w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire Approval of Evaluation Videos 1-4 and 5
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org, shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2020-02-06 to 2020-02-13.
10 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
1. About this survey
This is an Approval to Publish (Butterfly Review) for:
- Video 1: Evaluating Web Accessibility: Resources Overview
- Video 2: Easy Checks for Web Accessibility
- Video 3: Tools for Evaluating Web Accessibility
- Video 4: Web Accessibility Conformance Evaluation
- [NEW] Video 5: Involving Users in Web Accessibility Evaluation
Note: no more changes can be made to these videos, only fixing bugs related to the implementation of this final version (some bugs already noted below).
Download the final version of Videos 1-4 (large file) and compare to final set of comments (docx format) as needed. (Download for Video 5 is provided separately in question 4 below)
Details
| Responder | |
|---|---|
| Sharron Rush | |
| Brent Bakken | |
| Kris Anne Kinney | |
| Lewis Phillips | |
| Shawn Lawton Henry | All videos: [ED-low] I find the sound effects with the icons of “Essential for some, useful for all” a bit sharp. [ED-low] Background music: I guess I assumed that we would have the same background music for all videos. I guess it's OK to have different music. * Video 1 – a bit too attention-getting, especially at the beginning. * Video 2 – a bit too attention-getting, especially at the beginning. * Video 3 – OK. * Video 4 – OK. * Video 5 – like it. I think this is a different style of music. I think the first are very guitar-y at the beginning and that’s what pulls my attention to the music. Probably just a personal thing. (I like how the music concludes at the end of the videos.) |
| Kevin White | |
| Eric Eggert | |
| Helen Burge | |
| Howard Kramer | |
| Daniel Montalvo | All these videos are great, I really like them! [[Not blocking publication]] -- I would prefer to have the sound effects a bit quieter. At their current volume, I find them a bit distracting, especially when the VoiceOver artist is speaking. If this is not allowed (or too complicated to ask for) at this phase, I would try to concentrate on turning down the volume of the bubble sounds and those of the closing section "Essential for some, useful for all". |
2. Review level
summary | by responder | by choice
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I reviewed the videos thoroughly. | 8 |
| I skimmed the videos. | 1 |
| I need more time, and will review by the date provided below. | 1 |
| I didn't get to it, and will not in the near future. |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Review level | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Brent Bakken |
|
|
| Kris Anne Kinney |
|
I found myself spelling every word to make sure nothing was spelled wrong. So I had to watch them twice and stop spelling! |
| Lewis Phillips |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Eric Eggert |
|
|
| Helen Burge |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
2/20/20 |
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I reviewed the videos thoroughly. |
|
| I skimmed the videos. |
|
| I need more time, and will review by the date provided below. |
|
| I didn't get to it, and will not in the near future. |
3. Review and approval Videos 1-4
summary | by responder | by choice
The following bugs have already been identified and will be fixed before publication:
- Video 1, at 1:17 progress animation bumpy (compare to Video 4 at 1:44)
- Video 3, at 0:48 bubbles are not symmetrical and look slightly misplaced
- Video 3, at 0:54 pen is pointing in the wrong direction (opposite to brush)
- Video 3, at 1:40 sound effect don't match visual timing (last sound extra?)
- Video 4, at 1:06 "mdash" missing between "WCAG-EM" and "Website"
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I support publishing videos 1-4 as they are, provided the above listed bugs get fixed before publication. I have no further comments on these videos. | 7 |
| I support publishing videos 1-4 as they are, provided the above listed bugs get fixed before publication. I identified further bugs. They are listed below and marked with [ED], leaving it editor's discretion to fix. | 2 |
| I do not support publishing videos 1-4 as they are. In addition to the above listed bugs, also the ones listed below and marked with [!!] must get fixed before publication. | |
| I do not support publishing videos 1-4 because of the comments below marked as [X]. | |
| I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Review and approval Videos 1-4 | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sharron Rush |
|
Nicely done! |
| Brent Bakken |
|
Videos are great. One little nit-pick. the final *visual* sequence in all videos before the title and website (computer and 5 attribute circles) seems to be inconsistent. (I will not block publication for this issue) - In video 1, the voice (5th) circle is not as far out as the hand (1st) circle making them seem not symmetrical. - In video 2, better, but in this version the voice (5th) circle jumps up slightly at the end when it slides in place. Symmetrical alignment is still a bit off. - In video 3, issue is same as video 1. The 1st and 5th circles are not the same distance from the computer. - Video 4, this is the best rendered version of this sequence. The circles are more symmetrically aligned and spacing seems right. Apply this to the others. |
| Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
| Lewis Phillips |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I support publishing the videos as they are. I am compelled to note the following. All are [ED-low] and I assume not worth addressing. All videos: [ED-low] I find the sound effects with the icons of “Essential for some, useful for all” a bit sharp. Video 1: [ED-low] 1:47 throughout, a green checkmark makes me think good! and a red X makes me think bad. So when I see red and green boxes here, I assume the red are things that need to be addressed and the green are things that are good. So it’s a bit odd that the green things get included in “prioritize the issues you need to address first”. (I guess I missed this in previous reviews.:( Video 4: [ED-low] 1:49 – geesh, this still looks like a piece of paper in a computer, instead of a web form. sign. no biggie, at least it’s in a computer. Video 3: [ED-low] 1:22-1:29 the tools are paper instead of online. I guess I missed that before. sigh. Oh well, no biggie. |
