13:54:38 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 13:54:38 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/07/27-wai-wcag-irc 13:54:43 rrsagent, make log world 13:55:01 meeting: WCAG Techniques Task Force Telecon 27 July 2005 13:55:07 chair: Michael Cooper 13:55:31 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005JulSep/0189.html 13:56:36 WAI_WCAG(techniques)10:00AM has now started 13:56:43 +Michael_Cooper 13:57:09 -Michael_Cooper 13:57:10 WAI_WCAG(techniques)10:00AM has ended 13:57:12 Attendees were Michael_Cooper 13:58:34 ben has joined #wai-wcag 13:59:25 WAI_WCAG(techniques)10:00AM has now started 13:59:27 +David_MacDonald 13:59:55 its a trick by the universe to make us punctual 14:00:29 ChrisRid has joined #wai-wcag 14:00:42 +??P17 14:00:43 -??P17 14:00:45 +??P17 14:00:52 zakim, ??P17 is Ben 14:00:52 +Ben; got it 14:01:19 +Christophe_Strobbe 14:01:20 +Michael_Cooper 14:01:23 +??P20 14:01:45 zakim, ??P20 is Chris_Ridpath 14:01:45 +Chris_Ridpath; got it 14:03:21 wendy has joined #wai-wcag 14:03:36 +Wendy 14:03:53 zakim, who's on the phone? 14:03:53 On the phone I see David_MacDonald, Ben, Christophe_Strobbe, Michael_Cooper, Chris_Ridpath, Wendy 14:04:12 RRSAgent, make log world 14:06:30 zakim, take up item 1 14:06:30 agendum 1. "Proposed changes to Requirements" taken up [from http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-wcag2-tech-req-20050503.htm via Michael] 14:06:53 scribe: ChrisRid 14:07:02 zakim scribe, chris 14:07:20 zakim scribe: chris 14:09:08 zakim scribe: ChrisRid 14:13:32 discussion of definitions 14:14:11 resolution: "positive test case" - means that test file has accessibility error 14:15:42 resolution: "negative test case" - means test file does NOT have error 14:16:37 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2005/05/WD-wcag2-tech-req-20050520.html 14:17:54 +??P0 14:18:35 zakim, ??P0 is Lisa_Seeman 14:18:35 +Lisa_Seeman; got it 14:22:04 resolution: change 2.1 "techniques must be usable..." to "should" 14:23:20 Becky has joined #wai-wcag 14:23:25 +Becky_Gibson 14:23:35 resolution: Modify text for 2.1 - Paragraph "Source files..." 14:24:29 action: Wendy will write up something and send to list 14:25:05 action 1 = Wendy will propose a replacement for the paragraph that begins, "Source files must be structured in such a way that multiple views can be achieved." 14:25:42 resolution: accept proposal in 2.2 - Each technique must have a unique ID 14:29:41 resolution: paragraph in 2.2 "techniques must be versionable..." will be removed because is redundant with W3C requirements 14:34:15 notes on I18N extensions to xmlspec: Notes on use of the xmlspec-i18n dtd 14:34:15 http://www.w3.org/International/xmlspec/002/documentation/xmlspec-i18n-dtd 14:34:15 14:34:15 Styleguide for i18n specifications 14:34:15 http://www.w3.org/International/xmlspec/002/documentation/styleguide.html 14:37:19 David_ has joined #wai-wcag 14:39:54 action: wendy check with Ivan (head of offices) about translating xml - how likely? 14:41:27 test 14:42:20 http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Translation/ 14:44:14 action 2 = wendy check with Ivan (head of offices) about translating xml and about 2 points in 2.2 about localization. 14:48:56 discussion re 2.3 paragraph "Each technique must map to a Success Criteria" 14:54:25 resolution: techniques should map to SC, guideline, or Principle - lowest granularity possible 14:54:52 note on resolution: techniques that don't map to SC are optional, even if highly recommended 14:56:58 clarification: because conformance is at level of SC. Also note not all optional techniques are in this category, i.e., some optional techniques /do/ map to SC. 15:05:36 resolution: change text in final paragraph of 2.3 to "...intent of the Success Criteria, Guideline or Principle." 15:08:30 resolution: second paragraph in 2.4 should be modified to clear ambiguity on "optional and not recommended" 15:09:58 resolution: last sentence in 2nd point in 2.4 needs rewriting for clarification. 