W3C

Results of Questionnaire Videos on WCAG Requirements (Squirrel Review)

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2020-07-29 to 2020-08-24.

11 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Introduction
  2. Guideline 1.1 Text Alternatives
  3. Guideline 1.2 Time-based Media
  4. Guideline 1.3 Adaptable
  5. Guideline 1.4 Distinguishable
  6. Guideline 2.1 Keyboard Accessible
  7. Guideline 2.2 Enough Time
  8. Guideline 2.3 Seizures and Physical Reactions
  9. Guideline 2.4 Navigable
  10. Guideline 2.5 Input Modalities
  11. Guideline 3.1 Readable
  12. Guideline 3.2 Predictable
  13. Guideline 3.3 Input Assistance
  14. Guideline 4.1 Compatible
  15. Success Criterion 1.1.1 Non-text Content
  16. Success Criterion 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)
  17. Success Criterion 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)
  18. Success Criterion 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)
  19. Success Criterion 1.2.4 Captions (Live)
  20. Success Criterion 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)
  21. Success Criterion 1.2.6 Sign Language (Prerecorded)
  22. Success Criterion 1.2.7 Extended Audio Description (Prerecorded)
  23. Success Criterion 1.2.8 Media Alternative (Prerecorded)
  24. Success Criterion 1.2.9 Audio-only (Live)
  25. Success Criterion 1.3.1 Info and Relationships
  26. Success Criterion 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence
  27. Success Criterion 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics
  28. Success Criterion 1.3.4 Orientation
  29. Success Criterion 1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose
  30. Success Criterion 1.3.6 Identify Purpose
  31. Success Criterion 1.4.1 Use of Color
  32. Success Criterion 1.4.2 Audio Control
  33. Success Criterion 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)
  34. Success Criterion 1.4.4 Resize text
  35. Success Criterion 1.4.5 Images of Text
  36. Success Criterion 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced)
  37. Success Criterion 1.4.7 Low or No Background Audio
  38. Success Criterion 1.4.8 Visual Presentation
  39. Success Criterion 1.4.9 Images of Text (No Exception)
  40. Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow
  41. Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast
  42. Success Criterion 1.4.12 Text Spacing
  43. Success Criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus
  44. Success Criterion 2.1.1 Keyboard
  45. Success Criterion 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap
  46. Success Criterion 2.1.3 Keyboard (No Exception)
  47. Success Criterion 2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts
  48. Success Criterion 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable
  49. Success Criterion 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide
  50. Success Criterion 2.2.3 No Timing
  51. Success Criterion 2.2.4 Interruptions
  52. Success Criterion 2.2.5 Re-authenticating
  53. Success Criterion 2.2.6 Timeouts
  54. Success Criterion 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold
  55. Success Criterion 2.3.2 Three Flashes
  56. Success Criterion 2.3.3 Animation from Interactions
  57. Success Criterion 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks
  58. Success Criterion 2.4.2 Page Titled
  59. Success Criterion 2.4.3 Focus Order
  60. Success Criterion 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)
  61. Success Criterion 2.4.5 Multiple Ways
  62. Success Criterion 2.4.6 Headings and Labels
  63. Success Criterion 2.4.7 Focus Visible
  64. Success Criterion 2.4.8 Location
  65. Success Criterion 2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only)
  66. Success Criterion 2.4.10 Section Headings
  67. Success Criterion 2.4.11 Focus Visible (Enhanced)
  68. Success Criterion 2.4.12 Fixed Reference Points
  69. Success Criterion 2.5.1 Pointer Gestures
  70. Success Criterion 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation
  71. Success Criterion 2.5.3 Label in Name
  72. Success Criterion 2.5.4 Motion Actuation
  73. Success Criterion 2.5.5 Target Size
  74. Success Criterion 2.5.6 Concurrent Input Mechanisms
  75. Success Criterion 2.5.7 Dragging
  76. Success Criterion 3.1.1 Language of Page
  77. Success Criterion 3.1.2 Language of Parts
  78. Success Criterion 3.1.3 Unusual Words
  79. Success Criterion 3.1.4 Abbreviations
  80. Success Criterion 3.1.5 Reading Level
  81. Success Criterion 3.1.6 Pronunciation
  82. Success Criterion 3.2.1 On Focus
  83. Success Criterion 3.2.2 On Input
  84. Success Criterion 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation
  85. Success Criterion 3.2.4 Consistent Identification
  86. Success Criterion 3.2.5 Change on Request
  87. Success Criterion 3.2.6 Findable Help
  88. Success Criterion 3.2.7 Hidden Controls
  89. Success Criterion 3.3.1 Error Identification
  90. Success Criterion 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions
  91. Success Criterion 3.3.3 Error Suggestion
  92. Success Criterion 3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)
  93. Success Criterion 3.3.5 Help
  94. Success Criterion 3.3.6 Error Prevention (All)
  95. Success Criterion 3.3.7 Accessible Authentication
  96. Success Criterion 3.3.8 Redundant Entry
  97. Success Criterion 4.1.1 Parsing
  98. Success Criterion 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value
  99. Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status Messages
  100. Other comments, suggestions, or observations

1. Introduction

This is a higher-level (squirrel) review of an analysis for videos on WCAG 2 requirements.

Please get acquainted with the following resources for this review:

In this survey each WCAG 2 Guideline and Success Criterion is listed, with a proposed scenario for a brief video to visualize the requirement and explain it in simple terms. The videos will potentially be embedded in Understanding WCAG 2, Accessibility Principles, and What's New in WCAG 2.1 to make them less text-heavy. The videos will likely also be used in different training settings.

Note that the final videos will include other aspects of diversity, such as gender, age, ethnicity, and disability nature (congenital, progressive, injury, age-related, etc.).

