IRC log of dawg on 2006-04-18
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:27:49 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #dawg
- 14:27:49 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc
- 14:29:24 [DanC]
- Zakim, this is dawg
- 14:29:24 [Zakim]
- ok, DanC; that matches SW_DAWG()10:30AM
- 14:29:30 [DanC]
- Zakim, call DanC-BOS
- 14:29:30 [Zakim]
- ok, DanC; the call is being made
- 14:29:31 [Zakim]
- +DanC
- 14:29:50 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 14:29:52 [AndyS]
- zakim, ??P1 is me
- 14:29:52 [Zakim]
- +AndyS; got it
- 14:30:03 [EliasT]
- Zakim, IBMCambridge is me
- 14:30:03 [Zakim]
- +EliasT; got it
- 14:30:19 [EliasT]
- Chair: DanC
- 14:30:23 [EliasT]
- Scribe: EliasT
- 14:30:27 [Zakim]
- +Libby_Miller
- 14:30:31 [Sven_Groppe]
- Sven_Groppe has joined #dawg
- 14:30:33 [libby]
- zakim, mute me
- 14:30:33 [Zakim]
- Libby_Miller should now be muted
- 14:30:36 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 14:30:40 [Zakim]
- +[IBMCambridge]
- 14:30:44 [jeen]
- Zakim, [IPcaller] is me
- 14:30:44 [Zakim]
- +jeen; got it
- 14:30:47 [LeeF]
- Zakim, IBMCambrdige is LeeF
- 14:30:47 [Zakim]
- sorry, LeeF, I do not recognize a party named 'IBMCambrdige'
- 14:30:58 [LeeF]
- Zakim, IBMCambridge is LeeF
- 14:30:58 [Zakim]
- +LeeF; got it
- 14:31:01 [LeeF]
- So picky.
- 14:31:11 [DanC]
- agenda + Convene RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-04-18T14:30Z
- 14:31:18 [DanC]
- agenda + Future meetings
- 14:31:19 [AndyS]
- EricP - extracted examples - any updates? I hope to make the corrections I noted in email
- 14:31:26 [DanC]
- agenda + JSON results format
- 14:31:34 [DanC]
- agenda + punctuationSyntax: bnodes in predicate
- 14:31:36 [AndyS]
- many of the examples aren't checked though
- 14:31:40 [DanC]
- agenda + valueTesting
- 14:31:47 [DanC]
- agenda + test suite maintenance
- 14:31:52 [AndyS]
- if there is an update soon I coudl do all fixes at once
- 14:31:54 [DanC]
- agenda + MIME type registrations
- 14:32:00 [DanC]
- agenda + UC&R end-game
- 14:32:07 [DanC]
- Zakim, take up item 1
- 14:32:07 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Convene RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-04-18T14:30Z" taken up [from DanC]
- 14:32:09 [EliasT]
- Meeting: RDF Data Access Working Group weekly telecon
- 14:32:16 [DanC]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 14:32:16 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see EliasT, DanC, AndyS, Libby_Miller (muted), jeen, LeeF
- 14:32:26 [Souri]
- Souri has joined #dawg
- 14:32:42 [DanC]
- DanC has changed the topic to: DAWG 18 apr http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda
- 14:32:59 [Zakim]
- +JacekK
- 14:33:13 [AndyS]
- Regrets: Kendall Clark
- 14:33:18 [Sven_Groppe]
- JacekK is me
- 14:33:30 [EliasT]
- Zakim, JacekK is Sven_Groppe
- 14:33:30 [Zakim]
- +Sven_Groppe; got it
- 14:33:54 [LeeF]
- agenda is ok
- 14:33:58 [Zakim]
- +Souri
- 14:34:01 [AndyS]
- Jeen -- sound check?
- 14:34:16 [EliasT]
- Regrets: KendallC
- 14:34:43 [ericP]
- zakim, please dial ericP-617
- 14:34:43 [Zakim]
- ok, ericP; the call is being made
- 14:34:45 [Zakim]
- +EricP
- 14:34:52 [ericP]
- zakim, thank you
- 14:34:52 [Zakim]
- you are very welcome, ericP
- 14:35:00 [DanC]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/04/11-dawg-minutes minutes 11 apr
- 14:35:00 [LeeF]
- oo
- 14:35:06 [LeeF]
- has it always been that polite?
