datatype definitions (CURIE, etc) at a level of detail approaching that of the XML Schema documentation (e.g. see http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#QName). """ requires further discussion. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0294.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403014511.466FFBF63@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-104: Last Call Comment: Provide complete datatype definitions dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080501123531.04398fb0@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-05-01 RDFa telecon swick@w3.org 2008-05-01 2008-05-08 RESOLVED as "Copy the CURIE datatype definition from WD-curie-20080402/#s_schema" in telecon http://www.w3.org/2008/05/01-rdfa-minutes.html On a related note, also RESOLVED: change the wording from URIorCURIE to URIorSafeCURIE. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: Copy the CURIE datatype definition from WD-curie-20080402/#s_schema 2008-06-16 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: would prefer more editorial details 105 2 6 2008-04-03 as brought up by Jonathan Rees in [1]: """ - Microformats are mentioned in the abstract. Please give a citation, as these might not be familiar to all readers. - I find the term 'URIorCURIE' to be very confusing, because a CURIE is not a URIorCURIE. It is very easy to interpret the name to imply you have created a syntactic context that admits either a URI or a CURIE, which would create an alarming ambiguity; but you have been careful not to do this. 'URIorSafeCURIE' would be more appropriate. (But I'm bothered by 'safe CURIE' for a similar reason - a safe CURIE is not a kind of CURIE.) - 3.6 Turtle: Incomplete sentence beginning "However, there are ..." - I know that "recurse" is in wide use in the sense in which you use it, but this is very poor English. To "recurse" is to curse again; what you mean is "recur". Follow the pattern of "incur / incursion". - 5.4.1 extraneous "then" in first sentence. - 5.4.2 extraneous "then" in last sentence of note. """ more or less straight-forward. Requires some sanity checks from Mark and Shane. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0294.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403014728.B4AD7BF63@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-105: Last Call Comment: a few editorial notes dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 2008-05-08 assigned to Shane 2008-05-09 This issue has several parts: Added a reference to microformats.org. Changed term to be URIorSafeCURIE. Fixed the missing content. We agree that propert English should be the term "recur" but the conventional computer science term is "recurse" and we are loathe to change it. Removed the extraneous "then" statements. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: Added a reference to microformats.org. Changed term to be URIorSafeCURIE. Fixed the missing content. We agree that propert English should be the term "recur" but the conventional computer science term is "recurse" and we are loathe to change it. Removed the extraneous "then" statements. 2008-06-16 Jonathan Rees responds: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0086.html 2008-06-16 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Partial Accept 106 2 6 2008-04-03 raised by TimBL in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0297.html 0 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403014850.25497BF63@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-106: Last Call Comment: TimBL on a few architectural points of RDFa dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 2008-04-10 responded in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0069.html 2008-06-09 full response in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0037.html 2008-06-12 ACTION: Partial Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: None 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: answered the point on Follow-Your-Nose with XHTML-namespace solution, explained why DTDs are unavoidable for now, simplified language on [default graph] 2008-06-19 RESOLUTION: Move the two items "SHOULD be a DOCTYPE" and "SHOULD be a @profile" from Section 4.1 to a new Informational Appendix "Deployment Advice". Replace sentence "This is called the [default graph]" with "This specification uses the term <tref>default graph</tref> to mean all of the triples asserted by a document according to the <a href="#s_model">Processing Model</a> section." 2008-06-19 resolutions noted in telecon: http://www.w3.org/2008/06/19-rdfa-minutes.html. TimBL had objected in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0098.html. Ralph explains to TimBL resolutions in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0114.html, and TimBL approves in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0115.html 2008-06-19 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-19 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-19 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 107 2 6 2008-04-03 raised by Micah Dubinko in [1] """ Section 5.5 step #10 summary Currently says: >The next step of the iteration is to establish any [current object literal]; But should also have words to the effect of: ...and create the triple, if this is not a skipped element """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0301.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403015040.A8362BF63@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-107: Last Call Comment: missing summary text dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 2008-05-08 assigned to Shane. 2008-05-09 This was clarified in the processing step. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: added language to clarify processing step, as requested. 