You are invited to review the following:

  • You agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • You agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario
  • You do not agree with having a video for the requirement, and provide the reasons for that
  • You abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

Note that this list of requirements includes proposals in the latest Editor Draft of WCAG 2.2 of 21 July. These may change or get entirely dropped, and new ones may be added in the coming weeks.

Please do not take time to review wording, grammar, and typos. This is an early requirements analysis to establish an understanding of which videos we will be developing as part of this deliverable. Reminder that you can fill in some of this survey now, "Submit your answers" button at the bottom, and come back and do more later.

Details

Responder
Sylvie Duchateau
Estella Oncins
Laura Keen
Shawn Henry Overall, I think there are a few SCs that would benefit from a video and many SCs that would not. Videos add complexity to a page. So I think we should only add videos in places where they will really help people understand the problem that the SC is addressing &/or the solution that it provides.

Rather than do videos for all or most of the SCs, I think our time and resources would be better spent on:
* other videos (e.g., for How People with Disabilities Use the Web)
* persona quotes for the SCs that don’t have them
* a static illustration for the top of some of the SCs (e.g., like some of the examples in the Tips pages <https://www.w3.org/WAI/tips/>)

In a few cases, we might consider a video to help understand the importance for people with disabilities – yet I think we should do that sparingly at the SC level. We could decide that some SCs don’t need a specific video for that SC, yet in the Understanding doc, we want to point to one (or more) of the new How People with Disabilities Use the Web videos that has content that helps appreciate the importance of that SC. I think we probably also want to add pointers in some Understanding docs to specific Perspectives Videos. [Note to Hidde to add pointers to other videos to the redesign drafts? :-]

These videos seem to be only the "works well". I feel strongly that for some of the SCs, also including a video of when it does *not* work would be much more powerful and significantly help understand the point.

Important: I didn't think through all of below carefully. So, I might change my opinion on specific ones when I do. And I am very open to other ideas! :-)

(I commented on almost all of the SCs, and not the Guidelines. Note: I put comments in several SC questions that I did *not* check an option.)

About the guidelines videos: I'm on the fence. I thought it might be a good idea... yet, the guideline text seems so simple and clear, that it doesn't feel like videos are needed? In any case, I don't much like the descriptions as they are now -- which is compliation of SC videos that I mostly found unhelpful. It might be a useful exercise to look at the Principles page by itself and think about if videos would be useful there, and what they might be like?

Overall, I'm thinking that most of what EOWG participants liked about the idea of videos will be met with the videos for How People with Disabilities Use the Web, and so most of these Guidelines and SC videos won't be needed in addition to those.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White This is a really challenging questionnaire. Not just because of the length but because it is lumping together Guideline videos with Success Criteria videos. I have

I think there is also a bit of a challenge in that it is often easier to illustrate the SC by presenting the problem rather than the well designed solution. These seem to focus on the solution. This might just be my misunderstanding the vision for each video though.

Another challenge is whether the videos are meant to explain and illustrate the need for the SC or explain the SC in a more digestible way. In the case of the former, then all the videos are required. I have provided answers based on the latter though.

I haven't responded to the guideline videos as I think those would be better explored once SC videos are broadly agreed upon.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush I can't comment on many of the videos specifically since I seldom watch/use them. But I know that most people do and I think it is a good idea for that reason and to clarify some concepts. I am very much in favor of illustrating multiple SCs with only one video. Otherwise I trust the judgement of the group, especially those who rely on videos for processing information. Thanks for all this good thinking and the hard work of producing clear concept videos.
Vicki Menezes Miller Apologies but due to lack of time, I have not devoted as much time as I would have liked to.
Andrew Arch
Howard Kramer

2. Guideline 1.1 Text Alternatives

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 1.1 Text Alternatives and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 4
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 1.1 Text AlternativesComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
It is not clear for me if the video shows good examples or what this implies when text alternative is too verbose or incorrect.
If the goal is to show good practice, may be it could be interesting to show alternative to a complex image and not talking about logos.
Or, if you want to talk about logos, not displaying as laternative "w3C logo" but simply "W3C, World Wide Web Consrotium".
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Maybe also include the difference between simple and complex images. Some images have an intended purpose which is not explained in the alt text.
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
A suggestion:
Nowadays, people try to add alt text but in an over enthusiastic way and to the greatest description for any image, including decorative images. If possible, introduce an example in which poorly entered alt text is given.
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Be good to have a complex image included as these seem to cause the most trouble for web authors
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Laura Keen
  • Mark Palmer
  • Kevin White
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

3. Guideline 1.2 Time-based Media

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 1.2 Time-based Media and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 2
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 1.2 Time-based MediaComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Elderly people with low vision might also be considered for this video.
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
The distinction between the various aspects of 1.2.X SCs I think is important. It is easy to get lost in the variations of live/prerecorded, audio description, media alternative, sign language etc. I think the overview video should seek to explain that rather than the specific SCs.
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Mark Palmer
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

4. Guideline 1.3 Adaptable

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 1.3 Adaptable and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 2
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 1.3 AdaptableComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
This is borderline. I think there is more value in the individual SC videos.
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I think it is important to have a scenario of a screen reader user benefiting of good page structure, good headings, landmarks and labels. I would expand the scenario proposed, "Person with aphasia hears screen reader output that matches the visual sequence),
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I agree with all - just wasn't sure I understood the 1.3.2 (Person with aphasia hears screen reader output that matches the visual sequence). I might have to see it before I can judge.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Mark Palmer
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Howard Kramer
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

