18:37:21 RRSAgent has joined #ws-addr 18:37:21 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/05/09-ws-addr-irc 18:37:27 zakim, this will be ws_addrwg 18:37:27 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled near this time, mnot 18:37:38 zakim, this will be ws_ 18:37:38 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled near this time, mnot 18:55:36 GlenD has joined #ws-addr 19:09:20 Marsh has joined #ws-addr 19:16:42 zakim, this will be ws_addrwg 19:16:42 ok, mnot; I see WS_AddrWG()4:00PM scheduled to start in 44 minutes 19:16:53 Meeting: Web Services Addressing WG Teleconference 19:16:57 Chair: Mark Nottingham 19:17:08 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/mid/48b6f05d4907cbd0ef00f3845ba5f7d1@bea.com 19:43:13 pauld has joined #ws-addr 19:55:12 plh-home has joined #ws-addr 19:55:59 Nilo has joined #ws-addr 19:57:15 marc has joined #ws-addr 19:58:46 mlpeel has joined #ws-addr 19:58:51 WS_AddrWG()4:00PM has now started 19:58:58 +Bob_Freund 19:59:20 +Paul_Knight 19:59:24 bob has joined #ws-addr 19:59:36 +Nilo_Mitra 19:59:57 +Mark_Little 19:59:59 zakim, call plh-home 19:59:59 ok, plh-home; the call is being made 20:00:00 +Plh 20:00:10 +MarkN 20:00:21 TomRutt has joined #ws-addr 20:00:24 zakim, mute me 20:00:24 sorry, plh-home, I do not see a party named 'plh-home' 20:00:25 +Mark_Peel 20:00:32 zakim, plh is me 20:00:32 +plh-home; got it 20:00:34 zakim, mute me 20:00:34 plh-home should now be muted 20:00:47 +Marc_Hadley 20:00:54 uyalcina has joined #ws-addr 20:00:59 +Mark_Peel.a 20:01:09 stevewinkler has joined #ws-addr 20:01:09 TonyR has joined #ws-addr 20:01:35 +Rebecca_Bergersen 20:02:06 +Tom_Rutt 20:02:14 +Umit_Yalcinalp 20:02:35 +??P14 20:02:54 zakim, ??p14 ismme 20:02:54 I don't understand '??p14 ismme', TonyR 20:03:00 +Ugo_Corda 20:03:05 zakim, ??p14 is me 20:03:05 +TonyR; got it 20:03:28 dhull has joined #ws-addr 20:03:29 RebeccaB has joined #ws-addr 20:03:33 zakim, mute me please 20:03:33 TonyR should now be muted 20:03:35 +Jonathan_Marsh 20:03:38 stevewinkler has joined #ws-addr 20:03:45 zakim, who is making noise? 20:03:49 Gudge has joined #ws-addr 20:03:56 mnot, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Bob_Freund (14%), Nilo_Mitra (14%), Mark_Little (19%), Marc_Hadley (34%) 20:04:01 +Andreas_Bjarlestam 20:04:19 +Gudge 20:04:36 +Glen 20:04:39 GlenD has joined #ws-addr 20:04:55 +Dave_Hull 20:05:01 anish has joined #ws-addr 20:05:20 andreas has joined #ws-addr 20:05:27 + +1.425.498.aaaa 20:05:54 pauld has joined #ws-addr 20:06:24 +MSEder 20:06:25 +??P22 20:06:36 Paco has joined #ws-addr 20:06:45 zakim, why are you deaf to my tonepad? 20:06:45 I don't understand your question, pauld. 20:07:03 +DOrchard 20:07:07 +pauld 20:07:14 Scribe: stevewinkler 20:07:34 MSEder has joined #ws-addr 20:07:34 +[IBM] 20:07:44 zakim, mute me 20:07:44 MSEder should now be muted 20:08:28 + +1.408.748.aabb 20:09:22 Call for corrections to minutes. 20:09:35 Minutes from May 2 approved. 20:09:41 TOPIC: Review Action Items 20:09:56 zakim, unmute me 20:09:56 plh-home should no longer be muted 20:10:50 Phillip: No w3c policy surrounding WSDL document split. 20:11:58 phllip: there is a normative reference to WSDL 1.1 in the charter. 20:12:03 phillip: During the member submission process, we received lots of requests for a WSDL 1.1. binding. 