10:53:46 RRSAgent has joined #er 10:53:46 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/11/14-er-irc 10:53:52 Zakim has joined #er 10:54:01 zakim, this will be team1 10:54:02 ok, shadi; I see Team_(er)11:00Z scheduled to start in 6 minutes 10:54:11 meeting: ET TF 10:54:19 chair: Shadi 10:54:58 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tools/2005Nov/0001.html 10:55:11 agenda+ Introduce ET TF Work Statement 10:55:19 agenda+ Introduce development process 10:55:28 agenda+ Divide work and assign responsibles 10:55:35 agenda+ Find date for next meeting 10:56:27 Team_(er)11:00Z has now started 10:56:34 +??P0 11:02:06 ChrisR has joined #er 11:02:11 +Klaus/Johannes/Thomas 11:02:15 +Shadi 11:02:51 zakim, ??p0 is really Steve 11:02:51 +Steve; got it 11:03:04 What is the conference code on Zakim for the call? 11:03:31 Andrew has joined #er 11:03:52 hello all - just arrived home - will dial in real soon 11:04:00 zakim, code? 11:04:00 the conference code is 83261 (tel:+1.617.761.6200), shadi 11:04:08 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tools/2005Nov/0001.html 11:04:34 +??P3 11:04:40 +Sandor_Herramhof 11:04:46 zakim, ??p3 is really Chris 11:04:46 +Chris; got it 11:05:43 Sandor has joined #er 11:05:53 zakim, who is on the call? 11:05:53 On the phone I see Steve, Klaus/Johannes/Thomas, Shadi, Chris, Sandor_Herramhof 11:06:13 +??P4 11:06:20 zakim, ??p4 in Andrew 11:06:20 I don't understand '??p4 in Andrew', Andrew 11:06:40 zakim, ??p4 is Andrew 11:06:40 +Andrew; got it 11:06:58 zakim, pick a victim 11:06:59 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Andrew 11:07:25 zakim, take up agendum 1 11:07:25 agendum 1. "Introduce ET TF Work Statement" taken up [from shadi] 11:08:21 Shadi: refer and 11:09:01 Shadi: interface is not our task - that is the role of EOWG 11:09:26 Sahdi: our role is to port the information from the static pages to the database 11:09:44 Shadi: phase 1 - is to port the information 11:10:10 Shadi: pahe 2 (optional) is to expand the list with additional tools that might be missing 11:10:29 s/pahe/phase 11:10:57 Shadi: we are looking at a 1 month spurt of activity - finish by Christmas 11:11:23 Zakim, who is on the call? 11:11:24 On the phone I see Steve, Klaus/Johannes/Thomas, Shadi, Chris, Sandor_Herramhof, Andrew 11:12:28 Present: Steve Faulkner, Klaus/Johannes/Thomas, Shadi Abou-Zahra, Chris, Sandor_Herramhof, Andrew Arch 11:12:51 Yehya has joined #er 11:13:32 Steve: what if we haven't finished? 11:14:02 Shadi: we will try and finish by then, but the list will remain open for ongoing work as required 11:14:41 Sandor: what if tool developers do not respond? 11:15:13 Shadi: I'm hoping they will respond - if not we will have to judge on a case-by-case basis 11:15:16 s/Sandor/Carlos 11:15:37 Present + Yeyha 11:15:53 Present + Carlos Velsco 11:16:12 Yes, but unfortunatly my phone does not work! 11:16:20 Present - Klaus/Johannes/Thomas 11:18:51 Steve: why can't we publish the public info (from the current list or from their site) even if they don't say "yes" 11:19:07 Shadi: we may misrepresent them 11:19:59 Shadi: mostly it is straight forward 11:21:04 Discussion: we don't relay need them permission, but give them an opportunity to respond. If no response, then publish or not depending on each case 11:22:07 Shadi: I don't want to hold anything up because a developer does not respond - as long as we don't "make it up" then it should be ok 11:23:04 Sandor: who should we approach the companies? If they get a random email from Sandor Herramhof, then it likely to be ignored 11:23:13 s/who/how 11:23:48 Shadi: lets see what we have as an email - should be ok with a good email and a good subject 11:25:02 zakim, close agendum 1 11:25:02 agendum 1, Introduce ET TF Work Statement, closed 11:25:03 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 11:25:04 2. Introduce development process [from shadi] 11:25:06 zakim, take up agendum 2 11:25:06 agendum 2. "Introduce development process" taken up [from shadi] 11:25:28 Shadi: see 11:26:57 Shadi: normally your regular W3C UserName & Password will give you access 11:27:40 Shadi: it is a form that will generate an email to send to the tool developer, or an RDF entry that can be plugged into the database 11:28:16 Shadi: uploads the form to a new location ... 