IRC log of wai-wcag on 2003-12-11
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 21:03:23 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag
- 21:03:35 [wendy]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 21:03:35 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Roberto_Scano (muted), Roberto_Ellero (muted), Ian, Yvette_Hoitink, JasonWhite, Kerstin_Goldsmith (muted), John_Slatin, Wendy,
- 21:03:38 [Zakim]
- ... Doyle_Burnett, Avi_Arditti, Ben_Caldwell, Mark_Friedman
- 21:04:00 [rscano]
- Regrets: Silvia Dini
- 21:04:03 [Zakim]
- +??P24
- 21:04:20 [wendy]
- zakim, ??P24 is Bengt_Farre
- 21:04:20 [Zakim]
- +Bengt_Farre; got it
- 21:04:25 [Yvette]
- zakim, mute me
- 21:04:25 [Zakim]
- Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted
- 21:04:35 [bengt]
- zakim, I am Bengt_Farre
- 21:04:36 [Zakim]
- ok, bengt, I now associate you with Bengt_Farre
- 21:04:42 [bengt]
- zakim, mute mne
- 21:04:42 [Zakim]
- sorry, bengt, I do not see a party named 'mne'
- 21:04:44 [bengt]
- zakim, mute me
- 21:04:45 [Zakim]
- Bengt_Farre should now be muted
- 21:04:52 [wendy]
- ===
- 21:05:10 [wendy]
- plain language rewrites
- 21:06:14 [Zakim]
- +Dave_MacDonald
- 21:07:04 [wendy]
- ===
- 21:07:18 [wendy]
- W3C process and errata
- 21:07:27 [wendy]
- Ian presents summary
- 21:07:30 [rcastaldo]
- rcastaldo has joined #wai-wcag
- 21:07:38 [rellero]
- Hi rob
- 21:07:42 [rcastaldo]
- Hi everybody
- 21:07:45 [wendy]
- of changes to process document related to w3c process doc
- 21:07:49 [rcastaldo]
- Hi Robs
- 21:07:50 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 21:07:57 [Yvette]
- Hi Rob#3
- 21:07:59 [wendy]
- zakim, who's making noise?
- 21:08:09 [rcastaldo]
- Hi Yvette
- 21:08:10 [Zakim]
- wendy, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Ian (100%)
- 21:08:23 [Zakim]
- +??P35
- 21:08:37 [rcastaldo]
- It's me
- 21:08:37 [wendy]
- always encouraged to keep errata up-to-date and whether or not if they are normative.
- 21:08:47 [wendy]
- zakim, ??P35 is Roberto_Castaldo
- 21:08:47 [Zakim]
- +Roberto_Castaldo; got it
- 21:08:48 [Ian]
- http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/tr.html#rec-modify
- 21:08:54 [wendy]
- zakim, mute Roberto_Castaldo
- 21:08:54 [Zakim]
- Roberto_Castaldo should now be muted
- 21:09:05 [Ian]
- 7.6.2 Classes of Changes to a Recommendation
- 21:09:19 [wendy]
- zakim, who's muted?
- 21:09:19 [Zakim]
- I see Roberto_Scano, Roberto_Ellero, Yvette_Hoitink, Kerstin_Goldsmith, Bengt_Farre, Roberto_Castaldo muted
- 21:09:35 [wendy]
- 4 types of errata:
- 21:09:48 [Ian]
- 3. Corrections that MAY affect conformance, but add no new features
- 21:09:58 [Zakim]
- +David_D
- 21:10:34 [wendy]
- likely not to add, but to subtract (i.e., until user agents clauses being met)
- 21:10:40 [Zakim]
- +??P38
- 21:10:47 [wendy]
- paths to take to incorporate normatively: easiest is to edit the document and publish a revision.
- 21:11:05 [wendy]
- get review of the revision (1 month review) and if agreement, then publish as WCAG 1.0 2nd edition.
- 21:11:19 [wendy]
- people can continue to refer to older version.
- 21:11:38 [wendy]
- called "proposed edited recommendation" - get review. if support, becomes new version.
- 21:12:00 [wendy]
- possible to add something to the old version that says, "new version available"?
- 21:12:13 [Zakim]
- +Gregg_Vanderheiden
- 21:12:28 [wendy]
- a w3c policy to not modify published documents (archival state so important...) won't modify in place to say "new version available"
- 21:12:41 [wendy]
- more recent documents, try to highlight fact that new ones might be available.
