IRC log of dawg on 2006-04-11
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:22:02 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #dawg
- 14:22:02 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/04/11-dawg-irc
- 14:22:03 [kendallclark]
- hehe, old SGML hacks always smile like this: :> -- anything else just seems weird
- 14:22:54 [libby]
- zakim, please list conferences
- 14:22:54 [Zakim]
- I see I18N_CoreWG()10:00AM, SVG_WG()9:30AM, VB_VBWG()10:00AM active
- 14:22:56 [Zakim]
- also scheduled at this time are WAI_TIES()10:00AM, SYMM_WG()10:00AM, SW_DAWG()10:30AM, WS_DBWG()10:00AM, HTML_XHTML(editors)10:00AM
- 14:23:10 [LeeF]
- haha, let's hijack one of those
- 14:23:12 [DanC_lap]
- Zakim, this will be dawg
- 14:23:12 [Zakim]
- ok, DanC_lap; I see SW_DAWG()10:30AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes
- 14:23:29 [libby]
- thanks danc_lap. I'm just tryying to remember how to use the bots
- 14:23:32 [kendallclark]
- i'm gonna feed the agenda to zakim
- 14:23:37 [libby]
- ok
- 14:23:40 [LeeF]
- Chair: kendallclark
- 14:23:46 [LeeF]
- Scribe: libby
- 14:24:21 [ericP]
- Meeting: RDF Data Access Working Group weekly telecon
- 14:24:57 [kendallclark]
- agenda+ Convene RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-04-11T14:30Z
- 14:25:11 [ericP]
- LeeF, i don't use localhost URLs. those might have a prayer of working on your machine.
- 14:25:17 [kendallclark]
- agenda+ CR!
- 14:25:34 [LeeF]
- true, but i couldn't remember the name of your machine =)
- 14:25:38 [ericP]
- unagi
- 14:25:41 [kendallclark]
- agenda+ Test Case, Suite Maintenance, Etc
- 14:25:49 [kendallclark]
- agenda+ Future meeting frequency
- 14:26:00 [kendallclark]
- agenda+ Implementation Report
- 14:26:03 [LeeF]
- I hemmed and hawed over my lack of preciseness. And now I was called out over it. Dang.
- 14:26:09 [kendallclark]
- agenda+ MIME type registrations
- 14:26:14 [kendallclark]
- agenda+ UC&R end game
- 14:26:41 [kendallclark]
- ok, i suppose that worked well enough
- 14:27:16 [ericP]
- do we want to chat about sameTermAs(RDF term, RDF term) ?
- 14:27:28 [ericP]
- might be worth an agendum at the end
- 14:27:30 [Zakim]
- SW_DAWG()10:30AM has now started
- 14:27:32 [Zakim]
- +Kendall_Clark
- 14:27:51 [kendallclark]
- ericP: sure... is that the AndyS Geoff discussion?
- 14:28:01 [kendallclark]
- i didn't see that when reviewing the traffic from last week
- 14:28:57 [Zakim]
- +Libby_Miller
- 14:28:59 [Zakim]
- -Libby_Miller
- 14:28:59 [ericP]
- zakim, please dial ericP-617
- 14:29:00 [Zakim]
- +Libby_Miller
- 14:29:01 [Zakim]
- ok, ericP; the call is being made
- 14:29:02 [Zakim]
- +EricP
- 14:29:13 [Zakim]
- +[IBMCambridge]
- 14:29:18 [libby]
- zakim, mute me
- 14:29:18 [Zakim]
- Libby_Miller should now be muted
- 14:29:20 [EliasT]
- EliasT has joined #dawg
- 14:29:21 [LeeF]
- Zakim, IBMCambridge is me
- 14:29:21 [Zakim]
- +LeeF; got it
- 14:29:29 [Zakim]
- +DanC
- 14:29:43 [Zakim]
- +[IBMCambridge]
- 14:29:50 [EliasT]
- Zakim, IBMCambridge is me
- 14:29:50 [Zakim]
- +EliasT; got it
- 14:29:57 [Zakim]
- +??P26
- 14:30:07 [AndyS]
- zakim, ??P26 is me
- 14:30:07 [Zakim]
- +AndyS; got it
- 14:30:53 [Zakim]
- + +1.603.459.aaaa
- 14:31:16 [ericP]
- Zakim, aaaa is Souri
- 14:31:16 [Zakim]
- +Souri; got it
- 14:31:23 [LeeF]
- Nope
- 14:32:12 [kendallclark]
- zakim, who's on the call?