2008-06-13 Micah agrees with resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0078.html 2008-06-13 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 108 2 1 2008-04-03 raised by Micah Dubinko in [1] """ Section 5.5 step #4 >/otherwise/, if [parent object] is present, [new subject] is set to that /and/ the [skip element] flag is set to 'true'; Spec is unclear on what to do if processing gets to this final step and [parent object] is not "present" and ("present" should be more specific, e.g. "not null"). Additionally, it seems like an error to set the [skip element] flag in this step. In the case of an element with @property and no other attributes, the element definitely shouldn't be skipped. """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0302.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403015122.A4966BF63@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-108: Last Call Comment: Ambiguous otherwise step dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 2008-04-30 resolved quickly by Mark, and approved by Micah: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0150.html 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: bug fix 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: updated language to prevent confusion. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 109 2 6 2008-04-03 raised by Laurens Holst in [1]: """ First of all, I think the @cite attribute on blockquote and q elements should have the same status as @href (be considered as @resource), so that RDFa can pick up on existing cite attribute annotations in documents, and to avoid authors having to write the citation URI twice, one for RDFa and one for HTML. See the example in section 6.3.2.1. """ Discussion already under way with a good explanation by Mark as to why we didn't do this [2]. May be sufficient, will confirm with task force. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0309.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0311.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403015517.99FEEBF63@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-109: Last Call Comment: do something with @cite dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852016638B9@RZJC2EX.jr1.local meeting record: 2008-04-24 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2008-04-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080501123531.04398fb0@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-05-01 RDFa telecon swick@w3.org 2008-05-01 2008-04-30 RESOLVED as: "We considered @cite but realized that many other attributes would then require RDFa interpretation and that doing so is not simple. We defer this issue to a future version of RDFa." 2008-05-21 Laurens Holst accepts resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0155.html 2008-06-12 ACTION: Reject 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: None 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: We considered @cite but realized that many other attributes would then require RDFa interpretation and that doing so is not simple. We defer this issue to a future version of RDFa. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 110 2 6 2008-04-03 raised by Laurens Holst in [1]: """ Second, are you sure that it is a good idea to give @src different semantics than @href? I think it would probably be better if they had the same semantics in RDFa. The reason for this is that I find the difference between overriding @src and @href values (as explained in the Primer [2] section 3.6) confusing, and it is not really clear to me why they are treated differently. After all, they both reference a resource in a very similar manner, only differing in the way the resource is displayed. The usefulness of treating @src as @about also seems to be rather limited, as <img> can not have child content and you can thus specify at most three triples; one with a literal object, one with a resource object, and one reverse relation of the resource. Or, maybe @href should also be treated as @about? """ A good response by Mark in [2]. May be enough, will discuss with task force. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0309.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0311.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403015639.6D1E1BF63@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-110: Last Call Comment: why is @src the same as @about instead of @href? dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 2008-04-30 RESOLVED in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/17-rdfa-minutes.html as "we considered @src in both subject and object positions, and resolved that the current situation - it's equivalent to @about - is more useful to authors." 2008-05-21 Laurens Holst accepts resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0156.html 2008-06-12 ACTION: Reject 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: None 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: we considered @src in both subject and object positions, and resolved that the current situation - it's equivalent to @about - is more useful to authors. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 111 2 6 2008-04-03 raised by Micah Dubinko in [1]: """ When the RDFa specification enters Candidate Recommendation, please include as part of the exit criteria the requirement for at least one 100% conforming implementation in XSLT 1.0. If it turns out to be difficult to fully implement RDFa in XSLT 1.0 (as other comments may indicate), please either revise the specification or consider a separate conformance level for XSLT processors. """ Requires discussion. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0378.