- 21:12:44 [wendy]
- zakim, who's making noise?
- 21:12:55 [Zakim]
- wendy, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Gregg_Vanderheiden (38%), Ian (100%), JasonWhite (4%)
- 21:13:53 [wendy]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 21:13:53 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Roberto_Scano (muted), Roberto_Ellero (muted), Ian, Yvette_Hoitink (muted), JasonWhite, Kerstin_Goldsmith (muted), John_Slatin, Wendy,
- 21:13:56 [Zakim]
- ... Doyle_Burnett, Avi_Arditti, Ben_Caldwell, Mark_Friedman, Bengt_Farre (muted), Dave_MacDonald, [IBM], Roberto_Castaldo (muted), David_D, ??P38, Gregg_Vanderheiden
- 21:14:00 [wendy]
- zakim, ??P38 is Mat
- 21:14:00 [Zakim]
- +Mat; got it
- 21:14:03 [Ian]
- zakim, mute Mat
- 21:14:03 [Zakim]
- Mat should now be muted
- 21:14:03 [wendy]
- zakim, mute Mat
- 21:14:04 [Zakim]
- Mat was already muted, wendy
- 21:14:07 [doyle]
- still hear noise
- 21:14:07 [wendy]
- zakim, Mute Gregg
- 21:14:07 [Zakim]
- Gregg_Vanderheiden should now be muted
- 21:14:18 [wendy]
- zakim, who's muted?
- 21:14:18 [Zakim]
- I see Roberto_Scano, Roberto_Ellero, Yvette_Hoitink, Kerstin_Goldsmith, Bengt_Farre, Roberto_Castaldo, Mat, Gregg_Vanderheiden muted
- 21:14:50 [wendy]
- several WGs said, "we want to make our errata page contain normative changes w/out republishing our doc.
- 21:14:55 [wendy]
- pros: less effort and time
- 21:15:10 [wendy]
- cons: if lots of corrctions, people might not find them or might not integrate them into text in the same way
- 21:15:11 [Zakim]
- +??P39
- 21:15:28 [Ian]
- 7.6.4 Call for Review of Proposed Corrections
- 21:15:33 [wendy]
- AB created compromise process in section 7.6.4 - WG calls for review of proposed corrections
- 21:15:44 [wendy]
- if no objections after 4 weeks, they become normative.
- 21:15:48 [Zakim]
- -Kerstin_Goldsmith
- 21:15:52 [wendy]
- useful for the case of labeling as normative
- 21:16:18 [Zakim]
- +Kerstin_Goldsmith
- 21:16:19 [wendy]
- however, at some point have to integrate into spec.
- 21:16:39 [wendy]
- after 1 month review have 6 months to republish document
- 21:16:49 [wendy]
- similar to proposed edited rec, but delay
- 21:16:50 [Zakim]
- -Kerstin_Goldsmith
- 21:17:29 [wendy]
- zakim, unmute Gregg
- 21:17:29 [Zakim]
- Gregg_Vanderheiden should no longer be muted
- 21:17:57 [wendy]
- ack Gregg
- 21:18:15 [wendy]
- we can change WCAG 1.0, send it out for 1 month review, and it is normative?
- 21:18:22 [wendy]
- yes. and be called WCAG 1.0 second revision.
- 21:18:43 [wendy]
- would not replace the old version but become the new latest version and say "this doc supercedes the 1999 draft..."
- 21:18:47 [wendy]
- only edit to old one?
- 21:18:54 [wendy]
- it is already there.
- 21:18:56 [Zakim]
- +Kerstin_Goldsmith
- 21:19:00 [wendy]
- "current draft" link
- 21:19:08 [wendy]
- latest version draft
- 21:19:51 [wendy]
- zakim, mute Kerstin
- 21:19:51 [Zakim]
- Kerstin_Goldsmith was already muted, wendy
- 21:19:54 [wendy]
- zakim, mute Gregg
- 21:19:54 [Zakim]
- Gregg_Vanderheiden should now be muted
- 21:20:02 [wendy]
- zakim, who's muted?
- 21:20:02 [Zakim]
- I see Roberto_Scano, Roberto_Ellero, Yvette_Hoitink, Bengt_Farre, Roberto_Castaldo, Mat, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Kerstin_Goldsmith muted
- 21:20:07 [wendy]
- zakim, who's making noise?
