w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire Videos on WCAG Requirements (Squirrel Review)
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2020-07-29 to 2020-08-24.
11 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Introduction
- Guideline 1.1 Text Alternatives
- Guideline 1.2 Time-based Media
- Guideline 1.3 Adaptable
- Guideline 1.4 Distinguishable
- Guideline 2.1 Keyboard Accessible
- Guideline 2.2 Enough Time
- Guideline 2.3 Seizures and Physical Reactions
- Guideline 2.4 Navigable
- Guideline 2.5 Input Modalities
- Guideline 3.1 Readable
- Guideline 3.2 Predictable
- Guideline 3.3 Input Assistance
- Guideline 4.1 Compatible
- Success Criterion 1.1.1 Non-text Content
- Success Criterion 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)
- Success Criterion 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)
- Success Criterion 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)
- Success Criterion 1.2.4 Captions (Live)
- Success Criterion 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)
- Success Criterion 1.2.6 Sign Language (Prerecorded)
- Success Criterion 1.2.7 Extended Audio Description (Prerecorded)
- Success Criterion 1.2.8 Media Alternative (Prerecorded)
- Success Criterion 1.2.9 Audio-only (Live)
- Success Criterion 1.3.1 Info and Relationships
- Success Criterion 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence
- Success Criterion 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics
- Success Criterion 1.3.4 Orientation
- Success Criterion 1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose
- Success Criterion 1.3.6 Identify Purpose
- Success Criterion 1.4.1 Use of Color
- Success Criterion 1.4.2 Audio Control
- Success Criterion 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)
- Success Criterion 1.4.4 Resize text
- Success Criterion 1.4.5 Images of Text
- Success Criterion 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced)
- Success Criterion 1.4.7 Low or No Background Audio
- Success Criterion 1.4.8 Visual Presentation
- Success Criterion 1.4.9 Images of Text (No Exception)
- Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow
- Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast
- Success Criterion 1.4.12 Text Spacing
- Success Criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus
- Success Criterion 2.1.1 Keyboard
- Success Criterion 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap
- Success Criterion 2.1.3 Keyboard (No Exception)
- Success Criterion 2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts
- Success Criterion 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable
- Success Criterion 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide
- Success Criterion 2.2.3 No Timing
- Success Criterion 2.2.4 Interruptions
- Success Criterion 2.2.5 Re-authenticating
- Success Criterion 2.2.6 Timeouts
- Success Criterion 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold
- Success Criterion 2.3.2 Three Flashes
- Success Criterion 2.3.3 Animation from Interactions
- Success Criterion 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
- Success Criterion 2.4.2 Page Titled
- Success Criterion 2.4.3 Focus Order
- Success Criterion 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)
- Success Criterion 2.4.5 Multiple Ways
- Success Criterion 2.4.6 Headings and Labels
- Success Criterion 2.4.7 Focus Visible
- Success Criterion 2.4.8 Location
- Success Criterion 2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only)
- Success Criterion 2.4.10 Section Headings
- Success Criterion 2.4.11 Focus Visible (Enhanced)
- Success Criterion 2.4.12 Fixed Reference Points
- Success Criterion 2.5.1 Pointer Gestures
- Success Criterion 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation
- Success Criterion 2.5.3 Label in Name
- Success Criterion 2.5.4 Motion Actuation
- Success Criterion 2.5.5 Target Size
- Success Criterion 2.5.6 Concurrent Input Mechanisms
- Success Criterion 2.5.7 Dragging
- Success Criterion 3.1.1 Language of Page
- Success Criterion 3.1.2 Language of Parts
- Success Criterion 3.1.3 Unusual Words
- Success Criterion 3.1.4 Abbreviations
- Success Criterion 3.1.5 Reading Level
- Success Criterion 3.1.6 Pronunciation
- Success Criterion 3.2.1 On Focus
- Success Criterion 3.2.2 On Input
- Success Criterion 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation
- Success Criterion 3.2.4 Consistent Identification
- Success Criterion 3.2.5 Change on Request
- Success Criterion 3.2.6 Findable Help
- Success Criterion 3.2.7 Hidden Controls
- Success Criterion 3.3.1 Error Identification
- Success Criterion 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions
- Success Criterion 3.3.3 Error Suggestion
- Success Criterion 3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)
- Success Criterion 3.3.5 Help
- Success Criterion 3.3.6 Error Prevention (All)
- Success Criterion 3.3.7 Accessible Authentication
- Success Criterion 3.3.8 Redundant Entry
- Success Criterion 4.1.1 Parsing
- Success Criterion 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value
- Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status Messages
- Other comments, suggestions, or observations
1. Introduction
This is a higher-level (squirrel) review of an analysis for videos on WCAG 2 requirements.
Please get acquainted with the following resources for this review:
- List of requirements for consideration (main resource for review, please read carefully!)
- Introduction in minutes from 17 July meeting
- Overall project description
In this survey each WCAG 2 Guideline and Success Criterion is listed, with a proposed scenario for a brief video to visualize the requirement and explain it in simple terms. The videos will potentially be embedded in Understanding WCAG 2, Accessibility Principles, and What's New in WCAG 2.1 to make them less text-heavy. The videos will likely also be used in different training settings.
Note that the final videos will include other aspects of diversity, such as gender, age, ethnicity, and disability nature (congenital, progressive, injury, age-related, etc.).