- 14:32:12 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Kendall_Clark, Libby_Miller (muted), EricP, LeeF, DanC, EliasT, AndyS, Souri
- 14:32:18 [Zakim]
- -Souri
- 14:33:15 [kendallclark]
- agenda?
- 14:33:19 [Souri]
- Souri has joined #dawg
- 14:33:41 [libby]
- zakim, open next agendum
- 14:33:41 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Convene RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-04-11T14:30Z" taken up [from kendallclark]
- 14:34:01 [kendallclark]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0021.html
- 14:34:02 [ericP]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/04/04-dawg-minutes last meeting record
- 14:34:11 [Zakim]
- +Souri
- 14:34:26 [libby]
- kc: propose this as a true record
- 14:34:44 [libby]
- ...kc sent regrets - needs fixing
- 14:35:05 [kendallclark]
- next item?
- 14:35:11 [DanC_lap]
- Zakim, next item
- 14:35:12 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "CR!" taken up [from kendallclark]
- 14:35:20 [libby]
- ericp seconds
- 14:35:26 [kendallclark]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0018.html
- 14:35:32 [LeeF]
- yay!
- 14:35:36 [libby]
- kc: a happy thing
- 14:35:53 [libby]
- kc: anything we need to know here?
- 14:36:17 [kendallclark]
- what are the constraints on how long CR should last?
- 14:36:20 [libby]
- danc: it's a good thing. I got asked how long CR will last
- 14:36:29 [libby]
- ... minimum 2 months
- 14:37:09 [libby]
- ... we chose this minimum
- 14:37:26 [libby]
- kc: do we need to wait for xquery?
- 14:37:50 [libby]
- danc: we can't go to rec until they are at PR
- 14:38:10 [kendallclark]
- WSDL 2 also a dependency
- 14:38:19 [libby]
- danc: PR means rec in 6 weeks, sets clear expectations
- 14:38:58 [libby]
- kc: wsdl2 and xquery are the twop primary dependences on external things - what else? an implementation report? test suite creation / maintenance
- 14:39:25 [libby]
- danc: we have set ourselves a bar that's higher than typical, we're well ahead with a test suite and have some approved
- 14:39:40 [kendallclark]
- Approve the remaining unapproved tests
- 14:40:01 [kendallclark]
- Maintain an implementation report, answer questions pursuant to that work
- 14:40:04 [libby]
- ... expectation is that we go through the remaining 120 and approve / reject / modify, a few at a time; and also the public is reportign implemnattion experience - we have to answer mains
- 14:40:08 [libby]
- ..mails
- 14:40:26 [libby]
- ... basically testcases, questions, marketing
- 14:40:39 [libby]
- kc: implemnentation report - can it continue to be a wiki page?
- 14:40:53 [libby]
- danc: material in wiki, report in w3c cvs
- 14:41:18 [libby]
- ... basically an argument to director that have enough implemntations, according to the criteria we made
- 14:41:24 [ericP]
- I just added a list of those present to the minutes we just approved :[[Jeen, Libby_Miller, DanC, EliasT, EricP, SteveH, Sven_Groppe]]
- 14:42:14 [kendallclark]
- zakim, next item?
- 14:42:14 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, kendallclark.
- 14:42:16 [kendallclark]
- zakim, next item
- 14:42:16 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Test Case, Suite Maintenance, Etc" taken up [from kendallclark]
- 14:42:18 [libby]
- zakim, next item
- 14:42:19 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 was just opened, libby
- 14:42:23 [libby]
- heh
- 14:42:46 [kendallclark]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0016.html
- 14:42:59 [libby]
- kc: is the validator rejecting approved testcasese?
- 14:43:55 [libby]
- andys: I replied. problem is bnodes in the predicate syntax. the doc was a bit inconsistent about that and was resolved late on. need to corerect these
- 14:44:03 [libby]
- ... tests need removing
- 14:44:30 [libby]
- kc: propose someone takes an action to remove those
- 14:44:53 [AndyS]
- Tests are SyntaxFull/syntax-bnodes-03.rq and SyntaxFull/syntax-bnodes-04.rq
- 14:45:02 [libby]
- andys: we definitely made that decision
- 14:45:12 [libby]
- ... finding them
- 14:45:33 [kendallclark]
- Auto extraction from rq23?
- 14:45:36 [ericP]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#rVerb
- 14:45:50 [AndyS]
- Discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0318.html
- 14:46:07 [libby]
- danc: when was this approved?
