14:00:36 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 14:01:25 ChrisR has joined #wai-wcag 14:01:34 zakim, this is WAI_WCAG 14:01:34 ok, wendy; that matches WAI_WCAG(techniques)10:00AM 14:01:41 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:01:41 On the phone I see ??P0, [Microsoft], Becky_Gibson, Wendy, Alex_Lee 14:01:50 zakim, ??P0 is David_MacDondald 14:01:50 +David_MacDondald; got it 14:01:59 zakim, [Microsoft] is Jenae 14:01:59 +Jenae; got it 14:02:05 bcaldwell has joined #wai-wcag 14:02:10 +Chris_Ridpath 14:02:20 +Sailesh_Panchang 14:02:33 +Michael_Cooper 14:02:46 +??P11 14:03:13 zakim, ??P11 is Ben_Caldwell 14:03:13 +Ben_Caldwell; got it 14:04:49 +??P12 14:06:00 zakim, ??P12 is Lisa_Seeman 14:06:00 +Lisa_Seeman; got it 14:06:10 zakim, who's on the phone? 14:06:10 On the phone I see David_MacDondald, Jenae, Becky_Gibson, Wendy, Alex_Lee, Chris_Ridpath, Sailesh_Panchang, Michael_Cooper, Ben_Caldwell, Lisa_Seeman 14:07:02 +Richard 14:07:07 Meeting: WCAG WG Techniques Task Force 14:07:13 Chair: Michael Cooper 14:07:30 r12a has joined #wai-wcag 14:07:40 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JulSep/0363.html 14:08:13 Topic: test cases 14:08:29 cr i've been working on test cases for checking conformance. talked with jon gunderson. 14:08:39 cr jenae and i are joining the uawg call tomorrow. 14:08:49 cr heard from tim boland about our test cases and how to improve them. 14:08:58 cr after talk with uawg have a clearer idea. 14:09:07 cr next week can publish some closer to finished documents. 14:09:22 cr (the format of the test case) 14:09:24 cr a proposed draft 14:09:38 mc include the xml format as well as all the metadata? 14:09:44 cr yes: html doc and xml format 14:10:49 bg where do we look for test cases? chris' site? 14:12:09 cr my site is open and anyone can contribute. trying to promote idea of common set of accessibility checks. 14:12:45 cr i looked at a number of w3c test suites. they are all different. 14:12:57 cr the test suites i liked best were uaag, because they are the clearest 14:13:07 -Richard 14:13:34 sp the old AERT has a few test cases 14:14:31 +Richard 14:15:38 http://www.w3.org/QA/TheMatrix 14:15:44 i got cut off, so i don't know whether the CSS test guidelines were mentioned 14:15:53 as a good example 14:16:18 do you have a uri? we've looked at some css test suite materials. 14:16:22 David_MacDonald has joined #wai-wcag 14:16:31 Topic: end-to-end mappings 14:17:13 ja in examples, do short equivalent and short label mean the same thing? if so, use one term? 14:17:25 bc using "alternative" instead of "equivalent" anyway 14:19:18 zakim, mute ishida 14:19:18 sorry, r12a, I do not see a party named 'ishida' 14:19:27 zakim, mute richard 14:19:27 Richard should now be muted 14:21:20 action: wendy add issues related to gateway and guidelines to bugzilla 14:21:44 action 1 = jenae add issues related to gateway and guidelines to bugzilla 14:21:59 action: jenae add issues related to html techniques and multimedia to bugzilla 14:22:25 2.4 14:22:36 sp haven't gotten to test cases, but success criteria and guideline. 14:23:01 sp difficult to have one-to-one mapping between html techniques and success criteria 14:23:44 sp lots of content is read in a chunk and am unsure what the mapping is between tech-indie and html-specific. 14:23:56 bg is there an easier way to have it read to you? 14:24:08 bg even for sighted, hard to follow since it's in a table 14:24:16 bg better way to group the info? 14:24:59 sp the way the guidelines are written (with headings), perhaps nest information 14:25:10 bg if add another column for testing, that will make it even more confusing 14:25:20 dmd headings at each column? 14:25:33 sp yes, but it reads chunks. all techniques are read together. 