You are invited to review the following:
- You agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
- You agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario
- You do not agree with having a video for the requirement, and provide the reasons for that
- You abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Note that this list of requirements includes proposals in the latest Editor Draft of WCAG 2.2 of 21 July. These may change or get entirely dropped, and new ones may be added in the coming weeks.
Please do not take time to review wording, grammar, and typos. This is an early requirements analysis to establish an understanding of which videos we will be developing as part of this deliverable. Reminder that you can fill in some of this survey now, "Submit your answers" button at the bottom, and come back and do more later.
Details
| Responder | |
|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau | |
| Estella Oncins | |
| Laura Keen | |
| Shawn Lawton Henry | Overall, I think there are a few SCs that would benefit from a video and many SCs that would not. Videos add complexity to a page. So I think we should only add videos in places where they will really help people understand the problem that the SC is addressing &/or the solution that it provides. Rather than do videos for all or most of the SCs, I think our time and resources would be better spent on: * other videos (e.g., for How People with Disabilities Use the Web) * persona quotes for the SCs that don’t have them * a static illustration for the top of some of the SCs (e.g., like some of the examples in the Tips pages <https://www.w3.org/WAI/tips/>) In a few cases, we might consider a video to help understand the importance for people with disabilities – yet I think we should do that sparingly at the SC level. We could decide that some SCs don’t need a specific video for that SC, yet in the Understanding doc, we want to point to one (or more) of the new How People with Disabilities Use the Web videos that has content that helps appreciate the importance of that SC. I think we probably also want to add pointers in some Understanding docs to specific Perspectives Videos. [Note to Hidde to add pointers to other videos to the redesign drafts? :-] These videos seem to be only the "works well". I feel strongly that for some of the SCs, also including a video of when it does *not* work would be much more powerful and significantly help understand the point. Important: I didn't think through all of below carefully. So, I might change my opinion on specific ones when I do. And I am very open to other ideas! :-) (I commented on almost all of the SCs, and not the Guidelines. Note: I put comments in several SC questions that I did *not* check an option.) About the guidelines videos: I'm on the fence. I thought it might be a good idea... yet, the guideline text seems so simple and clear, that it doesn't feel like videos are needed? In any case, I don't much like the descriptions as they are now -- which is compliation of SC videos that I mostly found unhelpful. It might be a useful exercise to look at the Principles page by itself and think about if videos would be useful there, and what they might be like? Overall, I'm thinking that most of what EOWG participants liked about the idea of videos will be met with the videos for How People with Disabilities Use the Web, and so most of these Guidelines and SC videos won't be needed in addition to those. |
| Mark Palmer | |
| Kevin White | This is a really challenging questionnaire. Not just because of the length but because it is lumping together Guideline videos with Success Criteria videos. I have I think there is also a bit of a challenge in that it is often easier to illustrate the SC by presenting the problem rather than the well designed solution. These seem to focus on the solution. This might just be my misunderstanding the vision for each video though. Another challenge is whether the videos are meant to explain and illustrate the need for the SC or explain the SC in a more digestible way. In the case of the former, then all the videos are required. I have provided answers based on the latter though. I haven't responded to the guideline videos as I think those would be better explored once SC videos are broadly agreed upon. |
| Daniel Montalvo | |
| Sharron Rush | I can't comment on many of the videos specifically since I seldom watch/use them. But I know that most people do and I think it is a good idea for that reason and to clarify some concepts. I am very much in favor of illustrating multiple SCs with only one video. Otherwise I trust the judgement of the group, especially those who rely on videos for processing information. Thanks for all this good thinking and the hard work of producing clear concept videos. |
| Vicki Menezes Miller | Apologies but due to lack of time, I have not devoted as much time as I would have liked to. |
| Andrew Arch | |
| Howard Kramer |
2. Guideline 1.1 Text Alternatives
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 1.1 Text Alternatives and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 4 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 1.1 Text Alternatives | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
It is not clear for me if the video shows good examples or what this implies when text alternative is too verbose or incorrect. If the goal is to show good practice, may be it could be interesting to show alternative to a complex image and not talking about logos. Or, if you want to talk about logos, not displaying as laternative "w3C logo" but simply "W3C, World Wide Web Consrotium". |
| Estella Oncins |
|
Maybe also include the difference between simple and complex images. Some images have an intended purpose which is not explained in the alt text. |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer |
|
|
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
A suggestion: Nowadays, people try to add alt text but in an over enthusiastic way and to the greatest description for any image, including decorative images. If possible, introduce an example in which poorly entered alt text is given. |
| Andrew Arch |
|
Be good to have a complex image included as these seem to cause the most trouble for web authors |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
3. Guideline 1.2 Time-based Media
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 1.2 Time-based Media and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 2 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 1.2 Time-based Media | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Elderly people with low vision might also be considered for this video. |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer |
|
|
| Kevin White |
|
The distinction between the various aspects of 1.2.X SCs I think is important. It is easy to get lost in the variations of live/prerecorded, audio description, media alternative, sign language etc. I think the overview video should seek to explain that rather than the specific SCs. |
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
4. Guideline 1.3 Adaptable
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 1.3 Adaptable and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 2 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 1.3 Adaptable | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer |
|
|
| Kevin White |
|
This is borderline. I think there is more value in the individual SC videos. |
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
I think it is important to have a scenario of a screen reader user benefiting of good page structure, good headings, landmarks and labels. I would expand the scenario proposed, "Person with aphasia hears screen reader output that matches the visual sequence), |
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
I agree with all - just wasn't sure I understood the 1.3.2 (Person with aphasia hears screen reader output that matches the visual sequence). I might have to see it before I can judge. |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
5. Guideline 1.4 Distinguishable
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 1.4 Distinguishable and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 2 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 1.4 Distinguishable | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
Color blindness is related to vision of colour, but not contrasts between foreground and background, so I don't understand the purpose of showing someone with color blindness in this video. Perhaps give clearer explanations about what this means. |
| Estella Oncins |
|
Not clear how the narrative of the videos can be to address the different personas and still make the SC clear to the audience. Specially for 1.4.2 (Audio control) which is a different channel than text (visual) |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer |
|
|
| Kevin White | ||
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
6. Guideline 2.1 Keyboard Accessible
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 2.1 Keyboard Accessible and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 8 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 2.1 Keyboard Accessible | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer |
|
|
| Kevin White | ||
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
what about also considering tabbing out of a modal and continuing behind it invisibly (modal didn't trap the keyboard until dismissed) |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
7. Guideline 2.2 Enough Time
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 2.2 Enough Time and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 8 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 2.2 Enough Time | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Maybe include also a persona with cognitive disabilities? |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer |
|
|
| Kevin White | ||
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
8. Guideline 2.3 Seizures and Physical Reactions
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 2.3 Seizures and Physical Reactions and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 8 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 2.3 Seizures and Physical Reactions | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer |
|
|
| Kevin White | ||
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
9. Guideline 2.4 Navigable
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 2.4 Navigable and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 2 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 2.4 Navigable | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer |
|
|
| Kevin White | ||
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
I would also include navigational mechanisms provided by assistive technologies such as screen readers, that rely on good page titles, links and headings texts, etc. |
| Sharron Rush |
|
So are you saying that all these videos would be mashed up into one to illustrate the Guidelines and then broken into separate ones for the SC? Seems a bit excessive...?? |
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
10. Guideline 2.5 Input Modalities
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 2.5 Input Modalities and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 2.5 Input Modalities | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer |
|
|
| Kevin White | ||
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
11. Guideline 3.1 Readable
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 3.1 Readable and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 3.1 Readable | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer |
|
|
| Kevin White | ||
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
Will the AT be text-to-speech software rather than a fully-blown screen reader like JAWS? |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
12. Guideline 3.2 Predictable
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 3.2 Predictable and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 3.2 Predictable | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White | ||
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
13. Guideline 3.3 Input Assistance
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 3.3 Input Assistance and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 3.3 Input Assistance | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White | ||
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
Person with dementia is provided with clear instructions on how to complete the form (eg. "all form fields are required" - would have to see it before could make a determination. |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
14. Guideline 4.1 Compatible
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 4.1 Compatible and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Guideline 4.1 Compatible | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White | ||
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
Would have to see it implemented before making determination. This is a complex guideline. Not sure it can be conveyed properly until I see the implementation. |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
15. Success Criterion 1.1.1 Non-text Content
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.1.1 Non-text Content and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.1.1 Non-text Content | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Well understood and communicated concept. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
16. Success Criterion 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Missing audio description for visually disabled audiences |
| Laura Keen |
|
This SC seems really straight forward and easy to understand. I'm not sure a video is required. |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
" Person who is deaf is provided with a transcript for an audio-only podcast " Can be communicated with a static image just as well. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Podcasts are generally overlooked. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
17. Success Criterion 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 4 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Captions are also useful for people speaking a language different from the video/audio (linguistically disabled) |
| Laura Keen |
|
This SC seems really straight forward and easy to understand. I'm not sure a video is required. |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
" Person who is hard of hearing is provided with captions for a video with audio " Can be communicated with a static image just as well. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Well understood and communicated concept. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
18. Success Criterion 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 2 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Elderly could also be included |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Many people don't know or understand what this is, so video example would be useful. You don't really have to have a person, though. Could just have a simple video clip with description. " Person with tunnel vision is provided with audio descriptions for a movie " How would you show that they have tunnel vision? I guess you'd have to simulate what they see? Maybe not worth that? |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
"Person with tunnel vision" may be too specific and/or too difficult to communicate in a video. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
I am abstaining from many of these but captions seem so self explanatory, is a video really necessary? |
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
19. Success Criterion 1.2.4 Captions (Live)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.4 Captions (Live) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 4 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.2.4 Captions (Live) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Live captions differ broadly from pre-recorded captions. I would not use the same video. They are usually not as timely synchronised and display mode is usually verbatim not in pop-up (prerecorded) |
| Laura Keen |
|
This SC seems really straight forward and easy to understand. I'm not sure a video is required. |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Reuse video from Success Criterion 1.2.2 " Person who is hard of hearing is provided with captions for a video with audio " Can be communicated with a static image just as well. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Well understood and communicated concept. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
20. Success Criterion 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 8 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Reuse video from Success Criterion 1.2.3 " Person with tunnel vision is provided with audio descriptions for a movie " |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
21. Success Criterion 1.2.6 Sign Language (Prerecorded)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.6 Sign Language (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 4 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 2 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.2.6 Sign Language (Prerecorded) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Not clear to understand the proposal of this video because a "press conference" is live not prerecorded. |
| Laura Keen |
|
This SC seems really straight forward and easy to understand. I'm not sure a video is required. |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Person who is deaf is provided with sign language for a press conference Can be communicated with a static image *almost* just as well. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Well understood and communicated concept. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
22. Success Criterion 1.2.7 Extended Audio Description (Prerecorded)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.7 Extended Audio Description (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.2.7 Extended Audio Description (Prerecorded) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Extended audio description is not the same as prerecorded audio description. I would not use the same video. |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Reuse video from Success Criterion 1.2.3 " Person with tunnel vision is provided with audio descriptions for a movie " |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush | ||
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
Alternatively it could be for a government advert of national/state importance, eg a health or safety announcement during a pandemic, bushfire, etc |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
23. Success Criterion 1.2.8 Media Alternative (Prerecorded)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.8 Media Alternative (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.2.8 Media Alternative (Prerecorded) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins | Again, if it is live is not prerecorded. | |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | " Person who is deaf-blind is provided with a live-ticker for a live broadcast of a match " I don't know what a "live-ticker" is. And, isn't this for prerecorded, not live? | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
