ISSUE-44: Whether to have named argument Uniterms in BLD or not [CP]
Whether to have named argument Uniterms in BLD or not [CP]
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)
- Raised by:
- Pedram Abrari
- Opened on:
- 2007-10-30
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- draft minutes RIF telecon, 18 March 2008 (from igor.mozetic@ijs.si on 2008-03-18)
- RE: implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44) (from Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca on 2008-01-21)
- [admin] Draft Minutes of 2008-01-15 RIF Telecon (from gary.hallmark@oracle.com on 2008-01-15)
- Re: implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44) (from mproctor@redhat.com on 2008-01-15)
- RE: implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44) (from Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca on 2008-01-15)
- Re: implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44) (from mproctor@redhat.com on 2008-01-15)
- RE: implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44) (from Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca on 2008-01-15)
- Re: implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44) (from kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) on 2008-01-15)
- Re: implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44) (from gary.hallmark@oracle.com on 2008-01-14)
- Re: implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44) (from gary.hallmark@oracle.com on 2008-01-14)
- RE: implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44) (from Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca on 2008-01-10)
- Re: implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44) (from kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) on 2008-01-09)
- implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44) (from sandro@w3.org on 2008-01-09)
- ISSUE-44: Whether to have named argument Uniterms in BLD or not (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2007-10-30)
Related notes:
Resolved by WG consensus at F2F9 to keep named argument uniterms in BLD provided the spec outlines how implementors of rule systems that do not support them should treat them on input. See http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/F2F9_Minutes
Christopher Welty, 4 Mar 2008, 15:08:03Display change log
