IRC log of i18ncore on 2006-07-18
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:34:14 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #i18ncore
- 13:34:14 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/18-i18ncore-irc
- 13:34:18 [fsasaki]
- meeting: i18n core working group
- 13:34:25 [fsasaki]
- chair: Francois
- 13:34:28 [fsasaki]
- scribe: Felix
- 13:34:32 [fsasaki]
- scribeNick: fsasaki
- 13:34:58 [fsasaki]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Jul/0019.html
- 14:01:58 [fyergeau]
- fyergeau has joined #i18ncore
- 14:02:03 [Zakim]
- I18N_CoreWG()10:00AM has now started
- 14:02:10 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 14:02:54 [r12a]
- r12a has joined #i18ncore
- 14:03:24 [r12a]
- zakim, dial richard
- 14:03:24 [Zakim]
- ok, r12a; the call is being made
- 14:03:25 [Zakim]
- +Richard
- 14:03:28 [Zakim]
- +Felix
- 14:03:58 [Zakim]
- -Felix
- 14:04:06 [Zakim]
- +Felix
- 14:09:24 [Zakim]
- +Karunesh_Arora
- 14:10:08 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 14:10:15 [fyergeau]
- zakim, [ is fyergeau
- 14:10:15 [Zakim]
- +fyergeau; got it
- 14:11:36 [fsasaki]
- Francois: last meetings minutes - any comments?
- 14:11:39 [fsasaki]
- .. nothing
- 14:11:40 [fsasaki]
- topic: action items
- 14:12:09 [karuneshvijay]
- karuneshvijay has joined #i18Ncore
- 14:12:15 [fsasaki]
- action: Everybody to look at input mode discussion (ONGOING)
- 14:12:31 [fsasaki]
- Felix: I had a short look, what should we do now
- 14:12:58 [fsasaki]
- Richard: It will come up in the XHTML review again
- 14:13:07 [fsasaki]
- .. but other people might have input here
- 14:13:13 [fsasaki]
- Francois: let's keep it ongoing
- 14:13:27 [fsasaki]
- action: all to look at charmod resid test suite and gather feedback (PENDING)
- 14:14:02 [fsasaki]
- action: Francois to build a current issues list on charmod norm (PENDING)
- 14:14:14 [fsasaki]
- action: Mary will make the updates discussed in Mandelieu on ws-i18n (ONGOING)
- 14:14:18 [fsasaki]
- Mary: working on that
- 14:14:37 [fsasaki]
- ... should I just start a second document on the policy?
- 14:14:47 [fsasaki]
- Francois: Felix asked what remains in the first document
- 14:15:12 [fsasaki]
- Mary: it would describe how the headers look like
- 14:15:37 [fsasaki]
- Francois: why having two documents?
- 14:15:56 [fsasaki]
- Mary: since you might implement the stuff with a different framework
- 14:17:07 [fsasaki]
- Francois: it is more difficult to do more than one document
- 14:17:54 [fsasaki]
- Felix: it might help the adoption to have a separate document, how the other policy domains do
- 14:19:42 [fsasaki]
- .. Mary, could you edit both documents?
- 14:19:55 [fsasaki]
- Mary: it depends, we have to see
- 14:20:17 [fsasaki]
- Francois: could we start with one document, and see what happens
- 14:20:26 [fsasaki]
- Mary: see if we need two documents
- 14:21:08 [fsasaki]
- Franois: the actoin item is ongoing?
- 14:21:10 [fsasaki]
- Mary: Yes
- 14:21:15 [fsasaki]
- s/Franois/Francois/
- 14:21:28 [fsasaki]
- action: Richard to create a wiki on "first letter" (DONE)
- 14:21:33 [fsasaki]
- Richard: not a wiki, though
- 14:21:36 [r12a]
- http://www.w3.org/International/notes/firstletter.html
- 14:22:04 [fsasaki]
- Richard: the current wikis are a pain to edit as they get long
- 14:23:06 [fsasaki]
- .. I have a hybrid between a wiki and a mailing system
- 14:24:16 [fsasaki]
- .. Karunesh, do you think that is useful?