I assume a live ticker be available to a Braille device? |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
24. Success Criterion 1.2.9 Audio-only (Live)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.9 Audio-only (Live) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 2 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.2.9 Audio-only (Live) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
If it is a live broadcast is not audio-only it is video and audio. |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Not sure that using the same example as 1.2.8 is a good idea. Is there something that can highlight the difference between the two SC? |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
25. Success Criterion 1.3.1 Info and Relationships
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.3.1 Info and Relationships and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.3.1 Info and Relationships | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | " Person with tremors is able to select a checkbox by clicking on the larger label " doesn't seem to illustrate "1.3.1 Info and Relationships (Level A): Information, structure, and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined or are available in text. " ? | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Borderline on this one. I think there is probably a need to explain this SC more but there is a lot within it. Using form labels as the example runs the risk of that being the focus. It might be that more is required in the video to illustrate the different impact that programmatic structure has on use. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
This seems like a much larger issue that the video would indicate. |
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
26. Success Criterion 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Yes, this one lends itself to video showing reading order by screen reader. I wonder about showing a good and bad example? " Person with aphasia hears screen reader output that matches the visual sequence " aphasia = loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage. hum, so doesn't seem like good fit for this |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
27. Success Criterion 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | " Person with low vision using re-flowed content due to text-resizing understands which button to press (button was beside and is now below the instruction/text) " I guess to really illustrate the wording of the SC, you'd need to have instructions that say something like: "the button after" and opposed to "the button to the right of". I do not think this needs a video. Instead, could have examples that illustrate -- preferably good & bad. | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think this would benefit much more from the problem being presented. For example, 'Please click on the red button' or 'Contact details can be found on the right of the page'. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
scenario seems irrelevant to topic? |
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
I find this SC a bit confusing so I'm going to abstain from comment. |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
28. Success Criterion 1.3.4 Orientation
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.3.4 Orientation and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.3.4 Orientation | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
As a user I also benefit from rotation. It would also be great to have examples that benefit all types of users. |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | "Person with cerebral palsy using tablet mounted on wheelchair can use the app because it does not rely on a particular orientation" I mildly don't think this needs a video. It's pretty easy to understand from the quote text. https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#134-orientation-aa could have a static image. | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
seems complex to communicate in a short video but OK if it can be done |
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
29. Success Criterion 1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | I don't think this needs a video. It's pretty easy to understand from the quote text https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#135-identify-input-purpose-aa I guess the video would show the fields being automatically populated? I mildly think the video itself would take more effort to watch and understand than just reading the quote text. | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Gaaah. Can we just rewrite the SC or more particularly the Understanding! Extremely confusing presentation and I think the SC example just adds to the confusion. Definitely needs a video but I think it needs something to highlight the significance of the autocomplete value. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
30. Success Criterion 1.3.6 Identify Purpose
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.3.6 Identify Purpose and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.3.6 Identify Purpose | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | Maybe good to have a video showing "software that changes the words in the navigation into symbols." | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
As above |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
31. Success Criterion 1.4.1 Use of Color
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.1 Use of Color and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 3 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.1 Use of Color | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
Woudn't it be useful to give the example of colour blind person for this success criterion? |
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | Doesn't need a video. Instead, can put the examples from https://www.w3.org/WAI/tips/designing/#dont-use-color-alone-to-convey-information | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Think the example is relatively common and likely not to illustrate the problem. Thinking about graphs with coloured columns, or pie charts, or coloured input buttons. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
As '*' not always announced (depends on verbosity) can we use the words 'required' instead? |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
32. Success Criterion 1.4.2 Audio Control
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.2 Audio Control and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 8 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.2 Audio Control | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
"Person with autism distracted by automatically playing music and doesn't know how to easily stop it but is relieved when it stops by itself after 3 seconds" Would it be stronger to show website audio overlapping screen reader audio? |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
33. Success Criterion 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 2 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
Same comment as for question 5 on colour blind person. |
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
" Person with color blindness is able to read the text because there is sufficient contrast between foreground and background " seems lame. Maybe a good video would be demonstrating how a page is "seen" by a person with "normal" contrast sensitivity, and then that same page by a person with low contrast sensitivity -- and showing low-contrast text being invisible for the second user -- then a good version where it is still visible. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Well understood and communicated concept. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
Seems simple to do but still scratching my head about how much it is needed. |
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
34. Success Criterion 1.4.4 Resize text
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.4 Resize text and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.4 Resize text | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I think good to have video that shows how a page changes as the text size is increased. And I think this is one (of several) where it would be good to show a bad version (where text and buttons get cut off or overlapping) and a good version. separate videos: video for 1.4.4 should show content disappearing; video for 1.4.10 should focus on horizontal scrolling |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Borderline on this one. On balance I think the criteria is clear. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
35. Success Criterion 1.4.5 Images of Text
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.5 Images of Text and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 4 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 3 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.5 Images of Text | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Make sure that "fancy-styled headings" are easy to understand/understandable for people with cognitive disabilities. |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
"Person with low vision using screen magnification can comfortably read fancy-styled headings because they are not an images " again, I think show a good and bad. I think it would be more clear and powerful to show a user increasing text size, and show that some of the text increases and some does not ('cause it's image) -- and then how a good where it all does. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Not sure that images of text are common as headings. More likely to be in infographic, logo or meme image. Regardless I think this is a pretty clear SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
