16:53:52 RRSAgent has joined #swbp 16:53:52 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/07/11-swbp-irc 16:54:00 Meeting: SemWeb Best Practices and Deployment WG 16:54:03 Chair: Guus 16:54:10 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Jul/0040.html 16:54:22 Previous Meeting: http://www.w3.org/2005/06/27-swbp-minutes 16:54:33 Zakim has joined #swbp 16:54:43 zakim, this will be swbp 16:54:43 ok, Ralph; I see SW_BPD()1:00PM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 16:58:08 SW_BPD()1:00PM has now started 16:58:13 +Guus_Schreiber 16:58:13 +DBooth 16:58:16 + +30210772aaaa 16:58:22 zakim, mute me 16:58:22 DBooth should now be muted 16:58:32 FabGandon has joined #swbp 16:58:35 zakim, unmute me 16:58:35 DBooth should no longer be muted 16:58:46 +[Sophia] 16:58:57 danbri has joined #swbp 16:59:50 zakim, +302 is George_Stamos 16:59:50 +George_Stamos; got it 17:01:01 hello 17:01:31 +DanBri 17:01:39 +Ralph 17:01:45 evenin' fabgandon 17:01:56 hi libby 17:02:51 JeffP has joined #swbp 17:02:52 zakim, who's here? 17:02:52 On the phone I see George_Stamos, DBooth, Guus_Schreiber, Fabien_Gandon (muted), Bristol, Ralph 17:02:54 Bristol has libby, danbri 17:02:56 On IRC I see JeffP, danbri, FabGandon, Zakim, RRSAgent, libby, guus, dbooth, Ralph 17:03:06 zakim, mute me 17:03:06 DBooth should now be muted 17:03:22 +??P9 17:03:41 Regrets: Benjamin Nguyen, Tom Baker, Elisa Kendall 17:03:46 zakim, ??P9 is MikeU 17:03:46 +MikeU; got it 17:04:16 +Guus_Schreiber.a 17:04:21 zakim, the loud keyboard is . . . . ;) 17:04:21 I'm glad that smiley is there, dbooth 17:04:38 zakim, guus_schreiber.a is really Jeff 17:04:39 +Jeff; got it 17:06:49 danbri-test has joined #swbp 17:08:00 Scribe: DanBri 17:08:07 welcome to George Stamos, new WG member 17:08:22 Regrets: Tom Baker, Benjamin, Elisa 17:08:35 zakim, who is on the phone? 17:08:35 On the phone I see George_Stamos, DBooth (muted), Guus_Schreiber, Fabien_Gandon (muted), Bristol, Ralph, MikeU, Jeff 17:08:37 Bristol has libby, danbri 17:08:44 Minutes of last time? 17:08:57 guus: I only saw IRC notes , which looked ok 17:09:02 ralph: no reply yet from Alistair 17:09:13 ...Benjamin asked to be recorded as present, by IRC only 17:09:26 i/Meeting:/Topic: 1. ADMIN 17:09:28 zakim, unmute me 17:09:28 DBooth should no longer be muted 17:09:48 guus: propose that with those edits we accept 17:09:55 danbri: 2nd'd 17:09:56 aliman has joined #swbp 17:10:02 zakim, mute me 17:10:02 DBooth should now be muted 17:10:07 stamou has joined #swbp 17:10:14 RESOLVED: accept last minutes w/ edit for benjamin's presence via irc 17:10:33 +??P0 17:10:34 +Alistair_Miles (was ??P0) 17:10:42 guus: re my action to contact Andreas re DERI F2F, I've mailed him. 17:10:51 ...Completed. 17:11:03 [DONE] ACTION: guus to contact andreas re f2f venue 17:11:10 guus: we have a fri/sat meeting 17:11:38 Topic: Liaison 17:11:42 Agendum 2.1 TAG on HTTP RANGE 17:11:43 zakim, unmute me 17:11:43 DBooth should no longer be muted 17:12:08 ACTION: ralph davidw and davidb to an initial draft of TAG httpRange-14 17:12:09 resolution impact on semweb application developers [recorded in 17:12:11 http://www.w3.org/2005/06/27-swbp-minutes.html#action02] 17:12:14 (continued) 17:12:16 +Evan_Wallace 17:12:40 guus: see also, per agenda, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Jun/0051.html 17:12:58 zakim, mute me 17:12:58 DBooth should now be muted 17:13:19 2.2 XML Schema Last Call 17:13:24 guus: i've not seen any progress here 17:13:41 ralph: I think David's action is complete 17:13:48 ...he raised that at a recent CG meeting 17:13:58 ...Liam Q responded, that we should still send comments. 