11:28:25 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/entry-temp.php 11:28:39 Shadi: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/entry-temp.php 11:29:29 Yeyha, can you see the form? 11:30:28 hadi: two parts - vendor & tool details AND tool features 11:30:37 s/hadi/shadi 11:30:45 carlos has joined #er 11:31:28 yes, I can 11:31:43 Shadi: if anything is missing from the checkbox choices, then add to Other and it will be added 11:32:13 Shadi: if any categories are missing, then send me a note (and CC the list) and I'll see what I can do 11:32:15 It looks very detailed, I will check it further 11:33:06 Carlos: should each version be a separate entry? 11:33:38 Shadi: it depends - often thye are two quite different version, eg a desktop version and an online version 11:33:57 Stave: where do we put the fact that it is an online version? 11:34:14 Shadi: under "user interface" - needs to be addedd 11:34:26 action: add online services as types of tools (possible in UI) 11:36:55 Carlos: what about CMS tools under Authoring Tool Compatibility 11:39:19 Action: Change the term "compatibility" to "integration" 11:39:22 action: feedback for EOWG, change "compatibility" to "integration" 11:39:58 zakim, drop action 3 11:39:58 I don't understand 'drop action 3', shadi 11:40:02 Steve: we also need "tool version" 11:40:11 action: add tool version 11:40:22 rrsagent, drop action 3 11:40:53 action: add HTML to export formats 11:41:25 action: add CSV to export formats 11:43:01 Carlos: what about indicating the target audience? Developers vs Managers, etc 11:43:25 Shadi: this is scope creep - lets refer this back to EOWG 11:46:47 action: feedback for EOWG, consider target audience and target customers 11:47:20 Shadi: other information can always go into the "description" field 11:48:17 Shadi: at the end of the form, you can generate an email (to copy and paste) and send to the vendor/developer OR generate an entry 11:49:00 Steve: headers are required to make the data understandable 11:49:14 Shadi: I'm working on that 11:51:58 Carlos: the third sentence needs to mention the data source 11:52:12 Andrew: what about the "subject" for the email? 11:53:08 Steve: need to select a subject that will get filtered as SPAM 11:53:48 Yehya has joined #er 11:54:19 Andrew: what about just "w3c accessibility tool list updates"? 11:54:25 proposed topic: W3C List of Evaluation Tools 11:54:54 Shadi: proposed subject "W3C List of Evaluation Tools" 11:55:25 Steve: the current wording implies that a non-response will lead to no list 11:56:22 suggested text: "Please review this information, complete any missing fields or provide changes" 11:57:15 Shadi: suggested text: "Please review this information, complete any missing fields or provide changes" 11:57:35 Steve: what about offering an option to not be listed? 11:59:06 Andrew: we shouild tell them we will publish this information unless we recceive corrections or ammendments 11:59:19 s/shouild/should 12:00:48 This information will be published unless we receive correction or ammendments. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact 12:00:48 12:00:48 12:01:40 carlos has joined #er 12:02:16 Action: shadi to amend form accounting from the previous discussion points 12:02:32 s/from/for 12:03:34 Shadi: WRT generating an entry - just copy and paste into an email and send to Shadi PLUS list 12:04:31 Shadi: When info is received back from vendor/developer, then re-enter and send entry to Shadi & list 12:04:49 Carlos: but means we have to enter twice? 