- 14:46:29 [libby]
- ericp: probably 2 places - no bnodes in the prediacte and an approved grammar
- 14:46:56 [DanC_lap]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax
- 14:47:00 [EliasT]
- I found this: http://www.w3.org/2006/02/13-htmltf-irc
- 14:47:09 [libby]
- danc: this should be colected under the punctuation sysntax
- 14:47:39 [libby]
- want an action kendall?
- 14:47:51 [kendallclark]
- eek, no. not me, not on this ;)
- 14:48:17 [libby]
- ACTION: DanC_lap find decision record for bnodes in predicate
- 14:48:23 [libby]
- ACTION DanC_lap: find decision record for bnodes in predicate
- 14:48:46 [DanC_lap]
- action -2
- 14:48:46 [DanC_lap]
- ACTION: find decision record for bnodes in predicate
- 14:48:50 [libby]
- thanks
- 14:49:20 [libby]
- rssagent, show actions
- 14:50:05 [kendallclark]
- sorry, quarter of a pig arrives in an ice chest, you can't ignore it :>
- 14:50:42 [libby]
- kc: if we approve a document that has a grammar in it - implicit decision at least
- 14:51:02 [kendallclark]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0025.html
- 14:51:53 [kendallclark]
- Found an inconsistency in the document re: casting illegal lexical forms and IRIs/anyURI
- 14:51:57 [AndyS]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0028.html
- 14:52:01 [libby]
- andys: I think we found an inconsistency. one issue steve brought up as casting illegal lexical forms, the other was iris and anyurio
- 14:52:33 [libby]
- kc: what does it need?
- 14:52:36 [kendallclark]
- but yr more complete, libby :>
- 14:53:05 [libby]
- ericp: illegal lexical forms - we rely on xpaths - guessing it's illegal but we don't take a stand on it
- 14:53:19 [libby]
- ... test for casting 256 to a byte
- 14:53:24 [libby]
- ... e.g
- 14:53:34 [DanC_lap]
- FILTER int("23.4") > 20
- 14:53:37 [DanC_lap]
- type errro
- 14:53:51 [DanC_lap]
- FILTER "23.4"^^xsd:int > 20
- 14:54:12 [libby]
- danc: our spec doesn't deleetgate to xpath / xquery there does it?
- 14:54:12 [DanC_lap]
- ^ not sure about 2nd case there
- 14:55:30 [ericP]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/examples-extract.xslt
- 14:55:52 [ericP]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#evaluation
- 14:57:19 [kendallclark]
- ACTION EricP to figure out what our spec says re: casting illegal lexical forms
- 14:57:32 [DanC_lap]
- the relevant issue is "valueTesting"; pls include that in the subject of relevant email
- 14:57:33 [ericP]
- [[
- 14:57:34 [ericP]
- RDF typed literals passed as arguments to these functions and operators are mapped to XML Schema typed values with a string value of the lexical form and an atomic datatype corresponding to the datatype IRI. The returned typed values are mapped back to RDF typed literals.
- 14:57:37 [EliasT]
- ACTION: EricP to figure out what our spec says re: casting illegal lexical forms
- 14:57:38 [ericP]
- ]]
- 14:58:23 [libby]
- ericp: guessing we don't say what happens there
- 14:58:28 [DanC_lap]
- I think our spec has a hole here.
- 14:58:56 [libby]
- ericp: we don't say what happens when there isn;t a corresponing xsd data type
- 14:58:58 [DanC_lap]
- this looks like sufficient information to re-open valueTesting, unfortunately
- 14:59:10 [libby]
- ericp: we could throw a type errror there for example
- 15:00:04 [libby]
- danc: it has been the chair's perogative to open the issue and it needs the wg to make a decision in order to close it
- 15:00:27 [libby]
- kc: as acting chair today it looks like there's enough tehre that the wg needs to make a decision
- 15:01:04 [libby]
- zakim next item
- 15:01:05 [kendallclark]
- zakim, next item
- 15:01:05 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Future meeting frequency" taken up [from kendallclark]
- 15:01:38 [libby]
- kc: we have to decide as a group how often we want to meet now
- 15:02:00 [ericP]
- q+ to propose we postpone this agendum until things quiet down
- 15:02:16 [ericP]
- ack me
- 15:02:16 [Zakim]
- ericP, you wanted to propose we postpone this agendum until things quiet down
- 15:02:40 [libby]
- ericp: don't think we can make this decision now, need a quiet week
- 15:03:07 [kendallclark]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 15:03:07 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Kendall_Clark, Libby_Miller (muted), EricP, LeeF, DanC, EliasT, AndyS, Souri
- 15:03:08 [libby]
- danc: if you want things to get quieter, meet less often
- 15:03:17 [DanC_lap]
- ack libby
- 15:03:19 [libby]
- thanks
- 15:04:14 [libby]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:04:14 [Zakim]
- Libby_Miller should now be muted
- 15:04:24 [libby]
- I would like to meet less often, fwiw
- 15:05:00 [kendallclark]
- dan notes the cost to meeting less often, swapping in, etc
- 15:05:08 [libby]
- danc: if you meet less often, there's a cost to swapping back in; but cost to meeting often too, time, agendas etc
- 15:05:28 [libby]
- kc: expect to meet next week, so no differnce today
- 15:05:43 [libby]
- elias: not sure, depend on the todos that are leftf. shorten the meetings?