5. Guideline 1.4 Distinguishable

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 1.4 Distinguishable and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 2
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 1.4 DistinguishableComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Color blindness is related to vision of colour, but not contrasts between foreground and background, so I don't understand the purpose of showing someone with color blindness in this video. Perhaps give clearer explanations about what this means.
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Not clear how the narrative of the videos can be to address the different personas and still make the SC clear to the audience. Specially for 1.4.2 (Audio control) which is a different channel than text (visual)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Kevin White
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Laura Keen
  • Mark Palmer
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

6. Guideline 2.1 Keyboard Accessible

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 2.1 Keyboard Accessible and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 8
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 2.1 Keyboard AccessibleComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Kevin White
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
what about also considering tabbing out of a modal and continuing behind it invisibly (modal didn't trap the keyboard until dismissed)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Mark Palmer
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Andrew Arch
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

7. Guideline 2.2 Enough Time

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 2.2 Enough Time and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 8
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 2.2 Enough TimeComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Maybe include also a persona with cognitive disabilities?
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Kevin White
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Mark Palmer
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

8. Guideline 2.3 Seizures and Physical Reactions

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 2.3 Seizures and Physical Reactions and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 8
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 2.3 Seizures and Physical ReactionsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Kevin White
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Mark Palmer
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

9. Guideline 2.4 Navigable

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 2.4 Navigable and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 2
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 2.4 NavigableComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Kevin White
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I would also include navigational mechanisms provided by assistive technologies such as screen readers, that rely on good page titles, links and headings texts, etc.
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
So are you saying that all these videos would be mashed up into one to illustrate the Guidelines and then broken into separate ones for the SC? Seems a bit excessive...??
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Mark Palmer
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Sharron Rush
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

10. Guideline 2.5 Input Modalities

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 2.5 Input Modalities and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 2.5 Input ModalitiesComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Kevin White
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Mark Palmer
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller

11. Guideline 3.1 Readable

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 3.1 Readable and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 3.1 ReadableComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Kevin White
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Will the AT be text-to-speech software rather than a fully-blown screen reader like JAWS?
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Mark Palmer
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Andrew Arch
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

12. Guideline 3.2 Predictable

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 3.2 Predictable and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 3.2 PredictableComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

13. Guideline 3.3 Input Assistance

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 3.3 Input Assistance and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 3.3 Input AssistanceComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Person with dementia is provided with clear instructions on how to complete the form (eg. "all form fields are required" - would have to see it before could make a determination.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Howard Kramer
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

14. Guideline 4.1 Compatible

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Guideline 4.1 Compatible and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Guideline 4.1 CompatibleComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
Daniel Montalvo
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Would have to see it implemented before making determination. This is a complex guideline. Not sure it can be conveyed properly until I see the implementation.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Howard Kramer
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

15. Success Criterion 1.1.1 Non-text Content

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.1.1 Non-text Content and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.1.1 Non-text ContentComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Well understood and communicated concept.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

16. Success Criterion 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Missing audio description for visually disabled audiences
Laura Keen
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
This SC seems really straight forward and easy to understand. I'm not sure a video is required.
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
" Person who is deaf is provided with a transcript for an audio-only podcast "

Can be communicated with a static image just as well.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Podcasts are generally overlooked.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Kevin White
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Laura Keen

17. Success Criterion 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 4
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Captions are also useful for people speaking a language different from the video/audio (linguistically disabled)
Laura Keen
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
This SC seems really straight forward and easy to understand. I'm not sure a video is required.
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
" Person who is hard of hearing is provided with captions for a video with audio "

Can be communicated with a static image just as well.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Well understood and communicated concept.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush

18. Success Criterion 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 2
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Elderly could also be included
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Many people don't know or understand what this is, so video example would be useful.

You don't really have to have a person, though. Could just have a simple video clip with description.

" Person with tunnel vision is provided with audio descriptions for a movie "

How would you show that they have tunnel vision? I guess you'd have to simulate what they see? Maybe not worth that?
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
"Person with tunnel vision" may be too specific and/or too difficult to communicate in a video.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
I am abstaining from many of these but captions seem so self explanatory, is a video really necessary?
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Henry
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

19. Success Criterion 1.2.4 Captions (Live)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.4 Captions (Live) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 4
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.2.4 Captions (Live)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Live captions differ broadly from pre-recorded captions. I would not use the same video. They are usually not as timely synchronised and display mode is usually verbatim not in pop-up (prerecorded)
Laura Keen
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
This SC seems really straight forward and easy to understand. I'm not sure a video is required.
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Reuse video from Success Criterion 1.2.2
" Person who is hard of hearing is provided with captions for a video with audio "

Can be communicated with a static image just as well.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Well understood and communicated concept.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush

20. Success Criterion 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 8
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Reuse video from Success Criterion 1.2.3
" Person with tunnel vision is provided with audio descriptions for a movie "
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

21. Success Criterion 1.2.6 Sign Language (Prerecorded)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.6 Sign Language (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 4
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 2
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.2.6 Sign Language (Prerecorded)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Not clear to understand the proposal of this video because a "press conference" is live not prerecorded.
Laura Keen
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
This SC seems really straight forward and easy to understand. I'm not sure a video is required.
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Person who is deaf is provided with sign language for a press conference

Can be communicated with a static image *almost* just as well.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Well understood and communicated concept.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
  • Shawn Henry
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush

22. Success Criterion 1.2.7 Extended Audio Description (Prerecorded)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.7 Extended Audio Description (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.2.7 Extended Audio Description (Prerecorded)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Extended audio description is not the same as prerecorded audio description. I would not use the same video.
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Reuse video from Success Criterion 1.2.3
" Person with tunnel vision is provided with audio descriptions for a movie "
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Alternatively it could be for a government advert of national/state importance, eg a health or safety announcement during a pandemic, bushfire, etc
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