20:12:52 phillip: if the working group really wants this change we need to discuss that within AC and AE. 20:12:56 q+ 20:14:29 s/AE/AB/ 20:14:34 zakim, unmute me 20:14:34 MSEder should no longer be muted 20:14:49 s/Phillip/Philippe/g 20:15:00 s/phllip/Philippe/ 20:15:07 zakim, mute me 20:15:07 MSEder should now be muted 20:15:17 stevewinkler has joined #ws-addr 20:15:25 phillip: if the working group really wants this change we need to discuss that within AC and AE. 20:15:54 ack anish 20:16:12 s/phillip/philippe/g 20:16:46 Scribe: MSEder 20:20:16 ... will cause a delay in any case 20:21:04 mark: sounds like a significant delay, if we choose to split the document 20:21:28 mark: lc7 and lc13 20:22:20 .... going through last call issues already assigned 20:23:43 ... last call issues raised by dimms 20:24:41 .... lc40 extra question mark In example 31 20:25:40 s|and AE|and/or AB| 20:26:12 jonathan: close with no action, sections have been renumbered. 20:27:45 umit: will raise another editorial issue 20:28:14 lc 40 closed 20:28:23 Topic: lc41 20:28:25 Marc, I also see a typo in that 3.1 pseudo-syntax, last line: xs:any* 20:28:31 closing tag name... 20:28:59 jonathan: values is correct 20:29:16 ... recommends no change 20:29:19 makes sense to me 20:29:39 mark: close LC 41 with no action 20:29:52 topic: lc42 20:30:38 mark: change order of abstract properties ... and will accept proposal 20:30:48 topic: lc43 20:31:33 mark: Marc and will check this editorial 20:31:54 ... already part of this taking care of 20:31:58 topic lc44 20:32:24 mark: recommends using OR 20:32:39 gudge: thinks it is correct 20:33:37 mark: accept 20:33:51 topic: lc45 20:35:39 -Glen 20:35:46 http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#References 20:36:23 mark: extra periods - some editorial issue to be resolved 20:37:15 ... close with no action 20:37:23 topic: lc47 20:37:31 mark: bad URLs 20:37:51 ACTION: Editors to fix RFC3987 refrence (make it like the others) 20:38:10 ACTION: Editors to fix typo in that 3.1 pseudo-syntax, last line: xs:any* 20:38:14 mark: close with no action' 20:39:44 mark: lc47 will fix 1st RL 20:39:52 [[ [WSDL 2.0] 20:39:52
Web Services Description Language 20:39:52 2.0, ]] 20:40:00 MarkLittle has joined #ws-addr 20:40:25 s/RL/URL/ 20:40:27 s/RFC3987/RFC3987 (in both Core and SOAP binding specs) 20:40:33 s/RFC3987/RFC3987 (in both Core and SOAP binding specs)/ 20:40:46 topic: lc48 20:41:11 mark: might be fixed 20:41:20 topic: lc49 20:41:34 +Glen_Daniels 20:41:37 mark: accepted 20:41:49 topic: lc51 20:42:11 mark: accepted 20:42:24 topic: lc52 20:42:55 mark: message ID vs. message ID 20:43:11 ... use message cap. I cap. D 20:44:14 mark: lc42 43 48 49 51 accepted 20:44:24 topic: lc53 20:45:00 mark: MAP and MEP should be introduced, WSDL comment 20:45:46 jonathan: Not use MAP 20:46:27 ... agreed 20:46:45 mark: Paul will respond to self 20:46:51 topic: lc59 20:47:39 mark: no objection 20:47:50 topic: lc63 20:48:35 s/determine whether they should use/determine whether to use/ 20:49:04 mark:Editorial suggestions accepted 20:49:09 topic lc64 20:49:58 Mark: Give to editors to deal with - accepted 20:50:24 topic: lc67 20:50:42 mark: Last of the editorial work 20:50:54 ... no objection - accepted 20:51:09 topic: Agenda item 5 20:51:59 Topic: lc6 / lc35 20:52:01 