not so sure about the scenario proposed, but don't have a better one off-hand |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
36. Success Criterion 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
(same comments as for 1.4.3. Maybe show how they can *barely* make out the text with ratio of 4.5:1 and can more easily see the text with ratio of 7:1 ! :-) |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Well understood and communicated concept. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
37. Success Criterion 1.4.7 Low or No Background Audio
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.7 Low or No Background Audio and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.7 Low or No Background Audio | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
This also applies to visually disabled when mixing main audio and alternative audio for the AD. |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | mildly don't think a video would help in understanding this. if so, do a bad then good. | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I am not sure the suggestion would capture the problem of low or no background. On balance though I think the SC is pretty clear. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
Maybe the background soundtrack can be louder in the dialogue gaps |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
38. Success Criterion 1.4.8 Visual Presentation
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.8 Visual Presentation and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 2 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.8 Visual Presentation | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
Suggest reusing video for 1.4.12 |
| Shawn Lawton Henry | mildly think video would be good -- would want to illustrate before and after they apply CSS to make those changes. | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Arrgh I can just see this leading to a swath of tools that website owners can slap on their sites and believe that all is well with their accessibility! |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
39. Success Criterion 1.4.9 Images of Text (No Exception)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.9 Images of Text (No Exception) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.9 Images of Text (No Exception) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins | See comment on 35 | |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
As above |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
40. Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Maybe this success criterion can be grouped with 1.4.4, 1.4.11, 1.4.12 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I think good to have video that shows how a page changes as the text size is increased. And I think this is one (of several) where it would be good to show a bad version -- and HOW HARD it is to read with horizontal scrolling (there is such a video in the W3Cx course :)) and a good version. separate videos: video for 1.4.10 should focus on horizontal scrolling; video for 1.4.4 should show content disappearing |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Borderline on this one. On balance I think the criteria is clear. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
41. Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 40 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Maybe a good video would be demonstrating how a page is "seen" by a person with "normal" contrast sensitivity, and then that same page by a person with low contrast sensitivity -- and showing low-contrast controls being invisible for the second user -- then a good version where the controls are still visible. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
42. Success Criterion 1.4.12 Text Spacing
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.12 Text Spacing and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.12 Text Spacing | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 40 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | mildly think video would be good -- would want to illustrate before and after they apply CSS to make those changes. | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Same problem as 1.4.8, how to present this in a way to avoid that risk. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
43. Success Criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I think a video would greatly help in understanding this! I don't think this is sufficient to illustrate the problem "Person with low vision using screen magnification is not disturbed by pop-up boxes appearing and disappearing on focus and hover" I think need to more clearly illustrate these persona quotes: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#1413-content-on-hover-or-focus-aa (I think some folks in LVTF can give you specific examples where it happens in live websites now) |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
44. Success Criterion 2.1.1 Keyboard
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.1.1 Keyboard and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.1.1 Keyboard | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Maybe this success criterion can be grouped with 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Not sure, I think the SC is quite clear. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
A lot will be left out with only this one example but ... |
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
YES |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
45. Success Criterion 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 44 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
" Reuse video from Guideline 2.1": " Person with motor disabilities using a mouth stick can type date directly without needing to select it by mouse from a widget " disagree with re-using same video. Need to actually show a keyboard trap. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
46. Success Criterion 2.1.3 Keyboard (No Exception)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.1.3 Keyboard (No Exception) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.1.3 Keyboard (No Exception) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 44 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Not sure, I think the SC is quite clear. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
47. Success Criterion 2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | illustrating the problem quote would be compelling https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#214-character-key-shortcuts-a | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Borderline on this one. On balance I think the criteria is clear. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
48. Success Criterion 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | a video is not needed to help people understand what this SC means. however, " Person with motor disabilities using single switch to type needs more time to type, and can extend the session without losing content." would help them understand the importance of it. | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think the SC is quite clear even if Security colleagues regularly ignore the issue. Hmm... on that basis alone it might be worth it |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
49. Success Criterion 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Maybe this success criterion can be grouped with 2.2.3, 2.2.4,2.2.5, 2.2.6 all related to cognitive |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | a video is not needed to help people understand what this SC means. however, a good video showing how it can really prevent someone from using content would be good to help people appreciate the importance of it. (there is such a video in the W3Cx course :-) | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think this criteria is clear. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
50. Success Criterion 2.2.3 No Timing
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.2.3 No Timing and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 3 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.2.3 No Timing | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 49 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Not sure this needs a video as the SC is quite clear. The understanding document might benefit from the addition of the example outlined in the video though. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
nice one :) |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
51. Success Criterion 2.2.4 Interruptions
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.2.4 Interruptions and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.2.4 Interruptions | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 49 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | " Person with anxiety can set application to "do not disturb" mode, to avoid unnecessary notifications " I know that we're wanting to have diversity and not too heavy on screen reader. However, I think this is a much stronger example: It also allows users who are blind or have low vision to keep their "viewing" focus on the content they are currently reading. -- that is, showing focus being pulled away, and then the user struggling to find their place again. | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
52. Success Criterion 2.2.5 Re-authenticating
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.2.5 Re-authenticating and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.2.5 Re-authenticating | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 49 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I don't think a video helps understand this SC. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
