This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group Other specs in this tool
Status: allopen proposal pending resolved_yes resolved_no resolved_partial other Type: allsubstantive editorial typo question general comment undefined
Quick access to LC-1879 LC-1880 LC-1881 LC-1882 LC-1883 LC-1910
There are 6 comments (sorted by their types, and the section they are about).
Typo <wdr:excludeHosts>video.example.com</wdr:includeHosts>
Regarding <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-powder-grouping-20070709/>, what are the lexical constraints (= conforming syntax) for the values of the includeHosts property? Thanks, Art Barstow ---
Note the example http://joe:mypasswd@www.example.com:1234/example1/example2?query=help#fragment is illegal, in that it does not conform with HTTP spec which does not allow username and password. Also the :mypasswd syntax is strongly discouraged in RFC 3986
The SHOULD under 4.7 is way too strong. I see no reason why the expression in 4.7 cannot be implemented efficiently and be generally useful; setting the expectation that Powder won't work well is not a good idea
includeHosts You seem to mean that includeHosts with example.org also includes www.example.org - in a quick skim I didn't see this stated explicitly, or for example that it does not include example.www.org or whatever; nor what to do if you only want example.org and not foo.example.org
I found example 4.6 I had to think fairly hard. If this is a standard idiom then it may be worth spelling it out a bit. "all resources on example.com except those on video.example.com shot in widescreen format." which is "all resources on example.com except those on video.example.com, and all resources on example.com except those shot in widescreen format."
Add a comment.