http://www.w3.org/mid/7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A507609918@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com 20:53:13 joathan: nothing really changed from his original proposal 20:53:56 mark: Jonathan answer to most people's questions 20:54:36 dhull: what are the current fault requirements 20:55:18 vikas has joined #ws-addr 20:58:08 -Mark_Little 20:58:11 jonathan: we could define what a conformant reply would be 20:59:18 jonathan: suggests that David right up to a better discussion of endpoint performance 20:59:31 dhull: feels he has already done that 21:01:07 marc: once you start using any of the WS addressing structures you should conform to the specification 21:03:01 jonathan: if the message has any of the headers from the WS address space then we can assess the performance of the message 21:03:14 ... what does it mean to check 21:04:35 jonathan: intention was to define what to return if you detect a specific error 21:05:54 dhull: agrees ... but it is not clear 21:06:21 ... what behavior falls out after you clarify it 21:08:34 paco: for the sake of clarity likes Jonathan's proposal 21:10:31 dhull: going from ambiguous semantics to not ambiguous semantics requires changing the semantics 21:12:03 -Glen_Daniels 21:12:17 jonathan: does not feel it is necessary to change his proposal 21:15:03 dhull: have put together a proposal of how to solve this issue 21:18:45 Nilo has joined #ws-addr 21:19:20 q+ 21:20:12 umit: suggests that David write test proposals 21:20:13 ack anish 21:21:02 David's message: http://www.w3.org/mid/4277C95A.8060606@tibco.com 21:21:04 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-comments/2005May/0029.html 21:21:29 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-comments/2005May/0031.html 21:22:01 jonathan: he could augment his proposal 21:22:15 +1 to Anish's suggestion 21:22:55 ... conformance to the soap binding spec implies conformance to core as well 21:23:28 dhull: this would address some of his concerns about clarity 21:24:36 mark: Jonathan to make revision of his proposal - David should review it 21:25:52 ACTION: Jonathan to revise proposal for LC6/LC35 21:26:06 .... agreement, David will bring up another last call issue 21:29:35 jonathan: there are some must statements in the core, they can only be tested once you do SOAP binding 21:31:00 dhull: this may not be testable with a binding that is not soapy 21:31:44 topic: lc20 21:32:06 Nilo has joined #ws-addr 21:32:17 mark: discussed in detail at the face-to-face 21:32:22 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/04/19-ws-addr-minutes.html#item20 21:32:58 ... what is the nature of the anonymous URI - no discussion on list 21:33:26 Jonathan has joined #ws-addr 21:36:07 topic: lc33 21:36:16 topic: lc33 21:42:06 mark: combine Jonathan's and Marc's suggestions 21:42:40 topic: lc34 21:43:03 http://www.w3.org/mid/ac5d0b7ae0f3905c93a843d5f2cdcec4@Sun.COM 21:43:08 ACTION: Marc to write back to Jonathan re issue 33 21:43:09 Mark: Marc to write back on Jonathan's proposal 21:44:19 jonathan: OK with Marc's suggestion 21:47:45 q+ 21:47:57 umit: should be role or ultimate receiver 21:48:43 ack anish 21:49:00 marc: we should not qualify the receiver 21:49:43 anish: Role a node takes is an implementation issue 21:51:46 zakim, who is here? 