53. Success Criterion 2.2.6 Timeouts
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.2.6 Timeouts and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.2.6 Timeouts | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 49 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I don't think a video helps understand this SC. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White | As per 2.2.1 | |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
54. Success Criterion 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
"Person with photo-sensitivity wanting to watch a video is sure that it has no dangerous content. " I don't think a video helps understand this SC. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
55. Success Criterion 2.3.2 Three Flashes
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.3.2 Three Flashes and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.3.2 Three Flashes | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
"Person with photo-sensitivity wanting to watch a video is sure that it has no dangerous content. " I don't think a video helps understand this SC. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
56. Success Criterion 2.3.3 Animation from Interactions
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.3.3 Animation from Interactions and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 3 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.3.3 Animation from Interactions | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
I would group this SC with 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I think it would be good to have a video that illustrates examples of "Motion animation triggered by interaction" |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I am not sure that the example describes motion animation. There is a change as a result of motion on the part of the user but not sure that is the same thing. Something like clicking a button and screen elements spiralling away to be replaced by other elements maybe, or presentation changes with animation actions attached. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
57. Success Criterion 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Persons using a screen reader also suffer from this. |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC - ok, some ambiguity but I don't think the video would help! |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
58. Success Criterion 2.4.2 Page Titled
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.2 Page Titled and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.4.2 Page Titled | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
I would group this with 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.3, 2.4.4 all grouped as A level and can be applied in visual and physical |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
59. Success Criterion 2.4.3 Focus Order
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.3 Focus Order and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.4.3 Focus Order | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 58, this is also visual |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
mild |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think the example doesn't really add much to the understanding. If it could be used to explore the preservation of meaning and operability then that might make it more useful. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
60. Success Criterion 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 58 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
mild |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think this is one where the poor implementation is more illustrative. Also, 'in context' is something that I think would be more useful to explore than simply decent link text. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
61. Success Criterion 2.4.5 Multiple Ways
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.5 Multiple Ways and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.4.5 Multiple Ways | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
mildly think a video is not particularly helpful for understanding this one. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Borderline on this one. On balance I think the criteria is clear. Although this is only from reading all the techniques; the examples are a bit poor. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
62. Success Criterion 2.4.6 Headings and Labels
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.6 Headings and Labels and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.4.6 Headings and Labels | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
mildly think a video is not particularly helpful for understanding this one. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
Maybe the headings could also be available as 'in page' navigation? |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
63. Success Criterion 2.4.7 Focus Visible
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.7 Focus Visible and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 9 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.4.7 Focus Visible | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
mildly think a video is helpful for this -- although static image can probably convey it almost as well |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Borderline. I think the SC is clear but the issue is ubiquitous enough to require an example. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
64. Success Criterion 2.4.8 Location
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.8 Location and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.4.8 Location | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | mildly think a video is helpful for this -- although static image can probably convey it almost as well | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
Not enough detail to determine. |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
65. Success Criterion 2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | "Reuse video from Success Criterion 2.4.4" : "Person who is blind using screen reader understands where the link goes because it appears in context" I think that I disagree with using the same video. This one is that the link itself makes sense, without needing to know any context around it. | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
If there is one for 2.4.4 then easy for this one. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
66. Success Criterion 2.4.10 Section Headings
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.10 Section Headings and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.4.10 Section Headings | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I don't think video is helpful in understanding this one. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
Would a user of a screen reader also help in illustrating the importance of section headings versus a long passage of text without section headings. |
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
67. Success Criterion 2.4.11 Focus Visible (Enhanced)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.11 Focus Visible (Enhanced) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.4.11 Focus Visible (Enhanced) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
68. Success Criterion 2.4.12 Fixed Reference Points
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.12 Fixed Reference Points and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.4.12 Fixed Reference Points | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
persona quotes now available in https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#2413-fixed-reference-points-a I mildly think a video doesn't help understanding this one. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Hmm... not even sure on the value of the SC. Which version would be the canonical one from which all other page numbering should be derived? |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
69. Success Criterion 2.5.1 Pointer Gestures
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.1 Pointer Gestures and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 2 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.5.1 Pointer Gestures | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
I would group 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.5.3 and 2.5.4 level A apply to physical and visual |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I mildly think that a video doesn't help given the existing persona quotes https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#251-pointer-gestures-a |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Not sure that the example would illustrate this SC. Pinch to zoom is effectively zoom and using that wouldn't really show much. Not got an immediate idea though. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
70. Success Criterion 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 69 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I mildly think that a video doesn't help given the existing persona quotes https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#252-pointer-cancellation-a although maybe illustrating this would be helpful? : " if I accidentally touch the "End Call" button, I can just slide my finger off the "End Call" button and it won't end the call." |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
71. Success Criterion 2.5.3 Label in Name