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403020016.21692C6DC0@barney.w3.org ISSUE-111: Last Call Comment: XSLT and Conformance Levels dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/48470299.3040002@adida.net [RDFa] Telecon Thursday - 1500 UTC ben@adida.net 2008-06-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852014C624C@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [RDFa] Telecon Thursday - 1500 UTC michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2008-06-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080605123059.043f0678@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-06-05 RDF-in-XHTML task force swick@w3.org 2008-06-05 2008-05-27 Manu, Fabien, and Ivan are investigating. 2008-06-05 RESOLUTION: in response to ISSUE-111, we do not believe a change in the spec is justifiable. We believe that, architecturally, whitespace and namespace preservation are important. We will rely on deployment experience to inform specific implementation techniques. -- http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes#item03 2008-06-09 RESOLVED as: "we do not believe a change in the spec is justifiable. We believe that, architecturally, whitespace and namespace preservation are important. We will rely on deployment experience to inform specific implementation techniques." in telecon: http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes#item02 and Micah responded: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0008.html 2008-06-12 ACTION: Reject 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: None 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: we do not believe a change in the spec is justifiable. We believe that, architecturally, whitespace and namespace preservation are important. We will rely on deployment experience to inform specific implementation techniques. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 112 2 6 2008-04-03 raised by Micah Dubinko in [1]: """ In addition to the procedural "Sequence" description in section 5.5, include a functional description of the algorithm. Often times, a functional description is better suited for describing an algorithm to implementers, even if the eventual code will closely follow the sequence of steps given in section 5.5. The process of translating the sequence description into functional terms will help improve the quality of the specification, make any algorithm errors or areas that are unclear or difficult to implement stand out better, resulting in a smoother call-for-implementations period. Obviously, people actually implementing in a functional language (including XSLT/GRDDL) will find the beneficial as well. What is a functional description? Any number of possible descriptions would qualify, but the essential constraints of a functional description are: * no side-effects or state * no mutable variables <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_programming> For example, a functional description be structured as a series of statements like this: * For each <condition on node> produce a triple with <rule for subject> <rule for predicate> <rule for object> I am personally interested in contributing on the list or wiki to flesh out the details of a functional description. I prefer a final result with normative weight, though. """ Requires discussion. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0379.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403020230.ADD31C6DC0@barney.w3.org ISSUE-112: Last Call Comment: describe algorithm in functional terms, too dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 2008-04-23 RESOLUTION: "on ISSUE-112, we sympathize with the comment, but, given the community pull to finalize RDFa, it would take too long to write up a functional description." http://www.w3.org/2008/04/17-rdfa-minutes.html#item06 2008-04-23 Commentor has accepted this resolution http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0128.html 2008-04-30 CLOSED, since it is resolved. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Reject 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: None 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: we sympathize with the comment, but, given the community pull to finalize RDFa, it would take too long to write up a functional description. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 113 2 6 2008-04-03 raised by Micah Dubinko in [1]: """ In many cases, such as clipboard operations, fragments of XHTML+RDFa might be passed around, in which case valuable triples still might be extracted from the fragment. Of course, there will always be potential cases where the process of extracting the fragment "breaks" the triple (or relies on additional context before being processed). But there will also be cases where complete triples remain intact in the fragment. If the RDFa spec doesn't describe what to do in these cases, ad-hoc solutions might take hold without the benefit of careful discussion. Please mention this possibility in the specification, describe normative behavior, and produce test cases for the behavior. The Last Call specification specifies special handling for the <head> and <body> elements. Please specify processing rules and conditions that apply to document fragments containing RDFa, in particular for cases where no <head> nor <body> element would be encountered. """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0381.