07:31:29 RRSAgent has joined #er 07:31:29 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/10/18-er-irc 07:31:38 meeting: ERT F2F Day 2 07:31:53 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-annotation/2002JanJun/0156.html 07:32:44 Agenda+ Persistence (Checksum for WebContent, Checksum for Location, Fuzzy pointers) 07:33:16 TOPIC: Persistence 07:33:20 Agenda+ Other Business (EARL Guide, Development time line) 07:34:01 sandor has joined #er 07:34:58 chaals has joined #er 07:36:00 NK: URI and XPointer are not sufficient for several problems 07:36:51 NK: e.g. misspelling of a certain word in some paragraph in some document at a given time 07:38:42 NK: reduce markup to some normalized version in order to detect different levels of change 07:40:13 NK: also works with some (not too bad) tag soup 07:43:26 NK/SAZ: some test results may be affected by certain changes, others may not 07:45:59 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-annotation/2002JanJun/0076.html 07:46:13 SAZ: do we have to double-check everthing? 07:46:42 JL: not necessarily 07:49:29 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2002Feb/0002.html 07:49:56 JK: there is a difference between automatic and manual tests here 07:52:20 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2002Jul/att-0017/metrics 08:01:03 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2005Mar/att-0062/errors 08:01:17 JL: it's not only about performing the test, but also displaying test results 08:09:09 value 08:10:32 JL: there are more types of metadata than hashes only 08:11:20 value 08:13:13 SAZ: persistency seems to have no top priority 08:16:00 NK: provide a web service to calculate the invariance-measure 08:17:50 SAZ: put hooks for persistence into EARL? 08:18:42 NK: needs to be optional 08:23:23 NK: per-page measures (HTTP headers: last-modified, content-md5, ...), per-element measures (hash on element structure) 08:24:52 NK: put hooks into Assertion 08:25:05 CMN: put hooks into Location 08:28:44 JL/CMN: property of TestSubject 08:29:36 SAZ: XPath may also be used 08:30:52 chaals has joined #er 08:44:29 chaals has joined #er 08:47:14 chaals has joined #er 08:48:21 chaals has joined #er 08:48:30 JohannesK has joined #er 08:49:02 chaals has joined #er 09:03:14 SAZ: hooks for delivery unit level 09:04:08 SAZ: do we need more stuff in WebContent? 09:04:25 rrsagent, draft minutes 09:04:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/10/18-er-minutes.html chaals 09:04:35 rrsagent, make log public 09:11:23 09:14:20 jl, nk: http headers should be stored parsed and queryable, not as a blob 09:15:16 09:17:24 nk: can store http as
with name and value properties or as value 09:17:51 cmn: can use annotea's unofficial namespace for http headers 09:18:01 http://www.w3.org/1999/xx/http 09:19:14 ericP, question about http://www.w3.org/1999/xx/http - do you think we could take over that namespace and extend it a little? 09:19:44 that was quick 09:19:52 have to run off. will think about it... 09:20:08 JibberJim, please relay to chaals when he finds his way back 09:20:24 eric, you are being projected :) 09:20:34 chaals can read you... 09:20:38 we are at f2f 09:21:54 chaals has joined #er 09:22:03 nk: don't enumerate headers because it makes it messy to extend 09:22:33 cmn: do enumerate http headers 09:22:38 chaals: It is a bad idea to use things we don't enumerate. 09:25:49 saz: do we need both content-type and dc:format? 09:25:56 http:ContentType 09:25:59 nk: probably good to have both 09:26:18 http:lastModified 09:26:47 http:language 09:26:58 jl, cmn: dc:format not very useful 09:27:55 MD5, e-tag 09:28:04 http:ContentEncoding 09:28:12 http:ContentLocation 09:28:13 vary 09:28:16 content-* 09:29:24 accept-foo 09:29:40 cookies and authentication 09:30:28 cookies and authentication - may be problematic to store 09:36:02 saz: do we range for http? 09:36:17 cmn: probably no 09:37:11 rrsagent, draft minutes 09:37:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/10/18-er-minutes.html chaals 09:37:22 action: jk to update proposal for recording http transaction info 09:38:01 Present: Shadi, CarlosV, Nick, Yehya, Chaals, JibberJim, CarlosI, Sandor, Johannes 09:38:23 Chair: Shadi 09:38:33 ScribeNick: niq 09:40:45 cmn: can store webcontent as body on that 09:42:19 nk: if we provide that hook, should also allow choice of representations 09:49:20 jl: people can use own has-copy; public copies are not earl's business 09:49:35 [we could live without doing the work of defining what to use. dc:hasVersion is what I was thinking of] 09:52:28 saz: outstanding issue is invariance measure; subject otherwise closed 09:55:11 saz: we should sort the world's problems before refining webcontent further 09:56:01 s/before refining/before word-smithing about 09:57:21 saz: are we done with location once we have hooked in invariance measure? 09:58:06 "a rose by any other name ..." 09:59:17 current proposal: value 10:04:12 foo < value > 10:06:02 Zakim has left #er 10:06:20 Zakim has joined #er 10:06:35 q+ to ask what role Zakim plays here 10:10:09 class: Representation 10:10:31 properties: method, value 10:13:14 (possibly further hasVersion recursions) 10:13:54 ericP: far too late, sorry 10:14:07 chaals, what's the objective in taking over xx/http instead of extending it in another namespace? 10:14:21 oh well 10:14:33 [slightly reducing the number of namespaces people deal with] 10:15:07 namespaces-soup 10:18:39 saz: lunch! 10:19:53 rrsagent, draft minutes 10:19:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/10/18-er-minutes.html chaals 11:10:09 CarlosI has joined #er 11:12:43 JohannesK has joined #er 11:13:35 JibberJim has joined #er 11:20:44 chaals has joined #er 11:35:48 ScribeNick: Chaals 11:36:30 SAZ: Request for everyone to have a look andd think about what other milestones we need to accomplish before we can get to last call 11:37:21 Nick: Would be nice to be able to describe actions and processes 11:37:26 SAZ: want to write that up? 11:37:58 JL: What is needed? Surely it is just a dscription of a test subject - which is outside of our scope of work. There isn't anything else the EARL needs to supoprt that 11:38:08 NK: None of our location stuff would handle it 11:38:16 bah, humbug 11:38:29 JL: Right, but we are not limited to the ones we have - we just create some for our own use and EARL allows you tp create others 11:38:42 NK: agree with Jim. 11:38:45 SEP 11:39:37 JL: We should look at other use cases, and do smething if EARL makes it impossible to do, but we ddon't need to do all the work for ourselves. 11:39:46 SEP == Someone Else's Problem 11:40:56 SAZ: There are a couple of action items open, some changes to be made, so we can put together a new working draft mid-late november? Depends on how fast things are done. 11:42:34 SAZ: Next thing is the EARL Guide 11:42:45 YOUR WIFE IS A BIG HIPPO! 11:42:48 q- 11:43:26 SAZ: Anyone interested? 11:43:40 CarlosV: yes... what's the timeline? 11:45:41 -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/talks/200311-earl/all earl by example - step by step guide that should be updated and could be a basis 11:51:01 Action: CarlosV get some shape to an EARL guide 11:51:29 SAZ: Next meeting 8 November 11:54:59 Chaals: Should we have the optional properties listed in the Schema? 11:55:23 SAZ: There are a lot of otional things. Developers can look at the schema and see at a glance what they need to support. 11:55:50 This makes the whole thing verbose, and is why there is the BNF, and so on. 11:56:23 JL: The developers who aren't going to read the prose are more likely to look at example EARL files than the actual schema, especially if the scchema is very verbose 12:00:14 CMN: Think the table is a lot clearer than mixing stuff into the schema. I like the table - but we also need to look at conformance requirements in general. 12:00:41 CV: Would like more examples, too 12:00:52 ... and code examples using it would be good. 12:01:34 SAZ: Don't think it is a good thing to do stuff in a Rec based on specific implementation 12:01:57 CI: Would like examples, too 12:04:09 chaals: lots of examples would be good, and hera can generate lots of those with ease 12:04:16 Chaals said HERA has bugs 12:04:27 chaals: But does have to be updated to the latest schema version 12:04:58 CV: Since we are using DC and FOAF, some kind of appendix about those would be good 12:05:16 Chaals: Guide should cover that material 12:06:15 RESOLUTION: Optional properties will be dropped from the shema 12:12:25 s/RESOLUTION/PROPOSED RESOLUTION/ 12:13:03 SAZ: What if I want to get all the optional properties using Jena, to determine whether I have all the optional properties implemented in my non-RDF tool 12:13:41 is there an earl report of all earl reports that don't contain themselves? 12:13:44 Chaals: Why would anyone do that? If you have an RDF tool it handles all RDF, if not then why would you use an RDF tool to read the schema and generate the table for you, instead of reading the table 12:15:43 SAZ: What about having another appendix with the verbose stuff, and the abbreviated schema being normative 12:16:27 CMN Would get rid of the N3 and the verbose stuff - the smaller the spec, the mnore chance it has of getting read. 12:17:42 chaals dances on the table 12:18:10 RESOLUTION: Optional properties will be dropped from the shema, and the n3 will be dropped from the spec 12:19:08 [ 12:19:39 TOPIC: Break 12:20:06 Chaals: Some things outstanding - conformance to EARL (tools, doccumments, ...) 