Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
2011-02-04-Protocol
From Object Memory Modeling Incubator Group Wiki
2011-02-04 Agenda/Minutes
Contents
Welcome
Participants and Scribe
- Barbara Schennerlein SAP
- Sven Horn SAP
- Jörg Neidig Siemens
- Ralf Barthel UCL
- Alexander Kröner, Jens Haupert, Boris Brandherm DFKI
- Daniel Schreiber TU Darmstadt
Scribe
- SAP
Off-topic: Connection problems from last phone conference
- Audio quality is low, people loose connection
- W3C assumption: Voice over IP connections of company networks can be a reason
- Observation: the problem is persisting
- The members will try to identify an alternative conference option
TOP 1 Review of past Action Points
RB: Event logging standards
- standard from a non-profit organization
- specification from Nov 2010
- description of structure of standardized events
- options for internationalization
- see wiki Event Logging - CEE
TOP 2 Use Cases
- Action point: Siemens provides an example of use case Integration of other product information standards
- New use cases from Daniel Schreiber: Task Knowledge, Procedural Knowledge
- Discussion: Should the DPM focus on logging/data storage alone? Following the use cases provided so far, the participants express a preference towards an open model.
TOP 3 Basic Features: Metadata
SH: Encoding metadata in the SemProM format
- Metadata can be stored in two ways: using the block header or the Attribute block
- Variant: Metadata (Meta Tags) in a block header. Standardized set of keys and values; binary coded; supports standardized access to the memory. (see "SemProM-Metaformat_v1.0.pdf" page 6)
- Variant: Attribute block - proprietary structure, no standardized format. It supports the flexibility of the approach; however, potential abuse - users might refrain from using the standardized metadata. (see "SemProM-binary-blocks_v1.0.pdf" page 12)
- both are name/value pairs; which can optionally be mapped to Vocabularies/Ontology's, e.g. using the Namespace data field in Attribute Block
- Action point: All members (one per project) provide examples of metadata encodings used so far. This can be done by extending the examples given in use case descriptions.
Next Conference:
- 18.2. ? -Barbara cannot participate, substitute: Sven