21:51:46 On the phone I see Bob_Freund, Paul_Knight, Nilo_Mitra, plh-home, MarkN, Mark_Peel, Marc_Hadley, Mark_Peel.a, Rebecca_Bergersen, Tom_Rutt, Umit_Yalcinalp, TonyR (muted), Ugo_Corda, 21:51:49 ... Jonathan_Marsh, Andreas_Bjarlestam (muted), Gudge, Dave_Hull, +1.425.498.aaaa, MSEder (muted), anish, DOrchard, pauld, [IBM], +1.408.748.aabb 21:51:51 On IRC I see Jonathan, Nilo, MSEder, Paco, pauld, anish, Gudge, RebeccaB, dhull, TonyR, uyalcina, bob, mlpeel, marc, plh-home, RRSAgent, Zakim, mnot, hugo 21:58:03 jonathan: safest is to say, all nodes are treated equally 21:58:41 mark: accept Jonathan's proposal- closed 21:59:29 ACTION: marc to respond to Jonathan re issue lc34 21:59:40 mark: Other groups want some more time 21:59:48 -[IBM] 21:59:49 -pauld 21:59:50 -DOrchard 21:59:51 - +1.408.748.aabb 21:59:52 -Mark_Peel 21:59:53 zakim, list participants 21:59:53 -Bob_Freund 21:59:54 As of this point the attendees have been Bob_Freund, Paul_Knight, Nilo_Mitra, Mark_Little, MarkN, Mark_Peel, plh-home, Marc_Hadley, Rebecca_Bergersen, Tom_Rutt, Umit_Yalcinalp, 21:59:59 ... Ugo_Corda, TonyR, Jonathan_Marsh, Andreas_Bjarlestam, Gudge, Glen, Dave_Hull, +1.425.498.aaaa, MSEder, anish, DOrchard, pauld, [IBM], +1.408.748.aabb, Glen_Daniels 22:00:02 -Rebecca_Bergersen 22:00:03 -Gudge 22:00:05 -Jonathan_Marsh 22:00:06 TonyR has left #ws-addr 22:00:07 -anish 22:00:08 -Marc_Hadley 22:00:09 -Mark_Peel.a 22:00:10 -Nilo_Mitra 22:00:12 -Ugo_Corda 22:00:14 -Umit_Yalcinalp 22:00:16 - +1.425.498.aaaa 22:00:17 -Andreas_Bjarlestam 22:00:18 RRSAgent, generate minutes 22:00:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/05/09-ws-addr-minutes.html MSEder 22:00:19 -MarkN 22:00:21 -TonyR 22:00:23 -Paul_Knight 22:00:25 -Tom_Rutt 22:00:27 -Dave_Hull 22:00:29 -plh-home 22:01:13 zakim, bye 22:01:13 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Bob_Freund, Paul_Knight, Nilo_Mitra, Mark_Little, MarkN, Mark_Peel, plh-home, Marc_Hadley, Rebecca_Bergersen, Tom_Rutt, 22:01:13 Zakim has left #ws-addr 22:01:16 ... Umit_Yalcinalp, Ugo_Corda, TonyR, Jonathan_Marsh, Andreas_Bjarlestam, Gudge, Glen, Dave_Hull, +1.425.498.aaaa, MSEder, anish, DOrchard, pauld, [IBM], +1.408.748.aabb, 22:01:19 ... Glen_Daniels 22:02:01 DDD 22:02:17 rRRSAgent, bye 22:02:20 rsagent, generate minutes 22:02:23 rrsagent, generate minutes 22:02:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/05/09-ws-addr-minutes.html plh-home 22:03:55 MSEder has left #ws-addr 22:04:07 rrsagent, bye 22:04:07 I see 5 open action items: 22:04:07 ACTION: Editors to fix RFC3987 refrence (make it like the others) [1] 22:04:07 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/05/09-ws-addr-irc#T20-37-51 22:04:07 ACTION: Editors to fix typo in that 3.1 pseudo-syntax, last line: xs:any* [2] 22:04:07 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/05/09-ws-addr-irc#T20-38-10 22:04:07 ACTION: Jonathan to revise proposal for LC6/LC35 [3] 22:04:07 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/05/09-ws-addr-irc#T21-25-52 22:04:07 ACTION: Marc to write back to Jonathan re issue 33 [4] 22:04:07 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/05/09-ws-addr-irc#T21-43-08 22:04:07 ACTION: marc to respond to Jonathan re issue lc34 [5] 22:04:07 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/05/09-ws-addr-irc#T21-59-29