12:05:11 Shadi: means it will be correct from the vendor/developer 12:05:39 Shadi: and just a short term use - so can we live with this? 12:06:55 zakim, close agendum 2 12:06:55 agendum 2, Introduce development process, closed 12:06:56 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 12:06:57 3. Divide work and assign responsibles [from shadi] 12:07:02 zakim, take up agendum 3 12:07:02 agendum 3. "Divide work and assign responsibles" taken up [from shadi] 12:07:12 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2005/tools 12:07:34 Shadi: see - 12:12:43 Andrew: Shadi should just assign, say, 5 each to those of us already participating - leaves some for others who are not on the call, or still have to be approved 12:13:19 Action: Shadi to assign 5 tools to each participant - starting from the top 12:14:14 Sandor: offering to take extra, say 10 12:14:39 Steve: we can all ask for extras when we finish the ones assigned 12:15:50 Yehya, are you happy to get assigned 5 tools? 12:15:53 zakim, close agendum 3 12:15:53 agendum 3, Divide work and assign responsibles, closed 12:15:54 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 12:15:55 4. Find date for next meeting [from shadi] 12:15:56 zakim, take up agendum 4 12:15:56 agendum 4. "Find date for next meeting" taken up [from shadi] 12:17:40 Shadi: Thursday 24th at the same time 12:17:57 5 are ok., when finished I could ask for other 12:18:09 yes, please! :) 12:18:44 -Chris 12:18:46 scribe: andrew 12:18:48 ChrisR has left #er 12:18:50 -Klaus/Johannes/Thomas 12:18:52 -Sandor_Herramhof 12:18:54 Shadi: and then, tentatively, Wednesday 30th November 12:19:10 -Steve 12:19:27 -Shadi 12:19:28 Team_(er)11:00Z has ended 12:19:29 Attendees were Klaus/Johannes/Thomas, Shadi, Steve, Sandor_Herramhof, Chris, Andrew 12:19:34 regrets: Johannes 12:19:48 scibenick: andrew 12:19:55 rrsagent, make logs world 12:20:04 scribenick: Andrew 12:20:05 zakim, bye 12:20:05 Zakim has left #er 12:20:06 Yehya has left #er 12:20:12 rrsagent, make minutes 12:20:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/11/14-er-minutes.html shadi 12:21:01 shadi - have you heard from Shawn lately? 12:21:26 rrsagent, bye 12:21:26 I see 8 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/14-er-actions.rdf : 12:21:26 ACTION: add online services as types of tools (possible in UI) [1] 12:21:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/14-er-irc#T11-34-26 12:21:26 ACTION: Change the term "compatibility" to "integration" [2] 12:21:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/14-er-irc#T11-39-19 12:21:26 ACTION: add tool version [4] 12:21:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/14-er-irc#T11-40-11 12:21:26 ACTION: add HTML to export formats [5] 12:21:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/14-er-irc#T11-40-53 12:21:26 ACTION: add CSV to export formats [6] 12:21:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/14-er-irc#T11-41-25 12:21:26 ACTION: feedback for EOWG, consider target audience and target customers [7] 12:21:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/14-er-irc#T11-46-47 12:21:26 ACTION: shadi to amend form accounting from the previous discussion points [8] 12:21:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/14-er-irc#T12-02-16 12:21:26 ACTION: Shadi to assign 5 tools to each participant - starting from the top [9] 12:21:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/14-er-irc#T12-13-19 12:21:35 about what? 12:21:48 she wanted to talk to me last week about the Melb meeting, but I never heard from her (not this week yet), though I sent her times I wouold be around 12:22:26 hmmm, she is usually quite good at responding