23. Success Criterion 1.2.8 Media Alternative (Prerecorded)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.8 Media Alternative (Prerecorded) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(4 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.2.8 Media Alternative (Prerecorded)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins Again, if it is live is not prerecorded.
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry " Person who is deaf-blind is provided with a live-ticker for a live broadcast of a match "

I don't know what a "live-ticker" is. And, isn't this for prerecorded, not live?
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I assume a live ticker be available to a Braille device?
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Andrew Arch
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

24. Success Criterion 1.2.9 Audio-only (Live)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.2.9 Audio-only (Live) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 2
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.2.9 Audio-only (Live)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
If it is a live broadcast is not audio-only it is video and audio.
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Not sure that using the same example as 1.2.8 is a good idea. Is there something that can highlight the difference between the two SC?
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

25. Success Criterion 1.3.1 Info and Relationships

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.3.1 Info and Relationships and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.3.1 Info and RelationshipsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry " Person with tremors is able to select a checkbox by clicking on the larger label " doesn't seem to illustrate "1.3.1 Info and Relationships (Level A): Information, structure, and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined or are available in text. " ?
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Borderline on this one. I think there is probably a need to explain this SC more but there is a lot within it. Using form labels as the example runs the risk of that being the focus. It might be that more is required in the video to illustrate the different impact that programmatic structure has on use.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
This seems like a much larger issue that the video would indicate.
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

26. Success Criterion 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.3.2 Meaningful SequenceComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Yes, this one lends itself to video showing reading order by screen reader. I wonder about showing a good and bad example?

" Person with aphasia hears screen reader output that matches the visual sequence "
aphasia = loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage.
hum, so doesn't seem like good fit for this
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller

27. Success Criterion 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.3.3 Sensory CharacteristicsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry " Person with low vision using re-flowed content due to text-resizing understands which button to press (button was beside and is now below the instruction/text) "

I guess to really illustrate the wording of the SC, you'd need to have instructions that say something like: "the button after" and opposed to "the button to the right of".

I do not think this needs a video. Instead, could have examples that illustrate -- preferably good & bad.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I think this would benefit much more from the problem being presented. For example, 'Please click on the red button' or 'Contact details can be found on the right of the page'.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
scenario seems irrelevant to topic?
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
I find this SC a bit confusing so I'm going to abstain from comment.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Sharron Rush
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Howard Kramer

28. Success Criterion 1.3.4 Orientation

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.3.4 Orientation and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.3.4 OrientationComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
As a user I also benefit from rotation. It would also be great to have examples that benefit all types of users.
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry "Person with cerebral palsy using tablet mounted on wheelchair can use the app because it does not rely on a particular orientation"

I mildly don't think this needs a video. It's pretty easy to understand from the quote text. https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#134-orientation-aa

could have a static image.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
seems complex to communicate in a short video but OK if it can be done
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

29. Success Criterion 1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.3.5 Identify Input PurposeComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry I don't think this needs a video. It's pretty easy to understand from the quote text https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#135-identify-input-purpose-aa

I guess the video would show the fields being automatically populated? I mildly think the video itself would take more effort to watch and understand than just reading the quote text.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Gaaah. Can we just rewrite the SC or more particularly the Understanding! Extremely confusing presentation and I think the SC example just adds to the confusion. Definitely needs a video but I think it needs something to highlight the significance of the autocomplete value.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

30. Success Criterion 1.3.6 Identify Purpose

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.3.6 Identify Purpose and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.3.6 Identify PurposeComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry Maybe good to have a video showing "software that changes the words in the navigation into symbols."
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
As above
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

31. Success Criterion 1.4.1 Use of Color

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.1 Use of Color and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 3
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.1 Use of ColorComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Woudn't it be useful to give the example of colour blind person for this success criterion?
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry Doesn't need a video. Instead, can put the examples from https://www.w3.org/WAI/tips/designing/#dont-use-color-alone-to-convey-information
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Think the example is relatively common and likely not to illustrate the problem. Thinking about graphs with coloured columns, or pie charts, or coloured input buttons.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
As '*' not always announced (depends on verbosity) can we use the words 'required' instead?
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Kevin White
  • Andrew Arch
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

32. Success Criterion 1.4.2 Audio Control

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.2 Audio Control and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 8
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.2 Audio ControlComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
"Person with autism distracted by automatically playing music and doesn't know how to easily stop it but is relieved when it stops by itself after 3 seconds"

Would it be stronger to show website audio overlapping screen reader audio?
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Henry
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

33. Success Criterion 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 2
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Same comment as for question 5 on colour blind person.
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
" Person with color blindness is able to read the text because there is sufficient contrast between foreground and background " seems lame.

Maybe a good video would be demonstrating how a page is "seen" by a person with "normal" contrast sensitivity, and then that same page by a person with low contrast sensitivity -- and showing low-contrast text being invisible for the second user -- then a good version where it is still visible.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Well understood and communicated concept.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Seems simple to do but still scratching my head about how much it is needed.
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Shawn Henry
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

34. Success Criterion 1.4.4 Resize text

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.4 Resize text and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.4 Resize textComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I think good to have video that shows how a page changes as the text size is increased. And I think this is one (of several) where it would be good to show a bad version (where text and buttons get cut off or overlapping) and a good version.

separate videos: video for 1.4.4 should show content disappearing; video for 1.4.10 should focus on horizontal scrolling
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Borderline on this one. On balance I think the criteria is clear.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