- 14:24:44 [fsasaki]
- Karunesh: The current way will also work
- 14:25:19 [fsasaki]
- .. I will make some comments
- 14:25:28 [fsasaki]
- Richard: sent it to www-international
- 14:25:47 [fsasaki]
- Francois: very nice, but more work for Richard
- 14:26:33 [fsasaki]
- action: Richard to review XHTML Basic 1.1 (ONGOING)
- 14:26:55 [fsasaki]
- s/1.1/1.1 and XHTML Modularization/
- 14:27:14 [fsasaki]
- topic: LTLI discussion
- 14:27:26 [fsasaki]
- Francois: Mark is not here
- 14:27:29 [fsasaki]
- Felix: I'll ping him again
- 14:28:39 [fsasaki]
- Francois: we cannot go on without Mark
- 14:29:12 [fsasaki]
- action: Felix to ping Mark on LTLI discussion
- 14:30:11 [fsasaki]
- Felix: how about matching - should LTLI discuss matching, not normatively?
- 14:30:41 [fsasaki]
- Richard: if it is not normative, it should not be in LTLI
- 14:30:49 [fsasaki]
- Felix: it was just brought up a while ago
- 14:31:15 [fsasaki]
- Francois: LTLI could identify use cases for matching on the web
- 14:31:22 [fsasaki]
- .. that is more BP than normative spec
- 14:31:41 [fsasaki]
- Richard: not sure
- 14:31:47 [fsasaki]
- .. this could slow things down for LTLI
- 14:31:58 [fsasaki]
- .. this could slow things down
- 14:32:07 [fsasaki]
- Francois: that's a worthy point
- 14:33:38 [fsasaki]
- Felix: summary: people at the call currently think explanatory material on matching should not be on LTLI
- 14:34:42 [fsasaki]
- Francois: that's all for this week
- 14:34:51 [fsasaki]
- topic: ws i18n progress
- 14:35:07 [fsasaki]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-i18n-20050914/
- 14:35:34 [Zakim]
- +??P11
- 14:35:43 [fsasaki]
- Francois: already handled during action items
- 14:36:14 [fsasaki]
- topic: LTLI (now with Mark)
- 14:36:51 [fyergeau]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JulSep/0004.html
- 14:40:27 [mdavis]
- mdavis has joined #i18ncore
- 14:41:05 [fsasaki]
- Francois: discussion state: we need use cases for LTLI
- 14:41:35 [fsasaki]
- Francois describes a use case which uses the browsers language
- 14:41:53 [fsasaki]
- Richard: we agreed that xml:lang will not be used for local, right?
- 14:41:55 [fsasaki]
- Mark: no
- 14:42:17 [fsasaki]
- .. you could either deny xml:lang
- 14:42:35 [fsasaki]
- .. or is it as the core of locale, and get other information from somewhere else
- 14:42:46 [fsasaki]
- .. the latter seems to be more practical
- 14:43:02 [fsasaki]
- .. "locale" has no well established meaning like language
- 14:43:24 [fsasaki]
- .. e.g. for some people, locale definitions requires at least three countries
- 14:43:43 [fsasaki]
- .. e.g. the nationality of a user, the place of transaction, the place of the user etc.
- 14:43:59 [fsasaki]
- .. "locale" is an amorphous set of preferences
- 14:44:18 [fsasaki]
- .. I think, the core part is language
- 14:44:52 [fsasaki]
- .. so people would add other fields for their requirements
- 14:45:06 [fsasaki]
- Richard: should we say "a core for locale"
- 14:45:13 [fsasaki]
- .. or "the key indicator"?
- 14:45:15 [fsasaki]
- Francois: both
- 14:45:30 [fsasaki]
- .. it is core, but you can use it also as an indication
- 14:45:42 [fsasaki]
- Richard: that is: the other aspects of the locale
- 14:45:54 [fsasaki]
- Mark: take a look at time zone
- 14:46:36 [fsasaki]
- Francois: what is the use case for time zone on the web?
- 14:46:46 [fsasaki]
- .. to give time indications in the users time zone?
- 14:46:51 [fsasaki]
- Mark: yes
- 14:47:07 [fsasaki]
- .. e.g. for news to say "this happened three hours ago" or "two o'clock"
- 14:47:24 [fsasaki]
- .. sometimes you don't do that
- 14:47:38 [fsasaki]
- Francois: time zone is the most independent from language, so its outside the core
- 14:47:47 [fsasaki]
- .. the same holds for currency
- 14:48:00 [fsasaki]
- s/../Mark:/
- 14:48:15 [fsasaki]
- Francois: for most languages you can make a good guess
- 14:48:30 [fsasaki]
- Richard: what is "a locale"?
