IRC log of dawg on 2005-09-27

Timestamps are in UTC.

14:30:04 [RRSAgent]

RRSAgent has joined #dawg

14:30:04 [RRSAgent]

logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc

14:30:06 [Zakim]

Zakim has joined #dawg

14:30:23 [AndyS]

zakim, who is on the phone?

14:30:23 [Zakim]

sorry, AndyS, I don't know what conference this is

14:30:24 [Zakim]

On IRC I see RRSAgent, kendall, LeeF, bijan, patH, DaveB, AndyS, SteveH, afs, ericP, DanC

14:30:33 [DanC]

agenda + Convene, take roll, review records and agenda

14:30:37 [DanC]

Zakim, this is DAWG

14:30:37 [Zakim]

ok, DanC; that matches SW_DAWG()10:30AM

14:30:40 [AndyS]

zakim, who is on the phone?

14:30:40 [Zakim]

On the phone I see ??P2, ??P4, PatH

14:30:50 [DanC]

agenda + Protocol Last Call

14:30:52 [AndyS]

zakim, ??p2 is HPLB

14:30:52 [Zakim]

+HPLB; got it

14:30:54 [Zakim]

+Kendall_Clark

14:30:56 [DanC]

agenda + SPARQL Protocol and WSDL

14:31:03 [AndyS]

zakim, hplb has AndyS, DaveB

14:31:03 [Zakim]

+AndyS, DaveB; got it

14:31:04 [DanC]

agenda + issues#sort

14:31:14 [DanC]

agenda + BASE IRI resolution comment

14:31:14 [kendall]

I think I'm scribing today.

14:31:20 [kendall]

-alas-

14:31:25 [Zakim]

+[IBMCambridge]

14:31:32 [LeeF]

zakim, [IBMCambridge] is temporarily LeeF

14:31:32 [Zakim]

+LeeF; got it

14:31:32 [DanC]

well, I consider it a good thing, kendall :)

14:31:40 [kendall]

:)

14:31:42 [DanC]

agenda 5=BASE IRI resolution comment **

14:31:45 [kendall]

I suck at it, but okay.

14:31:52 [DanC]

agenda + issues#valueTesting: handling type "error"s

14:32:00 [DanC]

agenda + issues#rdfSemantics, issues#owlDisjunction **

14:32:04 [LeeF]

zakim, please mute me

14:32:06 [Zakim]

LeeF should now be muted

14:32:15 [DanC]

agenda + SPARQL QL grammar, issues#punctuationSyntax

14:32:24 [DanC]

agenda + issues#badIRIRef

14:32:35 [Zakim]

+DanC

14:32:38 [Zakim]

+EricP

14:32:55 [DanC]

Zakim, take up item 1

14:32:55 [Zakim]

agendum 1. "Convene, take roll, review records and agenda" taken up [from DanC]

14:32:57 [kendall]

Anyone notice that a CS prof, Jon Kleinberg, got a MacArthur ("genius") grant? He apparently does algorithm design but also WWW research.

14:32:57 [DanC]

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/att-0489/_ag27sep.html

14:33:28 [LeeF]

zakim, please unmute me

14:33:28 [Zakim]

LeeF should no longer be muted

14:33:47 [danbri]

danbri has joined #dawg

14:34:44 [EliasT]

EliasT has joined #dawg

14:35:10 [kendall]

s/halo/mandela/ :)

14:35:22 [Zakim]

+ +1.617.496.aabb

14:35:34 [EliasT]

Zakim, +1.617.496.aabb is EliasT

14:35:34 [Zakim]

+EliasT; got it

14:35:40 [DanC]

Zakim, who's on the phone?

14:35:41 [Zakim]

On the phone I see HPLB, ??P4, PatH, Kendall_Clark, LeeF, DanC, EricP, EliasT

14:35:42 [Zakim]

HPLB has AndyS, DaveB

14:35:51 [EliasT]

Zakim, mute me

14:35:51 [Zakim]

EliasT should now be muted

14:36:08 [DanC]

Zakim, ??P4 is Souri

14:36:08 [Zakim]

+Souri; got it

14:36:16 [DanC]

Regrets: SteveH

14:36:23 [DanC]

Regrets: SteveH, Jeen

14:36:26 [kendall]

Attending: Souri, EricP, me, Pat, Andy, Lee, Dan, Elias

14:36:33 [DanC]

Regrets: SteveH, Jeen, JosD

14:36:54 [DanC]

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/att-0446/dawg-13sep.html__charset_ISO-8859-1 minutes 13 Sep

14:37:07 [kendall]

Minutes approve

14:37:15 [kendall]

d

14:37:17 [kendall]

:>

14:37:42 [DaveB]

(Regrets for me 4Oct)

14:37:45 [kendall]

I'm at risk for 4 Oct.