35. Success Criterion 1.4.5 Images of Text

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.5 Images of Text and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 4
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 3
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.5 Images of TextComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Make sure that "fancy-styled headings" are easy to understand/understandable for people with cognitive disabilities.
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
"Person with low vision using screen magnification can comfortably read fancy-styled headings because they are not an images "

again, I think show a good and bad. I think it would be more clear and powerful to show a user increasing text size, and show that some of the text increases and some does not ('cause it's image) -- and then how a good where it all does.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Not sure that images of text are common as headings. More likely to be in infographic, logo or meme image. Regardless I think this is a pretty clear SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
not so sure about the scenario proposed, but don't have a better one off-hand
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
  • Shawn Henry
  • Andrew Arch
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

36. Success Criterion 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
(same comments as for 1.4.3. Maybe show how they can *barely* make out the text with ratio of 4.5:1 and can more easily see the text with ratio of 7:1 ! :-)
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Well understood and communicated concept.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

37. Success Criterion 1.4.7 Low or No Background Audio

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.7 Low or No Background Audio and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.7 Low or No Background AudioComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
This also applies to visually disabled when mixing main audio and alternative audio for the AD.
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry mildly don't think a video would help in understanding this. if so, do a bad then good.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I am not sure the suggestion would capture the problem of low or no background. On balance though I think the SC is pretty clear.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Maybe the background soundtrack can be louder in the dialogue gaps
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

38. Success Criterion 1.4.8 Visual Presentation

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.8 Visual Presentation and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 2
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.8 Visual PresentationComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Suggest reusing video for 1.4.12
Shawn Henry mildly think video would be good -- would want to illustrate before and after they apply CSS to make those changes.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Arrgh I can just see this leading to a swath of tools that website owners can slap on their sites and believe that all is well with their accessibility!
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

39. Success Criterion 1.4.9 Images of Text (No Exception)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.9 Images of Text (No Exception) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(4 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.9 Images of Text (No Exception)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins See comment on 35
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
As above
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

40. Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.10 ReflowComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Maybe this success criterion can be grouped with 1.4.4, 1.4.11, 1.4.12
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I think good to have video that shows how a page changes as the text size is increased. And I think this is one (of several) where it would be good to show a bad version -- and HOW HARD it is to read with horizontal scrolling (there is such a video in the W3Cx course :)) and a good version.

separate videos: video for 1.4.10 should focus on horizontal scrolling; video for 1.4.4 should show content disappearing
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Borderline on this one. On balance I think the criteria is clear.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

41. Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-text ContrastComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 40
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Maybe a good video would be demonstrating how a page is "seen" by a person with "normal" contrast sensitivity, and then that same page by a person with low contrast sensitivity -- and showing low-contrast controls being invisible for the second user -- then a good version where the controls are still visible.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

42. Success Criterion 1.4.12 Text Spacing

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.12 Text Spacing and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.12 Text SpacingComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 40
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry mildly think video would be good -- would want to illustrate before and after they apply CSS to make those changes.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Same problem as 1.4.8, how to present this in a way to avoid that risk.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

43. Success Criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or FocusComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I think a video would greatly help in understanding this!

I don't think this is sufficient to illustrate the problem "Person with low vision using screen magnification is not disturbed by pop-up boxes appearing and disappearing on focus and hover"

I think need to more clearly illustrate these persona quotes: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#1413-content-on-hover-or-focus-aa
(I think some folks in LVTF can give you specific examples where it happens in live websites now)
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

44. Success Criterion 2.1.1 Keyboard

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.1.1 Keyboard and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.1.1 KeyboardComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Maybe this success criterion can be grouped with 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Not sure, I think the SC is quite clear.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
A lot will be left out with only this one example but ...
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
YES
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Henry
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

45. Success Criterion 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.1.2 No Keyboard TrapComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 44
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
" Reuse video from Guideline 2.1": " Person with motor disabilities using a mouth stick can type date directly without needing to select it by mouse from a widget "
disagree with re-using same video. Need to actually show a keyboard trap.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins

46. Success Criterion 2.1.3 Keyboard (No Exception)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.1.3 Keyboard (No Exception) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.1.3 Keyboard (No Exception)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 44
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Not sure, I think the SC is quite clear.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

47. Success Criterion 2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.1.4 Character Key ShortcutsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry illustrating the problem quote would be compelling https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#214-character-key-shortcuts-a
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Borderline on this one. On balance I think the criteria is clear.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

48. Success Criterion 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.2.1 Timing AdjustableComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry a video is not needed to help people understand what this SC means. however, " Person with motor disabilities using single switch to type needs more time to type, and can extend the session without losing content." would help them understand the importance of it.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
I think the SC is quite clear even if Security colleagues regularly ignore the issue. Hmm... on that basis alone it might be worth it
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

49. Success Criterion 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, HideComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Maybe this success criterion can be grouped with 2.2.3, 2.2.4,2.2.5, 2.2.6 all related to cognitive
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry a video is not needed to help people understand what this SC means. however, a good video showing how it can really prevent someone from using content would be good to help people appreciate the importance of it. (there is such a video in the W3Cx course :-)
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think this criteria is clear.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

50. Success Criterion 2.2.3 No Timing

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.2.3 No Timing and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 3

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.2.3 No TimingComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 49
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Not sure this needs a video as the SC is quite clear. The understanding document might benefit from the addition of the example outlined in the video though.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
nice one :)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Shawn Henry
  • Sharron Rush

51. Success Criterion 2.2.4 Interruptions

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.2.4 Interruptions and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.2.4 InterruptionsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 49
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry " Person with anxiety can set application to "do not disturb" mode, to avoid unnecessary notifications "

I know that we're wanting to have diversity and not too heavy on screen reader. However, I think this is a much stronger example: It also allows users who are blind or have low vision to keep their "viewing" focus on the content they are currently reading. -- that is, showing focus being pulled away, and then the user struggling to find their place again.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

