Thank you for your feedback. See our answers inlined.
Thomas Krekeler wrote 2 November 2009:
> > = 'type' attribute for 'Const' = > The list in  contains > - Const (individual, function, or predicate symbol, with optional 'type' > attribute) > On the other hand the XSD schema () explicitly defines the 'type' > attribute to be required.
You are right, the type information is mandatory for RIF constants. We have corrected that. Thank you for spotting the mistake.
> = Locator in an Import Directive = > The XSD schema () element 'location' refers to 'LOCATOR' which contains a > 'Const' element. > Maybe the XSD schema is out dated since  says that a locator is not a > (rif:iri) constant?
> = xml:lang = > The definition of the 'Const' element in  refers to the 'xml:lang' > attribute. > Is this attribute for the reader's information only, or does it affect the > back transformation from XML syntax to presentation syntax? > If so, which of the following XML fragments are valid and what are their > back transformations? > <Const type="&rdf;PlainLiteral" xml:lang="en">abc</Const> > <Const type="&rdf;PlainLiteral" xml:lang="en">abc@</Const> > <Const type="&rdf;PlainLiteral" xml:lang="en">abc@de</Const>
> = xml:base = > The xml:base specification () does not define on which URIs contained in > an XML document the resolving mechanism against their base URIs applies. > What about > * the 'type' attribute of 'Const', > * the content of the 'location' element, > * the content of the 'Const' element if its type is xsd:anyURI or rif:IRI?
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-fld/#XML_for_the_RIF-FLD_Language >  http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-fld/#Baseline_Schema_Module >  http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-fld/#Well-formed_Terms_and_Formulas >  http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/
Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
-The RIF WG