14:38:07 [DanC]

EricP is at risk 4 Oct

14:38:32 [DanC]

bijan, are you and enrico still planning to be here 4 Oct?

14:38:44 [bijan]

I am

14:38:52 [bijan]

I can't speak for enrico but he's not told me not

14:38:53 [DanC]

ok. you don't care to scribe, do you? 1/2 ;-)

14:39:00 [kendall]

I'm leaving for .MX on the 5th, so there's a good chance I'll have to miss telcon.

14:39:04 [bijan]

I don't care to scribe :)

14:39:06 [DanC]

Zakim, pick a scribe

14:39:06 [Zakim]

Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose DaveB

14:39:08 [DanC]

Zakim, pick a scribe

14:39:08 [Zakim]

Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose DaveB

14:39:10 [DanC]

Zakim, pick a scribe

14:39:10 [Zakim]

Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose EricP

14:39:13 [DanC]

Zakim, pick a scribe

14:39:13 [Zakim]

Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Kendall_Clark

14:39:15 [DanC]

Zakim, pick a scribe

14:39:16 [Zakim]

Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose DanC

14:39:24 [DanC]

Zakim, pick a scribe

14:39:24 [Zakim]

Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose LeeF

14:39:50 [DanC]

scribe for 4 Oct: LeeF

14:40:15 [DanC]

DONE: ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases

14:40:26 [DanC]

DONE: ACTION: SteveH to review the relevant test case re: IRI normalization

14:40:35 [DanC]

ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple [continues]

14:40:44 [DanC]

ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve [continues]

14:40:54 [DanC]

ACTION: ericp to draft lang-match design, summarizing and citing RFC3066 [continues]

14:41:15 [DanC]

Zakim, next item

14:41:15 [Zakim]

agendum 2. "Protocol Last Call" taken up [from DanC]

14:41:51 [DanC]

-> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/ protocol lcwd

14:43:44 [DanC]

-> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/sparql-protocol-query.wsdl wsdl

14:44:25 [ericP]

Content-Type: application/wsdl+xml

14:44:45 [DanC]

targetNamespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/#">

14:45:20 [DanC]

and I get 404 @ http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/ [which means it shouldn't have been published]

14:48:35 [DanC]

ACTION EricP: arrange for 200 response from http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/

14:48:48 [DanC]

xmlns:st="http://www.w3.org/2005/09/sparql-protocol-types/#"

14:49:15 [DanC]

sparql-protocol-types.xsd,v 1.1 2005/09/14 15:04:07 eric Exp

14:49:30 [DanC]

happy enough

14:49:50 [patH]

patH has left #dawg

14:49:56 [DanC]

KC: yes, sparql-protocol-types.xsd,v 1.1 2005/09/14 15:04:07 is happy enough

14:50:17 [kendall]

some confusion caused by .../2005/08/... and .../2005/09/... URIs

14:50:42 [patH]

patH has joined #dawg

14:51:00 [DanC]

... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html

14:52:43 [DanC]

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0077.html David Wood: SPARQL Protocol Review and Comments

14:53:04 [LeeF]

Kendall, isn't this the latest version actually:

14:53:04 [LeeF]

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-types.xsd ? ( 2005/09/21 )

14:55:45 [DanC]

LeeF, is that interestingly different from sparql-protocol-types.xsd,v 1.1 2005/09/14 15:04:07 ?

14:55:54 [DanC]

i.e. other than CVS keywords?

14:55:59 [LeeF]

Yes

14:56:04 [LeeF]

It removes a stray "/>"

14:56:13 [LeeF]

And adds an import of the result format XSD

14:56:26 [EliasT]

Lee, there's an xs:import on that one..

14:56:31 [LeeF]

On which one?

14:56:45 [EliasT]

sorry... I saw this one: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-types.xsd

14:56:59 [LeeF]

Right - that's the 9/21 latest one AFAIK

14:57:02 [LeeF]

http://www.w3.org/2005/09/sparql-protocol-types/# is older

14:57:30 [EliasT]

Zakim, unmute me

14:57:30 [Zakim]

EliasT should no longer be muted

14:58:21 [AndyS]

Won't I have to change code for the SOAP binding (not a block as not widely deployed)?

15:00:56 [DanC]

KC: David Wood's comments were substantial... as he's affiliated with UMD, I've had some offline discussion and I think he'll be satisfied with some minor editorial changes.