- 15:05:52 [libby]
- ... 30-45 mins?
- 15:05:57 [Souri]
- I prefer meeting less often, but same duration as now
- 15:06:02 [libby]
- danc: more for the chair, less for others
- 15:06:30 [libby]
- andys: would like to get towards meetign every 2 weeks but not there yet
- 15:06:37 [libby]
- ... it's the chair's call
- 15:07:03 [libby]
- kc: might be a few more meetings to change chair, but after that maybe later
- 15:07:19 [libby]
- souri: meeting less often but keep the duration the same
- 15:07:35 [kendallclark]
- agenda?
- 15:07:37 [libby]
- ... an hour or so is fine - once we're swapped in
- 15:07:40 [DanC_lap]
- (in order for shorter meetings to work well, agenda items have to be prepared better in email.)
- 15:08:11 [libby]
- kc: leaning to meet less often but not yet
- 15:08:14 [kendallclark]
- agenda, next item
- 15:08:19 [libby]
- zakim, next item
- 15:08:19 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Implementation Report" taken up [from kendallclark]
- 15:08:22 [kendallclark]
- zakim, next item
- 15:08:22 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 was just opened, kendallclark
- 15:09:04 [libby]
- kc: useful to maintain impl report in wiki form
- 15:09:18 [libby]
- ... saw some gaps lately, ned to keep it up to date
- 15:09:31 [libby]
- ... we talked about this earlier though
- 15:09:37 [DanC_lap]
- (the report itself http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/imp39 is mostly pointers into the wiki and the test suites)
- 15:10:24 [libby]
- danc: at one point steve harris took an action to make a working draft out the test materials, not sure what's happened there, but it would be nice to have
- 15:10:51 [libby]
- kc: just a wg draft or a note or just written up some place
- 15:10:53 [libby]
- ?
- 15:11:04 [libby]
- danc: any of those, the readme doesn't quite do it for me
- 15:11:08 [DanC_lap]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/
- 15:11:36 [libby]
- danc: it doesn't say "hello gentle reader, I'm going to talk nice to you"
- 15:11:45 [libby]
- ... redame is mildly friendlier
- 15:11:57 [libby]
- kc: copy the readme into the file?
- 15:12:05 [libby]
- danc: needs hacking into the makefile
- 15:12:13 [libby]
- ericp: not sure how it works...
- 15:12:21 [libby]
- ... needs 3store
- 15:12:33 [libby]
- danc: jeen also knows how to do it
- 15:12:58 [libby]
- kc: I'd like a doc too; let's put this back on the agenda when jeen /steve is back
- 15:13:30 [libby]
- danc: 2 bars: can people run the tests? (seems ok) and does it encourage new people to try (no)
- 15:13:47 [libby]
- kc: woudl like people to submit tests too, though we would have to approve them
- 15:14:03 [kendallclark]
- zakim, next item?
- 15:14:03 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, kendallclark.
- 15:14:04 [kendallclark]
- zakim, next item
- 15:14:04 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "MIME type registrations" taken up [from kendallclark]
- 15:14:20 [libby]
- kc: not sure of the status here?
- 15:14:26 [kendallclark]
- agenda?
