ISSUE-80: Should be clear that Grammar Learning Parameters do not take into account xsi:type

Should be clear that Grammar Learning Parameters do not take into account xsi:type

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Profile

Raised by:

Daniel Peintner

Opened on:

2012-04-19

Description:

It has been found that the parameter "maximumNumberOfEvolvingBuiltInElementGrammars" may lead to the interpretation that no more than maximumNumberOfEvolvingBuiltInElementGrammars "evolving" built-in grammars can be instantiated.

This is not entirely true. In practice unlimited built-in grammars can be instantiated. The difference is that the first maximumNumberOfEvolvingBuiltInElementGrammars may evolve without limit while all other grammars may only evolve with AT(xsi:type).

The same applies to "maximumNumberOfBuiltInProductions".

Does it make sense to exclude AT(xsi:type) from the definition of "evolving built-in element grammar" to clarify this issue?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Agenda for 25 April EXI Telecon (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2012-04-24)
2. RE: ISSUE-80: Should be clear that Grammar Learning Parameters do not take into account xsi:type [Profile] (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2012-04-24)
3. AW: ISSUE-80: Should be clear that Grammar Learning Parameters do not take into account xsi:type [Profile] (from daniel.peintner.ext@siemens.com on 2012-04-24)
4. RE: ISSUE-80: Should be clear that Grammar Learning Parameters do not take into account xsi:type [Profile] (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2012-04-23)
5. ISSUE-80: Should be clear that Grammar Learning Parameters do not take into account xsi:type [Profile] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-04-19)

Related notes:

Display change log