- 21:20:19 [Zakim]
- wendy, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: JasonWhite (69%), ??P39 (8%)
- 21:20:30 [wendy]
- zakim, mute ??P39
- 21:20:30 [Zakim]
- ??P39 should now be muted
- 21:20:35 [wendy]
- who's P39?
- 21:20:53 [Yvette]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 21:20:53 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Roberto_Scano (muted), Roberto_Ellero (muted), Ian, Yvette_Hoitink (muted), JasonWhite, John_Slatin, Wendy, Doyle_Burnett, Avi_Arditti,
- 21:20:54 [wendy]
- if nothing effects conformance, can republish and no review required.
- 21:20:56 [rscano]
- nobody here in irc i think...
- 21:20:56 [Zakim]
- ... Ben_Caldwell, Mark_Friedman, Bengt_Farre (muted), Dave_MacDonald, [IBM], Roberto_Castaldo (muted), David_D, Mat (muted), Gregg_Vanderheiden (muted), ??P39 (muted),
- 21:20:58 [Zakim]
- ... Kerstin_Goldsmith (muted)
- 21:21:18 [wendy]
- the review is required when there are dependencies and stakeholders who will be effected by changes.
- 21:21:24 [wendy]
- ack Gregg
- 21:21:49 [wendy]
- theoretically, we could publish WCAG 2.0 as WCAG 1.0 revision 2 with 1 month review?
- 21:22:00 [wendy]
- doubtful that would be considered fixing WCAG 1.0.
- 21:22:06 [ben]
- q+
- 21:22:16 [wendy]
- i.e., WCAG 2.0 contains new features
- 21:22:17 [wendy]
- ack Ben
- 21:22:21 [wendy]
- mute Gregg
- 21:22:26 [wendy]
- zakim, mute gregg
- 21:22:26 [Zakim]
- Gregg_Vanderheiden was already muted, wendy
- 21:22:37 [wendy]
- until user agents would be deletions. is that acceptable?
- 21:22:50 [wendy]
- deprecations rather than deletions?
- 21:23:10 [wendy]
- they are not new features. process is largely geared towards protocol and format specs.
- 21:23:33 [wendy]
- seem to be a change that does effect conformance.
- 21:23:45 [wendy]
- could bring non-conforming documents conformant or conforming docs non-conformant.
- 21:24:45 [Ian]
- q+
- 21:25:45 [Yvette]
- Wendy: "Different types of errata: technical problems in the PDF version, typos, 'until user agents' clauses that have been met, clarifications"
- 21:25:47 [wendy]
- ack Ian
- 21:25:53 [wendy]
- thx yvette!
- 21:25:57 [Yvette]
- no problem
- 21:26:30 [wendy]
- in uaag had links to pdf and other version. at time of rec, got rid of them b/c took time to produce. offer that in revision, don't link to them.
- 21:26:38 [wendy]
- create and link to them from someplace else.
- 21:26:50 [wendy]
- e.g., uaag faq, "is there a pdf version" "yes, here"
- 21:27:12 [wendy]
- q+ to say, "also techniques docs. need to decide"
- 21:27:28 [wendy]
- ack wendy
- 21:27:28 [Zakim]
- wendy, you wanted to say, "also techniques docs. need to decide"
- 21:28:15 [wendy]
- ack Loretta
- 21:28:31 [wendy]
- worried that already sliding down slope of putting a lot of work in WCAG 1.0, would like WCAG 2.0 to finish.
- 21:30:53 [wendy]
- revised version help with harmonization?
- 21:31:13 [wendy]
- techniques can help clarify some of the issues with WCAG 1.0.
- 21:31:16 [rscano]
- i think so
- 21:31:42 [wendy]
- take a conservative approach, fix significant typos and errors, until user agent clauses if necessary.
- 21:32:03 [wendy]
- (if we are to take this path, should be very limited in scope, type, and tightly managed so as not to jeopardize work on WCAG 2.0)
- 21:32:06 [wendy]
- ack Gregg
- 21:32:21 [Yvette]
- ack Gregg_VanderHeiden
- 21:32:21 [wendy]
- zakim, unmute Gregg
- 21:32:22 [Zakim]
- Gregg_Vanderheiden was not muted, wendy
- 21:32:33 [rellero]
- I think so too, even referring to ATAG
- 21:32:44 [Zakim]
- -Gregg_Vanderheiden
- 21:33:40 [wendy]
- 3 votes for: quick fix - typos and until user agents
- 21:33:50 [Yvette]
- + my vote
- 21:33:57 [bengt]
- me too
- 21:34:06 [doyle]
- yes from me, too
- 21:34:22 [rscano]
- me too
- 21:34:31 [rellero]
- + my vote
- 21:35:21 [wendy]
- anything in html techniques for wcag 2.0 that would affect conformance to wcag 1.0?
