ISSUE-58: Whether to or not to add a testcase that would exhibit the interoperability of section "9.1 Blocks" that addresses the case in which the would-be last block is empty.
Whether to or not to add a testcase that would exhibit the interoperability of section "9.1 Blocks" that addresses the case in which the would-be last block is empty.
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Interoperability Test
- Raised by:
- Takuki Kamiya
- Opened on:
- 2010-06-30
- Description:
- There was an argument that this is an edge case that does not warrant a new test case. There was an counter argument it is not really so. One implementor indicated he is not completely certain he can come up with a good way to implement a provision for the case that was allegedly an edge case. There was an argument that why we don't take the simplest option if that's an edge case that does not even warrant a test case.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RE: Regrets for 7 July telecon (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2010-07-07)
- Regrets for 7 July telecon (from daniel.peintner.ext@siemens.com on 2010-07-07)
- Agenda for 7 July telecon (from msc@mitre.org on 2010-07-06)
- ISSUE-58: Whether to or not to add a testcase that would exhibit the interoperability of section '9.1 Blocks' that addresses the case in which the would-be last block is empty. [Interoperability Test] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-06-30)
Related notes:
The WG unanimously agreed to have one.
The issue was resolved and was turned into an action (see ACTION-630).
Display change log
