ISSUE-101: Should rdf:type arcs be a part of the RIF-in-RDF mapping?
RDF Syntax Uses Classes
Should rdf:type arcs be a part of the RIF-in-RDF mapping?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RIF in RDF
- Raised by:
- Sandro Hawke
- Opened on:
- 2010-06-18
- Description:
- It's possible to do the RIF-in-RDF mapping with our without using rdf:type arcs and corresponding RDF/OWL classes.
Using classes means using more triples, but may make the RDF version easier to understand.
One complication of using classes: if RDFS/OWL reasoning is done, there may be additional rdf:type arcs inferred. In the presence of incomplete reasoning, with rule-transformation rules, this might result in simply having different (but also correct) rdf:type arcs from the expected/original ones. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 7 September (from csma@fr.ibm.com on 2010-09-06)
- Re: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 24 Aug (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-08-23)
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 24 Aug (from cawelty@gmail.com on 2010-08-23)
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 10 August (from cawelty@gmail.com on 2010-08-09)
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 27 July (from csma@fr.ibm.com on 2010-07-26)
- Re: RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 [Switching to KR Argument] (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-07-25)
- Re: RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 (from kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu on 2010-07-25)
- Re: RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-07-25)
- Re: RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 (from kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu on 2010-07-25)
- Re: RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-07-25)
- Re: RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 (from kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu on 2010-07-25)
- RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-07-25)
- Re: Toward closing the RIF-in-RDF open issues (from kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu on 2010-07-22)
- RE: Toward closing the RIF-in-RDF open issues (from Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca on 2010-07-21)
- Re: Toward closing the RIF-in-RDF open issues (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-07-21)
- Re: Toward closing the RIF-in-RDF open issues (from dave.e.reynolds@googlemail.com on 2010-07-21)
- Toward closing the RIF-in-RDF open issues (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-07-20)
- RIF-in-RDF ready for review, okay for FPWD? (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-06-18)
- ISSUE-102: Naming of RDF properties (and maybe classes) in RIF-in-RDF mapping [RIF in RDF] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-06-18)
- ISSUE-101 (RDF Syntax Uses Classes): Should rdf:type arcs be a part of the RIF-in-RDF mapping? [RIF in RDF] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-06-18)
Related notes:
Closed by resolution at telecon 10 Aug 2010 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2010Aug/att-0017/2010-08-10-rif-minutes-edited.html)
Christian de Sainte Marie, 6 Sep 2010, 14:35:03Display change log