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403020645.BAFF7C6DC0@barney.w3.org ISSUE-113: Last Call Comment: clarify situation around document fragments containing RDFa dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852016638B9@RZJC2EX.jr1.local meeting record: 2008-04-24 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2008-04-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080501123531.04398fb0@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-05-01 RDFa telecon swick@w3.org 2008-05-01 http://www.w3.org/mid/48470299.3040002@adida.net [RDFa] Telecon Thursday - 1500 UTC ben@adida.net 2008-06-04 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852014C624C@RZJC2EX.jr1.local RE: [RDFa] Telecon Thursday - 1500 UTC michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2008-06-05 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080605123059.043f0678@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-06-05 RDF-in-XHTML task force swick@w3.org 2008-06-05 2008-05-08 proposed paragraph in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0030.html 2008-06-05 RESOLUTION: close ISSUE-113 as "we will not be specifying processing rules for fragments, though a future version of the spec may do so. We don't rule out the use case." -- http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes#item03 2008-06-09 RESOLVED as "we will not be specifying processing rules for fragments, though a future version of the spec may do so. We don't rule out the use case." in telecon: http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes#item03 2008-06-12 Micah ACCEPTs the resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0066.html 2008-06-12 ACTION: Partial Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: we will not be specifying processing rules for fragments, though a future version of the spec may do so. We don't rule out the use case. We added a non-normative explanation of how fragments may contain RDFa. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 114 2 6 2008-04-03 raised by PFWG in [1] """ 2.1 Processing described for static information only (section 5) RDFa in XHTML seems to be scoped for static information only, and the processing model is described for a static DOM that does not account for dynamic changes after the document has been loaded. (Cf. first sentence in 5.5: “Processing would normally begin after the document to be parsed has been completely loaded”.) This processing model seems restricted with regard to Web 2.0 applications that dynamically add or remove information while interacting with the user. Has the use of RDFa for dynamic information in XHTML pages been considered? """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0031.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403171326.77A56BF64@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-114: Last Call Comment: RDFa specified for static pages, what about dynamic content? dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852016638B9@RZJC2EX.jr1.local meeting record: 2008-04-24 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2008-04-25 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080501123531.04398fb0@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-05-01 RDFa telecon swick@w3.org 2008-05-01 2008-04-17 Ralph proposes a response in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0116.html 2008-04-30 RESOLVED in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/24-rdfa-minutes.html as "No change in the syntax document needed as it is not obvious that there is a tractable solution to the full problem. We will create a section on the RDFa community Wiki to address dynamic modification of XHTML." Manu to contact PFWG. 2008-06-02 Waited 1 month for response from PFWG, haven't received one. Closing Issue. Email requesting feedback: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0155.html 2008-06-12 ACTION: Partial Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: No change in the syntax document needed as it is not obvious that there is a tractable solution to the full problem. We will create a section on the RDFa community Wiki to address dynamic modification of XHTML. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: No Response after 1 month 115 2 6 2008-04-03 raised by PFWG in [1] """ 2.2 Issues with @content (section 6.3.1.1) @content may be used to indicate a plain literal which would overwrite the element content for RDF generation purposes. (a) What is the rationale for having the @content value replace the element content in terms of RDF statements? Why not make the @content value an alternative object in the statement (with the element content being the other alternative object)? - This would give the end user the option to choose between the two alternatives. (b) The use of @content bears the drawback that its value cannot be marked up. The most prominent need for markup of text for assistive technology is the indication of language. The spec addresses this issue (section 6.3.1.1.1) by making a sibling @xml:lang reign over @content. However, this does not solve the problem of language changes inside the @content value (foreign words). We propose to add a note that warns about the drawback of @content with regard to marking up foreign words within its value, and recommend using the (marked-up) element content instead of @content, wherever possible. """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0031.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403171407.A8274BF63@nelson.w3.org ISSUE-115: Last Call Comment: issues with @content dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080501123531.04398fb0@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-05-01 RDFa telecon swick@w3.org 2008-05-01 2008-05-08 RESOLVED by adding a short non-normative paragraph approximately as follows "Note that the use of @content prohibits the inclusion of rich markup in your content. If the inline content of an element is what you are trying to convey, then documents should rely upon that rather than duplicating that content using the @content attribute." in telecon http://www.w3.org/2008/05/01-rdfa-minutes.html 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: added a short non-normative paragraph approximately as follows "Note that the use of @content prohibits the inclusion of rich markup in your content. If the inline content of an element is what you are trying to convey, then documents should rely upon that rather than duplicating that content using the @content attribute." 