W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire Poll for Spring 2015 meeting location

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2015-01-20 to 2015-01-27.

34 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Poll for Spring 2015 meeting location

1. Poll for Spring 2015 meeting location

We are fortunate enough to have two proposed locations for the HTML and Web Applications face-to-face meeting in the week of April 13-17, 2015. Your feedback will help us picking the location.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
NoYes, but prefer notYesYes, and prefer
Redmond, WA, USA (Hosted by Microsoft) 14 4 8 8
Zaragoza, Spain (Hosted by Yandex) 12 3 10 9

Ranking of choices in order of least unacceptable/most prefered:

RanksAll responders:
1Zaragoza, Spain (Hosted by Yandex)
2Redmond, WA, USA (Hosted by Microsoft)

Details

Responder Redmond, WA, USA (Hosted by Microsoft)Zaragoza, Spain (Hosted by Yandex)Comments
Arthur Barstow Yes, and prefer No
Chaals Nevile Yes, but prefer not Yes, and prefer I have a strong preference for Zaragoza, for the reasons noted in my answer to the HTML questionnaire. It's basically a lot less time wasted travelling to and fro, being in a real city that is walkable and affordable.
Olli Pettay No Yes I don't actually know what the poll is asking, since there is no question.
So I'm answering to a question "if the WG had a f2f, would you think of attending if it was organized at the location:"
Xiaoqian Wu Yes, but prefer not Yes, and prefer
Yves Lafon Yes, but prefer not Yes, and prefer Losing 2 days on the plane for each US travel is a bit painful.
Daniel Appelquist No Yes, and prefer
Léonie Watson No Yes, and prefer
Steve Faulkner No Yes Travel to US for this is not an option for me. FYI I know Zaragoza well as I travel there annually (my wife has family there).
Jose Manuel Cantera Fonseca No Yes, and prefer
Eduardo Fullea No Yes
Janusz Majnert Yes Yes
Ryosuke Niwa Yes Yes I would slightly prefer Redmond for logistical reasons but I would be supportive of having it in Europe since we haven't had a meeting in Europe for a long time.
Shijun Sun Yes No
Ali Alabbas Yes No
Israel Hilerio Yes, and prefer No
Ben Peters Yes, and prefer No
Jean Michel Rouger No Yes
Robin Berjon Yes, but prefer not Yes, and prefer
Sam Ruby Yes, and prefer Yes, but prefer not ApacheCon is April 13 - 16 in Austin Texas. I'd like to be able to stop over for a day (or two) there. <http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america>
Jacob Rossi Yes No
Bryan Sullivan Yes No
Daniel Coloma No Yes
Jungkee Song Yes, and prefer Yes
Patrick Lauke No Yes, and prefer
Mounir Lamouri Yes, and prefer Yes, but prefer not
Theodore Mielczarek No No Will not attend.
Cory Plock Yes, and prefer No
Joshua Bell Yes No My "Yes" for Redmond is more of a "Maybe"; I am unlikely to have any pressing agenda items for the F2F, but would take the opportunity to meet several colleagues at MSFT for other discussions.
Johannes Wilm No Yes, and prefer
Dimitri Glazkov No No I can't travel during this time. In retrospect, I probably should've attended the one in San Jose :(
Hallvord Steen No Yes I may attend (not sure yet) if it is in Europe, certainly won't if it's in the U.S.
Travis Leithead Yes Yes, but prefer not
Vincent Scheib No No Will not attend.
Wonsuk Lee Yes, and prefer Yes

More details on responses

  • Arthur Barstow: last responded on 20, January 2015 at 23:15 (UTC)
  • Chaals Nevile: last responded on 20, January 2015 at 23:26 (UTC)
  • Olli Pettay: last responded on 20, January 2015 at 23:49 (UTC)
  • Xiaoqian Wu: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 04:31 (UTC)
  • Yves Lafon: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 07:54 (UTC)
  • Daniel Appelquist: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 09:02 (UTC)
  • Léonie Watson: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 09:29 (UTC)
  • Steve Faulkner: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 09:51 (UTC)
  • Jose Manuel Cantera Fonseca: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 09:54 (UTC)
  • Eduardo Fullea: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 10:45 (UTC)
  • Janusz Majnert: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 11:23 (UTC)
  • Ryosuke Niwa: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 18:20 (UTC)
  • Shijun Sun: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 21:37 (UTC)
  • Ali Alabbas: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 22:11 (UTC)
  • Israel Hilerio: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 22:12 (UTC)
  • Ben Peters: last responded on 21, January 2015 at 23:09 (UTC)
  • Jean Michel Rouger: last responded on 22, January 2015 at 15:37 (UTC)
  • Robin Berjon: last responded on 22, January 2015 at 17:24 (UTC)
  • Sam Ruby: last responded on 22, January 2015 at 17:57 (UTC)
  • Jacob Rossi: last responded on 23, January 2015 at 05:03 (UTC)
  • Bryan Sullivan: last responded on 23, January 2015 at 05:51 (UTC)
  • Daniel Coloma: last responded on 23, January 2015 at 08:22 (UTC)
  • Jungkee Song: last responded on 26, January 2015 at 01:12 (UTC)
  • Patrick Lauke: last responded on 26, January 2015 at 09:09 (UTC)
  • Mounir Lamouri: last responded on 26, January 2015 at 11:59 (UTC)
  • Theodore Mielczarek: last responded on 26, January 2015 at 12:57 (UTC)
  • Cory Plock: last responded on 26, January 2015 at 14:07 (UTC)
  • Joshua Bell: last responded on 26, January 2015 at 18:33 (UTC)
  • Johannes Wilm: last responded on 26, January 2015 at 18:36 (UTC)
  • Dimitri Glazkov: last responded on 26, January 2015 at 19:20 (UTC)
  • Hallvord Steen: last responded on 26, January 2015 at 20:12 (UTC)
  • Travis Leithead: last responded on 26, January 2015 at 21:16 (UTC)
  • Vincent Scheib: last responded on 26, January 2015 at 21:29 (UTC)
  • Wonsuk Lee: last responded on 27, January 2015 at 01:59 (UTC)

Everybody has responded to this questionnaire.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.