- 15:14:45 [ericP]
- agenda + same term as
- 15:15:04 [kendallclark]
- agenda, next item
- 15:15:05 [libby]
- ericp: still needs to do actions on mimetype registration
- 15:15:30 [libby]
- danc: we didn't do LC before CR but we could on UC&R before PR
- 15:16:09 [libby]
- ... we know that people want to be able to query lists, but this isn't in the UC&R. if we did a LC, people could say this
- 15:16:26 [libby]
- ... we couldcoontinue on the current path or open it up a bit more
- 15:17:27 [libby]
- kc: would like to be guided by what owl did, UC&R very useful, would like to make it more visible
- 15:18:16 [libby]
- andys: be a good idea to try and capture the things we haven't covered; not sure LC for UC&R is the way to go there - sounds like saying 'we haven;t finished'
- 15:18:44 [libby]
- kc: could be messy
- 15:20:03 [kendallclark]
- ack libby
- 15:20:19 [LeeF]
- an application??!?! heavens!
- 15:20:38 [libby]
- well, a student application
- 15:21:04 [libby]
- danc: some experimental implementations of this
- 15:21:08 [AndyS]
- http://seaborne.blogspot.com/2006/02/property-functions-in-arq.html
- 15:21:17 [libby]
- ericp: andys has one, ericp has one
- 15:21:24 [libby]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:21:24 [Zakim]
- Libby_Miller should now be muted
- 15:21:25 [AndyS]
- cwm/Euler
- 15:21:48 [libby]
- kc: let's take this decision when we have a fuller house. need to be plumper
- 15:22:08 [libby]
- andys: when we went to CR, some of the ourstanding dissent was in UC&R
- 15:22:24 [libby]
- ...e.g. dissent on optional
- 15:22:34 [libby]
- ... network inference
- 15:22:41 [kendallclark]
- agenda?
- 15:22:54 [kendallclark]
- zakim, next item
- 15:22:54 [Zakim]
- agendum 7. "UC&R end game" taken up [from kendallclark]
- 15:23:25 [libby]
- andys: wasn't sure what it meant to do a LC with outstanding dissent
- 15:23:35 [DanC_lap]
- Zakim, close item 7
- 15:23:35 [Zakim]
- agendum 7, UC&R end game, closed
- 15:23:37 [Zakim]
- I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
- 15:23:38 [Zakim]
- 8. same term as [from ericP]
- 15:23:58 [LeeF]
- q+ to ask status of JSON document because I have a bad memory
- 15:24:02 [ericP]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0368
- 15:24:34 [libby]
- ericp: a msg a long time ago where ericp proposed a modification to the operators - numerical equalisty symbol is the same as test for same rdf term. same rdf term = same node is easy
- 15:24:42 [DanC_lap]
- (re JSON, I think EricP has an action to publish it, which continues without discussion in today's meeting)
- 15:24:59 [libby]
- ericp numerical equality depends on degree of support for numerics (case was roman numeral)
- 15:24:59 [LeeF]
- (thanks, DanC_lap)
- 15:25:02 [LeeF]
- q-
- 15:25:16 [kendallclark]
- hmm, i think there may have been 1 or 2 issues that Andy and I didn't agree on from his review...
- 15:25:21 [libby]
- ... simple implementation get a false, better get a true; can;t distinguish between that and rdf equality
- 15:26:00 [libby]
- andy: thought we decided not equal on 2 terms is as open world as possible - onlty reurns true if it definitely knows they are not the same
- 15:26:13 [libby]
- ericp: [missed it]
- 15:26:46 [libby]
- andys: boolean, lexical in upper and lower case - this case equals returns false.
- 15:27:15 [DanC_lap]
- q+ to say that I think I kinda screwed up the last time we closed valueTesting; I was supportive of proposals along the lines that Andy recalls (open world) but forgot about some stuff when I put the question, so we're prolly over the map, w.r.t. decision records
- 15:27:18 [libby]
- ericp: 2 issues numerical equals can give you a type error, same as wil not ...
- 15:27:58 [libby]
- ericp: if it doesn't understand my boollean then it does an rdf equals; if it does, a numeric equals
- 15:28:15 [DanC_lap]
- (this is all yet more reason to re-open valueTesting)
- 15:28:24 [kendallclark]
- q
- 15:28:26 [kendallclark]
- erp
- 15:28:28 [libby]
- ...separate syntax they would get a type error if the implementation did not understand what a boolean was, and the not equals would do the right thing
- 15:28:48 [libby]
- ericp: do you want to pick holes in my message?
- 15:28:56 [ericP]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0368
- 15:29:04 [libby]
- <-- this one
- 15:29:26 [libby]
- ericp: my thesis is that it answers this question
- 15:30:10 [kendallclark]
- q?