15:01:37 [kendall]

yep

15:02:04 [DanC]

Zakim, next item

15:02:04 [Zakim]

agendum 3. "SPARQL Protocol and WSDL" taken up [from DanC]

15:02:26 [DanC]

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0505.html Update and issues: ACTION: LeeF to draft WSDL 1.1 for SPARQL thingy with AndyS and Elias

15:02:43 [DanC]

DONE: ACTION: LeeF to draft WSDL 1.1 for SPARQL thingy with AndyS and Elias

15:05:45 [DanC]

discussion of protocol types... seq/all... the all construct we used seems to be invalid

15:06:13 [LeeF]

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-types.xsd

15:06:18 [AndyS]

Children of query-request : parent of default-graph-uri

15:06:43 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to change revert query-request from xs:all back to xs:seq

15:06:51 [AndyS]

Schema issue: wants any number, any order of items

15:06:55 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to revert query-request from xs:all back to xs:seq

15:06:57 [DaveB]

(just the first xs:all)

15:07:56 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to revert query-request from xs:all back to xs:seq, noting with regret this is due to limiations of XML Schema

15:07:58 [kendall]

kendall has joined #dawg

15:08:21 [AndyS]

+1

15:08:40 [kendall]

zakim, mute me

15:08:40 [Zakim]

Kendall_Clark should now be muted

15:08:57 [DanC]

so RESOLVED.

15:09:10 [kendall]

zakim, unmute me

15:09:10 [Zakim]

Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted

15:09:20 [kendall]

zakim, mute me

15:09:20 [Zakim]

Kendall_Clark should now be muted

15:09:20 [DanC]

ACTION KC: revert query-request from xs:all back to xs:seq and note this is due to limiations of XML Schema

15:09:42 [kendall]

zakim, unmute me

15:09:42 [Zakim]

Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted

15:10:16 [kendall]

zakim, mute me

15:10:16 [Zakim]

Kendall_Clark should now be muted

15:11:13 [kendall]

zakim, unmute me

15:11:13 [Zakim]

Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted

15:11:40 [DaveB]

here's as far as I got in 2001 - http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/discovery/2001/09/rdf-xml-schema/

15:15:36 [DaveB]

ref to http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/#section-RELAXNG-Schema

15:15:59 [DanC]

discussion of how to describe RDF/XML from WSDL ... whether to use XSD with any and a comment/annotation, or relax-ng per RDF/XML spec, or both

15:16:48 [DanC]

(a) from sparql-protocol types, reference an .xsd that gives a "stub" definition of rdf:RDF

15:16:50 [kendall]

LeeF: 1. Change the normative XSD to reference a basic RDF schema

15:17:20 [kendall]

LeeF: 2. Fork the XSD to have a copy for the WSDL 1.1

15:19:02 [DanC]

2. ... and keep the existing XSD description of rdf:RDF

15:20:16 [DanC]

3. Fork the XSD to have a stub XSD declaration of rdf:RDF for the WSDL 1.1, and a relax-ng description for normative WSDL 2.0

15:21:08 [DanC]

3. Fork the XSD. One copy has a stub XSD declaration of rdf:RDF for the WSDL 1.1. The other has a relax-ng description for normative WSDL 2.0

15:22:21 [DanC]

considered both stub XSD and relax-ng descriptions of rdf:RDF, but it doesn't seem to be technically possible.

15:23:25 [DanC]

Lee: I don't see much concrete benefit to using the relanx-ng description of rdf:RDF in this context

15:23:59 [LeeF]

That was Elias

15:24:14 [DanC]

s/Lee: I/Elias: I/

15:26:05 [kendall]

PROPOSED: To add a new schema doc, rdf.xsd, which sparql protocol types document imports.

15:26:10 [DanC]

(the "stub" should say 'any', plus have a link to the RDF/XML scpec)

15:27:46 [kendall]

It clearly sucks. :>

15:28:10 [LeeF]

It's a choice between sucking but allowing tools to work easily, and not sucking but not allowing tools to work without jumping through hoops.

15:28:15 [DanC]

so RESOLVED. Hayes abstaining

15:28:16 [kendall]

0 objections, PatH abstaining

15:29:07 [kendall]

thx

15:29:11 [DaveB]

see rdf.xsd in http://thefigtrees.net/DAWG/sparql-wsdl-1.1-note.html

15:29:52 [DanC]

ACTION KC: review sparql-types for xs:any weirdness

15:30:33 [DanC]

ACTION 6 = KC: review sparql-types for xs:any weirdness, w.r.t. WSDL 2.0 constraints

15:31:00 [EliasT]

Zakim, mute me

15:31:00 [Zakim]

EliasT should now be muted

15:31:35 [DaveB]

<soap:operation style="document" soapAction="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/#query-action" />

15:32:18 [ericP]

http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/

15:33:20 [DanC]

KC's actions to send WSDL comments are DONE...

