w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.
This questionnaire was open from 2012-07-24 to 2012-08-14.
11 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I support publishing it as is | 8 |
I support publishing it; however, I suggest the changes in the comments section below (for editors' discretion now or for a later revision) | 2 |
I support publishing it only with the changes indicated as [important to be addressed before publication] in the comments section below | 1 |
I do not support publishing it because of the comments indicated as [important to be addressed before publication] in the comments section below | |
I abstain (not vote) |
Responder | Support for publishing the page |
---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry | I support publishing it as is |
Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo | I support publishing it as is |
Suzette Keith | I support publishing it as is |
Sylvie Duchateau | I support publishing it only with the changes indicated as [important to be addressed before publication] in the comments section below |
Vicki Menezes Miller | I support publishing it as is |
Jennifer Sutton | I support publishing it; however, I suggest the changes in the comments section below (for editors' discretion now or for a later revision) |
Shadi Abou-Zahra | I support publishing it as is |
Denis Boudreau | I support publishing it as is |
Helle Bjarnø | I support publishing it; however, I suggest the changes in the comments section below (for editors' discretion now or for a later revision) |
Ian Pouncey | I support publishing it as is |
Andrew Arch | I support publishing it as is |
Remember to include priority, location, suggested revision, and rationale for each comment.)
Responder | Comments |
---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry | |
Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo | |
Suzette Keith | One of my goals of this 'basic' piece was to provide useful basic content on the page and minimise the number of links off the page. Rationale - the huge number of cross-referencing links in WAI materials confuse my brain and I tend to find myself going round in ever decreasing or possibly expanding circles. I am pleased with the result. Please continue to keep the number of links in this piece to the minimum essential. |
Sylvie Duchateau | Editor's discretion: Location: h2 "Understand how people use the Web" secon bullet on Ms Laitinen Actual wording: "Ms. Laitinen is the chief accountant at an insurance company that uses web-based documents and forms over a corporate intranet. She is blind and, like many other people who are blind, she does not read braille." Proposed change: check that this description corresponds to the modified version of this storry, as, if I remember correctly, Ms Laitinen reads braille but she uses it only to check things, like spelling. In the following paragraphs, check that if the links to diversityof Web users or the following link text correspond to the agreed title, when it has been agreed. |
Vicki Menezes Miller | |
Jennifer Sutton | I've one comment. It's very much editor's discretion. Should the {@@...} notes above the conent be removed at this point? Since it's a Wiki, comments/changes may come in, but we may want this version to appear more or less "final." |
Shadi Abou-Zahra | Looks really good for the audience that it is targeting! |
Denis Boudreau | |
Helle Bjarnø | Really good content whish I had time to translate it and use here. Priority: Editors discression. Location: Under h2 The web is for all people and especially under h3 "What is web accessibility" Suggested revision: Make this section shorter by removing 2nd paragraph: Web accessibility encompasses all disabilities that affect access to the Web, including people with auditory, cognitive, neurological, physical, speech, and visual disabilities. Accessibility includes people with impairments due to ageing." Rationale: When reading this intro section I feel that we are really saying the same thing in many different ways, and maybe too many I relly had to tell myself to continue reading. But I can live with it - not all people have heard this as many times as we have... |
Ian Pouncey | |
Andrew Arch |
summary | by responder | by choice
The version is right after the first contents list:
Status: Draft Updated 00 Month 2011
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
date not listed here, put in comments below | 1 |
28 June 2012 | 9 |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Which version are you commenting on? | Comments |
---|---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo |
|
|
Suzette Keith |
|
|
Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
Jennifer Sutton |
|
|
Shadi Abou-Zahra | ||
Denis Boudreau |
|
|
Helle Bjarnø |
|
|
Ian Pouncey |
|
|
Andrew Arch |
|
10 August 2012 |
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
date not listed here, put in comments below |
|
28 June 2012 |
|
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.