14:25:42 bg all of those usually go with that success criteria 14:26:13 dmd what if there is a corresponding css techniques? 14:26:34 s/dmd/sp 14:29:13 dmd the mapping is not between css and html it's all of the pieces associated with a success criteria 14:29:31 action: wac and sp look at structure and presentation of the mapping table 14:29:47 sp on what basis are we saying 50,000 words? 14:30:13 sp even a small page, there is hierarchical markup that is helpful. 14:30:31 bc there are 40 open issues with that guideline, including that one. 14:30:56 sp level 2 success criteria, a point about logical tab order, the issue said, "this might not be testable." 14:31:22 sp perhaps move to level 3? 14:31:28 wac level 3 is testable as well 14:32:05 sp move because it is an assertion, similar to the others in level 3 14:32:35 sp at level 3, only mentions paragraphs. doesn't mention lists or data tables 14:33:52 +Don_Evans 14:34:25 donaldfevans has joined #wai-wcag 14:35:06 action: sp look at issues in bugzilla and coordinate with yvette on guidelines summary 14:36:56 mc is there a need to discuss existing test suites on this call? 14:37:18 ja do we need to have a formal review process to look at each test case and approve it? 14:37:27 cr yes, think we do need that formal process. 14:37:46 ja best thing, start going through today. 14:42:07 action: ben add product to bugzilla for test suite 14:43:01 http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/policies.html#Policies 14:43:23 action: cr read process doc, if have questions talk w/wendy 14:43:58 action: bc, cr, ja set up bugzilla with components 14:44:30 -Richard 14:44:39 r12a has left #wai-wcag 14:44:43 dmd the layout of the end-to-ends is pretty well done. only a few that haven't been compelted: 4.1, 4.2, 2.5 14:45:06 dmd would need to get latest draft. 14:46:17 wac latest only has guideline 1.1 14:46:40 dmd biggest problems found were in the gateway 14:47:36 brb 14:47:54 bg i've updated 3.1 but haven't published it yet. 14:48:07 bg took an action item last week to send issues to the mailing list 14:48:27 bg js raised an issue with meaning and pronunciation last week. didn't see bugzilla related to that. 14:48:45 bg someone else was doing 3.2 14:49:15 bg tim was going to add the test cases. 14:49:42 action items from last week: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JulSep/0320.html 14:50:07 dmd start looking at tables and decide if we are covering guidelines well w/techniques or are there holes? 14:50:25 wac what are we waiting for? test cases? 14:50:43 dmd not sure what the relationship is (of test cases) to the end-to-ends. 14:50:54 mc test cases are an extension to the end-to-ends 14:51:15 mc helping us get a whole picture of the entire chain from principle down to test case 14:53:36 Michael has joined #wai-wcag 14:53:38 sp diff between example and test case: example conforms to success criteria. test cases may have one that passes and another tha fails. 14:53:59 bg diff between technique and examples? 14:54:04 ja there are examples at all levels. 14:56:58 bg could we attach files to techniques submissions? 14:57:12 bg e.g. javascript techniques 14:57:52 bg would be nice if could have examples can run when looking at techniques 14:59:01 brb 14:59:51 wac can send attachments to w3c mailing lists 15:00:02 bc having problems w/cdata 15:00:38 -Alex_Lee 15:00:40 bc copy the whole thing 15:00:55 bc best to start w/complete working file than piece of it 15:01:42 bc once the form is filled out, will trigger an issue 15:01:51 bc bugzilla will allow file attachments 15:07:08 bg where are the minutes? 15:07:18 mc i haven't been emailing the links 15:08:27 -Lisa_Seeman 15:08:27 RRSAgent, make log world 15:10:27 Topic: 1.4 end-to-end 15:10:52 http://www.eramp.com/david/end_to_end/end_to_end_1.4.htm 15:13:08 motion and contrast are different issues. 