- 14:48:49 [fsasaki]
- Francois: we already agreed that it depends on the application
- 14:49:13 [fsasaki]
- Richard: so the locale is not something you can label?
- 14:49:24 [fsasaki]
- Mark: the notion of locale is very amorphous
- 14:50:44 [fsasaki]
- Francois: you want locale identifiers so that a recipient is able to do s.t. with it
- 14:51:03 [fsasaki]
- .. it is a collective thing
- 14:51:15 [fsasaki]
- .. it applies to a group of people
- 14:51:41 [fsasaki]
- Richard: one could say "a locale groups together types of information and values that defines the interaction in a particular situation"
- 14:51:50 [fsasaki]
- .. but we refer to the usage of a particular
- 14:51:54 [fsasaki]
- .. label
- 14:52:58 [fsasaki]
- Francois: we need to distingush locale identifiers versus their meaning in different contexts
- 14:53:28 [fsasaki]
- Felix: we said two weeks ago that locale is always related to processes (interactions), whereas language is kind of static
- 14:53:41 [fsasaki]
- Richard: I wanted to say "xml:lang provides a component of the locale information"
- 14:54:31 [fsasaki]
- Mark: in most cases the core of the locale is provided by 3066
- 14:54:39 [fsasaki]
- .. if you look at Java
- 14:54:46 [fsasaki]
- .. posix adds a charset to the notion of locale
- 14:54:52 [fsasaki]
- .. but the core is really the language
- 14:55:20 [fsasaki]
- .. there is variance in the industry
- 14:55:27 [fsasaki]
- .. but not for the core of locale
- 14:55:40 [fsasaki]
- Richard: "the core of the locale is given by RFC 3066bis"
- 14:56:02 [fsasaki]
- .. that is: locale is a larger thing, and language is only a part of it
- 14:56:16 [fsasaki]
- .. as you think about locale identification
- 14:56:30 [fsasaki]
- Mark: I don't think if we should be too precise in the language
- 14:56:40 [fsasaki]
- .. that is: saying that xml:lang provides the core of the locale
- 14:56:47 [fsasaki]
- .. and for many applications that is sufficient
- 14:57:16 [fsasaki]
- .. you just want to cover the 99% cases
- 14:57:43 [fsasaki]
- Richard: I liked the way Mark phrased it
- 14:58:05 [fsasaki]
- Francois: posix locale is a problem
- 14:59:39 [fsasaki]
- .. you may need various ISO standards . We have to make sure that this work
- 15:01:05 [fsasaki]
- [discussion on posix versus other locale identifiers between Mark and Francois]
- 15:01:22 [fsasaki]
- Mark: if you specify the country
- 15:02:28 [Zakim]
- -Mark
- 15:02:34 [fsasaki]
- .. you need additional information
- 15:02:50 [fsasaki]
- Richard: could someone summarize where we are now?
- 15:03:02 [fsasaki]
- Francois: I could try, but I would be biased
- 15:03:33 [fsasaki]
- Richard: we could set up a wiki
- 15:05:30 [fsasaki]
- action: Richard to create a wiki for the LTLI discussion, Francois to make a summary of the current discussion
- 15:05:42 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/07/18-i18ncore-minutes.html fsasaki
- 15:05:56 [fsasaki]
- topic: other business
- 15:06:06 [Zakim]
- -fyergeau
- 15:06:06 [fsasaki]
- Felix: charmod, I'll bring it up on the mailing list
- 15:06:08 [Zakim]
- -Mary
- 15:06:09 [Zakim]
- -Richard
- 15:06:09 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/07/18-i18ncore-minutes.html fsasaki
- 15:06:13 [Zakim]
- -Felix
- 15:06:23 [Zakim]
- -Karunesh
- 15:06:24 [Zakim]
- I18N_CoreWG()10:00AM has ended
- 15:06:27 [Zakim]
- Attendees were [IBM], Richard, Felix, Mary, Vijay, [IPcaller], fyergeau, Mark
- 15:07:16 [fsasaki]
- present: Felix, Francois, Karunesh, Mark, Richard, Vijay
- 15:07:18 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/07/18-i18ncore-minutes.html fsasaki
- 16:13:07 [r12a]
- r12a has left #i18ncore
- 17:07:58 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #i18ncore