20:02:08 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 20:02:08 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/08/04-wai-wcag-irc 20:02:10 +Alex_Li 20:02:15 zakim, ??P3 is Gian 20:02:15 +Gian; got it 20:02:26 Meeting: WCAG Weekly Telecon 20:02:37 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005JulSep/0246.html 20:02:42 +John_Slatin 20:02:57 zakim, Gian is Gian_Sampson 20:02:57 +Gian_Sampson; got it 20:03:16 agenda+ Techniques Task Force update 20:03:22 +Wendy 20:03:32 agenda+ Mapping Discussions Continued 20:04:08 zakim, who is here? 20:04:08 On the phone I see Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Gregg_and_Ben, Yvette_Hoitink, Gian_Sampson, Christophe_Strobbe, Alex_Li, John_Slatin, Wendy 20:04:11 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, ben_, Christophe, Yvette, bengt 20:04:11 gregg has joined #wai-wcag 20:04:24 +??P8 20:04:49 zakim, ??P8 is Kerstin_Goldsmith 20:04:49 +Kerstin_Goldsmith; got it 20:06:29 +??P9 20:07:14 zakim, ??P9 is David_MacDonald 20:07:14 +David_MacDonald; got it 20:07:39 +Tim_Boland 20:08:29 Tim has joined #wai-wcag 20:10:01 Regrets: Michael_Cooper, Matt_May, Takayuki_Watanabe, Doyle_Burnett, Sebastiano_Nutarelli, Luca Mascaro 20:10:20 David_MacDonald has joined #wai-wcag 20:10:31 test 20:10:33 zakim, mute me 20:10:33 Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted 20:11:20 zakim, unmute me 20:11:20 Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted 20:12:17 zakim, mute me 20:12:17 Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted 20:12:53 scribe: ben 20:13:02 RRSAgent, make log world 20:13:18 zakim, take up agendum 1 20:13:18 agendum 1. "Techniques Task Force update" taken up [from ben_] 20:13:19 wendy has joined #wai-wcag 20:13:50 RRSAgent, generate minutes 20:13:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/08/04-wai-wcag-minutes.html ben 20:14:31 Kesh has joined #wai-wcag 20:14:34 Wonder has joined #wai-wcag 20:14:52 Gian here 20:15:00 Chair: Gregg_Vanderheiden 20:15:13 zakim, next agendum 20:15:13 agendum 2. "Mapping Discussions Continued" taken up [from ben_] 20:15:48 Topic: WCAG 1.0 P2 Checkpoints Mapping to WCAG 2.0 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/mapping2/results 20:16:28 zakim, unmute me 20:16:28 Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted 20:16:59 zakim, who's on the phone? 20:16:59 On the phone I see Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Gregg_and_Ben, Yvette_Hoitink, Gian_Sampson, Christophe_Strobbe, Alex_Li, John_Slatin, Wendy, Kerstin_Goldsmith (muted), David_MacDonald, 20:17:03 ... Tim_Boland 20:18:14 resolution: WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 2.2 should map to 1.4 L2 SC2 and L3 SC1 20:23:54 s/should/should also 20:24:15 +Andi_Snow_Weaver 20:24:34 discussing WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 3.1 mapping 20:25:18 Andi has joined #wai-wcag 20:26:30 ack Lor 20:27:21 -Alex_Li 20:28:39 ack John 20:28:44 +Alex_Li 20:34:24 ack john 20:34:51 zakim, who's making noise? 20:35:02 ben, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Gian_Sampson (95%), Christophe_Strobbe (13%), John_Slatin (32%) 20:35:16 zakim, mute Gian 20:35:16 Gian_Sampson should now be muted 20:35:48 gian - you can also type "zakim, unmute me" in irc 20:35:57 zakim, wonder is gian 20:35:57 sorry, wendy, I do not recognize a party named 'wonder' 20:36:03 zakim, gian is wonder 20:36:03 +wonder; got it 20:36:21 so fun to be back. :-) 20:39:26 resolution: map wcag 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 to guideline 1.3 advisory and possibly also 4.1 (which is in formulation) 20:40:06 resolution: no change to mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 3.2 20:41:55 q+ 20:43:08 what happens when a checkpoint doesn't map to anything in the WCAG 2.0 guidelines? 20:43:54 q+ to say "bug/action item to write rationale for all things no longer requried?" 20:46:27 ack ben 20:46:28 ack wendy 20:46:28 wendy, you wanted to say "bug/action item to write rationale for all things no longer requried?" 20:50:01 action: someone write rationale for each major difference between wcag 1.0 and wcag 2.0 (specifically: no longer required, deprecated, change in level/priority) 20:50:41 resolution: use "deprecated" for things we don't want people to do anymore and "not required" for things that WCAG 2.0 does not require for conformance, but may still appear in advisory 20:51:38 discussing wcag checkpoint 3.3 mapping 20:56:16 ack joh 20:56:19 ack tim 20:56:47 q+ 21:00:32 q+ 21:00:40 ack b 21:01:18 q- 21:02:07 -Tim_Boland 21:04:15 resolution: map wcag 1.0 checkpoint 3.3 to 1.3 L3 SC1, possibly 4.1 (which is in formulation) and advisory items in guide doc under 1.3 21:05:39 +q 21:05:44 q+ 21:10:03 ack David 21:10:29 ack Lor 21:10:37 q+ 21:11:13 http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-CSS-TECHS/#units-that-change 21:11:18 http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-CSS-TECHS/#units-for-static 21:13:55 ack wendy 21:14:01 q+ to say "should be a level 2 item" 21:14:37 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WAI-WEBCONTENT-ERRATA#entry-5 21:14:55 ack Yv 21:14:55 Yvette, you wanted to say "should be a level 2 item" 21:15:13 Wonder has joined #wai-wcag 