- 15:30:20 [libby]
- ... if they thing they're doing a numerica euqals, it falls through to a term equals and they get a false, then this is a failure. if separate those two syntaxes, get better errors
- 15:30:42 [libby]
- andys: don't agree...big trouble - same numeric with different lexical forms, different effects
- 15:30:45 [kendallclark]
- ack next
- 15:30:47 [Zakim]
- DanC_lap, you wanted to say that I think I kinda screwed up the last time we closed valueTesting; I was supportive of proposals along the lines that Andy recalls (open world) but
- 15:30:48 [libby]
- -> email
- 15:30:54 [Zakim]
- ... forgot about some stuff when I put the question, so we're prolly over the map, w.r.t. decision records
- 15:31:42 [libby]
- andys: what about string equals?
- 15:32:01 [libby]
- ericp: implicit in mail message, just stays the same as before
- 15:32:13 [libby]
- ... only changes term equals
- 15:32:58 [kendallclark]
- agenda?
- 15:33:00 [libby]
- kc: have we opened valuetesting properly?
- 15:33:04 [libby]
- danc: yes
- 15:33:07 [kendallclark]
- zakim, next item
- 15:33:07 [Zakim]
- agendum 8. "same term as" taken up [from ericP]
- 15:33:29 [AndyS]
- 14:30Z
- 15:33:32 [libby]
- kc: propose we meet next week 14.30Z
- 15:33:38 [libby]
- ... seconded
- 15:33:48 [DanC_lap]
- Zakim, pick a scribe
- 15:33:48 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose EliasT
- 15:33:49 [kendallclark]
- zakim, pick a scribe
- 15:33:49 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose LeeF
- 15:33:58 [libby]
- ... volunteer scribe?
- 15:34:01 [EliasT]
- k.
- 15:34:03 [EliasT]
- I'll do it.
- 15:34:15 [EliasT]
- that was rigged.
- 15:34:25 [libby]
- ... scribe next week: eliast
- 15:34:33 [EliasT]
- second
- 15:34:38 [libby]
- Adjourned
- 15:34:38 [Zakim]
- -EliasT
- 15:34:39 [Zakim]
- -Souri
- 15:34:45 [DanC_lap]
- RRSAgent, make logs world-access
- 15:34:47 [libby]
- shall I just follw the instructions?
- 15:34:47 [kendallclark]
- ack libby
- 15:34:48 [LeeF]
- (sorry, was trying to arrange to go to www2006)
- 15:34:51 [Zakim]
- -EricP
- 15:35:12 [DanC_lap]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 15:35:12 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/04/11-dawg-minutes.html DanC_lap
- 15:36:05 [Zakim]
- -LeeF
- 15:36:07 [Zakim]
- -Libby_Miller
- 15:36:08 [Zakim]
- -Kendall_Clark
- 15:36:09 [Zakim]
- -DanC
- 15:36:24 [Zakim]
- -AndyS
- 15:36:25 [Zakim]
- SW_DAWG()10:30AM has ended
- 15:36:26 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Kendall_Clark, Libby_Miller, EricP, LeeF, DanC, EliasT, AndyS, +1.603.459.aaaa, Souri
- 15:38:37 [libby]
- action -1
- 15:38:49 [libby]
- (duplicated)
- 15:39:04 [DanC_lap]
- don't worry about the dup
- 15:39:26 [libby]
- useful to know how to use it better
- 15:43:01 [libby]
- Present: Kendall_Clark, Libby_Miller, EricP, LeeF, DanC, EliasT, AndyS
- 15:44:00 [libby]
- Present+ Souri
- 15:46:47 [libby]
- s/kc/kendallclark/g
- 15:47:21 [libby]
- RSSAgent, make minutes
- 15:47:33 [libby]
- d'oh!
- 15:47:36 [libby]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 15:47:36 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/04/11-dawg-minutes.html libby
- 16:48:41 [DanC]
- DanC has joined #dawg
- 16:53:38 [EliasT_]
- EliasT_ has joined #dawg
- 17:07:22 [EliasT]
- EliasT has joined #dawg
- 17:17:49 [AndyS]
- AndyS has left #dawg
- 17:29:20 [SteveH]
- SteveH has joined #dawg
- 17:36:34 [DanC_lap]
- DanC_lap has joined #dawg
- 18:00:13 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #dawg
- 18:36:39 [LeeF]
- LeeF has joined #dawg
- 20:10:17 [EliasT_]
- EliasT_ has joined #dawg
- 20:39:44 [SteveH]
- SteveH has joined #dawg
- 21:11:08 [EliasT__]
- EliasT__ has joined #dawg
- 22:03:51 [EliasT]
- EliasT has joined #dawg