ISSUE-77: How to best balance the need for limited built-in grammar growth in some and no need in others
How to best balance the need for limited built-in grammar growth in some and no need in others
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Profile
- Raised by:
- Takuki Kamiya
- Opened on:
- 2011-10-31
- Description:
- Within the working group, there is a split of opinions
regarding the need for and utility of permitting limited
growth of built-in grammars.
One request from the camp that does not see need for such
a capability is about making it much simpler for profile
users to communicate "no use of growing built-in grammar".
Currently, there are two independent variables controlling
built-in grammar growth. One possibility is collapsing them
into one.
Another idea was for the absence of the header option field
convey the default meaning of "no growth", which makes sense
depending on the rarity of values other than zero.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Face-to-Face Agenda (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2011-11-03)
- ISSUE-77: How to best balance the need for limited built-in grammar growth in some and no need in others [Profile] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-10-31)
Related notes:
The upcoming 3rd WD will permit the use of other ways to constrain the grammar learning the methods of which are communicated out-of-band.
Display change log