17:14:26 COMPLETED: ACTION: DavidW ask about the XML Schema Component 17:14:28 Designators LC status at the SemWeb CG meeting 17:14:35 jeff: not much more to mention 17:14:45 ...jjc sent an email, they might ask for more info/comments 17:14:52 ...his orig mail 17:14:59 guus: currently no outstanding actions 17:15:20 Guus: shall I keep this on agenda? 17:15:20 zakim, mute me 17:15:20 sorry, aliman, I do not see a party named 'aliman' 17:15:24 ralph/jeff: yes 17:16:04 2.2 OMG: ODM review 17:16:11 guus: I hope to complete my action tommorrow 17:16:47 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/17-swcg-minutes#item04 record of completion of DavidW's action to ask SemWeb CG about XML Schema Component Designators LC status 17:17:04 evan: nothing much more to report. we were this week supposed to have a liaison meeting w/ a related iso project on registries for ontology metadata (15926/3) but several of us can't make it. 17:17:20 TF Updates: 17:17:36 guus: sent late today, I fwd'd an inital draft on multimedia tf proposal 17:17:54 ...related to new member, George S who is here today 17:18:10 ...we can see as an instantiation of an original tf from Cannes meeting 17:18:15 ..more detailed description 17:18:20 jrvosse has joined #swbp 17:18:43 ...G could talk a bit here, then a few short Qs, then take discussion to list, ... 17:18:56 zakim, George_Stamos is really Girgos_Stamou 17:18:56 +Girgos_Stamou; got it 17:18:59 ewallace has joined #swbp 17:19:02 G: from .... Athens 17:19:13 zakim, Girgos_Stamou is really Giorgos_Stamou 17:19:13 +Giorgos_Stamou; got it 17:19:36 ...we prepared 1st draft w/ ... from cwi + Jeff Pann, ... proposal for task force with main goal the investigation of some potential approaches for annotating multimedia docs using sw languages 17:20:10 ...until now, there is no specific progress in the area of multimedia analysis and auto-annotation using sw, so a problem there for presening multimedia semantics w/ sw langs 17:20:20 ...a great need now in the web for representing these semantics 17:20:28 ...using wellknown framework of the sw 17:20:35 ...interop w/ other descriptions 17:21:17 ...proposal not for a new standardisation process, or a new research enquiry area, but trying to make all this stuff interoperable; the standards from mpeg7 mainly, but other stds too, investigate how we can make all these stds interop w/ sw languages (specifically OWL) 17:21:21 ...main idea of this tf 17:21:46 ...some short term objectives. Collect all currently used vocabs for MM annotations, DC, VRA, etc 17:22:01 ...then describe the use cases that we can use as examples for this mm annotations 17:22:32 ...investigate and try to explain why they're not using standards/tools, then try to align with other TFs 17:23:01 ...longer term objectives - try to collect and try to have some mm annotators that have as output their annotations in sw standards 17:23:10 ...provide some mapping tools, eg using xslt 17:23:22 ...between standards mainly of iso, mpeg7, mpeg21 etc., and those of the semweb 17:23:34 ...main idea of proposal - more details + deliverables in the doc 17:24:33 ...planning to combine this effort and invite some ppl from ISO std to participate in the TF, and have a possible pool of other invited ppl who might not directly participate but help in other ways (tools, reesearch, ...) 17:25:04 ack ralph 17:25:04 Ralph, you wanted to ask about RDF and MPEG-7 integration 17:25:10 q? 17:25:40 ralph: thx for useful summary, esp references. In part, refs help answer 1 question. When you talk of annotating multimedia, 'annotating' is sometimes understood in diff ways 17:25:59 ...i understand mpeg 7 has a contained for metadata "about the content". It's long been a Q how to use RDF+OWL in that container. 