15:04:06 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 15:04:16 zakim, who's on the phone/ 15:04:17 I don't understand 'who's on the phone/', wendy 15:04:19 zakim, who's on the phone? 15:04:19 On the phone I see +1.512.306.aaaa, [Microsoft], Michael_Cooper, ??P14, Ben, Wendy 15:04:46 zakim, +1.512.306.aaaa is Jim_Thatcher 15:04:46 +Jim_Thatcher; got it 15:04:49 +??P21 15:04:56 zakim, ??P21 is Tom 15:04:56 +Tom; got it 15:05:03 Zakim, I am Tom 15:05:03 ok, sh1mmer, I now associate you with Tom 15:05:25 zakim, ??P14 is Chris_Ridpath 15:05:25 +Chris_Ridpath; got it 15:05:29 zakim, I am Ben 15:05:29 ok, ben, I now associate you with Ben 15:06:39 april 28-30 euroaccessibility tf3 is meeting in copenhagen 15:11:02 anyone likely to go? 15:11:12 tom 15:11:50 === 15:11:52 test matrix 15:11:59 "consider other platforms and devices" 15:12:07 (from notes from f2f, jenae has questiosn) 15:13:29 not sure how to approach, but suggestion was to test on at least one mobile and one phone browser. 15:14:08 action: ben pull together suggestion for jenae to include in test matrix wrt mobile devices 15:14:26 "need to add keyboard interface, spellchecker, etc." 15:15:28 think this referred to testing with other assistive technologies. 15:15:42 e.g., at least one technology that emulates a keyboard 15:15:52 things that sit on top of browser and emulate browser 15:19:49 action: wendy talk with DO-IT about what other assistive technologies we ought to test with 15:22:33 "issues with running old versions of netscape on macs" 15:23:08 single mac machine, multiple versions of netscape, they magically exhibit others behaviors. 15:23:28 "tom's checking on apple screen readers" 15:23:42 had action to talk with joe, he wrote an article about. 15:24:04 apple demonstrated new screen reader at csun, not released yet. 15:24:12 tom signing up for beta program. 15:24:21 " " 15:24:33 does platform itself have ability to address some things in wcag? 15:24:48 "operating systems ability to enlarge text?" 15:24:59 a column that we want to have for each os? 15:25:20 text enlargement or magnification? 15:25:37 should consider both 15:25:47 "include os features: windows magnifer, mac speech..." 15:25:52 need to know what those features are. 15:26:39 screen mag and on-screen keyboard for gnome 15:26:54 and KDE 15:27:33 Operating Systems with built-in Accessibility Features - http://trace.wisc.edu/world/computer_access/compare.html 15:27:53 doesn't include latest mac os 15:28:03 ask matt about mac os 15:28:31 +??P2 15:28:44 zakim, ??P2 is Lisa_Seeman 15:28:44 +Lisa_Seeman; got it 15:29:39 are we interested in each of these features? 15:29:55 serial keys for keyboard emulation. high contrast. 15:30:18 font size 15:31:29 mouse keys - p2 or p3? 15:31:59 show sounds - browsers don't pick up on do they? 15:32:26 does the os respond to any sound being made? 15:32:35 e.g., when play multimedia file? 15:33:46 action: ben when use show sounds how does it respond to multimedia in browsers 15:34:06 "combination of assistive technologies" 15:34:22 looking at screen reader combined with a magnifer 15:35:16 many companies produce both 15:35:28 action: wendy - also ask do-it about most common combinations 15:35:46 supernova - windows (hal and magnifier together) 15:36:41 jenae runs through rest of edits 15:37:13 jtcom has joined #wai-wcag 15:40:47 === 15:40:48 gateway 15:41:07 tom trying to eliminate references to html. however, difficult to illustrate a concept. 15:41:25 e.g., structure of a document. how illustrate that w/out refering to a particular technology. 15:41:47 instead of examples, link to the examples in techniques? 15:42:00 issue: creates circular "definition" 15:43:38 could talk about structural features w/out mentioning specific code 15:44:01 a rendered document. don't have to show code. 15:44:16 example doesn't talk about code 15:44:28 a separate document? 15:44:40 a screen shot that deals with that issue? 15:44:44 just show part of the screen? 15:44:51 could talk about structure of gateway doc itself. 15:45:00 headings: show extracted outline 15:47:15 language - have techniques for writing language. there are several in the wcag 2.0 guidelines (3.1) 15:47:49 will those be moved to gateway or if stay in main document, implications for gateway? 15:48:45 editorial note: for now this in guidelines. revisit as this evolves. 15:51:46 +Don_Evans 15:52:09 should tom send proposals to list or publish a new draft w/proposed changes included? 