IRC log of ws-cg on 2002-10-29

[em]
zakim, who is on the phone?
[Zakim]
On the phone I see Jonathan_Marsh, EricM, Dave_Hollander, BridgeControl, Hugo
[Marsh]
zakim, who's talking?
[Zakim]
Marsh, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: EricM (16%), Hugo (43%)
[em]
em has changed the topic to: ws-cg 2002-10-28 teleconference
RRSAgent, pointer?
[RRSAgent]
See http://www.w3.org/2002/10/29-ws-cg-irc#T18-05-12
[hugo]
agenda+ Review of action items
agenda+ Privacy in Web services (Lorrie Cranor's email)
agenda+ Attachment feature
agenda+ Choreography report
Zakim, agenda?
[Zakim]
I see 4 items remaining on the agenda:
1. Review of action items [from hugo]
2. Privacy in Web services (Lorrie Cranor's email) [from hugo]
3. Attachment feature [from hugo]
4. Choreography report [from hugo]
[hugo]
----
1. Review of action items [from hugo]
From http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/cg/2/10/15-minutes
DONE: Hugo open a WSAWG issue about MEP
DONE: Hugo to add the publication moratoria in the calendar
DONE: Hugo to contact Joseph Reagle about liasing through SJC
ACTION: DF to invite Kelvin to next wscg telcon [PENDING]
----
Zakim, close agendum 1
[Zakim]
agendum 1 closed
I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
2. Privacy in Web services (Lorrie Cranor's email) [from hugo]
[hugo]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-cg/2002Oct/0005.html
Discussions about what Lorrie wants
JM: does she want only a header? if so, we will need a whole lot of headers, why focus on this one?
DH: there are requirements about policies in the arch requirements
[em]
hugo: perhaps it makes sense to invite her to a future call to better understand the issue/history, etc.
jm: i think we should take this to email
DaveH: to me the cg is not the place for this kind of discussion
DaveH: suggest forwarding this to WSA as an issue
[hugo]
ACTION: Hugo to send email to Lorrie directing her about her issue
-----
Zakim, close agendum 2
[Zakim]
agendum 2 closed
I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
3. Attachment feature [from hugo]
[DaveH]
DaveH suggest Only post issue against wsa IF she is not satisfied with current status in Requirements and Arch doc draft
[hugo]
HH gives background about concrete attachment feature
JM: is there a list of work items maintained by the WSAWG?
DH: will be a work item for the next f2f
DH: is the scope of WSDWG set or are you looking at other areas?
JM: looking at describing features
DH: should be discussed with WSAWG at some point in the future. starting talking about description
... description is looking like any metadata about the service
EM: I am hearing things that I have been hearing for 5 years with RDF
... I would like to be included in the discussion
JM: we should hold the conversation in the context of the WSCG
DH: need a strawman
JM: I will have a look at that
ACTION: DaveH to review status of description (metadata, etc) work at post-f2f CG call
-----
Zakim, close agendum 3
[Zakim]
agendum 3 closed
I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
4. Choreography report [from hugo]
[hugo]
HH: talked to stakeholders, received responses from most of them; answers are not final, so situation not totally clear
HH: options: specs: go as is, or use a main one as the basis and other as resources
HH: doing the work: send to the AC before AC meeting, don't send at all, or do it later, e.g. after workshop
Discussions about the role of the CG in this process
MSM: CG made a recommendation to W3M, and W3M will take a decision taking it into account
DH: working on architecture document, how choreography fits in
... discussions about what choreography is, harvesting, etc
... not sure that we will have a choreography scope by the 1st week of Nov: working on a definition, getting consensus on scope is not likely
[Zakim]
WS_WSCG()1:00PM has ended
[hugo]
Zakim, please excuse us
RRSAgent, please excuse us
[RRSAgent]
I see 3 open action items:
ACTION: DF to invite Kelvin to next wscg telcon [PENDING] [1]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/10/29-ws-cg-irc#T18-09-37
ACTION: Hugo to send email to Lorrie directing her about her issue [2]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/10/29-ws-cg-irc#T18-22-21
ACTION: DaveH to review status of description (metadata, etc) work at post-f2f CG call [3]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/10/29-ws-cg-irc#T18-35-44