ISSUE-55: Disposition of schema-informed grammar test cases that expect xsi:type and xsi:nil to match AT(*)
Disposition of schema-informed grammar test cases that expect xsi:type and xsi:nil to match AT(*)
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Interoperability Test
- Raised by:
- Takuki Kamiya
- Opened on:
- 2010-06-15
- Description:
- The following test cases (and any others?) are designed with expectation that xsi:type and xsi:nil match AT(*) when specific productions do not exist for those two attributes.
- schemaInformed.undeclared.xsiNilStrict-02
- schemaInformed.undeclared.xsiNilStrict-04
- schemaInformed.undeclared.xsiNilStrict-05
- schemaInformed.undeclared.xsiTypeStrict-07
It has been discussed whether we really want to expect those two attributes to match AT(*). (ISSUE-56) - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RE: Possible side-effect of test case changes done for ISSUE-55 & ISSUE-56 (from Youenn.Fablet@crf.canon.fr on 2010-06-25)
- Possible side-effect of test case changes done for ISSUE-55 & ISSUE-56 (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2010-06-24)
- Agenda for 23 June EXI Telecon (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2010-06-22)
- RE: ISSUE-55: Disposition of schema-informed grammar test cases that expect xsi:type and xsi:nil to match AT(*) [Interoperability Test] (from Youenn.Fablet@crf.canon.fr on 2010-06-21)
- RE: ISSUE-55: Disposition of schema-informed grammar test cases that expect xsi:type and xsi:nil to match AT(*) [Interoperability Test] (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2010-06-18)
- RE: ISSUE-55: Disposition of schema-informed grammar test cases that expect xsi:type and xsi:nil to match AT(*) [Interoperability Test] (from Youenn.Fablet@crf.canon.fr on 2010-06-18)
- Agenda for 16 June EXI Telecon (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2010-06-15)
- ISSUE-55: Disposition of schema-informed grammar test cases that expect xsi:type and xsi:nil to match AT(*) [Interoperability Test] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-06-15)
Related notes:
TK to remove those test cases unless there are reasons not to.
Takuki Kamiya, 16 Jun 2010, 20:14:44The following items are to be determined whether to be worked on or not, depending on the outcome of ISSUE-56.
- schemaInformed.declared.complexType-09
- schemaInformed.declared.complexType-10
- schemaInformed.declared.complexType-11
Those three testcases mentioned in the previous note have been removed in compliance with ISSUE-56 resolution.
Takuki Kamiya, 23 Jun 2010, 21:28:32Display change log