- 21:36:56 [Yvette]
- q+ to say "One exception might be placeholder text"
- 21:37:32 [wendy]
- write clearly and simply - perhasp? not in html techniques but in techniques gateway
- 21:37:37 [wendy]
- ack kerstin
- 21:38:08 [wendy]
- techniques will change conformance. not so much does it effect, but could become conformant or not based on techniques.
- 21:38:31 [wendy]
- agree that should look into user agent clause, and typos and get back to assigning guidelines to people.
- 21:38:35 [wendy]
- ack yvette
- 21:38:36 [Zakim]
- Yvette, you wanted to say "One exception might be placeholder text"
- 21:38:44 [wendy]
- zakim, mute Kerstin
- 21:38:44 [Zakim]
- Kerstin_Goldsmith was already muted, wendy
- 21:39:04 [wendy]
- html tech for wcag 2.0 that would effect conformance for 1.0. place-holders in forms.
- 21:39:36 [wendy]
- Ian leaves
- 21:39:38 [Zakim]
- -Ian
- 21:39:43 [rscano]
- there will be a sub-group? like techniques group?
- 21:39:58 [wendy]
- ===
- 21:40:02 [wendy]
- assigning guidelines
- 21:40:27 [wendy]
- john slatin: 3.3
- 21:40:54 [wendy]
- ack Jason
- 21:43:47 [wendy]
- andi: 2.2
- 21:43:52 [wendy]
- ack Kerstin
- 21:44:04 [wendy]
- kerstin: no preference (can assign a couple)
- 21:44:15 [wendy]
- no meetings on 25 december and 1 january
- 21:44:30 [rscano]
- me like Kerstin
- 21:44:31 [wendy]
- andi: also 3.1
- 21:44:52 [wendy]
- dave macdonald: help john with 3.3
- 21:45:04 [wendy]
- goal: to get more discussion on list, to get through comments, and to be more prepared for telecons
- 21:45:12 [wendy]
- so that we can get a new public draft in february
- 21:45:19 [doyle]
- I do 1.6 but do not want to bump others also working on 1.6
- 21:45:31 [wendy]
- i.e., talk about proposals in january to prep for draft in february
- 21:45:33 [wendy]
- yvette: 4.1
- 21:46:06 [wendy]
- doyle: 1.6 (summary issues for subgroup)
- 21:46:24 [wendy]
- searching for 3.3? does that include issues raised about related items under older numbering schemes?
- 21:47:20 [wendy]
- ben gives summary about issues in bugzilla:
- 21:47:34 [Yvette]
- http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/query.cgi
- 21:47:39 [wendy]
- primarily issues from public comments.
- 21:47:41 [wendy]
- zakim, mute kerstin
- 21:47:41 [Zakim]
- Kerstin_Goldsmith was already muted, wendy
- 21:47:49 [wendy]
- who's trying to raise hand?
- 21:48:12 [wendy]
- issues are assigned to a checkpoint/guideline by a unique id not by numbering (numbers have changed)
- 21:48:13 [bengt]
- I can work on 3.3 too wendy
- 21:48:31 [rellero]
- I can work on 3.4
- 21:48:38 [wendy]
- ben is going to publish documentation about using bugzilla
- 21:48:42 [wendy]
- mat 1.6 and 1.7
- 21:49:10 [wendy]
- mat: could do more. will have a look.
- 21:49:12 [doyle]
- hand up
- 21:49:38 [wendy]
- Roberto Ellero: 3.4
- 21:49:43 [wendy]
- ack Loretta
- 21:49:43 [rscano]
- me too to 3.4
- 21:49:51 [wendy]
- loretta: 4.3
- 21:49:55 [wendy]
- ack doyle
- 21:50:03 [wendy]
- doyle willing to help with leftovers
- 21:50:15 [wendy]
- Mat: 1.1 10 bugs
- 21:50:40 [wendy]
- ack ??P39
- 21:50:40 [Yvette]
- zakim, unmute ??P39
- 21:50:42 [Zakim]
- ??P39 was not muted, Yvette
- 21:50:52 [wendy]
- zakim, ??P39 is Mike_Barta
- 21:50:52 [Zakim]
- +Mike_Barta; got it
- 21:51:22 [wendy]
- Mike already has 1.1 aciton item from tokyo mtg. will take 1.1.
