IRC log of wai-wcag on 2004-09-22
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:55:47 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag
- 13:55:53 [Michael]
- rrsagent, make logs world
- 13:59:38 [Becky]
- Becky has joined #wai-wcag
- 14:03:38 [Becky]
- do we need to tell zakim what meeting this is?
- 14:03:49 [Michael]
- it's set
- 14:04:15 [Michael]
- zakim, this is wai_wcag
- 14:04:15 [Zakim]
- ok, Michael; that matches WAI_WCAG(techniques)10:00AM
- 14:04:20 [Michael]
- sorry, I was wrong
- 14:04:49 [Michael]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 14:04:49 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see +1.425.885.aaaa, Alex_Li, ??P16, Becky_Gibson
- 14:04:55 [Zakim]
- -Becky_Gibson
- 14:05:07 [Zakim]
- +[ATTcaller]
- 14:05:27 [Zakim]
- +Becky_Gibson
- 14:05:54 [Zakim]
- +Michael_Cooper
- 14:06:30 [Michael]
- zakim, +1.425 is Jenae_Andershonis
- 14:06:30 [Zakim]
- +Jenae_Andershonis; got it
- 14:07:17 [Michael]
- zakim, [ATT is Tim_Boland
- 14:07:17 [Zakim]
- +Tim_Boland; got it
- 14:07:24 [Michael]
- zakim, ??P16 is Lisa_Seeman
- 14:07:24 [Zakim]
- +Lisa_Seeman; got it
- 14:09:39 [Michael]
- Topic: Acquiring Test Materials
- 14:09:44 [Michael]
- scribe: Michael
- 14:10:01 [Michael]
- will take time to do
- 14:10:09 [Michael]
- need documentation from Chris on how it all works
- 14:10:22 [Michael]
- big decision is, do we want to take Chris's test case?
- 14:10:34 [Michael]
- Will still have process of adding / removing
- 14:10:52 [Michael]
- Chris has to ok if we take his
- 14:11:00 [Michael]
- We have to redo work if we don't
- 14:12:43 [Michael]
- ls concern that tests just say "take a look at this"
- 14:13:00 [Michael]
- want "artificial intelligence" to help with that
- 14:13:19 [Michael]
- ja this will be an issue that will just be part of it
- 14:13:49 [Michael]
- tb would tests be supported by multiple implementations on multiple platforms?
- 14:13:58 [Michael]
- ja that's where the browser matrix comes in
- 14:14:20 [Michael]
- will need to update that to the test suite
- 14:14:48 [Michael]
- ja if we take tests, W3C will own tests
- 14:15:00 [Michael]
- tb so Chris can't maintain privately any more
- 14:15:43 [Michael]
- ja though there will be one person managing the test suites anyway
- 14:15:55 [Michael]
- ls are they normative?
- 14:15:56 [Michael]
- ja no
- 14:16:44 [Michael]
- W3C process will help in the discussion
- 14:17:00 [Michael]
- but trying to push them through to Recommendation would be way too difficult
- 14:17:12 [Michael]
- lots of work to do no matter what direction we go
- 14:17:30 [Michael]
- Will need to be sure to follow QA process
- 14:17:36 [Michael]
- can call on members of the QAWG to help
- 14:19:24 [Michael]
- mc propose we adopt Chris's tests, need to propose to WCAG WG
- 14:19:30 [Michael]
- tb need to check in with Chris
- 14:20:07 [Michael]
- :)
- 14:20:51 [Michael]
- ls Chris need to be sure he understands what's gonna happen with his stuff, i.e., he should be really clear on the transfer process
- 14:21:41 [Michael]
- ls be clear that if we adopt Chris's tests it's just as a basis, to which we can make any necessary modifications
- 14:22:08 [Michael]
- e.g., need to change from "programmatical assertions" to "have you tested this?"
- 14:22:40 [Michael]
- ja need to create a document on how we'll do the transfer, and a document on changes we'd make
- 14:23:46 [Michael]
- mc we can decide on the changes later, once we own it
- 14:24:12 [Michael]
- action: Jenae work up transfer document, work with QA editor
- 14:24:43 [Michael]
- action: Michael alert Chris, will wait on Jenae's document to proceed
- 14:28:13 [Zakim]
- -Jenae_Andershonis
- 14:28:21 [Zakim]
- -Tim_Boland
- 14:29:16 [Michael]
- Topic: RDF techniques
- 14:29:36 [Michael]
- ls has gotten some feedback on lists etc.
- 14:30:06 [Michael]
- hasn't worried about basic stuff like typos yet
- 14:31:12 [Michael]
- ls what info needed so people can look at the techniques and understand them?
- 14:31:39 [Michael]
- can send pieces of info around until people understand what's up
- 14:32:29 [Michael]
- would like to know where people are getting lost
- 14:32:44 [Michael]
- bg it's not something people have examples of
- 14:33:31 [Michael]
- al formatting makes it a bit difficult too
- 14:35:07 [Michael]
- adopting Andi's suggestions for relationship of documents will also make it easier to understand RDF techniques
- 14:36:49 [Michael]
- mc RDF techniques probably won't be included in the November public drafts
- 14:37:01 [Michael]
- ls what needs to be done so they could be ready for that?