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.3 Label in Name and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.5.3 Label in Name | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 69 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Really the best way to explain this would be an example of code te.g., https://w3c.github.io/wcag/techniques/general/G208#examples |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
72. Success Criterion 2.5.4 Motion Actuation
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.4 Motion Actuation and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 3 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.5.4 Motion Actuation | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 69 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
No video needed. persona quotes are sufficient https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#254-motion-actuation-a |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
73. Success Criterion 2.5.5 Target Size
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.5 Target Size and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.5.5 Target Size | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
No video needed. persona quotes are sufficient https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#255-target-size-aaa (although maybe editor whats to be the protagonist in this video ;-) |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
74. Success Criterion 2.5.6 Concurrent Input Mechanisms
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.6 Concurrent Input Mechanisms and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.5.6 Concurrent Input Mechanisms | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
No video needed. persona quotes are sufficient https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#256-concurrent-input-mechanisms-aaa |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I agree this could benefit from a video but the example seems limited and I am not even sure how you would do that in a web interface! Not the example, but limit input mechanism. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
75. Success Criterion 2.5.7 Dragging
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.7 Dragging and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 2.5.7 Dragging | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I mildly think that a video doesn't help given the persona quotes : https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#257-dragging-aa |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
76. Success Criterion 3.1.1 Language of Page
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.1.1 Language of Page and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.1.1 Language of Page | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video not helpful for understanding this SC. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
see 3.1 comment |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
77. Success Criterion 3.1.2 Language of Parts
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.1.2 Language of Parts and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.1.2 Language of Parts | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Mildly think Video not helpful for understanding this SC. If do one, this should have screen reader change language of parts it's reading. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
see 3.1 comment |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
78. Success Criterion 3.1.3 Unusual Words
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.1.3 Unusual Words and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 2 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.1.3 Unusual Words | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
I would include it in the video 3.1 and group 3.1.3, 3.1.4, 3.1.5 and 3.1.6 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video not helpful for understanding. (and if do video, "Person with language disability can understand the text more easily because it is written to avoid difficult words, abbreviations, and complex sentence structures " does not address the SC "A mechanism is available for identifying specific definitions of words or phrases used in an unusual or restricted way, including idioms and jargon. " ) |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
The example suggests rewriting to remove the unusual works but the SC indicates that a mechanism to explain those words is what is needed. Think there needs something to show a glossary, pop-up definitions, help icon or some such to explain complex words that have to be there. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
79. Success Criterion 3.1.4 Abbreviations
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.1.4 Abbreviations and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.1.4 Abbreviations | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 78 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video not helpful for understanding. (and if do video, "Person with language disability can understand the text more easily because it is written to avoid difficult words, abbreviations, and complex sentence structures " does not address this specific SC |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
3.1.3 does not account for abbreviations. This might be one to drop as how to achieve it is clear. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
80. Success Criterion 3.1.5 Reading Level
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.1.5 Reading Level and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.1.5 Reading Level | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 78 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video not helpful for understanding. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think this would benefit from thinking about the 'supplemental content' aspect rather than the rewrite aspect. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
81. Success Criterion 3.1.6 Pronunciation
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.1.6 Pronunciation and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 4 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 3 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.1.6 Pronunciation | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 78 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video not helpful for understanding. (and if do video, "Person with language disability can understand the text more easily because it is written to avoid difficult words, abbreviations, and complex sentence structures " does not address this specific SC |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Similar to 3.1.3 but would need to include a specific element of the pronunciation. Although I am borderline on whether this is actually required. The examples in the SC understanding are quite clear. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
82. Success Criterion 3.2.1 On Focus
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.1 On Focus and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.2.1 On Focus | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Mildly think a video doesn't help understand this one. Persona quotes would be enough. (If do video, would need to show bad to really help understanding.) |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
83. Success Criterion 3.2.2 On Input
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.2 On Input and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.2.2 On Input | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Mildly think a video doesn't help understand this one. Persona quotes would be enough. (If do video, would need to show bad to really help understanding.) |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think this is distinct from 3.2.1 and needs to use an example that is distinct. Unless the idea is to include, for example, tabbing to an element followed by nasty change then submitting a form followed by another nasty change. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
84. Success Criterion 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video doesn't help understanding. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think the SC is quite clear. If there is a perceived need for this then I would suggest a different form for the video as buttons being in the same place may be difficult to make 'real' enough. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
85. Success Criterion 3.2.4 Consistent Identification
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.4 Consistent Identification and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 7 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.2.4 Consistent Identification | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video doesn't help understanding. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
86. Success Criterion 3.2.5 Change on Request
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.5 Change on Request and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 3 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.2.5 Change on Request | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
Not clear how it relates to 3.2.1 and to physical https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/change-on-request.html Individuals who are unable to detect changes of context or may not realize that the context has changed are less likely to become disoriented while navigating a site Some individuals with low vision, with reading and intellectual disabilities, and who have difficulty interpreting visual cues may benefit from additional cues in order to detect changes of context. People with certain cognitive limitations do not get confused if automatic redirects are performed by the Web server instead of the browser. |