12:20:23 SAZ: CarlosI has an action item to write about test subjects 12:20:46 SAZ: Nick might be adding some stuff about his thoughts on hash 12:21:07 Conformance likely to be clearer when we ahve the new schema in place. 12:21:19 too late in the day - my thoughts on hash have gone to pot 12:21:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:21:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/10/18-er-minutes.html chaals 12:34:39 chaals has joined #er 12:43:15 bentoweb.org 12:45:15 TOPIC: Test Case Description Language (TCDL) by BenToWeb project 12:45:27 CV: bentoweb EU funded to work on EARL and WAI test suites and improve algorithms for language simplicity colour blindness etc. 12:45:44 CV: TCDL - test case description language, XML not RDF 12:46:18 CV: 4 major components in testCaseDescription formalMetadata, technology, testCase and rules 12:47:07 CV: for every testcase there are successCriterion 12:47:44 CV: a ruleset contains guidelines and success criteria 12:49:06 rulesets URL: http://bentoweb.org/refs/rulesets.xml 12:50:39 CV: points to specs to identify the successCriterion for the ruleset 12:51:56 CV: for every test case you have the formalMetadata which is description and Dublin Core data and the source - where the testCase came from 12:53:32 CV: Then there's the recommendation, which is what mark-up language is the test relevant too 12:54:52 chaals has left #er 12:55:04 CV: rules, a collection of rules to meet the test, locations and expected results and the outcome etc. 12:57:11 CV: test describes the purpose and preconditions of the test and the files to be used, as well as other info required to run the test 12:57:56 CV: example file will be on the web soon... 12:59:40 CV: created 400 testcases for WCAG 2 13:00:11 chaals has joined #er 13:01:50 SAZ: Why not EARL results? 13:02:04 CV: because Earl wasn't stable 13:03:12 chaals has joined #er 13:03:14 CV: We're using location based on line/col and xpath 13:04:39 CV: we opted for xml as we could parse it, which we couldn't RDF 13:05:13 CV: We could map it to RDF with xslt for public consumption 13:05:42 SAZ: Will you adopt EARL more actively? 13:06:02 CV: Absolutely, we were just on a tight deadline and to start quickly. 13:08:22 CV: the earl:requirement will be the same as our ruleSet 13:12:02 SAZ: Does anyone want to work on test suite for WCAG? 13:14:44 chaals: I'm not too excited by test suites, and wcag 2 seems like something santa might bring 13:15:09 chaals: more exiting would be test suites that are in WCAG 1 which are likely to be in 2 13:15:51 wcag isa can of rancid worms 13:18:37 SAZ: we want to review wcag 2 tests... 13:23:34 http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ is teh current public draft 13:23:51 It's, umm, not very clear. 13:24:49 SAZ: There's life beyond EARL 13:24:58 chaals: but we should finish EARL first... 13:28:11 SAZ: we all agree a Test case description language is important, but we should postpone it until EARL is done. 13:33:30 chaals: UAAG and ATAG are interesting and valuable future direction 13:35:57 chaals: Other area of interest is PF but it's all private so we can't talk to them... 13:38:03 chaals: They've published a roadmap for DHTML Accessibility at http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/roadmap/DHTMLRoadmap092305.html 13:40:42 SAZ: time change of meeting... 13:40:58 SAZ: we should attract more people if possible... 13:42:05 action: Shadi to investigate possible meeting times 13:42:27 SAZ: Thanks! 13:46:33 SAZ: Meeting Adjourned. 13:47:53 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html 13:48:29 saz: next meet cannes can-can ? 13:54:02 technical plenary 27 feb - 3 march 13:55:00 if not, possibly in spain (invitation by CTIC) some time around that date 13:56:14 rrsagent, make minutes 13:56:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/10/18-er-minutes.html shadi 13:56:25 rrsagent, make logs world 13:56:27 rrsagent, make minutes 13:56:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/10/18-er-minutes.html shadi 13:56:40 zakim, bye 13:56:40 Zakim has left #er 13:56:42 rrsagent, bye 13:56:42 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/18-er-actions.rdf : 13:56:42 ACTION: jk to update proposal for recording http transaction info [1] 13:56:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/18-er-irc#T09-37-22 13:56:42 ACTION: CarlosV get some shape to an EARL guide [2] 13:56:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/18-er-irc#T11-51-01 13:56:42 ACTION: Shadi to investigate possible meeting times [3] 13:56:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/18-er-irc#T13-42-05