17:26:07 ...is that sort of thing that the TF might address? 17:26:20 G: MPEG7 is using XML as serialization 17:26:33 ...they use it in some different ways, difficult to represent MM semantics 17:27:07 ...need something on top of this 17:27:23 ...using RDF 17:27:28 ...not straightfwd 17:28:12 ralph: thanks. sounds like an ambitious set of plans, good that there are others lined up to join the TF. Have you identified any other WG members who might participate? 17:28:29 G: (scribe missed names, sorry) 17:28:33 ...new members 17:28:46 zakim, unmute me 17:28:46 DBooth should no longer be muted 17:28:52 ...+ IBM have a leading role in this topic, and BT; also Jane Hunter has been active in this area 17:28:58 david: I think HP would be interested 17:29:05 s/david/dbooth/ 17:29:10 zakim, unmute me 17:29:10 DBooth was not muted, dbooth 17:29:11 ...Sony? many others 17:29:43 guus: I trimmed a list of potential members from the first draft; potential of too many members 17:30:07 q+ to ask how this relates to Image Description (EXIF etc) 17:30:14 zakim, unmute me 17:30:14 DBooth was not muted, dbooth 17:30:26 david: i'll check on specific individuals at HP 17:30:38 guus: with the Web becoming more multimedia, this likely to be of interest 17:31:01 ralph: any idea about timeframe? the current SWBPD charter expires in 6 months 17:31:07 ...to be considered i guess 17:31:45 G: we can split plan into 2. Short and long 17:31:50 nearby http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/ 17:31:58 scribe, you wanted to ask how this relates to Image Description (EXIF etc) 17:31:58 q? 17:32:04 zakim, unmute Alistair 17:32:04 Alistair_Miles should no longer be muted 17:32:25 DanBri: I'm excited to see work in this area, especially work that draws together existing things 17:32:45 ... I do have a concern about the scope; it's a lot of work to do this for multimedia 17:32:56 ... there is some work on EXIF; taking EXIF into RDF 17:33:08 ... also news feed syndication 17:33:31 zakim, mute alistair 17:33:31 Alistair_Miles should now be muted 17:33:32 ... describing audio objects; there is a W3C WG -- Timed Text 17:33:44 ... would this TF subsume other work on semantic image description? 17:33:53 G: you're right, some work on audio and other areas, we'l l try to fill the gaps 17:34:08 ...we'll not concentrate on audio, but on things that aren't well covered in the past 17:34:48 DanBri: the Semantic Web claim is that when everyone uses RDF it will be easy to draw these different things together 17:34:49 zakim, unmute alistair 17:34:49 Alistair_Miles should no longer be muted 17:35:17 G: distinctiion in past re MM semantics, ...video 17:35:20 (missed detail) 17:35:28 ...scenes etc., and characteristic frames 17:35:37 ...at least in mpeg7 17:36:00 guus: keyframes are more complex than stil images, as you have relationships to account for 17:36:06 G: still images are a first step 17:36:15 ...but we have video in the web too 17:36:22 guus: for short term plan, focus on still images 17:36:26 G: yes 17:36:36 q? 17:36:52 (danbri: yes, good split) 17:37:00 guus: feedback to list please 17:37:22 ...next call july25 probably, 17:37:30 G: I'll send this 5 days before, to give time for feedback 17:37:34 guus: that's good 17:38:00 ...procedure is that wg votes on making a tf active, based on a template description etc 17:38:04 ...can organize separate telecons 17:38:05 jrvosse has joined #swbp 17:38:20 q+ to note WG participation expectations 17:38:29 ...if you invite ppl that are note working for a member org, ... can cause difficulties 17:38:46 ...don't create any big expectations with non-w3c-members that might cause later dissapointment 17:38:50 ack ralph 17:38:50 Ralph, you wanted to note WG participation expectations 17:39:03 ralph: i tihnk its particularly important that tf members feel they're full WG participants 17:39:15 ...and all TF participants should be in the WG calls 17:39:30 ...we have at least one tf that is somewhat disconnected, which worries me 17:39:37 ...ppl should expect to attend this meeting too 17:39:47 guus: great, thanks, looking forward to new tf 17:39:58 3.1 PORT (Alistair) 17:40:07 alistair wants reviewers for next drafts 17:40:22 alistair: we have a review scheduled soon, want reviewers to look at change proposals 17:40:33 ...reviewers then to look at revised docs 17:40:50 guus: last time was tom and mark, want same again? 17:41:03 alistair: i don't mind. last time they did a great job, ... but either way ok 17:41:47 guus: i think mark could do it 17:41:55 danbri: tom might be too busy already... 17:42:03 guus: if no more volunteers here, take it to the list 17:42:45 alistair: if ralph or david had time, woudl be great 17:43:00 ralph, i'll consider, but feeling overcommitted already 17:43:24 alistair: list of changes this round is light, maybe only 3 changes to core schema 17:43:41 ...looks like 1 piece of work that needs doing is a Note on extending skos core in different directions 17:44:00 ...am trying to find time to do that; reviewing that could be a more substantive job too 17:44:00 zakim, who is here? 17:44:00 On the phone I see Giorgos_Stamou, DBooth, Guus_Schreiber, Fabien_Gandon (muted), Bristol, Ralph, MikeU, Jeff, Alistair_Miles, Evan_Wallace 17:44:02 Bristol has libby, danbri 17:44:03 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:44:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/07/11-swbp-minutes.html dbooth 17:44:04 On IRC I see jrvosse, ewallace, stamou, aliman, JeffP, scribe, FabGandon, Zakim, RRSAgent, libby, guus, dbooth, Ralph 17:44:10 ralph: i'm willing to help review proposed changes 17:44:41 alistair: we've a rule that we can only review changes that [lost detail] 17:44:57 s/[lost detail]/have been stable for 2 weeks/ 17:45:00 action: guus ask mark if he can review next SKOS edits 17:45:33 DanBri: IPTC met in London last Friday to talk about linking their work 17:45:41 ... seems very close to SKOK 17:45:44 s/SKOK/SKOS/ 17:45:59 3.2 OEP (Deb/Chris) 17:46:05 rrsagent, please make logs world-visible 17:46:07 ...mike and evan are on the call 17:46:11 zakim, who is speaking? 17:46:13 zakim, mute alistair 17:46:13 Alistair_Miles should now be muted 17:46:23 scribe, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Evan_Wallace (95%) 17:46:31 s/3.2 OEP/Topic: 3.2 OEP/ 17:46:36 evan: jerry hobbs on the call again. discussed OWL Time, potentially have an OWL time one 17:46:59 Evan: potentially may get a DL version of OWL-time 17:47:12 mike: chris Menzel (sp?) has joined Boeing temporarily, will help w/ Semantic Integration work 17:47:13 s/3.1 PORT (Alistair)/Topic: 3.1 PORT (Alistair)/ 17:47:15 (lost detail) 17:47:28 guus: re review of n-ary relations draft, timeline? 17:47:34 evan: not clear currently 17:48:04 ....some discussion of relationship to tools, eg Protege plugin 17:48:10 ...working on that re units ontology 17:48:15 Topic: 3.3 WordNet (Aldo) 17:48:46 s/2.2 OMG: ODM review/Topic: 2.2 OMG: ODM review/ 17:48:48 DanBri: at what point should we consider closing the WordNet TF if we're not making progress? 