15:33:53 [DanC]

ACTION DanC: notifty DAWG of WSDL response to our WSDL comments

15:35:03 [kendall]

Is it feasible or sensible to add the WSDL 1.1 stuff as an appendix of our spec?

15:36:30 [EliasT]

Zakim, unmute me

15:36:30 [Zakim]

EliasT should no longer be muted

15:37:38 [kendall]

KC: Wondering whether the normative spec should reference the WSDL 1.1 Note.

15:37:47 [kendall]

Elias & Lee (?) seem to be okay with that

15:37:55 [EliasT]

Yes.

15:38:32 [DanC]

ACTION EliasT: elaborate on how to use this WSDL 1.1 stuff with tools

15:38:40 [EliasT]

that was Lee

15:39:14 [DanC]

ACTION 8 = Lee: elaborate on how to use this WSDL 1.1 stuff with tools

15:39:34 [Zakim]

-EliasT

15:39:40 [DanC]

ACTION KC, EricP: review WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol publication candidate, once a candidate pointer is mailed to the WG

15:40:15 [kendall]

I want the right to say Elias is a big meanie! :>

15:40:55 [DanC]

ACTION DanC: help with SOTD of WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol

15:41:25 [patH]

kendall, I think its in the constitution.

15:41:32 [DanC]

ACTION 9 = DanC: publish WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol note, contingent on thumbs-up from KC, EricP, Lee/Elias

15:41:59 [DanC]

Zakim, next item

15:41:59 [Zakim]

agendum 4. "issues#sort" taken up [from DanC]

15:42:19 [kendall]

pat: ah, yes. thankx.

15:43:03 [EliasT]

EliasT has joined #dawg

15:43:18 [DanC]

-> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ 1.493 stuff on < and ORDER

15:43:31 [ericP]

http://unagi/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#defn_Ordered

15:43:44 [ericP]

The "<" operator (see the Operator Mapping Table) defines the relative order of pairs of numerics, xs:dateTimes and xs:strings.

15:44:35 [ericP]

If the ordering condition is a named variable, RDF Literals are compared with the &quot;&lt;&quot; operator (see below) where

15:44:38 [ericP]

possible.

15:44:57 [DanC]

^ new and older, resp.

15:45:03 [ericP]

2005-09-27T11:30:39Z <ericP> i.e. if ?a has the bindings "b", "a", "c", we want to ORDER ?a and ORDER str(?a) to be the same

15:51:27 [DanC]

Zakim, next item

15:51:27 [Zakim]

agendum 5. "BASE IRI resolution comment **" taken up

15:51:35 [DanC]

Zakim, take up item 7

15:51:35 [Zakim]

agendum 7. "issues#rdfSemantics, issues#owlDisjunction **" taken up [from DanC]

15:52:32 [DaveB]

at http://www.w3.org/2005/09/20-dawg-irc

15:52:59 [DanC]

DONE: ACTION Pat: summarize the entailment consensus

15:53:21 [DanC]

ACTION Bijon: take a pass through the editor's draft, listing what will change with the new semantics understanding, and what will not [CONTINUES]

15:53:43 [DanC]

ACTION Enrico: take a pass through the editor's draft, listing what will change with the new semantics understanding ... [CONTINUES]

15:53:47 [Zakim]

-PatH

15:54:31 [DanC]

Zakim, close item 8

15:54:31 [Zakim]

agendum 8, SPARQL QL grammar, issues#punctuationSyntax, closed

15:54:32 [Zakim]

I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is

15:54:33 [Zakim]

5. BASE IRI resolution comment **

15:54:37 [DanC]

Zakim, close item 7

15:54:37 [Zakim]

agendum 7, issues#rdfSemantics, issues#owlDisjunction **, closed

15:54:38 [Zakim]

I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is

15:54:39 [Zakim]

5. BASE IRI resolution comment **

15:54:42 [DanC]

Zakim, take up item 8

15:54:42 [Zakim]

agendum 8. "SPARQL QL grammar, issues#punctuationSyntax" taken up [from DanC]

15:55:17 [DanC]

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0470.html test reviews

15:55:45 [DanC]

everything under SyntaxDev, as discussed in 0470

15:55:49 [DanC]

^right?

