14:48:05 RRSAgent has joined #er 14:48:05 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/01/18-er-irc 14:48:11 Zakim has joined #er 14:48:17 zakim, this will be ert 14:48:17 ok, shadi; I see WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 12 minutes 14:48:40 meeting: ERT WG 14:48:44 chair: Shadi 14:48:49 regrets: Nick 14:49:11 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Jan/0033.html 14:49:22 agenda+ EARL 1.0 Schema - open issues 14:49:37 agenda+ HTTP Request/Response 14:49:47 agenda+ Reminder: open action items 14:50:00 agenda+ Reminder: face-to-face meeting 14:53:55 Sandor has joined #er 14:56:01 JibberJim has joined #er 14:56:34 ChrisR has joined #er 14:57:40 JohannesK has joined #er 14:58:30 WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has now started 14:58:41 +Carlos 14:59:24 +Shadi 14:59:29 +Sandor_Herramhof 15:00:03 carlos has joined #er 15:00:14 +[IPcaller] 15:00:43 zakim, ipcaller is really Chris 15:00:43 +Chris; got it 15:01:15 zakim, scribe is Chris 15:01:15 sorry, ChrisR, I do not recognize a party named 'scribe' 15:01:30 zakim, carlos has Carlos, Johannes 15:01:30 +Carlos, Johannes; got it 15:01:41 +David 15:01:53 scribe: Chris 15:01:58 scribenick: ChrisR 15:02:46 drooks has joined #er 15:02:53 zakim, agenda item 2 15:02:53 I don't understand 'agenda item 2', ChrisR 15:02:54 zakim, take up agendum 2 15:02:54 agendum 2. "HTTP Request/Response" taken up [from shadi] 15:03:11 CarlosI has joined #er 15:03:31 JibberJim has joined #er 15:04:11 saz: background info on HTTP request/response notes 15:04:38 saz: recalls that these were to be published as working notes 15:04:56 saz: anything missing? 15:05:28 +nacho 15:05:34 +Jim_Ley 15:05:56 zakim, nacho CarlosI 15:05:56 I don't understand 'nacho CarlosI', shadi 15:06:11 zakim, nacho is really CarlosI 15:06:11 +CarlosI; got it 15:06:25 JK: cookies issue 15:07:00 JK: seems to be no other issues - send spec to list 15:07:23 JK: will be able to edit as working group note. Carlos will help. 15:08:04 SAZ: any objections as publish as note? 15:08:30 resolution: HTTP request/response spec to be published as working group note. 15:08:42 resoultion: JK will edit 15:09:29 saz: cookies - publish as note in spec. Will discuss later. JK will send message to list to discuss. 15:10:05 JK: namespace issue still unresolved? 15:10:28 saz: do we want a temp namespace? (for now then switch to formal) 15:11:05 chaals has joined #er 15:11:47 discussion of namespace, temp namespace was helpful in short term 15:12:01 JK: used several namespaces in spec 15:12:40 saz: will look what other groups are using but would like to use temp for now 15:13:50 [I think it is a *terrible* idea to change namespaces. It is just an opaque string, and changing it just requires everyone to handle a bunch of extra stuff for no identifiable purpose] 15:13:51 action: saz will look into namespace for HTTP request/response stuff and talk to JK 15:14:22 zakim, close agendum 2 15:14:22 agendum 2, HTTP Request/Response, closed 15:14:23 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:14:25 1. EARL 1.0 Schema - open issues [from shadi] 15:14:27 zakim, take up agendum 1 15:14:27 agendum 1. "EARL 1.0 Schema - open issues" taken up [from shadi] 15:14:34 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:14:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/01/18-er-minutes.html chaals 15:14:43 rrsagent, make log member 15:15:41 saz: dc:location topic from CI - remove location (since using request/response)? 15:16:56 discussion of dc:location 15:16:57 [Location in the current spec isn't used in the same way as request/response, but I don't thik it is remotely necessary as currently used anyway so support removing it] 15:17:28 saz: define our own earl:location? 15:18:57 discussion of perhaps using something like earl:uri 15:19:38 ACK 15:21:20 resolution: use earl:uri instead of dc:location 15:25:07 ci: concerns over testcase element in earl draft (message sent to list) 15:25:54 ci: testrequirement element is OK but is more like testcase then testrequirement 15:26:10 saz: seems more like an editorial problem 15:26:35 ci: important that we have common view of what elements mean 15:27:22 ci: does group agree with suggestions from message posted to list? 15:29:04 jj: agrees with ci's post to list, wording is clearer 15:29:19 IMO a requirement is a documented need of what a particular product should be or do (what you expect from the product) and test are process used to ensure products are designed and produced to meet those requirements (the way you test whether you have what you expected or not). 15:30:43 discussion of ci's proposal 15:31:06 [I think the words are much more flexible and harder to pin down in english usage than Carlos' idea of them, but I like the wording proposals anyway...) 15:33:37 1. test (actual test that is performed) 15:39:21 discussion of what the actual tests are - something specific like HTML test suite or something more general like a WCAG guideline SC 15:48:57 saz: review of evidence class 15:54:12 saz: good discussion and we should take to list more more consideration 15:55:07 saz: is this a showstopper (hold off publication of EARL spec)? 15:56:14 ci: draft is still OK but needs to be resolved before final status 15:57:25 saz: after discussion on list we will bring up on next weeks call 15:58:25 zakim, close agendum 1 15:58:25 agendum 1, EARL 1.0 Schema - open issues, closed 15:58:27 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:58:28 3. Reminder: open action items [from shadi] 15:58:31 zakim, take up agendum 3 15:58:31 agendum 3. "Reminder: open action items" taken up [from shadi] 15:58:34 action: saz will send to mailing list 15:58:55 * Chaals make proposal for schema to describe how to add a Collection as evidence 15:58:55 - 15:58:55 * jim write up proposal for "earl:snippet" locator type 15:58:55 - 15:59:02 -Chris 15:59:45 zakim, close agendum 3 15:59:45 agendum 3, Reminder: open action items, closed 15:59:46 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 15:59:47 4. Reminder: face-to-face meeting [from shadi] 15:59:53 zakim, take up agendum 4 15:59:53 agendum 4. "Reminder: face-to-face meeting" taken up [from shadi] 16:00:53 -David 16:00:55 -Jim_Ley 16:00:55 -Shadi 16:00:57 -Carlos 16:01:01 saz: sign up and book hotels soon! 16:01:02 -Sandor_Herramhof 16:01:03 -CarlosI 16:01:04 zakim, close agendum 4 16:01:05 WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has ended 16:01:06 drooks has left #er 16:01:07 Attendees were Shadi, Sandor_Herramhof, Chris, Carlos, Johannes, David, Jim_Ley, CarlosI 16:01:09 agendum 4, Reminder: face-to-face meeting, closed 16:01:09 zakim, bye 16:01:11 I see nothing remaining on the agenda 16:01:13 Zakim has left #er 16:01:16 rrsagent, make logs world 16:01:22 rrsagent, make minutes 16:01:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/01/18-er-minutes.html shadi 16:01:25 rrsagent, make logs world 16:01:29 rrsagent, bye 16:01:29 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/18-er-actions.rdf : 16:01:29 ACTION: saz will look into namespace for HTTP request/response stuff and talk to JK [1] 16:01:29 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/18-er-irc#T15-13-51 16:01:29 ACTION: saz will send to mailing list [2] 16:01:29 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/18-er-irc#T15-58-34