17:49:05 Guus: if there's no progress by end of summer, we'll [propose to] close it down 17:49:05 guus: give me this summer to get it in place; if notthing then, we might need to close it. 17:49:15 3.4 XML Schema datatypes (Jeremy) 17:49:19 Topic: 3.4 XML Schema datatypes (Jeremy) 17:49:28 s/2.2 XML Schema Last Call/Topic: 2.2 XML Schema Last Call/ 17:49:43 jeff: [missed detail] 17:49:53 ...if we get comments from reviewers, it'll help us choose from the options in the Note 17:50:07 ...we can hopefully make it a final draft in near future 17:50:20 guus: doesn't seem far from moving to Note status, to me 17:50:35 ...please could coordinators consider that. Let's await jjc's input. 17:50:41 Topic: Vocabulary Management 17:50:43 q+ 17:51:01 q- 17:51:05 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:51:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/07/11-swbp-minutes.html dbooth 17:51:17 DanBri: encourage people to read the VM TF meeting report http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Jul/0019.html 17:51:17 zakim, unmute alistair 17:51:17 Alistair_Miles should no longer be muted 17:51:17 danbri: Covering for Tom, ... basically take a look at his report 17:51:34 Guus: how much longer to a Working Draft? 17:51:38 Alistair: hard to answer 17:52:14 DanBri: we encourage Tom to start writing a draft and then discuss 17:52:25 s/encourage/encouraged/ 17:52:36 Topic 3.6 RDF-in-HTML (Ben) 17:52:47 Topic: 3.6 RDF-in-HTML (Ben) 17:52:59 Ralph: we're feeling in TF that we're getting critical mass 17:53:30 ...we were discussing details, but have moved towards having one person (tom) get it into draft first, then tweak. 17:53:36 zakim, mute alistair 17:53:36 Alistair_Miles should now be muted 17:53:47 guus: there was a telecon recently 17:53:54 ...ralph had an action to discuss xhtml note 17:54:21 ralph: sorry that's slipped 17:55:05 DanBri: I have started a collection of samples 17:55:39 ... Jeremy is revising his XSLT converter from RDF/A to RDF/XML 17:56:34 ... see notes from IPTC meeting last Friday, though not an official TF meeting 17:56:45 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005Jul/0006.html W3C/IPTC meeting, 8 July 2005, London [Misha Wolf] 17:57:13 DanBri: need to abbreviate (via qnames) not just RDF Property names but also source and object URIs 17:57:21 ... this need has been discussed in several places 17:57:32 ... Mark Birbeck is considering this for the next iteration of the RDF/A design 17:57:58 ChrisW has joined #swbp 17:58:00 Topic: 3.7 ADTF (Libby) 17:58:08 zakim, who is here? 17:58:08 On the phone I see Giorgos_Stamou, DBooth, Guus_Schreiber, Fabien_Gandon (muted), Bristol, Ralph, MikeU, Jeff, Alistair_Miles (muted), Evan_Wallace 17:58:10 Bristol has libby, danbri 17:58:11 On IRC I see ChrisW, jrvosse, ewallace, stamou, aliman, JeffP, scribe, FabGandon, Zakim, RRSAgent, libby, guus, dbooth, Ralph 17:58:23 libby: Apps and Demos... 17:58:25 zakim, mute me 17:58:25 DBooth should now be muted 17:58:34 after not having done much for a while, done some more... 17:58:42 ...about 10 ppl have added DOAP files into the wiki index 17:58:50 ...just needs a bit more publicity, and we'll get more 17:58:59 ...i'll do that this week 17:59:07 guus: consider approaching sw challenge folk 17:59:14 libby: yep 17:59:25 http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebDOAPBulletinBoard 17:59:29 danbri: perhaps something on the wg homepage? 