11:18:17 RRSAgent has joined #htmltf 11:18:17 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-htmltf-irc 11:18:40 RalphS has changed the topic to: RDF-in-HTML TF; Ralph may be late due to broken-down train 11:18:57 rrsagent, please make log publci 11:19:08 rrsagent, please make log public 11:19:27 Zakim has joined #htmltf 11:19:37 zakim, this will be htmltf 11:19:37 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled near this time, RalphS 12:57:34 RalphS has joined #htmltf 12:57:38 Steven has joined #htmltf 12:57:44 zakim, this will be html 12:57:44 ok, RalphS; I see SW_BPD(rdfxhtml)9:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 12:57:57 hi there 12:58:46 RalphS has changed the topic to: RDF-in-HTML TF; agenda is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0028.html 12:59:02 Meeting: RDF-in-HTML TF 12:59:05 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0028.html 12:59:22 Previous: 2006-04-10 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0026.html 13:01:00 MarkB_ has joined #htmltf 13:01:00 benadida has joined #htmltf 13:01:04 SW_BPD(rdfxhtml)9:00AM has now started 13:01:11 +Ben_Adida 13:01:18 zakim, dial steven-617 13:01:18 ok, Steven; the call is being made 13:01:19 +Steven 13:01:31 +Ralph 13:01:53 +??P2 13:01:59 zakim, i am ? 13:01:59 +MarkB_; got it 13:03:01 Chair: Ben 13:03:08 next meeting: Monday, 24 April 13:04:10 Ben: to get 2nd WD of RDF/A Primer publishing approval at 8 May SWBPD telecon we need to distribute final editor's draft by Monday 24 April 13:04:48 ... I hope to distribute a draft by then 13:06:21 ACTION: Ben draft mail to Guus and David regarding continuation of HTML TF work 13:08:04 [DONE] ACTION: Ben integrate Jeremy's actions into list of issues [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/10-htmltf-minutes.html#action11] 13:08:24 ACTION: Mark, Steven, and Ralph respond to Ben's off-list draft of response to Bjoern [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/13-htmltf-minutes.html#action05] 13:08:45 -- done; Mark about to press 'send' on his commetns 13:08:52 s/tns/nts/ 13:09:03 ACTION: Ben start separate mail threads on remaining discussion topics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/06-swbp-minutes#action04] 13:09:06 -- continues 13:09:15 ACTION: Ben to draft full response to Bjoern's 2004 email [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-swbp-minutes.html#action03] 13:09:17 -- continues 13:09:31 Ben: likely done by next week after I integrate Mark's comments 13:09:44 [DONE] ACTION: Ben update his bookmarklet for XHTML mode [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/13-htmltf-minutes.html#action12] 13:09:52 Ben: this update was a lot of fun 13:10:01 ... works in Mozilla and Firefox, not 100% in Opera 13:10:22 Steven: it used to work on Opera 13:10:40 Ben: the DOM API changed slightly; it's supposed to be more conformant now 13:11:00 ... unfortunately, bookmarklet doesn't yet work in Safari 13:11:16 Steven: seems to work on Ben's bookmark page but not on Ben's home page 13:12:09 http://ben.adida.net/index.xhtml 13:12:24 Ben: you'll find two paragraphs on ^ that I've marked-up with 13:12:32 ... it turned out to be quite a bit easier than I had expected 13:14:00 ACTION: once Steven sends editors' draft of XHTML2, all TF members take a look and comment on showstopper issues only [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-htmltf-minutes.html#action01] 13:14:03 -- continues 13:14:20 Steven: just needs more cycles from the editors 13:14:30 ... nothing the TF can really contribute to getting those cycles 13:15:10 Mark: re Primer ... 13:15:27 ... where do Ben and Ralph see the spec itself going? 13:15:58 Mark: we agreed that the normative spec for RDF/A would be part of the XHTML specification 13:16:04 s/Mark:/Ben:/ 13:16:24 Mark: so if we're going to talk about XHTML 1 modules these need something to refer to 13:16:40 Ben: they (we!) can refer to the primer 13:16:51 ... we have a syntax that is pretty darn good 13:16:57 ... and we now have to make it work in XHTML1 13:17:17 ... so we have to see how much the browser vendors will agree to implement 13:17:31 Mark: we have to decide what it is that we call "RDF/A" 13:17:37 ... the primer cannot be the normative definition 13:17:52 ... can we revisit the other document? something more formal defining the attributes? 