- 21:51:44 [Zakim]
- -David_D
- 21:51:44 [wendy]
- zakim, mute Mike
- 21:51:45 [Zakim]
- Mike_Barta was already muted, wendy
- 21:53:01 [wendy]
- what do we want to know about?
- 21:53:30 [wendy]
- synthesis of the issues
- 21:53:36 [wendy]
- summarize how many issues there have been?
- 21:53:52 [wendy]
- summary of categories of comments?
- 21:54:41 [wendy]
- range of opinion (differing comments)
- 21:55:12 [Yvette]
- q+ to say "Using bugzilla is enough? Not necessary to sift through mail archives?"
- 21:56:11 [wendy]
- ack yvette
- 21:56:11 [Zakim]
- Yvette, you wanted to say "Using bugzilla is enough? Not necessary to sift through mail archives?"
- 21:57:22 [wendy]
- not all issues discussed on the list are in bugzilla. also, public comments were about june draft.
- 21:57:34 [wendy]
- many bugzilla comments point to a thread in the mail archives, should follow that thread for more comments.
- 21:57:55 [wendy]
- therefore, good to go through bugzilla first since reviewers picked up most of issues, but to be thorough, helpful to go through archives.
- 21:58:21 [wendy]
- ack kerstin
- 21:59:10 [wendy]
- zakim, mute kerstin
- 21:59:10 [Zakim]
- Kerstin_Goldsmith should now be muted
- 21:59:19 [Zakim]
- +Gregg_Vanderheiden
- 21:59:34 [wendy]
- in bugzilla: if a bug has been resolved, show up as resolved in bugzilla?
- 22:00:01 [wendy]
- there are different states in bugzilla.
- 22:01:00 [bengt]
- me
- 22:02:46 [rscano]
- ok :)
- 22:02:48 [doyle]
- sign me up too
- 22:03:16 [wendy]
- anyone who did not accept one but has ideas, please submit them and the person who took it will incorporate it.
- 22:05:41 [wendy]
- adopting plain language by next week: was doing to get people discussing (spur to action). instead, include plain language as an issue to review for a guideline.
- 22:06:19 [wendy]
- plain language are issues in bugzilla, so when reviewing your guideline plain language will become part of the issues.
- 22:06:32 [wendy]
- template for moving forward:
- 22:06:50 [wendy]
- outstanding issues, proposed solutions, proposed solution
- 22:06:55 [wendy]
- feel free to propose more than one solution.
- 22:07:09 [wendy]
- (each of those headings a summary of the issues)
- 22:07:18 [wendy]
- (contain a summary of the issues)
- 22:07:43 [wendy]
- also think about dependencies between guidelines
- 22:07:56 [Zakim]
- -Mike_Barta
- 22:07:59 [wendy]
- assumptions: what assumption do you make when thinking about this guideline?
- 22:08:08 [wendy]
- rationale: why this guideline is important.
- 22:12:19 [Zakim]
- +??P0
- 22:12:28 [wendy]
- Kerstin: 1.4 and 1.5
- 22:12:49 [wendy]
- zakim, ??P0 is Mike_Barta
- 22:12:49 [Zakim]
- +Mike_Barta; got it
- 22:13:19 [wendy]
- agenda: 1.6/1.7, 1.4, 1.5, wcag 1.0 errata
- 22:13:26 [rscano]
- next week is Jan 8 2004?
- 22:14:15 [wendy]
- gregg: 2.1, 2.3, 2.4
- 22:15:08 [wendy]
- ack Dave
- 22:15:37 [wendy]
- CAPTCHA related to 1.1
- 22:15:42 [wendy]
- are we going to deal with that?
- 22:16:21 [wendy]
- Inaccessibility of Visually-Oriented Anti-Robot Tests" http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-turingtest-20031105/
- 22:16:32 [Yvette]
- zakim, mute me
- 22:16:32 [Zakim]
- Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted
- 22:16:39 [wendy]
- principle in guidelines, solutions in techniques
- 22:17:40 [Yvette]
- q+ to say "alternative: contact by e-mail?"