| Laura Keen | ||
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video doesn't help understanding. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think 3.2.1 explains the problem and solution, this explores including a user option to switch the whole thing off. Not sure whether that would add much to the 3.2.1 video and not sure how much additional help it provides by including as a separate video. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
87. Success Criterion 3.2.6 Findable Help
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.6 Findable Help and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.2.6 Findable Help | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
video doesn't help understanding. persona quotes sufficient : https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#326-findable-help-a |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
88. Success Criterion 3.2.7 Hidden Controls
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.7 Hidden Controls and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.2.7 Hidden Controls | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
video doesn't help understanding. persona quotes sufficient : https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#327-hidden-controls-aa |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
89. Success Criterion 3.3.1 Error Identification
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.1 Error Identification and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.3.1 Error Identification | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
I would group 3.3.1 to 3.3.8 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video doesn't help understanding. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
90. Success Criterion 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 89 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video doesn't help understanding. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
91. Success Criterion 3.3.3 Error Suggestion
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.3 Error Suggestion and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.3.3 Error Suggestion | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 89 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video doesn't help understanding. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
92. Success Criterion 3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 89 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video doesn't help understanding. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
93. Success Criterion 3.3.5 Help
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.5 Help and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 2 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.3.5 Help | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 89 |
| Laura Keen |
|
+1 to combine with 3.2.6 |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video doesn't help understanding. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
yes, could be combined |
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
94. Success Criterion 3.3.6 Error Prevention (All)
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.6 Error Prevention (All) and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.3.6 Error Prevention (All) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 89 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Video doesn't help understanding. |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
Reuse of video is fine but the distinction between "Legal, Financial and Data" and "All" would need to be drawn out. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
95. Success Criterion 3.3.7 Accessible Authentication
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.7 Accessible Authentication and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.3.7 Accessible Authentication | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 89 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
video doesn't help understanding. persona quotes sufficient: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#337-accessible-authentication-a |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I am not sure that CAPTCHA counts as a cognitive function test. |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
96. Success Criterion 3.3.8 Redundant Entry
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.8 Redundant Entry and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 4 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 3 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 3.3.8 Redundant Entry | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
See comment 89 |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
video doesn't help understanding. persona quotes sufficient: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#338-redundant-entry-a |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think the example provided is a bit obvious and I can't think of anywhere that doesn't do this... or I haven't used anywhere that has done this in the past. I think it would need a different example - contact details having logged in with email address? |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
97. Success Criterion 4.1.1 Parsing
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 4.1.1 Parsing and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 5 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 3 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 4.1.1 Parsing | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | proposed video scenario is: "No video (this SC is being questioned)" :-) | |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
98. Success Criterion 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
video doesn't help understanding |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
99. Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status Messages
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status Messages and answer the questions below.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) | 6 |
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below | 1 |
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below | 1 |
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status Messages | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Estella Oncins |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
video doesn't help understanding, persona quotes sufficient |
| Mark Palmer | ||
| Kevin White |
|
I think this needs a video separate from 4.1 |
| Daniel Montalvo | ||
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) |
|
| I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below |
|
| I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below |
|
| I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) |
|
100. Other comments, suggestions, or observations
Please provide any other comments, suggestions, or observations you may have.
Details
| Responder | Other comments, suggestions, or observations |
|---|---|
| Sylvie Duchateau | |
| Estella Oncins | Great work to illustrate SC with actual user needs. From my point of views some SC criteria could be grouped by level and type of need cognitive/visual/physical. This would help to better illustrate the interaction of the users with the web. Use cases for videos related to SC for audio descriptions and captions need to be reviewed, specially regarding prerecorded and live concepts, which really differ in terms of professional work and output for the users. Maybe some examples could also be illustrated with users that do not present any type of (dis)ability but struggle with the web. |
| Laura Keen | |
| Shawn Lawton Henry | phew! it was a lot of work just going through the work to complete this survey. Doing all those videos would be... |
| Mark Palmer | |
| Kevin White | |
| Daniel Montalvo | |
| Sharron Rush | Good luck, seems like a lot of work! |
| Vicki Menezes Miller | |
| Andrew Arch | |
| Howard Kramer | Nice work. |
More details on responses
- Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 7, August 2020 at 15:02 (UTC)
- Estella Oncins: last responded on 12, August 2020 at 11:44 (UTC)
- Laura Keen: last responded on 20, August 2020 at 19:56 (UTC)
- Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 21, August 2020 at 15:44 (UTC)
- Mark Palmer: last responded on 21, August 2020 at 23:08 (UTC)
- Kevin White: last responded on 24, August 2020 at 15:15 (UTC)
- Daniel Montalvo: last responded on 24, August 2020 at 16:29 (UTC)
- Sharron Rush: last responded on 24, August 2020 at 16:52 (UTC)
- Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 24, August 2020 at 20:35 (UTC)
- Andrew Arch: last responded on 24, August 2020 at 23:51 (UTC)
- Howard Kramer: last responded on 25, August 2020 at 04:34 (UTC)
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Eric Velleman
- Shadi Abou-Zahra
- Kazuhito Kidachi
- Jedi Lin
- David Sloan
- Mary Jo Mueller
- Reinaldo Ferraz
- Bill Kasdorf
- Cristina Mussinelli
- Kevin White
- Kevin Rydberg
- Adina Halter
- Denis Boudreau
- Sarah Pulis
- Bill Tyler
- Gregorio Pellegrino
- Ruoxi Ran
- Jennifer Chadwick
- Sean Kelly
- Muhammad Saleem
- Sarah Lewthwaite
- Jade Matos Carew
- Sonsoles López Pernas
- Greta Krafsig
- Jason McKee
- Jayne Schurick
- Billie Johnston
- Michele Williams
- Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
- Brian Elton
- Julianna Rowsell
- Tabitha Mahoney
- Fred Edora
- Rabab Gomaa
- Marcelo Paiva
- Eloisa Guerrero
- Leonard Beasley
- Frankie Wolf
- Supriya Makude
- Aleksandar Cindrikj
- Angela Young
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project