52. Success Criterion 2.2.5 Re-authenticating

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.2.5 Re-authenticating and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.2.5 Re-authenticatingComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 49
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I don't think a video helps understand this SC.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

53. Success Criterion 2.2.6 Timeouts

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.2.6 Timeouts and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.2.6 TimeoutsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 49
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I don't think a video helps understand this SC.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White As per 2.2.1
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

54. Success Criterion 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below ThresholdComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
"Person with photo-sensitivity wanting to watch a video is sure that it has no dangerous content. "
I don't think a video helps understand this SC.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

55. Success Criterion 2.3.2 Three Flashes

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.3.2 Three Flashes and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.3.2 Three FlashesComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
"Person with photo-sensitivity wanting to watch a video is sure that it has no dangerous content. "
I don't think a video helps understand this SC.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

56. Success Criterion 2.3.3 Animation from Interactions

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.3.3 Animation from Interactions and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 3
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.3.3 Animation from InteractionsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I would group this SC with 2.3.1 and 2.3.2
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I think it would be good to have a video that illustrates examples of "Motion animation triggered by interaction"
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I am not sure that the example describes motion animation. There is a change as a result of motion on the part of the user but not sure that is the same thing. Something like clicking a button and screen elements spiralling away to be replaced by other elements maybe, or presentation changes with animation actions attached.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

57. Success Criterion 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.4.1 Bypass BlocksComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Persons using a screen reader also suffer from this.
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC - ok, some ambiguity but I don't think the video would help!
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Henry
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

58. Success Criterion 2.4.2 Page Titled

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.2 Page Titled and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.4.2 Page TitledComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
I would group this with 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.3, 2.4.4 all grouped as A level and can be applied in visual and physical
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Henry
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

59. Success Criterion 2.4.3 Focus Order

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.3 Focus Order and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.4.3 Focus OrderComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 58, this is also visual
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
mild
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think the example doesn't really add much to the understanding. If it could be used to explore the preservation of meaning and operability then that might make it more useful.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Henry
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

60. Success Criterion 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 58
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
mild
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I think this is one where the poor implementation is more illustrative. Also, 'in context' is something that I think would be more useful to explore than simply decent link text.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Henry
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

61. Success Criterion 2.4.5 Multiple Ways

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.5 Multiple Ways and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.4.5 Multiple WaysComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
mildly think a video is not particularly helpful for understanding this one.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Borderline on this one. On balance I think the criteria is clear. Although this is only from reading all the techniques; the examples are a bit poor.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

62. Success Criterion 2.4.6 Headings and Labels

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.6 Headings and Labels and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.4.6 Headings and LabelsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
mildly think a video is not particularly helpful for understanding this one.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Maybe the headings could also be available as 'in page' navigation?
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

63. Success Criterion 2.4.7 Focus Visible

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.7 Focus Visible and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 9
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.4.7 Focus VisibleComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
mildly think a video is helpful for this -- although static image can probably convey it almost as well
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Borderline. I think the SC is clear but the issue is ubiquitous enough to require an example.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

64. Success Criterion 2.4.8 Location

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.8 Location and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.4.8 LocationComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry mildly think a video is helpful for this -- although static image can probably convey it almost as well
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Not enough detail to determine.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Sharron Rush
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Howard Kramer

65. Success Criterion 2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry "Reuse video from Success Criterion 2.4.4" : "Person who is blind using screen reader understands where the link goes because it appears in context"
I think that I disagree with using the same video. This one is that the link itself makes sense, without needing to know any context around it.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
If there is one for 2.4.4 then easy for this one.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

66. Success Criterion 2.4.10 Section Headings

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.10 Section Headings and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.4.10 Section HeadingsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I don't think video is helpful in understanding this one.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Would a user of a screen reader also help in illustrating the importance of section headings versus a long passage of text without section headings.
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

67. Success Criterion 2.4.11 Focus Visible (Enhanced)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.11 Focus Visible (Enhanced) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.4.11 Focus Visible (Enhanced)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

68. Success Criterion 2.4.12 Fixed Reference Points

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.4.12 Fixed Reference Points and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.4.12 Fixed Reference PointsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
persona quotes now available in https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#2413-fixed-reference-points-a

I mildly think a video doesn't help understanding this one.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Hmm... not even sure on the value of the SC. Which version would be the canonical one from which all other page numbering should be derived?
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

69. Success Criterion 2.5.1 Pointer Gestures

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.1 Pointer Gestures and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 2
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.5.1 Pointer GesturesComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I would group 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.5.3 and 2.5.4 level A apply to physical and visual
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I mildly think that a video doesn't help given the existing persona quotes https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#251-pointer-gestures-a
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Not sure that the example would illustrate this SC. Pinch to zoom is effectively zoom and using that wouldn't really show much. Not got an immediate idea though.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

70. Success Criterion 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.5.2 Pointer CancellationComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 69
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I mildly think that a video doesn't help given the existing persona quotes https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#252-pointer-cancellation-a

although maybe illustrating this would be helpful? : " if I accidentally touch the "End Call" button, I can just slide my finger off the "End Call" button and it won't end the call."
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

71. Success Criterion 2.5.3 Label in Name

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.3 Label in Name and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.5.3 Label in NameComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 69
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Really the best way to explain this would be an example of code te.g., https://w3c.github.io/wcag/techniques/general/G208#examples
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

72. Success Criterion 2.5.4 Motion Actuation

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.4 Motion Actuation and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 3

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.5.4 Motion ActuationComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 69
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
No video needed. persona quotes are sufficient https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#254-motion-actuation-a
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

73. Success Criterion 2.5.5 Target Size

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.5 Target Size and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.5.5 Target SizeComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
No video needed. persona quotes are sufficient https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#255-target-size-aaa

