ISSUE-74: Should Core support only frames and omit uniterms?

Frame-only Core

Should Core support only frames and omit uniterms?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Core
Raised by:
Dave Reynolds
Opened on:
2008-08-21
Description:
By default Core should support n-ary relations (uniterms) since they are in both PRD and BLD.

However, several rule languages which might otherwise be mappable to Core do not natively support uniterms but just frame-like data structures such as java-like objects (Oracle) or RDF (N3, JenaRules).

Should we consider limiting Core to just Frames, omitting uniterms, to simplify implementability in such cases?
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-74 (Frame-only Core): Should Core support only frames and omit uniterms? [Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-08-21)

Related notes:

At F2F11 the WG resolved to close this issue, see http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/meeting/2008-09-27#resolution_7. Core will have both Predicates (with positional arguments) and Frames (no comment as yet on having membership)

Christopher Welty, 30 Sep 2008, 14:30:14

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 74.html,v 1.1 2013-02-08 09:09:37 vivien Exp $