2008-06-12 PFWG responded that they can live with this resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0164.html 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: can live with it 116 2 6 2008-04-03 raised by PFWG in [1] """ 2.5 RDFa in HTML documents This specification does not address using RDFa in HTML documents (only for XHTML documents). While most of the specification could also be applied to HTML documents, the mapping of CURIE prefixes will have to be rewritten for HTML documents (since there is no namespace concept in HTML). This and the complexity problem mentioned in 2.4 make us wonder if the concept of CURIEs should be modified to not use the “xmlns:[prefix]” attribute for prefix mapping. Have you considered alternatives that would allow a consistent use of RDFa in HTML and XHTML documents? From the perspective of accessibility, consistency between HTML and XHTML documents should be a goal of the specification. """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0031.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080403171502.C9FAEC6DC5@barney.w3.org ISSUE-116: Last Call Comment: use CURIE prefix other than xmlns for future HTML compatibility dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-03 http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852016638B9@RZJC2EX.jr1.local meeting record: 2008-04-24 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at 2008-04-25 2008-04-17 Ralph proposes a response in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0115.html 2008-04-30 RESOLVED in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/24-rdfa-minutes.html as "No change in the syntax document needed." and use Ralph's response to the WG. Manu to contact PFWG. 2008-06-02 waited 1 month for comments from PFWG. Closing Issue. Email requesting feedback: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0156.html 2008-06-12 ACTION: Reject 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: None 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: No change in the syntax document needed. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: None after 1 month. 117 3 16 2008-04-17 How should we handle the deprecated (legacy) SKOS vocabulary in the SKOS namespace document? Should the RDF schema for SKOS include the deprecated vocabulary or not? Action assigned to Sean to write a proposal: http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html#action06 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080417121830.9A64E5F74E@stu.w3.org ISSUE-117: Deprecated Vocabulary dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-17 http://www.w3.org/mid/19DA38A9-C4EC-4CE0-8FDB-9D9A231EF0D4@manchester.ac.uk Draft SKOS Scheme sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk 2008-04-29 2008-04-17 2008-04-07: Sean writes a proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Apr/0032.html 2008-04-17 2008-04-08: Sean's proposal discussesd during telecon http://www.w3.org/2008/04/08-swd-minutes.html#item03 2008-04-17 2008-04-15: Telecon notes that our rationale for decising this issue should be documented in the WG's Vocabulary Management Note deliverable http://www.w3.org/2008/04/15-swd-minutes.html 2008-04-17 See also: issue 118 "Deprecating Terms or Modifying Terms" on VM http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/118 2008-05-07 Closed through resolution on new SKOS namespace http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#skosnamespace 118 4 2 2008-04-17 What detailed guidance can we give to designers faced with the question of whether to create a new namespace name or modify an existing namespace document when deprecating old vocabulary or modifying the semantics of old vocabulary? 2 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080417124331.7C4C45F74E@stu.w3.org ISSUE-118: Deprecating Terms or Modifying Terms dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-17 2008-04-17 Related: issue 117 "Deprecated Vocabulary" on SKOS http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/117 2008-04-17 Related: issue 106 "reuse OWL 1.0 namespace?" on OWL 2 http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/106 2008-04-17 See also: issue 109 "What is the namespace for elements and attributes in the XML serialization" on OWL 2 http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/109 119 3 8 2008-04-29 From http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2008Mar/0005.html ... --- So consider an OWL ontology called ONT1, it contains the following instances. ex1:csA rdf:type skos:ConceptScheme ex1:csB rdf:type skos:ConceptScheme I also have an Ontology called ONT2 that conatins: ex2:csC rdf:type skos:ConceptScheme ex2:csC owl:imports ex1:csA What should I expect to get imported into ONT2. I get two different results depending on how I interpret skos:ConceptSchema (i.e as a owl:Class or an owl:Ontology - If I am correct it is consistent in SKOS to do both) 1) ONT2 imports only the concepts that are in concept scheme csA? (which is what I want to happen) 2) ONT2 imports all of ONT1? (which is how it could be interpreted because of the semantics of owl:imports) If owl:imports is to be used with concept schemes then why not always treat concept schemes to be the same as owl:Ontologies? Was the possibility of a skos:imports ever discussed by the working group? 