- 14:41:44 [Michael]
- action: Michael, Wendy, Lisa coordinate on time and way to present RDF techniques to WG
- 14:50:45 [Zakim]
- +??P35
- 14:51:01 [Michael]
- Topic: Hiding Labels
- 14:51:28 [Michael]
- zakim, ??P35 is David_MacDonald
- 14:51:28 [Zakim]
- +David_MacDonald; got it
- 14:52:01 [Michael]
- bg four methods to hide lables
- 14:52:04 [Michael]
- image w/ alt
- 14:52:06 [Michael]
- title on control
- 14:52:12 [Michael]
- display:none on label
- 14:52:16 [Michael]
- position label off screen
- 14:52:29 [Michael]
- vote on list was in favor of positioning off screen
- 14:53:05 [Michael]
- concern that if CSS disabled, undesired things displayed, but in reality bigger things messed up too
- 14:54:03 [Michael]
- title works, but not supported by eval tools
- 14:54:31 [Michael]
- display:none works with screen readers
- 14:55:04 [Michael]
- concern that if screen readers changing their handling of display:none
- 14:55:11 [Michael]
- tested that with labels they still get presented
- 14:55:47 [Michael]
- mc that's in line with my testing of labels, that they have a programmatic association with the control
- 14:56:03 [Michael]
- ls a lot of people consider screen readers displaying display:none to be a bug
- 14:57:58 [Michael]
- bg it makes sense to include all four techniques as optional techniques
- 14:58:07 [Michael]
- mc can log UA issues with each as needed
- 14:58:20 [Zakim]
- -Alex_Li
- 14:59:52 [Michael]
- moving things off to the left or top better than off to the right, because of horizontal scrolling
- 15:02:13 [Michael]
- action: Becky write up techniques for the four label things for Wendy and Michael to include in docs
- 15:04:09 [Zakim]
- + +1.978.399.aabb
- 15:04:30 [Michael]
- zakim, +1.978 is Becky_Gibson2
- 15:04:30 [Zakim]
- +Becky_Gibson2; got it
- 15:05:15 [Michael]
- Topic: Image Replacement
- 15:05:39 [Michael]
- mc disparages the idea of using such an elaborate workaround for a design choice
- 15:06:01 [Michael]
- dmd some people take the design very seriously, it's better to give them an accessible way to express it
- 15:06:09 [Michael]
- bg that's why it's proposed
- 15:07:39 [Michael]
- helps in certain conditions
- 15:07:45 [Michael]
- dmd are they marginal conditions?
- 15:08:58 [Michael]
- ls metadata / rdf could relate the image to a text equivalent, even if the image is in CSS
- 15:09:11 [Michael]
- bg rdf isn't supported yet
- 15:09:54 [Michael]
- mc we can still have both ways in the arsenal, authors can choose which to use
- 15:10:04 [Michael]
- dmd we could make recommendations
- 15:10:24 [Michael]
- bg high contrast users turn of css but not images; in this case image disappears when CSS turned off
- 15:13:11 [Michael]
- action: Wendy add image replacement to CSS techniques based on Becky's post
- 15:14:08 [Michael]
- action: Lisa create RDF techniques for associating text alternatives with images, and for having alternate versions of images (e.g., a larger, higher contrast one)
- 15:19:05 [Zakim]
- -Michael_Cooper
- 15:19:06 [Zakim]
- -Becky_Gibson2
- 15:19:07 [Zakim]
- -Lisa_Seeman
- 15:19:08 [Zakim]
- -David_MacDonald
- 15:22:07 [Zakim]
- -Becky_Gibson
- 15:22:08 [Zakim]
- WAI_WCAG(techniques)10:00AM has ended
- 15:22:09 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.425.885.aaaa, Alex_Li, Becky_Gibson, [ATTcaller], Michael_Cooper, Jenae_Andershonis, Tim_Boland, Lisa_Seeman, David_MacDonald, +1.978.399.aabb, Becky_Gibson2
- 16:58:30 [Michael]
- zakim, bye
- 16:58:30 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #wai-wcag
- 16:58:34 [Michael]
- rrsagent, bye
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- I see 6 open action items:
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Jenae work up transfer document, work with QA editor [1]
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/22-wai-wcag-irc#T14-24-12
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Michael alert Chris, will wait on Jenae's document to proceed [2]
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/22-wai-wcag-irc#T14-24-43
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Michael, Wendy, Lisa coordinate on time and way to present RDF techniques to WG [3]
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/22-wai-wcag-irc#T14-41-44
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Becky write up techniques for the four label things for Wendy and Michael to include in docs [4]
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/22-wai-wcag-irc#T15-02-13
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Wendy add image replacement to CSS techniques based on Becky's post [5]
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/22-wai-wcag-irc#T15-13-11
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Lisa create RDF techniques for associating text alternatives with images, and for having alternate versions of images (e.g., a larger, higher contrast one) [6]
- 16:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/22-wai-wcag-irc#T15-14-08