ACTION-408: [PENDING DISCUSSION] Draft an emali separating the different issues in the question about fct vs predicate forms for builtins

[PENDING DISCUSSION] Draft an emali separating the different issues in the question about fct vs predicate forms for builtins

State:
closed
Person:
Axel Polleres
Due on:
February 5, 2008
Created on:
January 29, 2008
Related emails:
  1. AW: Minutes from January 29, 2008, telecon (from adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de on 2008-02-05)
  2. Re: ACTION-408: separating the different issues in the question about fct vs predicate forms for builtins (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2008-02-03)
  3. Re: ACTION-408: separating the different issues in the question about fct vs predicate forms for builtins (from debruijn@inf.unibz.it on 2008-02-03)
  4. ACTION-408: separating the different issues in the question about fct vs predicate forms for builtins (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2008-02-01)
  5. Minutes from January 29, 2008, telecon (from adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de on 2008-01-30)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log.


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 408.html,v 1.1 2013-02-08 09:08:54 vivien Exp $