ISSUE-51: MetaData Syntax and Rule Identification [CP]
MetaData Syntax and Rule Identification [CP]
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)
- Raised by:
- Christopher Welty
- Opened on:
- 2008-04-15
- Description:
- The syntax for metadata in FLD and BLD is currently under discussion by the WG. Proposals by Jos and by Harold & Michael have been considered. The April 15th WDs reflect the Harold & Michael proposal and the publication does not reflect agreement of the WD, just pressure to publish some version.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Deriving BLD PS from the XML syntax (Was: Re: escaping quotes) (from csma@ilog.fr on 2008-05-07)
- [RIF] draft minutes for 29 April 2008 telecon (from cleo@us.ibm.com on 2008-04-29)
- RE: [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete) -- small metadata handle (from Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca on 2008-04-29)
- Re: [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete) (from kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) on 2008-04-29)
- [ISSUE-51] organising a RIF document VS attaching metadata to items? (from csma@ilog.fr on 2008-04-29)
- Re: [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete) (from csma@ilog.fr on 2008-04-29)
- Re: [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete) (from kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) on 2008-04-29)
- Re: [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (2/2: required or optional) (from debruijn@inf.unibz.it on 2008-04-29)
- [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (2/2: required or optional) (from csma@ilog.fr on 2008-04-29)
- [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete) (from csma@ilog.fr on 2008-04-29)
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax (from kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) on 2008-04-28)
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax --> org vs metadata (from csma@ilog.fr on 2008-04-28)
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax (from der@hplb.hpl.hp.com on 2008-04-28)
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax (from kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) on 2008-04-28)
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax --> org vs metadata (from kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) on 2008-04-28)
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax (from der@hplb.hpl.hp.com on 2008-04-28)
- RE: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax --> org vs metadata (from pvincent@tibco.com on 2008-04-28)
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax (from csma@ilog.fr on 2008-04-28)
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax (from csma@ilog.fr on 2008-04-28)
- ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax (from cawelty@gmail.com on 2008-04-25)
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 21 (from cawelty@gmail.com on 2008-04-21)
- Minutes from April 15, 2008, telecon (from adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de on 2008-04-18)
- ISSUE-51: MetaData Syntax and Rule Identification [Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-04-15)
Related notes:
Closed by WG resolution at the Galway F2F10 28 May 2008. The BLD spec includes a syntax for metadata that can hang off any "class" element in the XML syntax.
Christopher Welty, 28 May 2008, 09:51:17Display change log