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Eric Eggert |
|
I find them great. I have not noticed any of the bugs above, but I support them fixed :-) I really like the added sound effects. Makes them really lively. Let’s get them out there!! |
| Helen Burge |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I support publishing videos 1-4 as they are, provided the above listed bugs get fixed before publication. I have no further comments on these videos. |
|
| I support publishing videos 1-4 as they are, provided the above listed bugs get fixed before publication. I identified further bugs. They are listed below and marked with [ED], leaving it editor's discretion to fix. |
|
| I do not support publishing videos 1-4 as they are. In addition to the above listed bugs, also the ones listed below and marked with [!!] must get fixed before publication. | |
| I do not support publishing videos 1-4 because of the comments below marked as [X]. | |
| I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group |
|
4. [NEW] Review and approval Video 5
summary | by responder | by choice
Please review Video 5 (mp4 format). The following bugs have already been identified and will be fixed before publishing:
- Video 5, at 0:43 light bulb should appear above the mortarboard
- Video 5, at 0:59 people should getting more from the center outwards
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I support publishing video 5 as is, provided the above listed bugs get fixed before publication. I have no further comments on these videos. | 5 |
| I support publishing video 5 as is, provided the above listed bugs get fixed before publication. I identified further bugs. They are listed below and marked with [ED], leaving it editor's discretion to fix. | 4 |
| I do not support publishing video 5 as is. In addition to the above listed bugs, also the ones listed below and marked with [!!] must get fixed before publication. | |
| I do not support publishing video 5 because of the comments below marked as [X]. | |
| I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | [NEW] Review and approval Video 5 | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Brent Bakken |
|
This video is much improved. It is now more unified and the visuals match the audio much closer. One small comment... Same as comment I provided in question 3 of this survey. Final sequence timing of circle flyouts is not even. Pattern this after how it was done in video #4. |
| Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
| Lewis Phillips |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I support publishing the videos as they are. I am compelled to note the following. All are [ED-low] and I assume not worth addressing. 0:55 the outer icons get smaller for no reason. no biggie, it just caught my attention and was slightly distracting 0:27 this version has the computer and the checklist disappearing. I envisioned the people displacing the checklist, and the computer staying. …/me checks the script… “As we hear ‘the user experience’, we pan to the left so that the check list and computer are no longer visible (they disappear to the right), and we see 4 people (each differently colored).” hum, either I missed that, or it changed. :-) |
| Kevin White |
|
[ED-low] 00:35 When the meeples move out to the arrows they turn from blurred to solid black only when all the meeples have moved out. The association might be better if each arrow turned black when the meeple touches the line. [ED-med] 00:50 My thought on the motivation bar was that each block would change colour as the indicator arrow moved round. Doesn't really make sense that the whole bar slowly fills in at once. [ED-low] 00:59 People all fad in at once, I thought the idea was to quickly pop them in one by one - or a few by few. |
| Eric Eggert |
|
It would be great if the gauge would be filled by segment as the needle moves to the right, also the needle would benefit from an outline, especially in the last frame where it melts into the large last segment. This is minor nitpicking tho, happy to publish as is. |
| Helen Burge |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Daniel Montalvo |
|
My little suggestion above may also apply to video 5. |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I support publishing video 5 as is, provided the above listed bugs get fixed before publication. I have no further comments on these videos. |
|
| I support publishing video 5 as is, provided the above listed bugs get fixed before publication. I identified further bugs. They are listed below and marked with [ED], leaving it editor's discretion to fix. |
|
| I do not support publishing video 5 as is. In addition to the above listed bugs, also the ones listed below and marked with [!!] must get fixed before publication. | |
| I do not support publishing video 5 because of the comments below marked as [X]. | |
| I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group |
|
More details on responses
- Sharron Rush: last responded on 12, February 2020 at 17:24 (UTC)
- Brent Bakken: last responded on 12, February 2020 at 18:11 (UTC)
- Kris Anne Kinney: last responded on 12, February 2020 at 18:15 (UTC)
- Lewis Phillips: last responded on 12, February 2020 at 18:34 (UTC)
- Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 12, February 2020 at 22:19 (UTC)
- Kevin White: last responded on 13, February 2020 at 09:59 (UTC)
- Eric Eggert: last responded on 13, February 2020 at 11:53 (UTC)
- Helen Burge: last responded on 13, February 2020 at 22:21 (UTC)
- Howard Kramer: last responded on 14, February 2020 at 05:00 (UTC)
- Daniel Montalvo: last responded on 14, February 2020 at 11:29 (UTC)
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Eric Velleman
- Andrew Arch
- Shadi Abou-Zahra
- Sylvie Duchateau
- Kazuhito Kidachi
- Jedi Lin
- David Sloan
- Mary Jo Mueller
- Vicki Menezes Miller
- Reinaldo Ferraz
- Bill Kasdorf
- Cristina Mussinelli
- Kevin White
- Kevin Rydberg
- Adina Halter
- Denis Boudreau
- Laura Keen
- Sarah Pulis
- Bill Tyler
- Gregorio Pellegrino
- Ruoxi Ran
- Jennifer Chadwick
- Sean Kelly
- Muhammad Saleem
- Sarah Lewthwaite
- Mark Palmer
- Jade Matos Carew
- Sonsoles López Pernas
- Greta Krafsig
- Jason McKee
- Jayne Schurick
- Billie Johnston
- Michele Williams
- Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
- Brian Elton
- Julianna Rowsell
- Tabitha Mahoney
- Fred Edora
- Rabab Gomaa
- Marcelo Paiva
- Eloisa Guerrero
- Leonard Beasley
- Frankie Wolf
- Supriya Makude
- Aleksandar Cindrikj
- Angela Young
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project