17:59:32 ralph: +1 18:00:17 DanBri: I'm willing to edit the WG home page if Libby proposes text 18:00:19 action: libby gives danbri html fragment for wg homepage 18:00:32 action: danbri update wg homepage w/ pointer to doap registry from libby 18:00:41 Topic: 3.8 RDFTM (Steve) 18:00:43 the recent OEP telecon was briefly discussed 18:00:45 guus: not heard much 18:01:08 [scribe missed detail re OEP sorry; can someone fill-in] 18:01:08 questions remain about the statues of the n-ary relations note 18:01:14 guus: i'll send mail to steve re tf 18:01:33 action: guus send email to steve pepper re status of new rdftm draft 18:01:48 Topic: 3.9 Tutorial Page 18:01:59 jeff: Benjamin is taking lead. I sent him some comments. 18:02:13 guus: more actions needed? 18:02:19 jeff: not that i know of 18:02:30 guus: checking faq... 18:02:34 [later] 18:03:08 ralph: Benjamin sent a note a while back on process for submissions to FAQ 18:03:13 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Jun/0062.html [FAQ] Submission procedure proposition [Benjamin 2005-06-20] 18:03:18 ...didn't get much followup discussion 18:03:56 guus: put http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Jun/0062.html on agenda for next time (Benjamin's faq process proposal) 18:04:03 3.10 SE TF 18:04:05 Topic: 3.10 SE TF 18:04:17 jeff: deadline (for ?) is end of this month 18:04:31 ...chris welty is removed from contrib's list and is serving isntead as a reviewer 18:04:34 +Chris_Welty 18:04:47 chris: we did have some discussion about Semantic Integration 18:05:38 jeff: talked about onto integration, possible relationship to our TF 18:05:45 ...evan thought it might be in scope for OEP 18:05:51 ...so we'll leave it out of this TF 18:06:27 chris: still some Qs regarding n-ary relations note... what are those? 18:06:34 guus: just , what was deadline for review? 18:06:44 chris: guess we should set one! ... end of July 18:06:47 guus: ok 18:06:51 ralph: yup 18:07:11 (brief recap of earlier) 18:07:45 ...talked to Tony Cohen (sp?) about adding a spatial ontology 18:07:54 ....similar to what we've done with OWL Time, ie make an OWL version 18:08:13 ^cohen^cohn^ 18:08:19 Topic: Next Telecon 18:08:30 guus: in 2 weeks next, July 25th 18:08:46 ...i'm on holiday 18:08:47 zakim, unmute me 18:08:47 DBooth should no longer be muted 18:09:07 resolved: July 25th 2005 next meeting, Ralph or David to chair 18:09:09 q+ to request that task force abbreviations be defined in the meeting agenda 18:09:14 ...not telcon Aug 8, next on Aug 22 18:09:40 guus: by end summer, we should also set goals to reach by time of next f2f 18:09:45 ...eg notes schedule 18:10:13 zakim, unmute me 18:10:14 DBooth was not muted, dbooth 18:10:18 (danbri: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/samples/ was the HTML TF dir mentioned earlier) 18:10:31 dbooth: if you would define the abbrevations for the TFs it'd be helpful 18:10:40 ralph: see the WG page 18:10:44 dbooth: hard to crossref 18:10:54 guus: i'll check that, in agenda next time 18:10:57 ADJOURNED 18:10:59 bye. 18:11:04 rrsagent, please draft minutes 18:11:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/07/11-swbp-minutes.html scribe 18:11:16 thanks all :) 18:11:16 -Evan_Wallace 18:11:16 -Chris_Welty 18:11:16 -Alistair_Miles 18:11:16 -Jeff 18:11:16 -DBooth 18:11:17 -MikeU 18:11:18 -Guus_Schreiber 18:11:20 -Ralph 18:11:21 -Fabien_Gandon 18:11:27 -Giorgos_Stamou 18:11:31 -Bristol 18:11:32 SW_BPD()1:00PM has ended 18:11:34 Attendees were Guus_Schreiber, DBooth, +30210772aaaa, Fabien_Gandon, Ralph, libby, danbri, MikeU, Jeff, Alistair_Miles, Evan_Wallace, Giorgos_Stamou, Chris_Welty 18:11:50 FabGandon has left #swbp 18:17:36 bye all 18:17:40 danbri has left #swbp 20:11:46 Zakim has left #swbp