(although maybe editor whats to be the protagonist in this video ;-)
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

74. Success Criterion 2.5.6 Concurrent Input Mechanisms

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.6 Concurrent Input Mechanisms and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.5.6 Concurrent Input MechanismsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
No video needed. persona quotes are sufficient https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/#256-concurrent-input-mechanisms-aaa
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I agree this could benefit from a video but the example seems limited and I am not even sure how you would do that in a web interface! Not the example, but limit input mechanism.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

75. Success Criterion 2.5.7 Dragging

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 2.5.7 Dragging and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 2.5.7 DraggingComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I mildly think that a video doesn't help given the persona quotes : https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#257-dragging-aa
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

76. Success Criterion 3.1.1 Language of Page

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.1.1 Language of Page and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.1.1 Language of PageComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video not helpful for understanding this SC.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
see 3.1 comment
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

77. Success Criterion 3.1.2 Language of Parts

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.1.2 Language of Parts and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.1.2 Language of PartsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Mildly think Video not helpful for understanding this SC. If do one, this should have screen reader change language of parts it's reading.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
see 3.1 comment
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

78. Success Criterion 3.1.3 Unusual Words

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.1.3 Unusual Words and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 2
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.1.3 Unusual WordsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I would include it in the video 3.1 and group 3.1.3, 3.1.4, 3.1.5 and 3.1.6
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video not helpful for understanding. (and if do video, "Person with language disability can understand the text more easily because it is written to avoid difficult words, abbreviations, and complex sentence structures " does not address the SC "A mechanism is available for identifying specific definitions of words or phrases used in an unusual or restricted way, including idioms and jargon. " )
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
The example suggests rewriting to remove the unusual works but the SC indicates that a mechanism to explain those words is what is needed. Think there needs something to show a glossary, pop-up definitions, help icon or some such to explain complex words that have to be there.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

79. Success Criterion 3.1.4 Abbreviations

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.1.4 Abbreviations and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.1.4 AbbreviationsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 78
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video not helpful for understanding. (and if do video, "Person with language disability can understand the text more easily because it is written to avoid difficult words, abbreviations, and complex sentence structures " does not address this specific SC
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
3.1.3 does not account for abbreviations. This might be one to drop as how to achieve it is clear.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

80. Success Criterion 3.1.5 Reading Level

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.1.5 Reading Level and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.1.5 Reading LevelComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 78
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video not helpful for understanding.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I think this would benefit from thinking about the 'supplemental content' aspect rather than the rewrite aspect.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

81. Success Criterion 3.1.6 Pronunciation

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.1.6 Pronunciation and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 4
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 3

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.1.6 PronunciationComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 78
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video not helpful for understanding. (and if do video, "Person with language disability can understand the text more easily because it is written to avoid difficult words, abbreviations, and complex sentence structures " does not address this specific SC
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Similar to 3.1.3 but would need to include a specific element of the pronunciation. Although I am borderline on whether this is actually required. The examples in the SC understanding are quite clear.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

82. Success Criterion 3.2.1 On Focus

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.1 On Focus and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.2.1 On FocusComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Mildly think a video doesn't help understand this one. Persona quotes would be enough. (If do video, would need to show bad to really help understanding.)
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

83. Success Criterion 3.2.2 On Input

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.2 On Input and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.2.2 On InputComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Mildly think a video doesn't help understand this one. Persona quotes would be enough. (If do video, would need to show bad to really help understanding.)
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I think this is distinct from 3.2.1 and needs to use an example that is distinct. Unless the idea is to include, for example, tabbing to an element followed by nasty change then submitting a form followed by another nasty change.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

84. Success Criterion 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.2.3 Consistent NavigationComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video doesn't help understanding.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think the SC is quite clear. If there is a perceived need for this then I would suggest a different form for the video as buttons being in the same place may be difficult to make 'real' enough.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

85. Success Criterion 3.2.4 Consistent Identification

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.4 Consistent Identification and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 7
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.2.4 Consistent IdentificationComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video doesn't help understanding.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

86. Success Criterion 3.2.5 Change on Request

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.5 Change on Request and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 3
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.2.5 Change on RequestComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Not clear how it relates to 3.2.1 and to physical

https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/change-on-request.html

Individuals who are unable to detect changes of context or may not realize that the context has changed are less likely to become disoriented while navigating a site

Some individuals with low vision, with reading and intellectual disabilities, and who have difficulty interpreting visual cues may benefit from additional cues in order to detect changes of context.

People with certain cognitive limitations do not get confused if automatic redirects are performed by the Web server instead of the browser.
Laura Keen
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video doesn't help understanding.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think 3.2.1 explains the problem and solution, this explores including a user option to switch the whole thing off. Not sure whether that would add much to the 3.2.1 video and not sure how much additional help it provides by including as a separate video.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

87. Success Criterion 3.2.6 Findable Help

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.6 Findable Help and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.2.6 Findable HelpComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
video doesn't help understanding. persona quotes sufficient : https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#326-findable-help-a
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

88. Success Criterion 3.2.7 Hidden Controls

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.2.7 Hidden Controls and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.2.7 Hidden ControlsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
video doesn't help understanding. persona quotes sufficient : https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#327-hidden-controls-aa
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

89. Success Criterion 3.3.1 Error Identification

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.1 Error Identification and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.3.1 Error IdentificationComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I would group 3.3.1 to 3.3.8
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video doesn't help understanding.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Estella Oncins
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

90. Success Criterion 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.3.2 Labels or InstructionsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 89
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video doesn't help understanding.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

91. Success Criterion 3.3.3 Error Suggestion

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.3 Error Suggestion and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.3.3 Error SuggestionComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 89
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video doesn't help understanding.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I think there is little ambiguity in the SC.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Kevin White
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