21:17:26 issue http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1522 21:19:47 UAAG 1.0 checkpoint 4.1 - http://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG10/guidelines.html#tech-configure-text-scale 21:19:53 4.1 Configure text scale (P1) 21:20:28 I don't have not in my version IE 6.0 21:20:49 action: yvette and loretta explore whether there should or shouldn't be a SC about scaling of fonts and other presentational elements? (include consideration of JIS comments regarding readable fonts and relatinoship with UAAG 1.0 checkpoint 4.1) 21:21:20 s/relatinoship/relationship 21:21:45 action 2 = yvette and loretta explore whether there should or shouldn't be a SC about scaling of fonts and other presentational elements? (include consideration of JIS comments regarding readable fonts [issue 1522] and relatinoship with UAAG 1.0 checkpoint 4.1) 21:22:38 resolution: remove mapping of wcag 1.0 checkpoint 3.4 to UA issue (see action 2) 21:23:00 resolution: no change to mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 3.5 21:23:26 resolution: no change to mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 3.6 21:25:00 resolution: add "potentially" in front of guideline 4.1 in mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 3.7 21:26:06 resolution: no change to mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 7.2 21:29:00 resolution: change mapping of wcag 1.0 checkpoint 11.2 to "relates to 4.1, but should not map to a level 1 criterion." 21:30:08 resolution: no change to mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 13.1 21:33:51 resolution: add mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 7.2 to (2.4 L3 SC2) and also to an advisory item?? (note this is a partial mapping) 21:35:00 resolution: no change to mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 5.3 21:36:09 resolution: no change to mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 5.4 21:36:35 Gals/Guys -- I have to run. Will see people on the mailing list, and next week. 21:38:40 resolution: change mapping of wcag 1.0 12.4 to 4.2 L1 SC4 21:40:39 -Kerstin_Goldsmith 21:41:00 resolution: change to mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 6.4 to include a note that device independent event handlers are not explicitly required. 21:41:57 resolution: no change to mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 9.2 21:42:20 q+ to say "think about techniques when answering questionnaires" 21:42:25 resolution: no change to mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 9.3 21:44:02 Regrets: Doyle Burnett, Luca Mascaro, Sebastiano Nutarelli, WATANABE Takayuki, Roberto Scano 21:44:04 ack lor 21:44:06 ack yv 21:44:06 Yvette, you wanted to say "think about techniques when answering questionnaires" 21:49:11 resolution: update mapping for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 6.5 to GL 4.2 L1 SC1 21:52:50 resolution: add 3.2 L3 SC2 to mapping for wcag 1.0 checkpoint 7.4 21:56:36 q+ 21:57:26 ack John 21:57:31 ack Won 21:57:31 ACK W 22:00:34 q+ to say "isn't client-side redirect always implemented with a time-out (possibly 0 seconds)?" 22:01:35 http://www.pa.msu.edu/services/computing/faq/auto-redirect-example.html 22:04:45 action: David and Gian to explore mapping issues with wcag 1.0 checkpoint 7.5 22:04:56 q+ to say "think about techniques when answering questionnaires" 22:05:08 q- 22:05:24 action 3 = David, Christophe and Gian to explore mapping issues with wcag 1.0 checkpoint 7.5 22:07:35 rrsagent, generate minutes 22:07:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/08/04-wai-wcag-minutes.html ben 22:10:05 RRSAgent, make log world 22:10:19 -Loretta_Guarino_Reid 22:10:23 -Wendy 22:10:52 -Alex_Li 22:10:55 -Andi_Snow_Weaver 22:10:55 -Yvette_Hoitink 22:10:55 -Christophe_Strobbe 22:10:57 -Gregg_and_Ben 22:10:59 -John_Slatin 22:10:59 -wonder 22:13:17 Zakim, bye 22:13:17 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Yvette_Hoitink, Gregg_and_Ben, Christophe_Strobbe, Alex_Li, John_Slatin, Gian_Sampson, Wendy, Kerstin_Goldsmith, 22:13:17 Zakim has left #wai-wcag 22:13:20 ... David_MacDonald, Tim_Boland, Andi_Snow_Weaver, wonder 22:13:35 RRSAgent, generate minutes 22:13:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/08/04-wai-wcag-minutes.html ben 22:13:49 Wonder has left #wai-wcag 22:14:21 RRSAgent, bye 22:14:21 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/04-wai-wcag-actions.rdf : 22:14:21 ACTION: someone write rationale for each major difference between wcag 1.0 and wcag 2.0 (specifically: no longer required, deprecated, change in level/priority) [1] 22:14:21 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/04-wai-wcag-irc#T20-50-01 22:14:21 ACTION: yvette and loretta explore whether there should or shouldn't be a SC about scaling of fonts and other presentational elements? (include consideration of JIS comments regarding readable fonts [issue 1522] and relatinoship with UAAG 1.0 checkpoint 4.1) [2] 22:14:21 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/04-wai-wcag-irc#T21-20-49 22:14:21 ACTION: David, Christophe and Gian to explore mapping issues with wcag 1.0 checkpoint 7.5 [3] 22:14:21 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/04-wai-wcag-irc#T22-04-45