15:53:03 donaldfevans has joined #wai-wcag 15:54:24 good case for getting new draft out. want to be careful wrt process, but enough changes that is almost a "new" draft. 15:54:43 people should (and are willing) read top-to-bottom anew. 15:56:01 zakim, who's making noise? 15:56:12 wendy, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Lisa_Seeman (9%), Ben (20%), Tom (4%) 15:57:59 need to figure out how to acknowledge contributions from people 15:58:26 === 15:58:29 submissions form 15:58:42 the script was going to depend on the appropriate subcategories. 15:58:54 if put the big list in, then that's the degraded state. add script later. 15:59:15 talking about 100 or more options 15:59:42 make it a suggestion 16:00:42 action: ben have something done w/techniques submission by end of week 16:03:23 next steps: WCAG WG review, talk about next week, then send to individuals have talked to last few weeks 16:03:39 after that: "call for submissions" perhaps in conjunction w/publishing next html techniques draft. 16:03:47 how validate techniques that we receive? 16:03:50 we have to vet them. 16:04:02 do they fulfill thte guideline they intended to fulfill? 16:04:16 what about testability? 16:04:23 is it valid? does it make sense? does it look good? 16:04:36 2nd level: does it get into our techniques? 16:04:48 the work we have been doing w/test matrix and test files comes into that process. 16:05:00 we don't have a formal work plan for pulling the pieces together, but the pieces are happening. 16:05:21 time to connect the dots! 16:06:13 useful to allow people to attach html files to submissions? 16:06:19 test files? 16:06:24 that or examples 16:06:45 or a uri for "here's my example in real world" 16:07:01 references and notes 16:07:19 introduction at top of form? 16:07:35 submission form for test cases? 16:08:37 e.g., here's a site that passes all of the tools but is not accessible. 16:10:41 if do something like that, need to be careful how implemented so that don't have list (on w3c site) of list of sites that are slammed for accessibility. 16:10:53 however, these test cases are helpful in testing wcag 2.0. 16:13:17 donaldfevans has joined #wai-wcag 16:13:25 related to EOWG's gallery and our implementation testing. 16:13:43 how do point to sites that meet wcag but retain w3c vendor-neutrality. 16:13:46 === 16:13:47 next week 16:14:02 gateway, techniques submission, process to validate techniques 16:14:07 check in on action items 16:16:21 action: michael and wendy talk about action items in bugzilla 16:18:06 april 21 - publish a techs draft for ben's bday :) 16:18:34 (w/out him helping :) 16:18:56 donaldfevans has left #wai-wcag 16:19:03 -Michael_Cooper 16:19:05 -Wendy 16:19:06 -Don_Evans 16:19:06 -Ben 16:19:07 -Tom 16:19:07 -Chris_Ridpath 16:19:08 -[Microsoft] 16:19:08 -Jim_Thatcher 16:19:18 RRSAgent, make log world-visible 16:19:39 jtcom has left #wai-wcag 16:20:16 ben has left #wai-wcag 16:20:19 zakim, bye 16:20:19 leaving. As of this point the attendees were [Microsoft], Michael_Cooper, Wendy, Ben, Jim_Thatcher, Tom, Chris_Ridpath, Lisa_Seeman, Don_Evans 16:20:19 Zakim has left #wai-wcag 16:24:25 jtcom has joined #wai-wcag 16:24:34 jtcom has left #wai-wcag 16:26:32 JimT has joined #wai-wcag 16:26:39 JimT has left #wai-wcag 16:38:14 JimT has joined #wai-wcag 16:38:18 JimT has left #wai-wcag 16:42:43 sh1mmer has left #wai-wcag 17:28:54 rrsagent, make logs world-visible 17:28:59 rrsagent, bye 17:28:59 I see 6 open action items: 17:28:59 ACTION: ben pull together suggestion for jenae to include in test matrix wrt mobile devices [1] 17:28:59 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/31-wai-wcag-irc#T15-14-08 17:28:59 ACTION: wendy talk with DO-IT about what other assistive technologies we ought to test with [2] 17:28:59 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/31-wai-wcag-irc#T15-19-49 17:28:59 ACTION: ben when use show sounds how does it respond to multimedia in browsers [3] 17:28:59 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/31-wai-wcag-irc#T15-33-46 17:28:59 ACTION: wendy - also ask do-it about most common combinations [4] 17:28:59 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/31-wai-wcag-irc#T15-35-28 17:28:59 ACTION: ben have something done w/techniques submission by end of week [5] 17:28:59 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/31-wai-wcag-irc#T16-00-42 17:28:59 ACTION: michael and wendy talk about action items in bugzilla [6] 17:28:59 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/31-wai-wcag-irc#T16-16-21