92. Success Criterion 3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 89
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video doesn't help understanding.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

93. Success Criterion 3.3.5 Help

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.5 Help and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 2
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.3.5 HelpComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 89
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
+1 to combine with 3.2.6
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video doesn't help understanding.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
yes, could be combined
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
  • Andrew Arch
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

94. Success Criterion 3.3.6 Error Prevention (All)

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.6 Error Prevention (All) and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.3.6 Error Prevention (All)Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 89
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
Video doesn't help understanding.
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
Reuse of video is fine but the distinction between "Legal, Financial and Data" and "All" would need to be drawn out.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

95. Success Criterion 3.3.7 Accessible Authentication

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.7 Accessible Authentication and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.3.7 Accessible AuthenticationComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 89
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
video doesn't help understanding. persona quotes sufficient: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#337-accessible-authentication-a
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I am not sure that CAPTCHA counts as a cognitive function test.
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush

96. Success Criterion 3.3.8 Redundant Entry

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 3.3.8 Redundant Entry and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 4
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 3

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 3.3.8 Redundant EntryComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
See comment 89
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
video doesn't help understanding. persona quotes sufficient: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#338-redundant-entry-a
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I think the example provided is a bit obvious and I can't think of anywhere that doesn't do this... or I haven't used anywhere that has done this in the past. I think it would need a different example - contact details having logged in with email address?
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

97. Success Criterion 4.1.1 Parsing

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 4.1.1 Parsing and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 5
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 3

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 4.1.1 ParsingComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry proposed video scenario is: "No video (this SC is being questioned)" :-)
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Estella Oncins
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

98. Success Criterion 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 4.1.2 Name, Role, ValueComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
video doesn't help understanding
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Kevin White
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer

99. Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status Messages

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review proposed video scenario for Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status Messages and answer the questions below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested) 6
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below 1
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below 1
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way) 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status MessagesComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Estella Oncins
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Shawn Henry
  • I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
video doesn't help understanding, persona quotes sufficient
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
  • I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
I think this needs a video separate from 4.1
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
Howard Kramer
  • I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the video scenario for the requirement as proposed (no changes suggested)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Estella Oncins
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I agree with having a video for the requirement but have comments on the proposed scenario that I provide in the text box below
  • Kevin White
I do not agree with having a video for the requirement; please provide the reasons for that in the text box below
  • Shawn Henry
I abstain from commenting on this particular requirement (you don't feel strongly either way)
  • Sharron Rush

100. Other comments, suggestions, or observations

Please provide any other comments, suggestions, or observations you may have.

Details

Responder Other comments, suggestions, or observations
Sylvie Duchateau
Estella Oncins Great work to illustrate SC with actual user needs.
From my point of views some SC criteria could be grouped by level and type of need cognitive/visual/physical. This would help to better illustrate the interaction of the users with the web.
Use cases for videos related to SC for audio descriptions and captions need to be reviewed, specially regarding prerecorded and live concepts, which really differ in terms of professional work and output for the users.
Maybe some examples could also be illustrated with users that do not present any type of (dis)ability but struggle with the web.
Laura Keen
Shawn Henry phew! it was a lot of work just going through the work to complete this survey. Doing all those videos would be...
Mark Palmer
Kevin White
Daniel Montalvo
Sharron Rush Good luck, seems like a lot of work!
Vicki Menezes Miller
Andrew Arch
Howard Kramer Nice work.

More details on responses

  • Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 7, August 2020 at 15:02 (UTC)
  • Estella Oncins: last responded on 12, August 2020 at 11:44 (UTC)
  • Laura Keen: last responded on 20, August 2020 at 19:56 (UTC)
  • Shawn Henry: last responded on 21, August 2020 at 15:44 (UTC)
  • Mark Palmer: last responded on 21, August 2020 at 23:08 (UTC)
  • Kevin White: last responded on 24, August 2020 at 15:15 (UTC)
  • Daniel Montalvo: last responded on 24, August 2020 at 16:29 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 24, August 2020 at 16:52 (UTC)
  • Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 24, August 2020 at 20:35 (UTC)
  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 24, August 2020 at 23:51 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 25, August 2020 at 04:34 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Judy Brewer
  2. Eric Velleman
  3. Kazuhito Kidachi
  4. Dónal Fitzpatrick
  5. David Sloan
  6. Mary Jo Mueller
  7. Reinaldo Ferraz
  8. Vivienne Conway
  9. Bill Kasdorf
  10. Jan McSorley
  11. Cristina Mussinelli
  12. Steve Lee
  13. Brent Bakken
  14. Kevin Rydberg
  15. Adina Halter
  16. Denis Boudreau
  17. Sarah Pulis
  18. Kris Anne Kinney
  19. Bill Tyler
  20. Gregorio Pellegrino
  21. Amanda Mace
  22. Ian Smith
  23. Ruoxi Ran
  24. Jennifer Chadwick
  25. Carlos Duarte
  26. Sean Kelly
  27. Muhammad Saleem
  28. Sarah Lewthwaite
  29. Lewis Phillips
  30. Ash Harris
  31. Kim Hodges
  32. Isaac Durazo
  33. Hidde de Vries
  34. Omar Bonilla
  35. Jade Matos Carew
  36. Sonsoles López Pernas
  37. Greta Krafsig
  38. Dónal Rice
  39. Gerhard Nussbaum
  40. Jason McKee
  41. Valentina Kirinić
  42. Roberto Perez
  43. Letícia Seixas Pereira
  44. Karl Groves
  45. Jayne Schurick
  46. Vijaya Gowri Perumal
  47. Billie Johnston
  48. Emily Lewis
  49. Michele Williams
  50. Mark McCallum

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire