13:55:46 RRSAgent has joined #ws-desc 13:55:46 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/06-ws-desc-irc 13:55:58 RRSAgent, set log world 13:56:10 Arthur has joined #ws-desc 13:56:13 chathura has joined #ws-desc 13:56:29 lmandel_ has joined #ws-desc 13:56:42 ACTION: Lawrence - violate operation style assertions 13:57:09 q+ 13:57:33 ACTION: Youenn - define documents for stub generation 13:57:48 ACTION: Jonathan - create validation-report stylesheet 13:58:03 ACTION: John - resolve Woden component model interchange 13:58:03 format errors 13:58:29 ACTION: Arthur - add xpaths for soap and http to document coverage report 13:58:44 ACTION: Philippe - violate http binding assertions 13:59:01 ACTION: Chathura - will do interop tests with Youenn and Lawrence 14:02:03 oneway EPR http://127.0.0.1:8080/axis2/services/pingService 14:05:21 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#styles 14:06:05 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#RPCStyle-5016-summary 14:06:14 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#RPCStyle-5018-summary 14:06:28 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#RPCStyle-5014-summary 14:12:27 youenn has joined #ws-desc 14:13:03 ping epr is: http://lawrence.dyndns.ws:8090/wss/ping 14:13:36 echo axis epr is: http://lawrence.dyndns.ws:8090/wss/echoAxis2 14:41:24 Bozhong has joined #ws-desc 14:48:10 http://127.0.0.1:8080/axis2/services/Axis2SampleDocLitService 14:56:25 TonyR has joined #ws-desc 14:58:01 zakim, what is the code? 14:58:04 sorry, TonyR, I don't know what conference this is 14:58:15 zakim, this will be ws_desc 14:58:15 ok, pauld, I see WS_DescWG()11:00AM already started 14:58:25 zakim, what is the code? 14:58:25 the conference code is 97394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200), TonyR 14:58:51 zakim, read agenda from http://whatfettle.com/2006/07/RDFAgenda/http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0002.html 14:58:51 working on it, pauld 14:58:54 agenda+ Dial in information (members only) [.1]: 14:58:56 agendum 1 added 14:58:57 agenda+ Issue CR052: Serializing only part of the body with HTTP binding 14:58:59 agendum 2 added 14:59:04 Allen has joined #ws-desc 14:59:06 agenda+ Issue CR053: Allow absolute URI in {location} [.1] 14:59:13 agendum 3 added 14:59:17 agenda+ Issue CR054: URIPath feedback [.1] 14:59:19 agendum 4 added 14:59:22 agenda+ Issue CR055: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding [.1] 14:59:25 agendum 5 added 14:59:27 agenda+ Issue CR056: Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension 14:59:29 agendum 6 added 14:59:31 agenda+ Issue CR058: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} [.1] 14:59:34 agendum 7 added 14:59:35 agenda+ Issue CR059: Editorial: Where does {http location ignore uncited} 14:59:37 agendum 8 added 14:59:39 agenda+ Issue CR060: Why don't whttp:authenticationType and {http 14:59:41 agendum 9 added 14:59:43 agenda+ Issue CR061: service and binding name shown as QNames in 14:59:46 agendum 10 added 14:59:47 agenda+ Issue CR062: Re:service and binding name shown as QNames in 14:59:49 agendum 11 added 14:59:51 agenda+ Welcome new member: Eran Chinthaka 14:59:55 agendum 12 added 14:59:59 agenda+ Issue CR063: Prefix declarations in inlined schema [.1] 15:00:03 agendum 13 added 15:00:07 agenda+ Features "at risk" 15:00:15 agendum 14 added 15:00:23 agenda+ Approval of minutes: (Youenn was also present.) 15:00:25 agendum 15 added 15:00:27 agenda+ Review of Action items [.1]. 15:00:29 agendum 16 added 15:00:31 agenda+ Administrivia 15:00:33 agendum 17 added 15:00:35 agenda+ Issue CR022: Component Values Must Be Context Independent [.1] 15:00:37 agendum 18 added 15:00:39 agenda+ Issue CR037: Comments on Part 2, Chapter 6 [.1] 15:00:41 agendum 19 added 15:00:43 agenda+ Issue CR044: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with each 15:00:45 agendum 20 added 15:00:47 agenda+ Issue CR045: Inline schemas with no target namespace [.1] 15:00:51 agendum 21 added 15:00:53 done reading agenda, pauld 15:00:57 zakim, agenda-1 15:01:01 agendum 1, Dial in information (members only) [.1]:, dropped 15:01:09 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:01:09 On the phone I see ??P2 15:01:19 zakim, ??p2 is me 15:01:23 +TonyR; got it 15:01:30 +??P39 15:01:33 JacekK has joined #ws-desc 15:01:34 zakim, ??p39 is Allen 15:01:34 +Allen; got it 15:01:48 +??P37 15:01:50 +JacekK 15:02:19 0 15:02:26 + +1.905.413.aaaa 15:02:45 Zakim, aaaa is interopevent 15:02:47 +Glen 15:02:48 GlenD has joined #ws-desc 15:02:49 +interopevent; got it 15:03:05 JacekK has changed the topic to: agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0002.html 15:03:06 Roberto has joined #ws-desc 15:03:17 plh has joined #ws-desc 15:03:41 + +1.585.377.aabb 15:03:58 Zakim, interopevent holds Jonathan, Arthur, plh, youenn, Jkaputin lmandel_, chathura 15:03:58 +Jonathan, Arthur, plh, youenn, Jkaputin, lmandel_, chathura; got it 15:05:11 +Roberto 15:05:28 +bozhong 15:06:47 zakim, aabb is zehler 15:06:47 +zehler; got it 15:07:13 hey Glen seeing you after some time 15:08:32 scribe: Arthur 15:08:58 meeting: WSD WG Telecon 15:09:07 yah!:) 15:09:16 +Paul_Downey 15:09:25 PeteZ has joined #ws-desc 15:09:45 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0002 15:10:16 zakim, next agendum 15:10:16 agendum 2. "Issue CR052: Serializing only part of the body with HTTP binding" taken up 15:10:23 zakim, agenda? 15:10:23 I see 20 items remaining on the agenda: 15:10:24 2. Issue CR052: Serializing only part of the body with HTTP binding 15:10:26 3. Issue CR053: Allow absolute URI in {location} [from .1] 15:10:28 4. Issue CR054: URIPath feedback [from .1] 15:10:29 5. Issue CR055: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding [from .1] 15:10:32 6. Issue CR056: Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension 15:10:35 7. Issue CR058: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} [from .1] 15:10:37 8. Issue CR059: Editorial: Where does {http location ignore uncited} 15:10:39 9. Issue CR060: Why don't whttp:authenticationType and {http 15:10:42 10. Issue CR061: service and binding name shown as QNames in 15:10:44 11. Issue CR062: Re:service and binding name shown as QNames in 15:10:48 12. Welcome new member: Eran Chinthaka 15:10:51 13. Issue CR063: Prefix declarations in inlined schema [from .1] 15:10:54 14. Features "at risk" 15:10:55 15. Approval of minutes: (Youenn was also present.) 15:10:58 16. Review of Action items [from .1] 15:10:59 17. Administrivia 15:11:02 18. Issue CR022: Component Values Must Be Context Independent [from .1] 15:11:03 19. Issue CR037: Comments on Part 2, Chapter 6 [from .1] 15:11:04 20. Issue CR044: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with each 15:11:06 21. Issue CR045: Inline schemas with no target namespace [from .1] 15:11:08 +Anish 15:11:09 zakim, whuptish 15:11:09 I don't understand 'whuptish', pauld 15:11:13 chair: Jonathan 15:11:46 Date: July 6, 2006 15:12:17 PeteZ has joined #ws-desc 15:12:31 topic: action item review 15:13:50 topic: administrivia 15:14:14 jonathan: there will be a telecon next two weeks to clear up open issues 15:14:40 jonathan: assume august holiday from telecons - but still hold implementor telecons 15:15:47 jonathan: maybe no telecon July 27 due to potential absence of Jonathan and Tony 15:16:22 Arthur: we have indeed shown interop. Canon and Apache implementation are talking to each other. We have recorded message logs. 15:16:38 ... we now have reports that show all the covered assertions. 15:17:05 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/assertions-report.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 15:17:35 Arthur: lots of red in the assertion report. 15:17:50 ... please contribute that violate the assertions. 15:18:40 ... Jonathan will check the results produced by the implementations with the expected ones. 15:19:03 ... we only have two MEPs implemented. Anybody contemplating doing the others? 15:19:30 ... for the remainder of the events, we'll keep focusing on test coverage 15:19:51 arthur: red = shame 15:21:35 Tony: why 2 or 3 is yellow? 15:21:56 -??P37 15:22:07 Jonathan: we could put green if >= 1. no yellow 15:23:40 glen: any cases for extensions and features/property? 15:24:36 arthur: one for Feature, 0 for Property, all the Part 2 extensions 15:24:51 glen: will contribute some later 15:25:07 ACTION: Glen to contribute some extension test cases 15:25:31 topic: CR050 15:26:32 +1, sounds right 15:27:01 oh right, this discussion 15:27:18 +1 add to Interchange Format, -1 add to Component Model, I think 15:27:34 jonathan: recall that we resolved CR050 with no action since wsdlx is a "characteristic" of the implementation so the wsdlx:safety property gets added to all Operation components even if there is no markup in the documents 15:27:35 PeteZ has joined #ws-desc 15:27:36 I agree with Glen 15:27:52 me too agrees with Glen 15:28:10 jonathan: there was a proposal to add {extensions} to Description component 15:28:26 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0034.html 15:29:31 Jonathan: make this CR069 15:29:58 Bozhong has joined #ws-desc 15:32:11 glen: agree to putting {extensions} in the component model interchange format put not in the component model 15:32:16 q+ 15:32:24 q+ 15:32:25 q- ibm 15:32:33 ack jacek 15:33:02 ack roberto 15:33:12 jacek: nice to have {extensions} in component model since it is api guidance 15:33:32 roberto: agree with glen re interchange format 15:33:40 Bozhong has joined #ws-desc 15:33:43 +q 15:33:45 q+ 15:33:50 tony: {extension} useful for caching documents too 15:34:10 +??P0 15:34:12 roberto: {extensions} not an intrinsic part of the component model 15:34:16 q+ 15:34:35 ack glen 15:35:19 q+ 15:35:22 glen: +1 to roberto, BUT make be useful if a spec used that property, i.e. it needed to refer to that extension 15:35:25 -Anish 15:36:07 q+ 15:36:17 ack arthur 15:36:38 q+ to suggest trying to ask for objections one way or the other and just do what doesn't get objections 15:36:40 ack jon 15:37:07 arthur: need to know what extensions are in effect in order to decide validity of the component model 15:37:41 jonathan: a spec and just refer to another spec, doesn't need an explicit property 15:38:17 jonathan: the infoset spec started as a library of terms, not a data model 15:38:41 q+ 15:39:05 ack jacek 15:39:05 JacekK, you wanted to suggest trying to ask for objections one way or the other and just do what doesn't get objections 15:39:25 jacek: this is a minor issue so let's vote 15:39:32 ack arthur 15:41:30 tony: we need to be able to state component model validity so need to know extensions 15:41:48 jonathan: any objections to the status quo? 15:41:58 jonathan: no objections 15:42:09 jonathan: any objections to adding it? 15:42:16 glen: yes 15:42:20 roberto: yes 15:42:55 jonathan: RESOLUTION: closed with no action 15:47:09 topic: cr056 15:48:58 -Glen 15:49:13 arthur: {safety} may not be present if the wsdlx is not "engaged" 15:49:34 zakim, who is making noise? 15:49:37 Incidentally, I think this issue is fairly clear cut, and the problem is that we don't have a notion of "processor" and "engaged extensions". 15:49:44 TonyR, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: TonyR (4%) 15:49:50 q+ to suggest moving to CR044 discussion, will have to leave in 10 min 15:50:02 q+ to suggest moving to CR044 discussion after this item, will have to leave in 10 min 15:50:14 Any extension that you choose to have "engaged" in your environment may well add any properties it wants to the component model, regardless of what is or is not present in the actual markup. IMHO, of course. 15:50:53 It's up to the extension writers to do a good job at specifying how and when properties should be added/mutated. 15:52:08 ack jacek 15:52:08 JacekK, you wanted to suggest moving to CR044 discussion, will have to leave in 10 min and to suggest moving to CR044 discussion after this item, will have to leave in 10 min 15:52:11 RESOLUION: close with no action 15:53:01 topic: CR044 15:53:11 my version of CR44 writeup: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0014.html 15:53:42 arthur: by "engaged" I mean supported in the component model 15:59:18 Jonathan: can be close this as editorial or do we need to see final text? 15:59:27 tony: i'd like to see the text 15:59:50 -JacekK 15:59:57 ACTION: Roberto to propose text for CR044 and related interface-less binding text 16:00:07 topic: CR067 16:00:40 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR067 16:02:09 q+ 16:02:47 ack arthur 16:03:18 -??P0 16:06:09 Arthur: we should split the definition of the properties and their occurance, like XSD particles 16:06:59 Jonathan: I propose we just clarify this in the SOAP binding, i.e. say that the HTTP properties occur when the transport is HTTP 16:14:15 RESOLUTION: Accept Jonathan's proposal 16:16:17 ACTION: Arthur to update cm interchange schema to make http cookies optional in the soap extension 16:19:06 sanjiva has joined #ws-desc 16:22:44 topic: CR037 16:23:22 Arthur: the spec only defines a few serializations but doesn't prevent others so I suggest we close this with no action 16:23:33 RESOLUTION: close with no action 16:24:34 topic: CR055 16:25:08 jacek's proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0032.html 16:33:07 -Allen 16:33:08 -zehler 16:33:09 -Roberto 16:33:11 -Paul_Downey 16:33:13 -TonyR 16:33:17 zakim, kick ibm 16:33:17 I don't understand 'kick ibm', Jonathan 16:33:22 Roberto has left #ws-desc 16:33:22 TonyR has left #ws-desc 16:33:22 -interopevent 16:33:24 WS_DescWG()11:00AM has ended 16:33:25 Attendees were TonyR, Allen, JacekK, +1.905.413.aaaa, Glen, +1.585.377.aabb, Jonathan, Arthur, plh, youenn, Jkaputin, lmandel_, chathura, Roberto, zehler, Paul_Downey, Anish 16:33:37 ACTION: John to write proposal for CR055 based on discussion and Jacek's email 16:33:40 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:33:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/07/06-ws-desc-minutes.html Jonathan 18:35:51 Zakim has left #ws-desc 19:03:23 plh has joined #ws-desc 19:40:22 lmandel has joined #ws-desc 19:41:18 lmandel_ has joined #ws-desc 20:01:16 ?