- 22:18:08 [Yvette]
- zakim, unmute me
- 22:18:08 [Zakim]
- Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted
- 22:18:31 [wendy]
- ack Yvette
- 22:18:31 [Zakim]
- Yvette, you wanted to say "alternative: contact by e-mail?"
- 22:19:36 [Zakim]
- -Mike_Barta
- 22:21:15 [Zakim]
- -Kerstin_Goldsmith
- 22:22:55 [wendy]
- yes, an issue for us to address. likely 1.1, but not sure what to recommend.
- 22:23:58 [bengt]
- bye
- 22:23:59 [Zakim]
- -[IBM]
- 22:24:01 [Zakim]
- -Yvette_Hoitink
- 22:24:01 [bengt]
- bengt has left #wai-wcag
- 22:24:02 [Zakim]
- -Dave_MacDonald
- 22:24:02 [rellero]
- bye
- 22:24:03 [Zakim]
- -Loretta_Guarino_Reid
- 22:24:03 [Zakim]
- -John_Slatin
- 22:24:04 [Zakim]
- -Wendy
- 22:24:04 [Zakim]
- -Mark_Friedman
- 22:24:05 [Zakim]
- -Avi_Arditti
- 22:24:05 [rcastaldo]
- Bye everybody
- 22:24:06 [Zakim]
- -Doyle_Burnett
- 22:24:08 [Zakim]
- -Ben_Caldwell
- 22:24:08 [Yvette]
- bye all
- 22:24:10 [Zakim]
- -Mat
- 22:24:12 [Zakim]
- -Bengt_Farre
- 22:24:12 [rcastaldo]
- rcastaldo has left #wai-wcag
- 22:24:12 [rscano]
- bye all
- 22:24:14 [Zakim]
- -Roberto_Ellero
- 22:24:15 [doyle]
- next time!!!
- 22:24:16 [Zakim]
- -Roberto_Scano
- 22:24:20 [Zakim]
- -Roberto_Castaldo
- 22:24:21 [rscano]
- see u next year!
- 22:24:33 [rscano]
- merry christmas and happy new year :)
- 22:24:42 [Zakim]
- -Gregg_Vanderheiden
- 22:24:47 [Zakim]
- -JasonWhite
- 22:24:48 [Zakim]
- WAI_WCAG()4:00PM has ended
- 22:24:49 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Ian, Roberto_Scano, Yvette_Hoitink, JasonWhite, Roberto_Ellero, Kerstin_Goldsmith, John_Slatin, Wendy, Doyle_Burnett, Avi_Arditti,
- 22:24:51 [Zakim]
- ... Ben_Caldwell, Mark_Friedman, Bengt_Farre, Dave_MacDonald, [IBM], Roberto_Castaldo, David_D, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Mat, Mike_Barta
- 22:24:56 [wendy]
- roberto: we'll meet next week: 18 december. will you be on vacation?
- 22:25:03 [rscano]
- ah no :)
- 22:25:13 [rscano]
- opps... :)
- 22:25:52 [rscano]
- so with two weeks of holiday (no WCAG) i will do some translations :)
- 22:25:56 [wendy]
- :)
- 22:26:06 [rscano]
- have u received the files for WCAGConformance logos?
- 22:26:11 [Yvette]
- I will take off between Christmas and New Year's, first time I had more than a day off since February :-)
- 22:26:19 [wendy]
- yes. the first step is to make the default served the english version.
- 22:26:19 [Yvette]
- (including weekends)
- 22:26:35 [rscano]
- good :)
- 22:26:39 [wendy]
- i still need to talk with ivan and others about how to handle publishing the italian translations. i haven't done that before.
- 22:26:47 [rscano]
- also the default page is HTML 2.0 now :)
- 22:26:50 [wendy]
- and need to check if there is any process.
- 22:26:55 [rscano]
- ok
- 22:27:03 [wendy]
- zakim, bye
- 22:27:03 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #wai-wcag
- 22:28:27 [rscano]
- good night! see on 18th ;-)
- 22:28:35 [Yvette]
- By Roberto!
- 22:28:49 [Yvette]
- Bye all
- 22:28:59 [rscano]
- rscano has left #wai-wcag
- 22:41:59 [ben]
- ben has left #wai-wcag
- 23:15:46 [Ian]
- Ian has left #wai-wcag
- 23:28:18 [wendy]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 23:28:18 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items