13:18:04 Ben: it's OK to refer to the other document as input to the next WG 13:20:09 Ralph: it would indeed be too bad to have to maintain normative specifications in two parallel documents; an XHTML2 WD and separate RDF/A and CURIE WDs 13:20:33 ... I look to the HTML WG to advise on where to most effectively work during the month of May 13:20:47 Mark: there is some material from my IPTC work that ought to be added to the spec 13:21:21 ... did Ben do anything subconsciously when implementing his bookmarklet that hasn't yet made it into the spec? 13:21:33 Ben: I really worked just from the Primer 13:21:49 Mark: I think I could update the RDF/A spec next week 13:22:14 Mark: the HTML WG needs the feedback on the reference document 13:25:02 Steven: the XHTML2 editors' expectation is to integrate the RDF/A WD plus more recent agreements 13:25:21 Ben: would it help for Mark to update the independent document that we have, or do you have it all swapped-in? 13:25:34 Steven: I think I have it all swapped-in, but the results will need to be checked 13:25:48 Ben: I want to be sure we spend the cycles we have in the right place 13:26:12 Steven: the XHTML2 spec is changing in several places, not just in RDF/A 13:26:30 Mark: I think we need a document that we are confident is up-to-date, and sooner rather than later 13:26:57 ... e.g. if "someone" decides they want to start adding RDF/A support to, say, Redland, we want them to have the right details 13:27:20 Ben: what is going to help the HTML WG get the work out faster? 13:27:45 Steven: it will help to have everything in one place, so it would not be wasted work 13:27:57 ... we have noticed in the past that we'd interpreted things differently 13:30:14 Ralph: a possibility for Mark's proposed writing is to focus a normative proposal draft on an RDF/A XHTML 1.1 module 13:30:37 ... see proposed charter for SemWeb Deployment WG 13:30:53 Mark: I wasn't thinking that a new spec draft had to be done quickly 13:31:11 ... just wanted to insure that we'd captured everything we'd agreed 13:31:21 ... and some recent IPTC work that isn't written down 13:32:29 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/swap3/deployment-charter.html draft SemWeb Deployment WG charter proposal [Member only] 13:32:51 Topic: Marketing Proposal for RDF/A 13:33:19 Ben: I have received feedback on the topic of a name change 13:33:25 ... the overwhelming advice is 13:33:41 ... the overwhelming advice is "if you're going to change the name, do it right away" 13:34:29 zakim, q+ 13:34:29 I see MarkB_ on the speaker queue 13:34:50 Ben: I believe we need to address our main audience of HTML authors 13:35:18 Mark: many strands in the email discussion 13:35:45 ... I'd like to identify two things; (1) a language and (2) a tagging process; an action 13:35:56 ... I don't have a problem calling the language "RDF/A" 13:36:12 ... the tagging process is above the language and I don't think we should call that "RDF/A" 13:36:36 ... Microformats is an approach, not a language 13:36:59 ... the "microformats" process can be summed-up in a few words 13:37:51 ... so we can talk technical details about the language separately from [high-level goals] such as "structured blogging" 13:38:19 ... it's much more important to come up with a phrase or word that describes this structured metadata 13:38:31 [Ralph: +1 to Mark] 13:38:48 Steven: there are plusses and minuses to using the name "RDF/A" 13:39:01 ... "RDF" is tainted in some parts of the community 13:39:22 ... but it could help to make it clear that RDF is a broad concept and is more than RDF/XML 13:39:54 Ben: this could work well with Mark's second name; we need not mention RDF until people want to look deeply 13:39:59 zakim, q+ To mention a podcast I heard recently about microformats. 