13:39:08 RRSAgent has joined #i18ncore 13:39:08 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/04/04-i18ncore-irc 13:39:10 meeting: i18n core working group 13:39:14 chair: Francois 13:39:18 scribe: Felix 13:39:24 scribeNick: fsasaki 13:39:35 last minutes: http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html 13:42:44 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Apr/0009.html 13:52:33 agenda+ action items 13:52:45 agenda+ ws i18n republication schedule 13:52:54 agenda+ charmod resid progress 13:53:09 agenda+ LTLI / RFC 3066bis project review 13:53:29 agenda+ Voice XML and charmod (fundamentals) 14:00:45 zakim, dial Keio-617 14:00:46 ok, fsasaki; the call is being made 14:00:47 I18N_Core_WG()10:00AM has now started 14:00:48 +Keio 14:00:48 fyergeau has joined #i18ncore 14:01:11 agenda? 14:01:34 fyergeau_ has joined #i18ncore 14:02:13 +[IPcaller] 14:02:16 zakim, [ is fyergeau 14:02:16 +fyergeau; got it 14:02:16 -Keio 14:02:17 +Keio 14:03:29 r12a has joined #i18ncore 14:03:35 zakim, dial ishida 14:03:35 ok, r12a; the call is being made 14:03:37 +Ishida 14:04:02 agenda? 14:05:14 kazuyo 14:06:02 zakim, take up agendum 1 14:06:02 agendum 1. "action items" taken up [from fsasaki] 14:06:49 action: Felix to make regular call 1 hour earlier (talk to zakim)(DONE) 14:07:08 Felix to talk to Martin on IRI tests (DONE) 14:07:39 action: Mary to look at WS Addr (PENDING) 14:08:22 action: felix to go trough LTLI within the next 2 weeks (PENDING) 14:08:38 felix: hope to have this done next week (again) 14:08:49 action: Francois to build a current issues list on charmod norm (ONGOING) 14:09:16 action: Mary will make the updates discussed in Mandelieu on ws i18n (PENDING) 14:09:38 action: Richard to go through the xml:lang CDR review issue (DROPPED) 14:09:45 agenda? 14:10:24 zakim, take up agendum 2 14:10:24 agendum 2. "ws i18n republication schedule" taken up [from fsasaki] 14:11:32 felix: got feedback that we should slow down publication of this 14:11:43 .. i.e. not before May, better June 14:12:12 zakim, take up agendum 3 14:12:12 agendum 3. "charmod resid progress" taken up [from fsasaki] 14:12:28 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Apr/0006.html 14:12:35 Felix: mail from Martin 14:17:11 .. we need an implementation report for resid 14:17:58 Richard: charmod needs implementation in specs 14:18:12 Francois: for resid, you have to show that browsers or servers to the right thing 14:19:15 Felix: do we then have to write an implementation report? 14:19:26 Francois: in the resid spec, there are four requirements 14:19:54 .. we require a test suite, but the document places requirements on spec 14:20:04 .. the document is just a wrapper on the IETF IRI spec 14:20:20 Richard: conformance criteria are just about specs 14:22:06 action: Felix to find out where the tests from Martin are located 14:22:45 action: Felix to find out what we need in the IRI implementation report 14:23:11 Francois: We did require a test suite 14:23:21 .. what we could do is an implementation report related to specs 14:24:00 Felix: how many specs cite charmod resid? 14:24:15 Francois: they don't need to cite it, just be compliant 14:24:54 [[C061 [S] Specifications that define new syntax for URIs SHOULD also define the normalization requirements for the syntax they introduce.]] 14:25:24 Richard: we left that in there because we are not defining what the normalization requirements are 14:25:33 .. so we are fine with this 14:27:23 action: Felix to write an implementation report on charmod resid 14:27:28 http://www.w3.org/2004/11/charmod-implementation/ 14:29:30 agenda? 