15:56:36 [DanC]

ammendment: don't approve syntax-struct-04.rq

15:57:27 [DanC]

ACTION EricP: fix test schema to match manifest with negative tests

15:57:41 [DaveB]

there are two other duplicates: syntax-form-construct05.rq and syntax-form-ask-01.rq

15:57:41 [AndyS]

nor syntax-form-construct06.rq, syntax-form-ask-02

15:58:35 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to approve SyntaxDev, as discussed in 0470, without dups

15:58:42 [DanC]

so RESOLVED.

15:59:26 [DanC]

AFS: grammar is in yakker, not yet in rq23... also there's some BNODE renaming stuff...

16:00:34 [DanC]

ACTION AFS: propose resolution to punctuationSyntax, folding recent yakker grammar into editor's draft

16:01:08 [DanC]

ADJOURN.

16:01:09 [Zakim]

-HPLB

16:01:14 [DanC]

RRSAgent, please draft minutes

16:01:14 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html DanC

16:01:22 [DanC]

RRSAgent, make logs world-access

16:01:30 [Zakim]

-LeeF

16:01:33 [LeeF]

DanC, ericP or whomever else: EliasT has CVS check-in access under DataAccess, but if it's not a problem I could use it also to expedite getting the wsdl 1.1 stuff up there

16:01:50 [DanC]

hmm

16:02:16 [LeeF]

If it's a problem, I'll just get Elias to do it for me :-)

16:02:20 [DanC]

do you have an ssh2 key?

16:02:48 [DanC]

ericp seems interested to help

16:02:52 [ericP]

LeeF, mail me your pub key

16:02:58 [AndyS]

Eric - 5 mins on another thing thing?

16:02:59 [ericP]

or paste it

16:03:09 [ericP]

AndyS, can do

16:03:10 [AndyS]

Eric - 5 mins on another sorting thing?

16:03:12 [LeeF]

let me find it, I use it rarely at most =)

16:03:20 [AndyS]

Phone?

16:03:21 [Zakim]

-Kendall_Clark

16:03:24 [DanC]

Meeting: RDF Data Access Weekly

16:03:30 [DanC]

Chair: DanC

16:03:35 [LeeF]

ericP - will mail it to you a bit later - thanks

16:03:35 [DanC]

Scribe: KC

16:03:41 [DanC]

RRSAgent, please draft minutes

16:03:41 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html DanC

16:04:07 [DanC]

Zakim, bye

16:04:07 [Zakim]

leaving. As of this point the attendees were +1.781.405.aaaa, PatH, Kendall_Clark, AndyS, DaveB, LeeF, DanC, EricP, EliasT, Souri

16:04:07 [Zakim]

Zakim has left #dawg

16:04:12 [DanC]

RRSAgent, please draft minutes

16:04:12 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html DanC

16:06:25 [bijan]

bijan has joined #dawg

16:10:59 [patH]

hey, did anyone want to talk about something with me? Im back now.

16:12:26 [DanC]

I think ericp wanted to talk with you, patH, but he might have gotten what he needs from AndyS

16:13:31 [patH]

OK, great. Bye then, back to work.

16:13:35 [DaveB]

request on ExprBuiltins/result-str-2.ttl change "01 ;' to '01"^^xsd:integer'

16:20:03 [DanC]

RRSAgent, list actions

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

I see 13 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-actions.rdf :

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple [continues] [1]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T14-40-35

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve [continues] [2]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T14-40-44

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: ericp to draft lang-match design, summarizing and citing RFC3066 [continues] [3]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T14-40-54

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: EricP to arrange for 200 response from http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/ [4]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T14-48-35

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: KC to revert query-request from xs:all back to xs:seq and note this is due to limiations of XML Schema [5]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T15-09-20-2

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: KC: review sparql-types for xs:any weirdness, w.r.t. WSDL 2.0 constraints [6]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T15-29-52

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: DanC to notifty DAWG of WSDL response to our WSDL comments [7]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T15-33-53

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: Lee: elaborate on how to use this WSDL 1.1 stuff with tools [8]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T15-38-32

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: DanC: publish WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol note, contingent on thumbs-up from KC, EricP, Lee/Elias [9]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T15-40-55

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: Bijon to take a pass through the editor's draft, listing what will change with the new semantics understanding, and what will not [CONTINUES] [10]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T15-53-21

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: Enrico to take a pass through the editor's draft, listing what will change with the new semantics understanding ... [CONTINUES] [11]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T15-53-43

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: EricP to fix test schema to match manifest with negative tests [12]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T15-57-27

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: AFS to propose resolution to punctuationSyntax, folding recent yakker grammar into editor's draft [13]

16:20:03 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-irc#T16-00-34

16:21:10 [DanC]

RRSAgent, please draft minutes

16:21:10 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html DanC

16:22:29 [DanC]

RRSAgent, stop