13:39:59 I see RalphS, MarkB_ on the speaker queue 13:40:06 Steven: think about "meta" and "link" 13:40:16 ... suggestion: metalink 13:40:27 metal ink! 13:40:39 Ben: Hal Abelson sugestion: Semantic HTML, aka SHTML 13:40:58 ... though the latter has an unfortunate pronunciation 13:41:05 ... could also say "Structured HTML" 13:41:26 Steven: I think apache uses .shtml for server-side HTML 13:42:18 Ralph: agree with Mark's two items to name 13:43:28 [Things to do with 'inline' I quite like.....'embedding'...etc., for the 'approach' side.] 13:43:32 PROPOSED: the technical work may still be called "RDF/A" but the overall approach gets a new name 13:43:52 ... the approach to provide semantic structure in HTML gets a new name 13:43:59 Mark: seconded 13:44:33 ... we could call the language "RDFA" -- i.e. without '/' 13:44:38 ... or perhaps "RDFa" 13:45:00 ... I put the '/' in just to align with RDF/XML, RDF/N3 13:45:53 Ben: I like the proposal to take out the '/' 13:46:53 Ralph: I'm neutral on removing the '/'. I suspect I'm the one who most frequently writes RDF/N3, though I tend toward symmetry 13:47:00 Steven: I tend toward keeping the '/' 13:47:19 s|RDF/N3|"RDF/N3"| 13:47:56 Ben: my goal is to get people to understand the HTML language and then later realize that it's RDF and therefore RDF need not be as complicated as they had heard 13:48:20 Mark: was recently talking with a commentator who suggested that RDF was not as difficult as perceived 13:49:36 ... it's important that people realize the benefits of precise semantics 13:50:43 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0008 13:50:46 ^ marketing proposal 13:50:48 Ben: there's more to the marketing proposal than a name 13:51:17 ... it points to W3C as the repository for the normative specs 13:51:19 [no disagreement] 13:51:45 Ben: pointers to specific techniques, e.g. for bloggers 13:54:13 Ralph: I'm all in favor of letting other organizations share the fun of providing community forums to help in the design and deployment of this approach 13:54:28 Mark: this is a key technology for us 13:55:10 ... for example, we're doing a blogging interface 13:57:49 Ben: Creative Commons is offering to host a site but happy to defer to someone else 13:58:34 Mark: an implementation of a really good RDF/A site would be using lots of other technologies as well 13:58:47 ... our goal is quick and easy publication of metadata 13:59:05 q+ to ask if we really want just one site? 14:01:08 ack me 14:01:08 RalphS, you wanted to ask if we really want just one site? 14:01:19 Ralph: we should find a name for the approach that we can register in DNS 14:02:02 nk is a countrycode 14:02:09 metali.nk 14:02:09 :) 14:02:25 or me.tali.nk 14:02:33 LoL 14:02:56 iLi.nk? (Like iPod...) 14:03:00 ["metali" -- pronounced met'-al-ly -- has a nice ring to me] 14:03:31 MarkB_, you wanted to mention a podcast I heard recently about microformats 14:03:58 Mark: everyone wants to publish dates when they blog, so I'm quite into the calendaring application 14:05:00 Mark: I'd like introductory examples that are really _introductory_ -- that don't get into too many hard details 14:05:44 x - port.net 14:05:55 formsPlayer.com 14:06:28 skimstone.x-port.net 14:07:17 -Steven 14:07:18 -MarkB_ 14:07:20 -Ben_Adida 14:07:20 Ben: I will have a new editor's draft of Primer by Friday 14:07:23 [adjourned] 14:07:25 -Ralph 14:07:27 SW_BPD(rdfxhtml)9:00AM has ended 14:07:28 Attendees were Ben_Adida, Steven, Ralph, MarkB_ 14:19:40 rrsagent, please draft minutes 14:19:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-htmltf-minutes.html RalphS 14:19:47 zakim, bye 14:19:47 Zakim has left #htmltf 14:20:19 rrsagent, bye 14:20:19 I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-htmltf-actions.rdf : 14:20:19 ACTION: Ben draft mail to Guus and David regarding continuation of HTML TF work [1] 14:20:19 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-htmltf-irc#T13-06-21 14:20:19 ACTION: Mark, Steven, and Ralph respond to Ben's off-list draft of response to Bjoern [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/13-htmltf-minutes.html#action05] [2] 14:20:19 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-htmltf-irc#T13-08-24 14:20:19 ACTION: Ben start separate mail threads on remaining discussion topics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/06-swbp-minutes#action04] [3] 14:20:19 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-htmltf-irc#T13-09-03 14:20:19 ACTION: Ben to draft full response to Bjoern's 2004 email [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-swbp-minutes.html#action03] [4] 14:20:19 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-htmltf-irc#T13-09-15 14:20:19 ACTION: once Steven sends editors' draft of XHTML2, all TF members take a look and comment on showstopper issues only [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-htmltf-minutes.html#action01] [5] 14:20:19 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-htmltf-irc#T13-14-00 14:21:02 benadida has left #htmltf