15:10:21 potential rewording of proposal in 2.4: Techniques that are optional and not recommended in a given baseline are documented because they may be considered sufficient in a different baseline.. 15:10:51 resolution: revisit first point in 2.4 after we discuss further requirements 15:16:01 resolution: change 'must' to 'should' in 3.1 sentence "Where technologies work together (e.g., HTML and CSS), relevant joint techniques must..." 15:17:47 e.g., http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-GENERAL/content-structure-separation-programmatic.html 15:20:41 leasa has left #wai-wcag 15:25:06 resolution: remove note in 3.1 that begins with "Note: There is not consensus..." 15:26:33 resolution: change "must" to "should" in paragraph "Techniques must state to which versions...". Also rewrite paragraph to make it less academic. 15:29:29 resolution: remove paragraph in 3.1 that begins with "For a given technology, it is not necessary..." 15:30:13 resolution: remove note in 3.1 "There is serious debate about..." 15:30:18 action: wendy investigate in wcag 2.0 requirements if have a point that says "each SC must have at least one SC (could be a general tech) but that each SC does not need a SC for each tech (e.g., when look at the SC to tech mapping it is ok to have empty boxes as long as one is filled) 15:35:22 resolution: accept proposal in 3.1 15:37:26 -Lisa_Seeman 15:42:35 action: wendy and michael divvy "general tech requirements" into "guide requirements" and "general tech requirements" 15:46:43 resolution: in 4.2 bullet "conditional statements..." should be removed. 15:52:30 resolution: in 4.2 change "must" to "should" in paragraph "There must be at least two test files...". Revisit text to perhaps change "test files" to "test cases" 15:55:16 chris? did you get the resolution for the appendix? 15:56:57 sorry missed it, can you put it in? 15:56:58 -Wendy 15:57:06 -Becky_Gibson 15:57:08 -Ben 15:57:36 -Michael_Cooper 15:59:45 -Christophe_Strobbe 16:01:20 -David_MacDonald 16:01:21 -Chris_Ridpath 16:01:21 WAI_WCAG(techniques)10:00AM has ended 16:01:22 Attendees were David_MacDonald, Ben, Christophe_Strobbe, Michael_Cooper, Chris_Ridpath, Wendy, Lisa_Seeman, Becky_Gibson 16:06:21 ChrisRid has left #wai-wcag 16:06:59 RRSAGent, generate minutes 16:06:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/07/27-wai-wcag-minutes.html wendy 16:40:05 Christophe has left #wai-wcag 16:40:51 Zakim has left #wai-wcag 16:43:32 resolution: add something to the beginning of the appendix that these were thoughts we had previously and that influenced the design of the dtd. however, due to lack of resource (and time or whatever) decided that we would not require different views for recommenation, but might provide them in the future. 16:43:42 RRSAgent, generate minutes 16:43:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/07/27-wai-wcag-minutes.html wendy 18:20:10 RRSAgent, bye 18:20:10 I see 4 open action items: 18:20:10 ACTION: Wendy will propose a replacement for the paragraph that begins, "Source files must be structured in such a way that multiple views can be achieved." [1] 18:20:10 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/27-wai-wcag-irc#T14-24-29 18:20:10 ACTION: wendy check with Ivan (head of offices) about translating xml and about 2 points in 2.2 about localization. [2] 18:20:10 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/27-wai-wcag-irc#T14-39-54 18:20:10 ACTION: wendy investigate in wcag 2.0 requirements if have a point that says "each SC must have at least one SC (could be a general tech) but that each SC does not need a SC for each tech (e.g., when look at the SC to tech mapping it is ok to have empty boxes as long as one is filled) [3] 18:20:10 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/27-wai-wcag-irc#T15-30-18 18:20:10 ACTION: wendy and michael divvy "general tech requirements" into "guide requirements" and "general tech requirements" [4] 18:20:10 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/27-wai-wcag-irc#T15-42-35