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080429143759.EF21E5F74F@stu.w3.org ISSUE-119: SkosImports dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-04-29 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903B87AC7@hqgiex01.fao.org List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting Margherita.Sini@fao.org 2008-05-13 http://www.w3.org/mid/482ADFEC.9070001@cs.vu.nl Re: List of resolutions from the Face-to-Face meeting schreiber@cs.vu.nl 2008-05-14 2008-05-07 RESOLVED: That SKOS does not have its own specific import mechanism and that documents will have appropriate text on how to use existing owl:import mechanisms -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item03 120 2 6 2008-05-09 As per Ben's email [1] """ Here's the markup that we believe is ambiguous: <div about="" rel="dc:creator"> <img rel="myfoobarrel" href="ben.jpg" /> </div> The question here is: does <ben.jpg> complete dc:creator, because myfoobarrel is neither a CURIE nor a link type? In other words, do we get the following triple: <> dc:creator <ben.jpg> . ? My interpretation of the spec is that rel="myfoobarrel" is completely ignored, meaning that the triple completion behaves as if there was no @rel on the img, which means that <ben.jpg> indeed completes dc:creator. And I think that's a bad outcome. Instead, I think the *presence* of @rel, no matter what it contains, should cause completion of the incomplete triples. Then, once the triples are completed, the *contents* of the @rel are considered for new triple creation. Consider what would happen if you had a different @rel: <div about="" rel="dc:creator"> <img rel="foaf:img" href="ben.jpg" /> </div> which would then yield: <> dc:creator _:bnode1 . _:bnode1 foaf:img <ben.jpg> . Changing the @rel value on img should certainly kill the second triple, but I don't see why it should change the first triple at all. """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0045.html 1 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080509003840.70408153720@plopper.w3.org ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-05-09 http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20080529122700.052d08b8@127.0.0.1 meeting record: 2008-05-29 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force swick@w3.org 2008-05-29 2008-05-29 [[ RESOLUTION: Resolve ISSUE-120 having made a minor change to the Syntax Document specifying that the presence of a @rel is sufficient to complete an incomplete triple. ]] -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/29-rdfa-minutes.html#item04 2008-06-02 resolved in telecon, closing issue. 2008-06-12 ACTION: Accept 2008-06-12 CHANGE-TYPE: bug fix 2008-06-12 RESOLUTION: a minor change to the Syntax Document specifying that the presence of a @rel is sufficient to complete an incomplete triple. 2008-06-12 COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept 121 2 6 2008-06-19 Florian Schmedding wants clarification of default namespace language [1] """ section 7 says the RDFa default prefix mapping is http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab# and has to be used when the prefix but not the colon is omitted in a CURIE. At the bottom of page 53 is then said that "the mapping to use with the default prefix is the current default mapping" which would be the value of @xmlns in scope and therefore normally http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml (section 4.1). According to that, in Test 63 the predicate would be http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtmlnext rather than http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#next (rel=":next"). Additionally, page 29 states that the prefix http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab# should be used only for values in @rel/@rev without prefix and colon. Please correct me if I misunderstood this part. """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0101.html 2 http://www.w3.org/mid/20080619164034.3206C6B62B@tibor.w3.org ISSUE-121: CR Comment: clarification of default namespace dean+cgi@w3.org 2008-06-19 1 14 Michael to set up a RDFa Test Suite together with Wing Yung 2007-02-07 2007-02-26 1 2 18 ISSUE-14: Edit "Apache configuration" section of Recipes 2007-02-13 2007-03-17 0 4 15 ISSUE-17: Write first draft of Recipe 6 2007-02-13 2007-03-13 0 3 2 ISSUE-16: Write brief summary of User Agent-based content negotiation issues 2007-02-13 2007-03-13 0 5 18 ISSUE-18: Make changes as requested in the QA doc 2007-02-13 2007-03-13 0 6 18 ISSUE-15: Remove @@TODO from "Extended Configuration" section of Recipes 2007-02-13 2007-03-13 0 7 15 ISSUE-20: Provide a timeline for implementing a CN validation service 2007-02-14 2007-03-14 0 8 18 ISSUE-21: Add mod_rewrite required to Apache Configuration in Recipes 2007-02-14 2007-03-14 0 9 17 ISSUE-26 Owner 2007-02-20 2007-03-20 0 1 None 2007-10-23 2 None 2007-10-23 3 None 2007-10-23 4 http://www.w3.org/mid/471E011D0200006A00017852@ntgwgate.loc.gov 2007-10-23 5 http://www.w3.org/mid/471E011D0200006A00017852@ntgwgate.loc.gov 2007-10-23 6 http://www.w3.org/mid/471E011D0200006A00017852@ntgwgate.loc.gov 2007-10-23 7 http://www.w3.org/mid/4761021E0200006A0001BF5B@ntgwgate.loc.gov 2007-12-13 8 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BDA2FE.3020004@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 9 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BDA2FE.3020004@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 10 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BDA2FE.3020004@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 11 http://www.w3.org/mid/47BDA2FE.3020004@zoo.ox.ac.uk 2008-02-21 12 http://www.w3.org/mid/47E11ECC0200006A00024B85@ntgwgate.loc.gov 2008-03-19 13 http://www.w3.org/mid/47E11ECC0200006A00024B85@ntgwgate.loc.gov 2008-03-19 14 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669037A04D3@hqgiex01.fao.org 2008-04-02 15 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669037A04D3@hqgiex01.fao.org 2008-04-02 16 http://www.w3.org/mid/BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB669037A04D3@hqgiex01.fao.org 2008-04-02 17 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080528050511.06bef348@stanford.edu 2008-05-28 18 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080528050511.06bef348@stanford.edu 2008-05-28 19 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080528050511.06bef348@stanford.edu 2008-05-28 20 http://www.w3.org/mid/6.2.5.6.2.20080528050511.06bef348@stanford.edu 2008-05-28