- 14:35:35 [DanC]
- RESOLVED to approve minutes 11 Apr
- 14:35:54 [DanC]
- Zakim, next item
- 14:35:54 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Future meetings" taken up [from DanC]
- 14:36:49 [DanC]
- I'm in the mood to meet next 30 May
- 14:39:33 [EliasT]
- jeen: Do we need a full meeting to work on the test suite?
- 14:39:43 [EliasT]
- DanC: Well, to approve tests you need a WG decision.
- 14:40:51 [EliasT]
- ericP: Looking for items that need WG decisions in agenda
- 14:41:39 [EliasT]
- DanC: valueTesting seems to be needing more WG work.
- 14:42:23 [AndyS]
- AFS notes that fn => http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions
- 14:42:34 [EliasT]
- DanC: if we don't decide when to meet next, we need a 7-day notice before we can meet.
- 14:43:34 [DanC]
- PORPOSED: to meet next 2 May, EricP or KC to chair.
- 14:43:48 [DanC]
- JB: regrets 2 May
- 14:43:58 [libby]
- I can't make it either
- 14:44:18 [libby]
- 9 shoudl be ok
- 14:44:21 [DanC]
- PORPOSED: to meet next 9 May, EricP or KC to chair.
- 14:44:22 [LeeF]
- probably OK
- 14:45:00 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 14:45:25 [SteveH]
- Zakim, IPcaller is SteveH
- 14:45:25 [Zakim]
- +SteveH; got it
- 14:45:28 [AndyS]
- Even http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions is wrong because it seems to be /# for .../xpath-functions/#not
- 14:45:33 [SteveH]
- zakim, mute me
- 14:45:33 [Zakim]
- SteveH should now be muted
- 14:45:46 [EliasT]
- Zakim, pick a victim
- 14:45:46 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose LeeF
- 14:45:55 [LeeF]
- i can if i'm there, but i'm a bit at risk
- 14:46:00 [LeeF]
- say, 70% chance of it being OK
- 14:46:29 [LeeF]
- :-p
- 14:46:43 [DanC]
- PORPOSED: to meet next 9 May, EricP or KC to chair, Lee or Jeen to scribe
- 14:47:06 [DanC]
- RESOLVED: to meet next 9 May, EricP or KC to chair, Lee or Jeen to scribe.
- 14:47:10 [EliasT]
- PROPOSE: to meet next 9 May, EricP or KC to chair, Lee or Jeen to scribe
- 14:47:19 [EliasT]
- PROPOSED: to meet next 9 May, EricP or KC to chair, Lee or Jeen to scribe
- 14:47:23 [DanC]
- Zakim, next item
- 14:47:23 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "JSON results format" taken up [from DanC]
- 14:47:49 [DanC]
- ACTION: EricP to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/json-sparql/ [CONTINUES]
- 14:48:49 [DanC]
- comments to sparql-dev. Note
- 14:49:01 [DanC]
- Zakim, next item
- 14:49:01 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "punctuationSyntax: bnodes in predicate" taken up [from DanC]
- 14:49:02 [EliasT]
- ACTION: EricP to change status to reflect that comments should go to sparql-dev
- 14:50:17 [DanC]
- ACTION: DanC find decision record for bnodes in predicate [CONTINUES]
- 14:50:38 [DanC]
- Zakim, next item
- 14:50:38 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "valueTesting" taken up [from DanC]
- 14:51:29 [DanC]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Apr/0002.html Geoff's comment
- 14:52:03 [EliasT]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0047.html
- 14:52:28 [DanC]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0047.html Equality in FILTER [#ValueTesting] Seaborne, Andy (Tuesday, 18 April)
- 14:53:11 [DanC]
- (boolean isn't a subtype of integer, is it?)
- 14:54:42 [DanC]
- AFS: XQ F&O says False < True
- 14:55:10 [EliasT]
- Souri: Does XPath say that?