15:13:59 gateway 1.4.2 discusses why contrast is important. 15:14:18 lots of work needed. phrases are not best way to describe. 15:18:00 couple places where it is a "wendy cut, tom paste" (move from css to gateway) 15:18:14 still need to do that since didn't edit other parts of gateway (other than 1.1) 15:18:45 in gateway, need to cleanup text about "partial disabilities" 15:19:42 a section in html techniques for css techniques (use structural elements, style with css) 15:19:47 either needs expanding or coord w/css 15:19:51 largely a placeholder 15:20:30 dmd any other adjustments that need to be made? 15:21:01 latest mappings - http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2004/07/30-sc-techniques-mapping.html 15:21:07 4 css techniques: # 7 Colors and Backgrounds 15:21:07 * 7.1 Specifying colors by keyword or RGB value 15:21:07 * 7.2 Specifying colors 15:21:07 * 7.3 Creating foreground and background contrast 15:21:07 * 7.4 Specifying background and foreground color 15:21:51 bg sc 1: Any text that is presented over a background is electronically available so that it could be re-presented in a form that allows the text to be distinguished from the background. 15:22:00 saying, "don't put text in images?" 15:23:29 if want to show how to use a specific font and div to create these effects, that be useful? 15:27:06 wac sending css techs to variety of folks for review. don't have FIR or text replacement techniques in this draft, still some accessibility issues. will solicit people to submit techniques. 15:28:58 bc create the techniques, but the asst technologies don't support. need to make clear what is not supported and why. 15:29:59 ChrisR has left #wai-wcag 15:30:15 -Chris_Ridpath 15:34:46 next week: 90 minute call (to discuss test suites, etc) then 30 minutes for bugzilla training 15:37:50 action: editors prep bugzilla for html, css, gateway issues for next draft (3 sept) 15:37:55 -Don_Evans 15:38:03 donaldfevans has left #wai-wcag 15:38:18 -Becky_Gibson 15:38:35 -Wendy 15:38:37 -Jenae 15:38:39 -Michael_Cooper 15:38:43 -David_MacDondald 15:41:27 -Ben_Caldwell 15:41:28 -Sailesh_Panchang 15:41:29 WAI_WCAG(techniques)10:00AM has ended 15:41:30 Attendees were Becky_Gibson, Wendy, Alex_Lee, David_MacDondald, Jenae, Chris_Ridpath, Sailesh_Panchang, Michael_Cooper, Ben_Caldwell, Lisa_Seeman, Richard, Don_Evans 15:41:39 zakim, bye 15:41:39 Zakim has left #wai-wcag 15:41:43 RRSAgent, bye 15:41:43 I see 8 open action items: 15:41:43 ACTION: jenae add issues related to gateway and guidelines to bugzilla [1] 15:41:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/08/11-wai-wcag-irc#T14-21-20 15:41:43 ACTION: jenae add issues related to html techniques and multimedia to bugzilla [2] 15:41:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/08/11-wai-wcag-irc#T14-21-59 15:41:43 ACTION: wac and sp look at structure and presentation of the mapping table [3] 15:41:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/08/11-wai-wcag-irc#T14-29-31 15:41:43 ACTION: sp look at issues in bugzilla and coordinate with yvette on guidelines summary [4] 15:41:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/08/11-wai-wcag-irc#T14-35-06 15:41:43 ACTION: ben add product to bugzilla for test suite [5] 15:41:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/08/11-wai-wcag-irc#T14-42-07 15:41:43 ACTION: cr read process doc, if have questions talk w/wendy [6] 15:41:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/08/11-wai-wcag-irc#T14-43-23 15:41:43 ACTION: bc, cr, ja set up bugzilla with components [7] 15:41:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/08/11-wai-wcag-irc#T14-43-58 15:41:43 ACTION: editors prep bugzilla for html, css, gateway issues for next draft (3 sept) [8] 15:41:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/08/11-wai-wcag-irc#T15-37-50