ISSUE-217: Should the current Section 2 of the Problem Statement be folded into Section 1
Restructure Problem Statement
Should the current Section 2 of the Problem Statement be folded into Section 1
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Content Transformation Problem Statement
- Raised by:
- Jo Rabin
- Opened on:
- 2007-09-11
- Description:
- Having reworked section 1, section 2 of the problem statement [1] now looks a little spare or incomplete. One solution might be to fold the required techniques currently in section 2 into section 1 as highlighted text. This could make the document easier to read and provide a clearer rationale for those requirements. It's a relatively small point, but worth considering for the sake of clarity and readability.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/070907
This relates to my ACTION-555 - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [minutes] Content Transformation Task Force, 2007-09-25 (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-09-25)
- Re: HTTP in problem statement action (from mml@drutt.com on 2007-09-12)
- RE: HTTP in problem statement action (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-09-12)
- FW: ISSUE-217 (Restructure Problem Statement): Should the current Section 2 of the Problem Statement be folded into Section 1 [Content Transformation Problem Statement] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-09-11)
- ISSUE-217 (Restructure Problem Statement): Should the current Section 2 of the Problem Statement be folded into Section 1 [Content Transformation Problem Statement] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-09-11)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log