- 14:55:25 [AndyS]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#func-boolean-less-than
- 14:55:52 [AndyS]
- Hmm - no boolean-compare which is odd
- 14:56:35 [DanC]
- AFS: having < apply to booleans helps with sorting
- 14:57:41 [AndyS]
- I'd be happiest with a general what does "=" mean principle
- 14:57:47 [EliasT]
- DanC: would prefer to make WG decision based on tests
- 14:58:50 [EliasT]
- DanC: are replies to Geoff should be backed by tests.
- 14:59:35 [AndyS]
- Geoff's comment is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Apr/0003.html (not 0002)
- 14:59:57 [ericP]
- ACTION: EricP to propose text and tests to add {boolean < > = != boolean} to SPARQL
- 15:00:07 [DanC]
- ah... indeed, 0002 is the wrong one
- 15:00:07 [AndyS]
- As we discussed last week, I have acked him offlist that I fwd'ed it to the WG list
- 15:00:33 [EliasT]
- <EtnaRosso> i dont like librdf
- 15:00:33 [EliasT]
- <dajobe> maybe it doesn't like you :-P
- 15:01:35 [Sven_Groppe]
- must leave because of Kindergarten opening times...
- 15:01:50 [DanC]
- enjoy, Sven
- 15:01:56 [EliasT]
- DanC: can you look for roman numeral test?
- 15:02:01 [Zakim]
- -Sven_Groppe
- 15:02:29 [Sven_Groppe]
- Sven_Groppe has left #dawg
- 15:03:12 [AndyS]
- DanC: it should be that no processor says "2 != II^^:roman"
- 15:03:25 [SteveH]
- +! to what danc is saying
- 15:03:28 [SteveH]
- +1 even
- 15:03:47 [SteveH]
- (= sometimes being equivalence and sometimes value compare?)
- 15:04:45 [ericP]
- FILTER ( "XI"^^xsd:romanNumeral = "two"^^xsd:numericText ) in a naive processor falls through to the {RDFTerm = RDFTerm} test and = FALSE
- 15:04:46 [AndyS]
- What about ?p = <foo> ??
- 15:05:11 [ericP]
- when the processor understands both xsd:romanNumeral and xsd:numericText, we get TRUE
- 15:06:19 [EliasT]
- DanC: it would be interesting to see what users think getting type errors when we have unknown terms.
- 15:06:51 [DanC]
- (er... integer and decimal do intersect)
- 15:07:17 [ericP]
- FILTER ( ?p sameAs <foo> )
- 15:07:39 [EliasT]
- ericP: if we have error propagation then tests would only change from error to TRUE when implementation learns about new types. (since all of our xsd types don't intersect)
- 15:07:42 [ericP]
- FILTER ( ?p sameTermAs <foo> )
- 15:07:58 [ericP]
- FILTER ( !(?p sameTermAs <foo>) )
- 15:08:07 [DanC]
- (cwm calls it log:equalTo, I think, which is also goofy.)
- 15:08:14 [ericP]
- maybe FILTER ( !(?p ¥ <foo>) ) ?
- 15:10:28 [EliasT]
- ericP: the common usage is to be it numeric comparison and same term comparison, however the syntax gives us a non-monotonic behavior.
- 15:10:37 [EliasT]
- AndyS: it could be monotonic if we throw an error.
- 15:11:48 [EliasT]
- AndyS: if it doesn't have a clue, throws an error.
- 15:11:55 [ericP]
- FILTER ( "XI"^^xsd:romanNumeral = "two"^^xsd:numericText )
- 15:12:25 [EliasT]
- ericP: how do we differentiate between numeric and term compare?
- 15:12:30 [ericP]
- (?x = "XI"^^xsd:romanNumeral) (?y = "two"^^xsd:numericText)
- 15:12:32 [EliasT]
- DanC: you put it in the BGP
- 15:12:42 [ericP]
- FILTER ( ?x = ?y )
- 15:12:45 [EliasT]
- ericP: sorry for being dense
- 15:12:54 [AndyS]
- s/XI/II/ ??
- 15:13:15 [DanC]
- (?x = "II"^^xsd:romanNumeral) (?y = "two"^^xsd:numericText)
- 15:13:24 [EliasT]
- DanC: it should be an error.
