ISSUE-59: Can WML be

Can WML be

State:

CLOSED

Product:

mobileOK Basic tests

Raised by:

Ron Mandel

Opened on:

2005-11-10

Description:

Based on this current threads about WML I\'m hearing the following:
\"It will not be possible to mark a WML page as \'moblieOK\'\"

Is my interpretation wrong? If so, please correct me. If the above
statement is accurate, this strikes me as a pretty serious problem. I am
strongly opposed to a \"best practice\" of \"Don\'t use WML.\" If it\'s out of
scope, just ignore it, don\'t actively exclude it.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. [minutes] Thu July 13 teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2006-07-13)
2. [minutes] Thursday June 15 teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2006-06-15)
3. RE: [minutes] Thursday June 15 teleconf (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-06-15)
4. Re: WML on the desktop (was: Re: WML (from andrea@trasatti.it on 2005-11-16)
5. Re: WML on the desktop (was: Re: WML (from chaals@opera.com on 2005-11-14)
6. RE: WML on the desktop (was: Re: WML (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2005-11-14)
7. RE: WML on the desktop (was: Re: WML (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2005-11-14)
8. Re: WML on the desktop (was: Re: WML (from chaals@opera.com on 2005-11-13)
9. Re: WML on the desktop (from ph@w3.org on 2005-11-13)
10. ISSUE-59: Can WML be \\\'MobileOK\\\'? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2005-11-10)

Related notes:

Display change log