14:29:40 zakim, take up agendum 4 14:29:40 agendum 4. "LTLI / RFC 3066bis project review" taken up [from fsasaki] 14:31:42 Felix: I asked Addison if he could participate in a project review about RFC 3066bis 14:32:03 Richard: when will you do that? 14:32:07 Felix: in the next months 14:32:23 Richard: we have to figure out some things 14:32:41 .. and it should be after the doc is finalized 14:33:14 .. I am writing s.t. about the first part part of RFC 3066bis 14:33:43 .. for the www conference, and to put on the i18n site 14:34:24 zakim, take up agendum 5 14:34:24 agendum 5. "Voice XML and charmod (fundamentals)" taken up [from fsasaki] 14:34:26 +[IBM] 14:35:44 topic: ws addressing review 14:35:51 mary: I'll get to it this afternoon 14:36:00 topic: ws i18n update 14:36:17 mary: It looks like it makes sense 14:36:33 .. it will not be a 100 page document (like the security document) 14:37:46 zakim, take up agendum 5 14:37:46 agendum 5. "Voice XML and charmod (fundamentals)" taken up [from fsasaki] 14:38:06 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Apr/0005.html 14:38:43 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Apr/0011.html 14:42:22 Richard: I don't understand the DTMF part 14:42:51 i don't think *Max* understands the DTMF part 14:44:05 Francois: there seems to be some misunderstanding 14:44:10 [[Here's an analysis of why I recommend we do not mandate nor 14:44:10 recomment compliance to CharMod Fundamentals in VoiceXML2.1. 14:44:13 ]] 14:45:45 action: everybody to look at the mail at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Apr/0011.html 14:46:12 action: Felix ask Max if he can join next week's i18n core call 14:46:44 Richard: what will the TAG discuss? 14:46:52 Karl's tag action item: 14:46:53 [[ACTION: Karl to bring to the TAG the relationship between charmod and 14:46:53 XML as large and its implications on specification development 14:46:54 ]] 14:47:40 [[The question seems to be if all future Technologies defined in W3C 14:47:40 Specifications MUST conform or not to Charmod. 14:47:40 A related question is for the specifications themselves. 14:47:41 ]] 14:48:54 Richard: the tag question is a general question, different from Max' issues 14:49:19 .. as we developed charmod, we had something in the conformance section saying "all new W3C specs MUST refer to it" 14:49:30 .. Tim and others pushed back, so we took that out 14:49:42 .. in the hope that other specs would refer to charmod 14:49:50 .. Francois, is this the result? 14:49:58 Francois: I don't recall anything else 14:50:36 http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ 14:53:32 http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#no-charset 14:53:42 Richard: that means "don't look at the http header" 14:53:52 Francois: that stuff breaks all the time 14:54:37 correction: that means "don't declare the encoding in the http header for xhtml" 14:55:19 action: all to look at the TAG issue, and intercept Karl 14:55:52 Felix: should we take over from Karl? 14:55:57 Richard: I don't think so 14:56:03 .. it will take some time from us 14:57:16 .. we should not make a huge deal of it 14:57:53 topic: other business? 14:58:24 -fyergeau 14:58:26 -Mary 14:58:28 -Keio 14:58:30 I18N_Core_WG()10:00AM has ended 14:58:30 rrsagent, make log public 14:58:33 Attendees were Felix, [IPcaller], fyergeau, Keio, Ishida, Mary 14:58:41 present: Felix, Francois, Mary, Richard 14:58:45 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:58:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/04/04-i18ncore-minutes.html fsasaki 15:16:16 I18N_Core_WG()10:00AM has now started 15:16:24 +Karunesh_Arora 15:16:32 hello karunesh 15:16:33 -Karunesh_Arora 15:16:34 I18N_Core_WG()10:00AM has ended 15:16:35 Attendees were Karunesh_Arora 15:19:26 karora has joined #i18Ncore 15:20:55 I18N_Core_WG()10:00AM has now started 15:21:00 I18N_Core_WG()10:00AM has ended 15:21:01 Attendees were 15:21:15 hello karunesh, 15:21:26 core meetings start an hour earlier now 15:21:42 ie. at 2pm UTC 16:50:49 Zakim has left #i18ncore