- 15:13:25 [ericP]
- FILTER ( ?x = <foo> )
- 15:13:40 [DanC]
- (should as in: that's what AFS is proposing)
- 15:13:58 [EliasT]
- AndyS: it should return an error.
- 15:14:03 [DanC]
- Zakim, mute my dog
- 15:14:03 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'mute my dog', DanC
- 15:14:10 [AndyS]
- lol
- 15:14:19 [EliasT]
- Present: DanC's dog
- 15:15:18 [AndyS]
- Can do same-rdf-term by (1) BGP or (2) FILTER with str/datatype/lang (a bit verbose but uncommon?)
- 15:15:37 [EliasT]
- ericP: I believe AndyS proposal to remove RDFTerm equal when the two are typed literals.
- 15:16:21 [DanC]
- AFS isn't able to confirm based on the way that got recorded, but such is life
- 15:17:20 [AndyS]
- EricP's or mine?
- 15:17:24 [LeeF]
- All this has no bearing on error propagation, right?
- 15:17:26 [EliasT]
- AndyS: yours.
- 15:18:05 [AndyS]
- The discussion email is: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0047.html
- 15:18:16 [AndyS]
- Summary "=" on literals means sameValueAs
- 15:19:05 [EliasT]
- in soviet russia...
- 15:20:10 [DanC]
- Zakim, list actions
- 15:20:10 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'list actions', DanC
- 15:20:16 [DanC]
- RRSAgent, list actions
- 15:20:16 [RRSAgent]
- I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-actions.rdf :
- 15:20:16 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: EricP to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/json-sparql/ [CONTINUES] [1]
- 15:20:16 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc#T14-47-49
- 15:20:16 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: EricP to change status to reflect that comments should go to sparql-dev [2]
- 15:20:16 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc#T14-49-02
- 15:20:16 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: DanC find decision record for bnodes in predicate [CONTINUES] [3]
- 15:20:16 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc#T14-50-17
- 15:20:16 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: EricP to propose text and tests to add {boolean < > = != boolean} to SPARQL [4]
- 15:20:16 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc#T14-59-57
- 15:20:29 [DanC]
- ACTION EricP: draft text for open-world =
- 15:21:04 [DanC]
- ACTION Andy: draft of open-world = tests
- 15:21:43 [DanC]
- Zakim, next item
- 15:21:43 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "test suite maintenance" taken up [from DanC]
- 15:22:05 [DanC]
- ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple [CONTINUES]
- 15:23:41 [DanC]
- ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple [WITHDRAWN]
- 15:24:29 [DanC]
- ACTION AndyS: contribute a couple tests for computed-properties/virtual-prop/builtin. one usingn lists, and one not using lists
- 15:24:55 [DanC]
- ACTION: EricP and Jeen to fix OPTIONAL coding [DONE]
- 15:25:36 [DanC]
- jeen's work is noted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0020.html
- 15:26:55 [jeen]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/extracted-examples/extract
- 15:26:56 [ericP]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/extracted-examples/extract
- 15:27:38 [DanC]
- Zakim, next item
- 15:27:38 [Zakim]
- agendum 7. "MIME type registrations" taken up [from DanC]
- 15:28:24 [DanC]
- ACTION: EricP to respond to Dirk on MIME type stuff [CONTINUES]
- 15:28:35 [DanC]
- ACTION EricP: to follow up on mime type requests (2Mar) [CONTINUES]
- 15:29:12 [EliasT]
- May 2
- 15:29:17 [EliasT]
- sorry
- 15:29:25 [DanC]
- ADJOURN.
- 15:29:39 [Zakim]
- -Souri
- 15:29:46 [Zakim]
- -Libby_Miller
- 15:29:47 [Zakim]
- -jeen
- 15:29:48 [SteveH]
- bye
- 15:30:00 [Zakim]
- -SteveH
- 15:30:10 [EliasT]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 15:30:10 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-minutes.html EliasT
- 15:30:19 [EliasT]
- RRSAgent, make logs world-access
- 15:30:35 [EliasT]
- RRSAgent, please stop