W3C

Results of Questionnaire UAWG Survey for 2 May 2013

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2013-04-30 to 2013-05-24.

6 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Definition of Levels

1. Definition of Levels

This material would go in the introduction. It would not be normative material, and should be easy to read. The major audience for this new proposal for Definition of Levels section will be developers and policy makers. It is valuable to have a clear explanation of how the levels were developed when persuading policy makers to adopt the guidelines or to set a recommended adoption level as part of their policy.

Proposed

UAAG conformance levels (A, AA, AAA) provide a path for user agent developers to improve their product over time and to prioritize new features to develop. UAAG conformance levels attempt to balance the needs of people with disabilities with the difficulty the user agent developer could experience in meeting that need. There are many different types of disabilities and different types of user agents, so the UAAG level assigned to a success criterion may not precisely match the definition of the level in all circumstances.

Level A success criteria represent needs where different groups of people with disabilities are blocked from receiving information or accomplishing a task AND that the solutions to those needs are relatively minor for developers to solve or the solutions are common in the marketplace. In some cases, extensions or addons to popular browsers provide solutions.

Level AA represents needs where people with disabilities have difficulty accessing information or accomplishing a task (including tasks causing excessive fatigue), and where the solutions may be more difficult to implement or requires developing a new subsystem for the product.

Level AAA represents needs where the solution improves accessibility for specific groups or reduces fatigue to accomplish tasks, but the solution is challenging to solve, requiring a major effort or development of intelligent algorithms.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Agree with the proposal 5
Disagree with the proposal
Neutral, will accept consensus of the group
Suggest the following changes to the proposal 1

Details

Responder Definition of LevelsDefinition of Levels
Simon Harper Agree with the proposal
Jeanne F Spellman Agree with the proposal
Jan Richards Agree with the proposal
Jim Allan Agree with the proposal
Kimberly Patch Agree with the proposal
Eric Hansen Suggest the following changes to the proposal Conformance Level Designations of Success Criteria

The three levels of UAAG2 conformance (described above) are based on based on the level (A, AA, or AAA) designations of the more than 100 success criteria (i.e., specific requirements). The description of each success criterion in this document shows that designation. In making these designations, the UAWG considered both the impact of the success criterion of individuals with disabilities as well as the likely degree of technical challenge in satisfying the success criteria.

The level A designation was given to success criteria for which failure to satisfy would block access for one or more groups of individuals with disabilities. [Eric comment: Isn't the blocking of access for level A SCs much more essential aspect than technical challenge? If seems to me that while some of the level A SCs "are relatively minor for developers to solve", others are not. In a sense, if it would block access we do we really care if it is hard or easy to solve?]

The level AA designation was given to success criteria where failure to satisfy would make access difficult for one or more disability groups and where the technical challenge in satisfying would be moderate or easier.

The level AA designation was given to success criteria where failure to satisfy would make access difficult for one or more disability groups and where the technical challenge in satisfying would likely be large.

More details on responses

  • Simon Harper: last responded on 30, April 2013 at 15:15 (UTC)
  • Jeanne F Spellman: last responded on 30, April 2013 at 15:21 (UTC)
  • Jan Richards: last responded on 30, April 2013 at 20:45 (UTC)
  • Jim Allan: last responded on 2, May 2013 at 15:04 (UTC)
  • Kimberly Patch: last responded on 2, May 2013 at 18:12 (UTC)
  • Eric Hansen: last responded on 9, May 2013 at 13:37 (UTC)

Everybody has responded to this questionnaire.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire