The W3C Mobile Web Initiative
(MWI)
Philipp Hoschka,
W3C Deputy Director
Berlin, September 14, 2005
Overview
- Motivation
- "Mobile Web Initiative" structure
- Conclusion
Mobile Web: My First Encounter
Reading W3C homepage in Tokyo subway, February 2000
Why Mobile Web Access is Useful
- Future: M-Commerce, Mobile Enterprise, Location-Based services ...
maybe
- Today: Strong anecdotal evidence
- Teleconference from Osaka backstreet
- Pub argument in UK
- Decipher menus in Barcelona
- ...
Why Mobile Web Access is Possible
Source: RusselBeattie.com
Some Statistics
Source: T-Mobile, modeled on Credit Suisse First Boston, Mobile Data 2004,
Pyramid Research, Global Mobile Capex Handbook, August 2004
Internet-Enabled Mobile Phone Penetration
|
April 2004 |
Japan |
79% |
Other Asia |
54% |
Europe |
47% |
North America |
37% |
Brazil |
37% |
Worldwide |
49% |
Source: A.T. Kearny/University of Cambridge - Judge Institute of
Management, July 2004
Why Mobile Web Access is Hard
- While commuting to work, user sees a URL on a bill-board
- "Hey -- I've just bought a snazzy new phone with access to 'the Web,'
right? I'll give it a try!"
- Works for 15 minutes to figure out how to enter a URL into their
phone's browser
- Seems to load something, but logos and images are so huge that it's
impossible to make sense of the user interface on the small phone
screen
- 'Wait -- I'll try my mobile phone provider's web site -- I'm sure
theirs will work!'
- Same result.
- Tries to log in to favorite web mail system.
- "Sorry, your browser doesn't support cookies!"
- Throws phone out train window.
W3C's Mobile Web Initiative
- Web was key to create demand for Internet for desktop PCs
- Has potential to play similar role for mobile Internet
- Color screens and faster networks solve some issues of earlier
attempts
- Need to solve interoperability and usability issues for
- End users
- Content providers
Standards are Essential for Mobile Web Success
- Mobile Web access needs needs global standards
- Users and content providers need to be able to rely on them in similar
way as GSM
Concerted Community Effort Required
- Authoring tool vendors: produce standard-conformant content
- Content providers: follow best practices for user-friendly Web
experience
- Handset manufacturers: provide correct device information
- Browser vendors: correctly implement Web standards
- Mobile phone operators: encourage use of content standards
Mobile Web Access Has Significant Potential for Mobile Data
- Voice-based use of mobile networks reaching saturation point
- Continued growth from data traffic (mobile messaging, imaging, gaming,
music download)
- Web primary "data" user interface on "fixed-line" networks
- Successful mobile Web access has similar potential as phone service
W3C Can Help Enabling the Mobile Web
- Has mobile experience since 1997
- XHTML
- MMS content types (SMIL, SVG)
- Device Independence (CC/PP, UAProf)
- Multimodal Interaction
- Mobile becoming Web first class citizen
- "One Web" approach
- Leading consensus-building organization of the Web
- Experience in "breaking up silos"
Managing Liaisons
- OMA
- Plannning workshop co-located with OMA meeting
- Invited OMA presentation
- Work split: OMA providing requirements for W3C
specifications
- OMA "not considering certification of Web content"
- Existing liaisons: CDF, CSS, HTML, Multimodal Interaction, SMIL,
SVG
- Organizations signed MoU for collaboration
- 3GPP
- Ongoing collaboration on SMIL and SVG
- Both adopted by 3GPP for MMS
Mobile Web Best Practices WG: Goals
- Help content providers to develop web content that works well on mobile
devices
- Planned
- Authoring guidelines
- Checklists
- Best Practices
- "MobileOK" trust-mark
- For test tools applied to mobile web content
- Check adherence to guidelines
- Similar to marks for WAI, HTML, CSS (but stricter)
Mobile Web Best Practices WG: Status
- End of June: First f2f meeting (Vodafone, London)
- Aug: Published "Scope of Mobile Web Best Practices"
- First WD of "Best Practices" Soon
- Plan: Winter 2005/2006: First best practice document finalized
"Best Practices" WG Members: 23
- Afilias Limited
- America Online, Inc. (AOL)
- Argo Interactive Ltd
- AT&T
- Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)
- elmundo.es
- ERICSSON
- France Telecom
- FundaciĆ³n ONCE
- Google, Inc.
- International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild (IWA-HWG)
- Internet Content Rating Association
- mTLD Top Level Domain Limited
- Nokia
- NTT DoCoMo
- Openwave Systems Inc.
- Opera Software
- Segala M Test
- T-Online International AG
- The Boeing Company
- University of Helsinki
- Vodafone
- Volantis Systems Ltd
MWI Device Description WG: Goals
- Development of improved device description solutions
- Shared database of device description provided by handset manufacturers
and others
- Used by content authors for content adaptation
MWI Device Description WG: Status
- End of June: First f2f meeting (Vodafone, London)
- Early Aug: Launched public Device Description Technologies Survey
- Planned for Fall
- Public Working Draft of W3C Note ("Survey of existing technology
and conceptual architecture")
- Public Working Draft of W3C Note ("Business Model, Maintenance and
Use")
Mobile Web Initiative Steering Council
- MWI maintained through financial support by sponsors
- Leadership through seat on MWI Steering Council
- Develop MWI-supported Activity proposals
- Receive report on MWI progress
- Prioritize future work items
- Advice on marketing and oureach activities
- Manage liaisons
Sponsor Participation in Marketing and Outreach
- Press release on joining
- Testimonials
- MWI member logo
- MWI seminars
- MWI talks
- MWI publications
- MWI tradeshow appearances
MWI Sponsors: 19
- Full Sponsors
- Affiliate Sponsors
It's 1996 All Over Again ...
Web 1996 |
Mobile Web 2004 |
Too slow |
Too slow |
Lack of interoperability |
Lack of interoperability |
"What's new?" |
"What's new?" |
Child protection |
Child protection |
Not accessible |
Not accessible |
... But Not Quite 1996
Web 1996 |
Mobile Web 2004 |
Few connected users |
Many potentially connected users |
Lack of content |
Lots of potential content |
No industry |
Big potential industry |